On 17.01.17 08:08, Al Le wrote:
So maybe it's because of the inbuilt JDK's implementation of
connection.getInputStream (it throws an exception if the status is 500).
I've debugged it and found out that
the connection object is of type
'sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsURLConnectionImpl'
which d
On 07.03.2016 12:01, Al Le wrote:
It does not occur if I perform it via a Java program
I have to correct myself. It tried a java program in different JVMs, and it
gives me different results. In one case it gives the correct result, in other
cases still the wrong result is delivered. I could not
On 21/02/12 00:01, Bruce Atherton wrote:
5. Adding features like:
a) Identifying ways for Ant to automatically find parts of a build that can be
run in parallel. This allows taking advantage of multicores for example.
b) Distributed Ant builds in a cluster or a cloud.
c) a new build style that i
On 18/01/12 17:46, Nehal Patel wrote:
Nice, this was the solution!
Frankly this is a bit more advanced that i know.
I don't know the following:
What the "^" means.
What the "$" means.
What the "\1" means.
All you want to know about regular expressions and even more:
http://www.regular-expr
On 02/01/12 05:43, narenvudugu wrote:
Please Find updated Post!
I am trying to allow complete incoming input and extract last element name
from the input ServiceURL path (usaly separated by /),please find below
script which is not working for me...please help as soon as
possible.
On 05/03/09 10:04, jan.mate...@rzf.fin-nrw.de wrote:
see
http://marc.info/?l=ant-user&m=123255143025824&w=2
Jan
Hi,
as this is the one I mentioned in my e-mail, this means there is no alternative?
Regards,
Klaus
-
To unsu
Hi all,
I am looking for a method to manipulate XML files from Ant, i.e. adding/removing
elements, changing attributes or elements' contents, far simpler than the
capabilities of XSL/T. I have found the XmlTask ([1], [2]) and this seems to be
quite flexible. However, as part of a configuratio
On 2009-01-08 20:53, Ben Stover wrote:
As well known I can start an Ant script by entering
ant
However the visual output at the command prompt will be very small.
What I am searching for is a visual trace which outputs every statement BEFORE
and AFTER execution.
Here embedded variables like $
Bill Milbratz wrote:
Hi,
i have a problem which I don't know if I can solve elegantly with ant.
The problem: I'd like to use the xslt task to transform these inputs into
the following outputs;
inputs:
v10/changes.xml
v11/changes.xml
v12/changes.xml
outputs:
v10/changes.out
v11/chan
Steve Loughran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fast Google search: http://www.answers.com/topic/control-c
* ASCII and Unicode representation of "End Of Text":
Octal code: 3
Decimal code: 3
Hexadecimal code: 03, U+0003
Mnemonic symbol: ETX
I think you can use that in
no, XML doesnt a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you'll get the following dependencies among the _tasks_:
taskb1: -none-
taskb2: taskb1
taskb3: taskb1
where is ? Just for annotating?
taskb1 : -none-
parallel: taskb1
and the execution of 'parallel' would be
taskb2: - none-
taskb3: t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Usually tasks have to be processed sequentially.
Jan
Sure, but you can regard the body of a target as having an implicit
block.
e.g.
you'll get the following dependencies among the _tasks_:
taska1: -n
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thinking a little bit more about the issue, I was wondering
whether it would be
a good idea to integrate the target-level parallelism (as
discussed here) and
the task-level parallelism (i.e.
task) into one beast, as such issues
like output handling and maximum number of
Chuck Holzwarth wrote:
Perhaps the facility that spawns the targets could manage the screen/buffer
output. This would mean that some facility would have to exist similar to
named pipes in Unix. This way, console output would be directed from the
buffer (or pipe) that had first output while other
Chuck Holzwarth wrote:
[...]
How do you propose to handle potential fatal/non fatal errors? If target a
exits due to an error, should there be an option to kill a or allow it to
complete (similar to failonerror="yes/no")? If both a and (b,c) must succeed
for d, should a be killed if b or c fails
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, have to have a look at that. If I change the semantic this has to be
made explicit ...
(It can be done because you have to specify the executor for your own
...)
"Ant tries to execute the targets in the depends attribute in the order
they appear (from left to right)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't this the default behaviour anyway?
No - there is no multithreading by default.
That's why I write the ParallelExecutor.
If such a dependency did exist, it should be incorporated in
the depends attribute of the 'b' & 'c' target declarations.
Thats the meanin
Hi,
with the increased availability of multi-core systems, I am wondering whether
there are ways to improve the capabilities of Ant to parallelize the build
process. While it is possible to execute tasks in parallel within a target, it
seems to not be simple to execute multiple targets in parall
Hi,
sorry if this is a newbie question, but I did not find an answer in docs, faqs,
google etc.
I'm using Ant 1.7, and I would like to use the
19 matches
Mail list logo
