I did a small test.
Ant 1.6.5 and 1.7.0 support s.
My path has files like c:\temp\dir\file.
The map in 1.7.0 is independent of the fileseparator
and
work.
In Ant 1.6.5 this is not the case. The from-attribute has to match
the correct (os-specific) syntax.
Jan
>-Ursprüngliche Nach
Hi,
can anyone of you post how to get projects/files from pvcs using ANT
script.
A sample will be helpful.
Regards
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may
contain proprietary,
I've found a construct in our build.xml that just isn't working.
Example:
The "map" entry isn't doing anything. The generated path has many
occurrences of the install.local.dir in it.
Suggestions?
--
John G. Lussmyer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dragons soar an
I’ve found a construct in our build.xml that just isn’t working.
Example:
.
.
.
The “map” entry isn’t doing anything. The generated path has many occurrences
of the install.local.dir in it.
Suggestions?
--
Maybe http://enitsys.sourceforge.net/ant-classloadertask/ what you are
looking for.
It allows you to add jars to the project-classloader.
cheers
Rainer
> -Original Message-
> From: David Corley (AT/LMI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 2:48 PM
> To: user@ant.
Or Anthill
-Original Message-
From: RADEMAKERS Tanguy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 11:34 AM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: RE: Invoking Ant Procedures from tomcat ?
Hello,
What you are describing sounds a lot like continuous integration. Have
you considered Cru
Ouch. Looks like several tasks are marked this way; a
stylesheet did not have "BETA" removed as it should
have. :( Rest assured that this is a mistake, and
that macrodef, nor apply, etc. are considered "beta"
tasks.
-Matt
--- Michael Giroux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The MacroDef documentat
The MacroDef documentation for ANT 1.7 is marked BETA.
Is the MacroDef functionality really beta? It has been available since Ant
1.6.
Michael Giroux
I came to know that I need to declare tokens as follows:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
It worked fine now.
Keith Hatton wrote:
>
> A favourite that trips me up is that the destination files are newer
> than the source files, so no copy actually happens. Maybe you need to
> add overwrit
Hello,
What you are describing sounds a lot like continuous integration. Have
you considered CruiseControl? It can be used to build and test your
application each time code is committed to scm, and sends all kinds of
mails as well as having a web interface with results, etc.
Regs,
/t
>-Orig
1. developers can use junit standlone test runner.
2. developers can use the junit ide integration (Eclispe has fantastic
support, and I am sure othere IDE`s also supports junit).
3. you can create an build file that will invoke the junit task for the
automated testing.
Chun Ji wrote:
> We hav
We have a project going on, which involves 20 developers, 2000+ java files,
3,000+ junit test cases and ORACLE database. Every morning, there will be a
cron job running ant to do the build and run these junit test cases. It also
sends the results to everyone.
Our manager is looking for 0% f
... or use 's "preservelastmodified" on the original so
the copied file has the same time-stamp as the original. To my way of
thinking, this allows a more 'honest" appraisal of files. --Wayne
Keith Hatton wrote:
A favourite that trips me up is that the destination files are newer
than the
A favourite that trips me up is that the destination files are newer
than the source files, so no copy actually happens. Maybe you need to
add overwrite="true" to the ?
Hope this helps,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: jake_ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 March 2007 16:14
To: user
I consider it best practice to *never* incorporate runtime configuration
information into a build. When asked to do so I also request that I be
given a "way forward machine" that will peer into the future and tell me
where it will be deployed.
Less flippantly, relying on "targeted" builds - bui
I'm attempting to generate javadocs for code containing JDK 1.5 annotations.
I have specified source='1.5' but this does not eliminate the warnings.
What am I overlooking?
Thanks
Michael Giroux
Forgot to mention.. Here are the files:
file-1:
cc.db.username=itsme
cc.db.password=itsme
file-2
DbUser=shared
DbPassword=shared
After running ant, still I see DbUser and DbPassword as shared/shared. I
expected they wouldbe itsme/itsme.
I tried to use begintoken="%" endtoken="*" aswell, but of
I have a property file-1 where cc.db.username and cc.db.password are defined.
There is property file-2 with tokens DbUser and DbPassword with some default
values, that will be copied to a directory.
My task is to replace values of DbUser and DbPassword in file-2 with values
of cc.db.username and
Anton Vodonosov wrote:
From what I understand from documentation, it is impossible
to create Resource Collection based on classpath. Am I right?
that's right, because there is nothing in the Java API to enum all
classes in a package.
Yes, but it is possible to analyze classpath programmatic
I'm wondering if anyone knows a way to specify additional jars for use
by an task within an ant buildfile.
My current setup involves 2 build files, builda.xml and buildb.xml.
Builda.xml runs an task to kick-off buildb.xml. This a
multiproject setup.
There are many users having their own custom
20 matches
Mail list logo
