> I am interested to know why is it desirable to have the parallel
> executor work on unmodified build XML files.
Because its easier to use.
Dont forget - this executor is not the default one.
Jan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you'll get the following dependencies among the _tasks_:
taskb1: -none-
taskb2: taskb1
taskb3: taskb1
where is ? Just for annotating?
taskb1 : -none-
parallel: taskb1
and the execution of 'parallel' would be
taskb2: - none-
taskb3: t
> Sure, but you can regard the body of a target as having an
> implicit block.
yes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> you'll get the following dependencies among the _tasks_:
>
>
> taskb1: -none-
> taskb2: taskb1
> taskb3: taskb1
where is ? Just for annotating?
taskb1 : -none-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Usually tasks have to be processed sequentially.
Jan
Sure, but you can regard the body of a target as having an implicit
block.
e.g.
you'll get the following dependencies among the _tasks_:
taska1: -n
> sure. But if you would use and parallel execution
> of targets at the
> same time, you could end up in many more executing threads
> than the system can
> efficiently cope with (memory, CPU, I/O wise). One could try
> to break the target
> parallelism down to the task parallelism on the
>
> As I understand it, the order is respected under
> simple circumstances, but ultimately the dependency
> graph is calculated such that a dependency is executed
> however early it must be to ensure that every target's
> dependencies precede it.
That is what I thought.
The contract is only that
--- Klaus Malorny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Oh, have to have a look at that. If I change the
> semantic this has to be
> > made explicit ...
> > (It can be done because you have to specify the
> executor for your own
> > ...)
> >
> > "Ant tries to execute the t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, have to have a look at that. If I change the semantic this has to be
made explicit ...
(It can be done because you have to specify the executor for your own
...)
"Ant tries to execute the targets in the depends attribute in the order
they appear (from left to right)
> >>
> >> If such a dependency did exist, it should be incorporated in
> >> the depends attribute of the 'b' & 'c' target declarations.
> >
> > Thats the meaning - unordered list.
> >
> >
> >> Assuming in the example above that targets b, c & d have no
> >> dependencies of their own, they sho
