AW: AW: AW: missing page in manual

2004-12-16 Thread Jan . Materne
> We could have an on-line manual for head of 1.6 and head of cvs. ? If I remember right, that was asked several time. Mmmh - but with prio to the javadoc ... > > - seems to have the wrong tag (which could be the reason for > > the first point) > > No, it hasn't. The tag identifies the fil

Re: AW: AW: missing page in manual

2004-12-16 Thread Peter Reilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Puh! Good that I havent cvs here :) And what should be done instead? Make a new release. :-( Fact is that the file - is not online The online manual is the released manual. We could have an on-line manual for head of 1.6 and head of cvs. ? Peter - seems to have the w

AW: AW: missing page in manual

2004-12-16 Thread Jan . Materne
Puh! Good that I havent cvs here :) And what should be done instead? Fact is that the file - is not online - seems to have the wrong tag (which could be the reason for the first point) Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Donners