Thanks for your reply. The output occurs whether or not the "log" attribute
is specified. The output is a list of each directory processed by the
update. The log file is more of a summary. We have no problem with the log
file. We just want to suppress the other output.
From: "Anderson, Rob (Glo
Specify a log file to write to with the log attribute. Does that silence the
noise? If not, I have recently written some ClearCase output handling classes
for an lsco fileset selector that may be usefull. Let me know.
-Rob Anderson
> -Original Message-
> From: Russell Johannesson [mailt
The ClearCase "ccupdate" task writes too much to the standard output. I
can't seem to stop it from printing each directory in the update. The
ClearCase ccupdate task is ultimately implemented as a command-line exec, so
it seems that ant doesn't control the output. I'm wondering if this notion
i
Hi,
I'm having a problem running a small test program that calls
DocumentBuilderFactor.newInstance() and prints out the name
of the actual factory class.
If I run it by invoking java (1.5) directly on the commandline,
it works fine and reports the factory as:
factory is: com.sun.org.apache.xerces.i
Domique, Ivan,
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 10:55, Ivan Ivanov wrote:
> Hello, Paul,
> --- Paul Elschot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I upgraded ant from 1.6b2 to 1.6, and according to
> > the docs the
> > above forkmode should do what I need.
> >
> > For the moment the compilation of the tes
Ops...
I had forgetten about the behavior, thanks for the reminder...
Ninju
Jeffrey E Care <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Properties set in the target run by do not get passed back to
the calling target. I would suggest you investigate antcontrib's
AntCallBack task:
http://ant-contrib.sourc
Properties set in the target run by do not get passed back to
the calling target. I would suggest you investigate antcontrib's
AntCallBack task:
http://ant-contrib.sourceforge.net/tasks/antcallback_task.html
JEC
--
Jeffrey E. Care ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
WebSphere Build SWAT Team Lead
WebSphere B
Hey Guys (and gals),
I am having some trouble with trying to use antcall with input tasks.
See attached build file (called whats_up.xml).
The two targets that don't work (realwork1 and realwork2) both use helper targets that use tasks to invoke the tasks, while the third target (realwork3)
Hello,
I have a quick question;
I need to extend the tools=2Eant=2ETask so that i can call a specific task
from the build.Exml file.
I have been able to call the task by the task at the
command line i.e. ant -test which runs something like this
This executes the class MyVeryOwnTa
Hello, Paul,
--- Paul Elschot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I upgraded ant from 1.6b2 to 1.6, and according to
> the docs the
> above forkmode should do what I need.
>
> For the moment the compilation of the test code
> fails, because
> the junit.framework package does not exist for the
> compil
committed, should appear on the Ant site shortly.
I'm not sure whether "Related Project" wouldn't be a better fit than
"External Tasks", though.
Cheers
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
committed, should appear on the Ant site shortly.
I'm not sure whether "Related Project" wouldn't be a better fit than
"External Tasks", though.
Cheers
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
This is due to a
Matthew Nelson wrote:
I'm having some difficulty creating unions of PropertySets for a
series of subprojects in my build ... even when I copy the sample code
directly from the Ant documentation! It just doesn't work. Am I doing
something naively wrong, or is this a problem with
Dmonique,
On Monday 17 January 2005 21:12, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > From: Paul Elschot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Is it possible to fork junit itself, instead of each test case?
>
> Try with Ant 1.6.2. --DD
I upgraded ant from 1.6b2 to 1.6, and according to the docs the
above forkmode s
14 matches
Mail list logo
