Have you migrated now, Steve? ;-)
Main idea is that does the copy stuff. Why should we have a
?
Jan
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. September 2005 17:57
>An: Ant Users List
>Betreff: Re:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure - it´s not in 1.6.5.
is in svn head and maybe in 1.7 - but I think we will delete that task,
especially because itself
should now handle nested s, because paths are ResourceCollections. And
Stefan added that just yesterday :-)
hey, I use copypath.
---
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sure - it´s not in 1.6.5.
> is in svn head and maybe in 1.7 - but I
> think we will delete that task, especially because
> itself
> should now handle nested s, because paths are
> ResourceCollections. And Stefan added that just
> yesterday :-)
IIRC copypath does h
Sure - it´s not in 1.6.5.
is in svn head and maybe in 1.7 - but I think we will delete that
task, especially because itself
should now handle nested s, because paths are ResourceCollections. And
Stefan added that just yesterday :-)
Jan
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Tomáš Procházka
