Re: 1.8 Performance Degradation

2010-03-03 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2010-03-03, Murray, Mike wrote: > Thanks for the quick response. I have no use of "exec" tasks in my test > scenario. Well, that was the only performance degradation we have known of so far. > VisualVM showed that AntClassLoader.getCertificates() was sucking up all > the time. If I revert

RE: 1.8 Performance Degradation

2010-03-03 Thread Murray, Mike
Mike http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/an t/AntClassLoader.java?r1=796649&r2=796702 -Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 10:22 AM To: user@ant.apache.org Subject: Re: 1.8 Performance Degrad

Re: 1.8 Performance Degradation

2010-03-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2010-03-01, Murray, Mike wrote: > Has anyone else noticed a degradation with 1.8.0? Yes, for any type of task on Windows (this includes, for example, ) that used to take way less than a second. Currently each such takes at least a second (give or take a few millis) so if you are using a lo

1.8 Performance Degradation

2010-03-01 Thread Murray, Mike
Has anyone else noticed a degradation with 1.8.0? I noticed a target that took 34 minutes to run with 1.7.1, now takes 68 minutes. This target iterates through 600 or 700 Ant projects and runs the init target on each. I'm having trouble pinpointing where it is, but it seems to be in the pro