Ok. Someone had provided a patch in issue 40093, which adresses this, so
I'll just wait for that one to be merged into ant proper then.
The PropertyHelper class is indeed rather confusing.
Thanks,
/Marcus
Peter Reilly wrote:
Replacement of propertyhelper is broken in current ant:
see:
http://
Replacement of propertyhelper is broken in current ant:
see:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40093
and
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25998
However some people have done it see:
http://www.efanomars.net/pf/
My feeling that the replacement of propertyhelper was
Marcus Lindblom wrote:
Dominique Devienne wrote:
I am sure other Ant committers will feel differently. I do not see a
big urge to implement this.
On the other side, why not ?
[snip}
Righto. I'll see what I can come up with then. :)
I got response on the bugzilla issue, that there is a Proper
Dominique Devienne wrote:
I am sure other Ant committers will feel differently. I do not see a
big urge to implement this.
On the other side, why not ?
Yes, why not. Referencing an unset property is indeed often a bug in
the build, although not always. I have thought myself than an "sh"
proper
I am sure other Ant committers will feel differently. I do not see a
big urge to implement this.
On the other side, why not ?
Yes, why not. Referencing an unset property is indeed often a bug in
the build, although not always. I have thought myself than an "sh"
property handler, which implement
Hello Marcus,
I am sure other Ant committers will feel differently. I do not see a
big urge to implement this.
On the other side, why not ?
If you want, open a bug report concerning this idea. Be sure to add
to the bug report source code, documentation and testcases.
New files can be added
Sorry for bouncing. I'm just wondering if there is somewhere (other than
this list) where this is better dicusssed?
/Marcus
Marcus Lindblom wrote:
Hi,
I just want to ask a bit something that probably has been discussed to
death before: unset properties handling. The latest 1.7 does not
addr
Hi,
I just want to ask a bit something that probably has been discussed to
death before: unset properties handling. The latest 1.7 does not address
this (according to the release notes), and I could find no enhancement
request discussing it either.
So, my simple proposal is:
Allow the user
