Re: Using antcall but not re-running dependent targets

2007-01-21 Thread Cameron McCormack
previous mail. Thanks for the info though. Cameron -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Using antcall but not re-running dependent targets

2007-01-20 Thread Cameron McCormack
set the property at the bottom of the target: > > > . > (really delicate stuff that can only be run once) > . > > Ah that’s a good workaround. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Using antcall but not re-running dependent targets

2007-01-20 Thread Cameron McCormack
nloaded by users compiling. I wonder why there’s no build-in task to do this? BTW is there anything other than js.jar that I need to put on the classpath so that it will work? Ant gives me the “Could not create task or type of type: scriptdef” error. I also put bsf.jar on the classpath and still ge

Using antcall but not re-running dependent targets

2007-01-20 Thread Cameron McCormack
two-other: BUILD SUCCESSFUL but I want it so that the init target doesn’t get run again, because it has already been run. Is that just a limitation of antcall (that it forgets which dependencies have already been run)? If so, how I else can I get this sort of flow control? Thanks, Cameron -