[Bug 162212] Re: gtk apps don't behave properly after xrandr dual-screen modifications

2008-11-19 Thread rubberglove
I just reported it here: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561583 Note, the problem seems to be getting better in general. I'm not sure if it is due to updates, or just the fact that I recently added the https://launchpad.net/~fta/+archive PPA (which has the firefox 3.1 and the latest xulr

[Bug 367947] [NEW] Notifications appear in non-visible area of multi-head desktop

2009-04-27 Thread rubberglove
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: notify-osd I use xrandr to configure a multi-head display -- a main LCD screen and a TV-out. In order to keep within my video card's 2048x2048 virtual display size for 3D acceleration, I stack my screens vertically in the virtual display, with the sma

[Bug 331369] Re: regression vs. notification-daemon: positioning when multiple screens are available

2009-04-27 Thread rubberglove
@Matthew Paul Thomas: See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/notify- osd/+bug/367947">bug 367947 -- regression vs. notification-daemon: positioning when multiple screens are available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 367947] Re: Notifications appear in non-visible area of multi-head desktop

2009-04-29 Thread rubberglove
@David Barth-- Definitely, I think that would fix it for me. In cases where they top-right corner of the 'virtual screen' is in a non-visible area (outside the geometry of a monitor), that raises a new question -- which of the two 'top-right' corners to choose as the default location (1 and 2 in

[Bug 346095] Re: notify-osd doesn't honor my preference

2009-04-21 Thread rubberglove
I'd just like to say that forcing the notifications at the top of the screen renders them useless for me -- not because I have a special preference for the bottom vs top corner, or because I want things to 'go back to how they were', or even because I want to be able to configure everything all the

[Bug 331369] Re: regression vs. notification-daemon: positioning when multiple screens are available

2009-04-21 Thread rubberglove
I mentioned this in another bug thread, but I believe this is the more appropriate one. I use randr to do multiple displays stacked vertically (to stay within my poor graphics card's limit of 2048x2048 for 3d acceleration). The primary display is my LCD screen, and the secondary display (placed

[Bug 331369] Re: regression vs. notification-daemon: positioning when multiple screens are available

2009-04-24 Thread rubberglove
I just want to mention that I have the same positioning issues with xrandr and not twinview. Previously, with my screens stacked vertically (smaller screen above a larger one), the notifications would appear (I believe) in the top-right corner of the virtual display, which was a non-visible sectio

[Bug 162212] Re: gtk apps don't behave properly after xrandr dual-screen modifications

2008-11-08 Thread rubberglove
Since this bug is still 'bugging' me, I can report it somewhere else -- where would be the most appropriate place? bugs.freedesktop.org? bugzilla.gnome.org? -- gtk apps don't behave properly after xrandr dual-screen modifications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162212 You received this bug noti

[Bug 162212] Re: gtk apps don't behave properly after xrandr dual-screen modifications

2008-10-22 Thread rubberglove
I think spoke too soon. Now that I've been running intrepid for a while, I still see the broken behaviour, especially with firefox and thunderbird. In firefox, *some* dropdown menus will appear shifted from their correct location (testing it as I type this, the file/edit/tools/etc menus are correc

[Bug 162212] Re: gtk apps don't behave properly after xrandr dual-screen modifications

2008-09-11 Thread rubberglove
Nice! I just tested it under intrepid, and it seems to have solved this issue for me. This has been a minor, but persistent irritation for me for the past year of so. I use XrandR to turn my s-video output on/off (to let my son watch tv/movies while I work), and each time would mess up my fire

[Bug 175798] chuck is not 64-bit compatible.

2007-12-11 Thread rubberglove
Public bug reported: As detailed on the chuck mailing list, chuck will not run (produces nothing but segmentation faults), even in 'silent' mode. https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck- users/2007-October/002275.html $ chuck -s foo.ck Segmentation fault (core dumped) ** Affects: chuck