Re: Proposal for improving Ant output (post-1.7)

Ernst de Haan schrieb: > Here's an initial proposal for improving Ant output, making it less > verbose: > http://ernstdehaan.blogspot.com/2009/09/improving-ant-output.html > > What do you think? Do you consider the current Ant output too verbose or > just fine? Sometimes it's too verbose as some

Re: SCP task succeeds on client, but no file created on remote site

>> >> >Read the doc for the task, especially what >property/@location >evaluates to. Add these to check the values: >> > > Thanks. That revealed the problem: ${dest} was based on my local base directory. I simply needed to change from using the location attribute to using value. Then

Re: Proposal for improving Ant output (post-1.7)

Ernst de Haan schrieb: Michael Ludwig-4 wrote: That said, there is a potential for using less screen real estate. I would see that as an improvement. It may be a matter of taste. True, it is on one hand a matter of taste, but on the other hand it is related to how much data humans can proces

Re: Proposal for improving Ant output (post-1.7)

On 2009-09-03, Ernst de Haan wrote: > Now you're implicitly bringing up something else, which is colored output. > That would be very nice indeed for terminals that support it. added in Ant 1.5. Stefan --

RE: RegEx support for include and exclude patterns

-Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 4:56 PM To: user@ant.apache.org Subject: Re: RegEx support for include and exclude patterns /* >> Is there a feature in ant ... & > name="eee**/**"/> tags of path like structures, file

Re: Proposal for improving Ant output (post-1.7)

Michael Ludwig-4 wrote: > > I don't adhere to the UNIX philosophy that a tool should produce no > output if it has nothing interesting to report. A tool such as Ant > should definitely report what it is doing. > Agreed. Ant should give an indication of what it is about to do and/or what is has

Re: RegEx support for include and exclude patterns

On 2009-09-03, Rebhan, Gilbert wrote: > From: Raja Nagendra Kumar [mailto:nagendra.r...@tejasoft.com] >> Is there a feature in ant ... & > name="eee**/**"/> tags of path like structures, filesets etc. > see selectors/containsregexp = > http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTypes/selectors.html This

RE: Ivy Performance

The resolve task actually fetches artifacts into the local cache, so you would expect subsequent resolves of the same configuration to be much faster (likewise with extended configurations, if they are not too disjoint from the base configuration). If you observe that subsequent resolves don't ben

RE: RegEx support for include and exclude patterns

Thank You Gilbert. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RegEx-support-for-include-and-exclude-patterns-tp25277066p25277414.html Sent from the Ant - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscrib

Re: RegEx support for include and exclude patterns

On 2009-09-03, Raja Nagendra Kumar wrote: > Is there a feature in ant ... & > tags of path like structures, filesets etc. Not in 1.7.1, but Ant's trunk has and thus Ant 1.8.0 when it is ready will have as selector. I think the code in

RE: RegEx support for include and exclude patterns

-Original Message- From: Raja Nagendra Kumar [mailto:nagendra.r...@tejasoft.com] Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 4:18 PM To: user@ant.apache.org Subject: RegEx support for include and exclude patterns /* Hi, Is there a feature in ant ... & tags of path like structures, filesets et

RegEx support for include and exclude patterns

Hi, Is there a feature in ant ... & tags of path like structures, filesets etc. Currently * and ** are supported which are simple enough for most cases, but for complex searches, we see the need for more powerful pattern matching. Regards, Raja Nagendra Kumar, C.T.O www.tejasoft.com -- Vie

Re: SCP task succeeds on client, but no file created on remote site

littlebluehou...@juno.com schrieb: I am just trying to copy one file from my local computer to my remote server using an scp task. According to my local computer, my attempt works: I get "BUILD SUCCESSFUL" and even the number of bytes per second that the transfer took. However, the file does n

SCP task succeeds on client, but no file created on remote site

Hi. I am a new ant user seeking to use ant to deploy my webapp to my remote server. For starters, I am just trying to copy one file from my local computer to my remote server using an scp task. According to my local computer, my attempt works: I get "BUILD SUCCESSFUL" and even the number of b

Re: Proposal for improving Ant output (post-1.7)

Ernst de Haan schrieb: Here's an initial proposal for improving Ant output, making it less verbose: http://ernstdehaan.blogspot.com/2009/09/improving-ant-output.html Do you consider the current Ant output too verbose or just fine? I don't adhere to the UNIX philosophy that a tool should prod

Re: Proposal for improving Ant output (post-1.7)

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 14:15, wrote: > > > > > > current output is >  a: >  b: >  c: >  d: > > What do you expect here? > > If you call target d, I suspect? Well, a is called from b and c, and b is the first in the call chain. Ant will have resolved the fact that there's no need to call a fro

Re: antcontrib or antelope

Once upon a time, ant-contrib was under fairly active development, and I proposed to the ant-contrib admins to merge my Antelope tasks with their project since there seemed to be a good fit between the two projects. Not long after that, the focus of ant-contrib seemed to be on the C compiler task

AW: Proposal for improving Ant output (post-1.7)

current output is a: b: c: d: What do you expect here? Jan >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Francis GALIEGUE [mailto:f...@one2team.com] >Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. September 2009 14:04 >An: Ant Users List >Betreff: Re: Proposal for improving Ant output (post-1.7) > >On Thu

Re: Proposal for improving Ant output (post-1.7)

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:39, Ernst de Haan wrote: > Here's an initial proposal for improving Ant output, making it less verbose: > http://ernstdehaan.blogspot.com/2009/09/improving-ant-output.html > > What do you think? Do you consider the current Ant output too verbose or > just fine? > Have you

Proposal for improving Ant output (post-1.7)

Here's an initial proposal for improving Ant output, making it less verbose: http://ernstdehaan.blogspot.com/2009/09/improving-ant-output.html What do you think? Do you consider the current Ant output too verbose or just fine? Have you every had issues examining why an Ant build failed and yo

Re: antcontrib or antelope

Thank you Gilbert.. > Work is underway to merge the Antelope tasks with the AntContrib project. from the above reading I am confused if Antelope making AntContrib obsolete or wise versa.. With your summary I feel to depend on Antelope. Also, your URL for more tasks of ant helps lot more. Re