"my.loaderref"/>
>
> Havent followed the thread deeply, but an idea here.
> Would bundling the stuff into an AntLib help with the ClassLoader?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jan
>
> -----
/05, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Tchepannou wrote:
>
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> >As my base class is an abstract class, I have no interest to use a
> >My hope is to do the following:
> >
> > Reflect.java --
>
-------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Eric Tchepannou
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
--
Best Regards,
Eric Tchepannou
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I checked in the list's archives and it appears this post has not been
delivered in my first attempt to post it, so I send it again.
my apologies for the inconvenience caused, if you receive it twice.
Eric
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eric Tchepannou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 6/9/05, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
>
> >>--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> >>Von: Eric Tchepannou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>An: user@ant.apache.org
> >>Betreff: Re: What is the difference between a n
On 6/9/05, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> > Von: Eric Tchepannou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > An: user@ant.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: What is the difference between a nested element and a nested
> > type?
nvocation, ant will call add(MyTypeBase c).
> Not sure though if the syntax public void add(MyTypeBase c) is supported by
> Ant 1.5
>
> What works in Ant 1.5 is
>
> public void addSomething(MyTypeBase c)
>
> which will then instantiate MyTypeBase if you nest
>
> and
spath="classes" />
> classpath="classes"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Task.java --
>
> package my;
>
> public class Task extends org.apache.tools.ant.Task {
> public void a
I have checked
http://www.oracle.com/technology/pub/articles/bodewig_taskwriters.html
I think I should rather use addMyBaseType(MyBaseType t) instead of
addConfigured(...) ?
Could it be that this new syntax is now only valid with Ant 1.6 + ?
On 6/9/05, Eric Tchepannou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Beyond that I do wonder why you need
> to cast your subtypes... OO would dictate that you
> call a designated method and they would simply behave
> accordingly, but whatever floats your boat I suppose.
>
> HTH,
> Matt
>
> --- Eric Tchepannou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
and not an element,
because with an element, I would have to write for each concrete type
the corresponding createXXX() method.
--
Best Regards,
Eric Tchepannou
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comman
(TypeSubclass o)?
...or do you think the the problem somewhere else?
My next step will be to test this, but as this might be a time
consuming typing job, I thought I could count on your previous
experiences.
Many thanks for your contributions.
--
Best Regards,
Eric Tchepannou
13 matches
Mail list logo
