Re: Problem with version of Apache Ant 1.8.1

2010-06-15 Thread Alex Foreman
always going to have to generate this file myself. Again thanks for the replies. On 15 June 2010 14:21, Peter Reilly wrote: > I get >> ant -version > Apache Ant version 1.8.1 compiled on April 30 2010 > on linux. > > Peter > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:58 PM, A

Problem with version of Apache Ant 1.8.1

2010-06-15 Thread Alex Foreman
achines. So they are the same binaries that is being called. Many thanks, -- Alex Foreman - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: [ANN] Ant 1.8.0RC1 released

2010-01-14 Thread Alex Foreman
all the work, I will certainly try out 1.8.0 in the mean time and report back any problems _if_ i encounter anything. Many thanks, 2010/1/14 Antoine Levy Lambert : > Alex Foreman wrote: >> >> Is there a Roadmap with planned releases available? >> E.G. have we any idea how lo

Re: [ANN] Ant 1.8.0RC1 released

2010-01-14 Thread Alex Foreman
la and in > WHATSNEW > > > Regards, > > Antoine > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org > > -- Alex Foreman -

Re: Using Ivy to automate build

2009-11-25 Thread Alex Foreman
ss to the artefact repository. > > Am I out of luck in hoping that Ivy can help automate my build.  Or has > anyone come across the same problem and arrived at an ingenious solution? > > Thanks in advance > Jonathan > > -- Alex Foreman

How to programaticly gather all the artifacts from an ivy file.

2009-10-08 Thread Alex Foreman
way I can setup my classpath on the fly and be completely driven from Ivy.xml Is there any easy way to do this.  I'm not to keen on writing a separate xml parser to gather this information which I would presume I should have access to already. Many thanks in advance! -- Alex Foreman

Re: WELCOME to user@ant.apache.org

2009-09-29 Thread Alex Foreman
needed. Is this functionality available currently? It would be preferred that we had the stacktrace being printed above the timeout in a formatted manner. It would also be preferred if the offending test(s) do show up in the report in full. What do you guys think? Thanks in advance. -- Alex Foreman