Re: proguard error !!!

2007-07-16 Thread cuillandre frederic
> On 7/16/07, cuillandre frederic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > thanks Peter, > > it is now working. > > just a few things . i hope it will be the last of the day :-) > > > > according to the documentation, we can do: > > > > > > > destdir="${build}" > > > > > > > > >

Re: Select JDK compiler

2007-07-16 Thread Roman Ivashin
Hello! You can always use JDK 1.5. If you will need to compile project with java 1.4 you can specify Of course, you can use properties here to avoid manual editing of build.xml: Built-in props "ant.build.javac.source" and "ant.build.javac.source" hold default value for JDK that i

Re: Select JDK compiler

2007-07-16 Thread Sunil Prabhakaran
hi Hezjing, Try the executable attribute in . By default it will be 1.5 for you. however try setting this executable attribute to the filepath for 1.4 javac.exe, whereever you require the sources to be compiled with 1.4 JDK hope this helps regards Sunil Prabhakaran On 7/17/07, hezjing <[EMAIL P

Select JDK compiler

2007-07-16 Thread hezjing
Hi! I have projects to be compiled with Java 1.4, or Java 1.5 and how can I explicitly select the compiler in build.xml? When I set fork="yes" when calling , how do I know which JDK compiler the is executing? There are Java 1.4 and 1.5 installed in my environment, with JAVA_HOME pointing to Ja

Re: proguard error !!!

2007-07-16 Thread Peter Reilly
On 7/16/07, cuillandre frederic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: thanks Peter, it is now working. just a few things . i hope it will be the last of the day :-) according to the documentation, we can do: my build.xml is ... ... 1) the shoul

Re: proguard error !!!

2007-07-16 Thread cuillandre frederic
thanks Peter, it is now working. just a few things . i hope it will be the last of the day :-) according to the documentation, we can do: my build.xml is ... ... the problem is that i've got in my build folder the excluded classes !!!

Re: proguard error !!!

2007-07-16 Thread Peter Reilly
The manual for progard (http://proguard.sourceforge.net/manual/ant.html) has the following: The resource is a relative path within the jar file, so you should *not* use ${progard.path} for the resource attribute. use this instead: Peter On 7/16/07, cuillandre frederic <[EMAIL PROTECTED

proguard error !!!

2007-07-16 Thread cuillandre frederic
one more time today ! i'm a bit confused because i tried this: ... ... and my lovely ant says: Could not create task or type of type: proguard. so i'm a bit stucked! the ${proguard.path}/src/proguard/ant/task.properties exists but it cannot create the proguard task i don't k

Re: adding additional classes...

2007-07-16 Thread cuillandre frederic
thanks it works :-) > Hi, > the following is incorrect: > > > > > > > > > > It should be: > > > > > > > > Peter > On 7/16/07, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/16/07, cuillandre frederic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > it loads the additional jars

Re: adding additional classes...

2007-07-16 Thread Peter Reilly
Hi, the following is incorrect: It should be: Peter On 7/16/07, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/16/07, cuillandre frederic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it loads the additional jars but not the additionals classes. > i tried it under linux with eclipse 3.2

Re: adding additional classes...

2007-07-16 Thread Dominique Devienne
On 7/16/07, cuillandre frederic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: it loads the additional jars but not the additionals classes. i tried it under linux with eclipse 3.2 and jdk 5 is anybody could help me and tell me what's wrong I bet it does add the .class files to the classpath, and you can confirm

adding additional classes...

2007-07-16 Thread cuillandre frederic
hi guys, i tried to add additionals classes to my build.xml but it doesn't work !! i tried this: ... ... ... it loads the additional jars but not the additionals classes. i tried it under linux with eclipse 3.2 and jdk 5 is anybody could help me and tell