RE: Umlauts in ANT home

Hi Antoine, I have tried to define ant.home with OEM and with ANSI encoding with no effort. If I leave out the ant.home definition from ant.bat then the launcher succeeds in finding ant.home (by getting the parent dir of the jar containing the Launcher). But afterwards the UrlClassLoader fails.

Umlauts in ANT home

Hi, I tried to execute ANT from a path that contains umlauts (means ant.home contains umlauts). The result was: C:\java\apache-Änt-1.6.5>bin\ant java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.tools.ant.Main at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:199) at java.security.A

Re: Performance difference between 1.6.1 and 1.6.4 (in eclipse)

Hi, I did not follow the list thoroughly. Are there any news on the subject? Ullrich. > -Original Message- > From: Kev Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 5:18 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Cc: 'Ant Users List' > Subject: [[**SPAM**]] - Re: Performance diffe

RE: Performance difference between 1.6.1 and 1.6.4 (in eclipse)

Hi Dominique, > -Original Message- > From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 4:29 PM > To: 'Ant Users List' > Cc: 'Ant Developers List' > Subject: [[**SPAM**]] - RE: Performance difference between 1.6.1 and > 1.6.4 (in eclipse) - Bayesian Filter det

RE: Performance difference between 1.6.1 and 1.6.4 (in eclipse)

Hi Dominique, > I did note that your run with the 2 ant seems to result in > different numbers > of calls to , , , etc... so we may not > be comparing > apples to apples 100%, but it's compelling enough that we > should look into > it. the different number of imports astonished me too. ;-) An

RE: Performance difference between 1.6.1 and 1.6.4 (in eclipse)

Hi Dominique, > That's interesting. What you are saying is that is expensive > because it creates a new project, which is known Ant wisdom > ;-) well this wasn't a problem until 1.6.3. ;-) > Would you mind sending the output of the performance listener > for the same > script (with heavy ) on

Re: Windows path problems

Hi, I wasn't aware that the file attribute exists on fileset (maybe because I did not think of one element sets) but it should be functionally the same. Ullrich. > -Original Message- > From: dsarris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 4:45 PM > To: Ant Users List >

RE: Windows path problems

Hi, I would assume that drive E: is the current drive while you execute the script? The filelist in the path is defined for the root directory of the current drive. Try to replace the filelist with Ullrch. > -Original Message- > From: dsarris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday,

RE: Performance difference between 1.6.1 and 1.6.4 (in eclipse)

Hi Dominique, now I start to understand the numbers. ;-) The script contains a main target that simply calls the others with antcall (since it is simpler to edit than editing the depends attribute). Doing it this way:

RE: [[**SPAM**]] - RE: Performance difference between 1.6.1 and 1.6.4 (in eclipse) - Bayesian Filter detected spam

gt; To: 'Ant Users List' > Subject: [[**SPAM**]] - RE: Performance difference between 1.6.1 and > 1.6.4 (in eclipse) - Bayesian Filter detected spam > > > > From: Pollähne. Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > no one experienced any performance degradations? > &g

RE: Performance difference between 1.6.1 and 1.6.4 (in eclipse)

Hi, no one experienced any performance degradations? I tested this stuff with plain distributions (from apache.org) and with ANT 1.6.5. The numbers stay the same. It does not matter if I use Java 1.4.2_08 or 1.5.0_03. Ullrich. > > most of the time I use ANT from within eclipse. > With eclips

Performance difference between 1.6.1 and 1.6.4 (in eclipse)

Hi, most of the time I use ANT from within eclipse. With eclipse 3.1M6 there is ANT 1.6.1 and eclipse 3.1RC2 comes with ANT 1.6.4. I am running this stuff on Windows XP Pro with SP2 on a P4 3 GHz (1024MB RAM). There are some non-trivial scripts that I run every day. One of them (referenced as scr