We currently use CruiseControl, but I recently downloaded Hudson and I
am considering replacing CruiseControl with Hudson.
Hudson's configuration is probably not as flexible, but it is a heck
of a lot easier to figure out. This means that when I am not here and
something goes terribly wrong, someo
david wrote:
Hello Steve and ant folks, I have read and have completely improved my
development with the JDA book but now I'm in the position such that I need more
tools. Please reply if the continual build tools listed are in order of
preference and why. I am currently (trying...) to use CC.
Simple,
use hudson ;-)
see the awesome plugins
Peter
On 10/26/07, david <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Steve and ant folks, I have read and have completely improved my
> development with the JDA book but now I'm in the position such that I need
> more tools. Please reply if the continual
Hello Steve and ant folks, I have read and have completely improved my
development with the JDA book but now I'm in the position such that I need more
tools. Please reply if the continual build tools listed are in order of
preference and why. I am currently (trying...) to use CC. What I complete
david wrote:
If you want an ant only solution you will have to build locally and deploy
remotely:
I am currently building locally and deploying remotely using and doing post deployment using
. You will have to look up both ant optional tasks for their argument lists. Minimally you
will need
If you want an ant only solution you will have to build locally and deploy
remotely:
I am currently building locally and deploying remotely using and doing
post deployment using . You will have to look up both ant optional
tasks for their argument lists. Minimally you will need to set the tas
> Set up one of the continuation tools to do the build on the remote box
>
> Free
>-cruisecontrol
>-hudson
>-luntbuild
>-gump
>-continuum
>-anthill
or cruisecontrol.rb[1] if you're willing to install another runtime on
the build machine - ThoughtWorks have switched to using
Has anybody seen a comparison of Hudson to CruiseControl?
-Original Message-
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 07:07 AM Eastern Standard Time
To: Ant Users List
Subject:Re: Build on remote machine.
Hudson as a slave mechanism
Yona Eilat wrote:
Hi,
I would like to write ant file that will run Build on NT remote machine.
I have doubts regarding the way to implement it.
I would like enabling the option to run it from any local PC (of my team
members) or to run it from the remote machine in itself.
The build sh
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 11:38 AM
> To: user@ant.apache.org
> Subject: Build on remote machine.
>
> /*
> I would like to write ant file that will run Build on NT remote machine.
>
> I have doubts regarding the way to implement it.
>
>
-Original Message-
From: Yona Eilat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 11:38 AM
To: user@ant.apache.org
Subject: Build on remote machine.
/*
I would like to write ant file that will run Build on NT remote machine.
I have doubts regarding the way to
I would use CruiseControl ...
Jan
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Yona Eilat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Oktober 2007 11:38
>An: user@ant.apache.org
>Betreff: Build on remote machine.
>
>
>
>Hi,
>
>
>
>I would like to w
Hi,
I would like to write ant file that will run Build on NT remote machine.
I have doubts regarding the way to implement it.
I would like enabling the option to run it from any local PC (of my team
members) or to run it from the remote machine in itself.
The build should to execute comma
13 matches
Mail list logo
