[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you'll get the following dependencies among the _tasks_:
taskb1: -none-
taskb2: taskb1
taskb3: taskb1
where is ? Just for annotating?
taskb1 : -none-
parallel: taskb1
and the execution of 'parallel' would be
taskb2: - none-
taskb3: t
> Sure, but you can regard the body of a target as having an
> implicit block.
yes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> you'll get the following dependencies among the _tasks_:
>
>
> taskb1: -none-
> taskb2: taskb1
> taskb3: taskb1
where is ? Just for annotating?
taskb1 : -none-
> As I understand it, the order is respected under
> simple circumstances, but ultimately the dependency
> graph is calculated such that a dependency is executed
> however early it must be to ensure that every target's
> dependencies precede it.
That is what I thought.
The contract is only that
