On Jul 1, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
Matt Benson schrieb am 01.07.2010 um 10:26 (-0500):
On Jul 1, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
Wouldn't it be nicer to have , which is still young and
flexible, have augment/@refid to refer to an existing reference, and
augment/@id t
Matt Benson schrieb am 01.07.2010 um 10:26 (-0500):
> On Jul 1, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> >Wouldn't it be nicer to have , which is still young and
> >flexible, have augment/@refid to refer to an existing reference, and
> >augment/@id to present an ID of its own so it can be referre
On Jul 1, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
I'm wondering about the design of the Augment task, which uses
augment/@id instead of augment/@refid to refer to an existing
resource. To draw on the example from the manual:
\,,,/
(o o)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo--
Given
I'm wondering about the design of the Augment task, which uses
augment/@id instead of augment/@refid to refer to an existing
resource. To draw on the example from the manual:
\,,,/
(o o)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo--
Given
Modifies the excludes attribute of input-fs.