Hi,
I have some tests that send output to plain text files. Its easy to spot
errors in the files by simply doing something like:
What I cannot figure out, is how to log something that would identify
exactly what the er
>
> apparently not
> i saw "junitreport" and assumed your junitreport task was spawning n number
> ANT junit task(s)
>
> would be interested to know the solution graham provides
Me too. :)
-T
>
>
> Martin Gainty
> __
> Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanme
apparently not
i saw "junitreport" and assumed your junitreport task was spawning n number ANT
junit task(s)
would be interested to know the solution graham provides
Martin Gainty
__
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung
Diese Nachricht ist vertr
Hey that's good news! :)
Raagu wrote:
>
> I got it. We should write ${line.separator} as delimiter attribute value.. It
> works..
>
>
>
>
> Scot P. Floess-2 wrote:
> >
> >
> > And yes - I see what you mean about the two characters...
> >
> > I was wrong about that one :)
> >
> >
Hello
I have used svn copy in ant script..
My ant script is
when executing this script
I am getting Null pointer exception..
org.tigris.subversion.svnclientAdapter.javahl.AbstractjhlClientAdapter.copy(AbstractJhlClientAdapter.java:638)
Please help me out solve this problem
--
View this
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the quick reply!
Since the tap2junit utility is used to convert a non-junit test to
junit-like output, I do not have a junit definition. Do I need one even if
I'm not using junit?
-T
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Martin Gainty wrote:
>
> somewhere in the build.xml yo
A scans a directory for files to select.
The standard 'selectors' matches against file names, but other are configurable.
calculates MD5 hashes for files and selects files which MD5 differs
from earlier stored values.
Jan
http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTypes/selectors.html
http://ant.apache.
I got it. We should write ${line.separator} as delimiter attribute value.. It
works..
Scot P. Floess-2 wrote:
>
>
> And yes - I see what you mean about the two characters...
>
> I was wrong about that one :)
>
> So, curious... I see you perform loadfile first, then fixcrlf... Is that
>