> We could have an on-line manual for head of 1.6 and head of cvs. ?
If I remember right, that was asked several time.
Mmmh - but with prio to the javadoc ...
> > - seems to have the wrong tag (which could be the reason for
> > the first point)
>
> No, it hasn't. The tag identifies the fil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Puh! Good that I havent cvs here :)
And what should be done instead?
Make a new release. :-(
Fact is that the file
- is not online
The online manual is the released manual.
We could have an on-line manual for head of 1.6 and head of cvs. ?
Peter
- seems to have the w
Puh! Good that I havent cvs here :)
And what should be done instead?
Fact is that the file
- is not online
- seems to have the wrong tag (which could be the reason for
the first point)
Jan
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet am: Donners