[Bug 387734] Re: xserver is left wide open during install.

2009-06-22 Thread rew
Ehh. I just started an install. The Default commandline for X when the system is installed and up is /usr/X11R6/bin/X :0 -br -audit 0 -auth /var/lib/gdm/:0.Xauth -nolisten tcp vt7 so it doesn't listen to tcp connections on HOSTNAME:0.0 however during the install it seems the "-nolisten tcp" is

[Bug 387734] Re: xserver is left wide open during install.

2009-06-26 Thread rew
I understand you changed the "package" to "xorg". I doubt that the "xorg" package is involved. It's the ubuntu-install-environment that apparently does the wrong thing, while the xorg-package, which is installed on the target system actually DOES do the right thing. -- xserver is left wide open

[Bug 368521] [NEW] Amd64 kernels have the same name as ia31 kernels

2009-04-28 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-server When 64-bit capable machines first appeared, installing a 64-bit userspace wasn't as attractive as it is now. Now is the time to switch (for me). Because my system was upgraded from originally 32-bit machines, and I want to make sure I

[Bug 265035] Re: Xorg -configure breaks on undefined symbol: xf86GetPciVideoInfo

2009-01-09 Thread rew
Bryce: Who is ogra? Why are you sending automated messages, marking a bug as "incomplete" while a solution is provided (by me) in the comments? -- Xorg -configure breaks on undefined symbol: xf86GetPciVideoInfo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/265035 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 317997] [NEW] Pulseaudio stops working after a few days.

2009-01-16 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pulseaudio I leave my computer on. Sometimes when I come back sound has stopped working. restarting pulseaudio seems to fix it. Of course it's difficult to reproduce. Description:Ubuntu 8.10 ii pulseaudio 0.9.10-2ubuntu PulseAudio sound server

[Bug 317997] Re: Pulseaudio stops working after a few days.

2009-01-22 Thread rew
/var/log/messages contains "MARK" every 20 minutes, and "restarted" every day. Nothing else. /var/log/daemon.log contains: - ntp messages - hald mounting my digital camera media - networkmanager messages (there is something with my eth0, it shows "down" in the toolbar, but works just fine! It r

[Bug 265035] Re: Xorg -configure breaks on undefined symbol: xf86GetPciVideoInfo

2008-12-17 Thread rew
Hi, I have a ltsp client system that actually uses the NSC driver, so removing it is not an option for me. I was planning on /using/ it. -- Xorg -configure breaks on undefined symbol: xf86GetPciVideoInfo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/265035 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 265035] Re: Xorg -configure breaks on undefined symbol: xf86GetPciVideoInfo

2008-12-20 Thread rew
On or around (I've been debugging the code a bit) line 520 of src/nsc_driver.c is the call to xf86GetPciVideoInfo . It is intended to detect wether or not PCI is available at all. I changed this to if (1). If PCI is NOT available, the xf86MatchPciInstances calls in the following lines will silent

[Bug 302179] Re: gimp-remote not included

2008-12-14 Thread rew
I'm running "stable" Intrepid, how do I get the Jaunty package? -- gimp-remote not included https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302179 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 317997] Re: Pulseaudio stops working after a few days.

2009-02-06 Thread rew
Hey guys, progress Instead of logging out and logging back in, I restarted pulsaudio manually. When I didn't close the window before it happened again, I found: Pulseaudio: CPU time exeeded. My guess is that pulseaudio sets a CPU time limit for itself, and after several days or weeks, it exc

[Bug 397371] [NEW] i386 installer may install x86_64 on a system

2009-07-09 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: base-installer Wishlist item. I have a bunch of installer CDs lying around. As x86_64 machines can run i386 code just fine, it might be nice to have the i386 install CD offer to install an x86_64 kernel/system... Here are some suggestions that might hel

[Bug 397373] [NEW] installer could auto-install updates.

2009-07-09 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: base-installer Wishlist item... The installer could check, before starting the normal installation process, if it has proper internet connectivity. If it does, it can check if updates are available for the packages that it is going to install. If that ha

[Bug 397381] [NEW] installer could check for newer releases.

2009-07-09 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: base-installer Wishlist item. The installer could verify internet connectivity, and if available, check with the ubuntu distribution server whether a newer release than that of the current CD is available. If that is the case, installing the newer versio

[Bug 397745] [NEW] One-large-partition is not advisable.

2009-07-10 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debian-installer In the old days you'd make partitions for /, /tmp, /usr, /var, /home, and several other locations of the filesystem. Nowadays I personally prefer to have just two, and I was moving towards favoring the modern Ubuntu approach: Everything o

[Bug 397745] Re: One-large-partition is not advisable.

2009-07-10 Thread rew
The "fsck that is fast" that you're thinking of is the one with the reboot-after-power-failure. the fsck I'm talking about is the one that happens once-every- half-a-year (provided you reboot that often), even if no unclean reboot ever happened. The filesystem I'm talking about is a bit extreme.

[Bug 415416] [NEW] sasl2-bin doesn't mention saslauthd for apt-cache search searchterm.

2009-08-18 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sasl2-bin see also bug 12464 Not being entirely familiar with the sasl system, I found I needed saslauthd. Turns out this lives in the sasl2-bin package. Usually when I use apt-cache search I get the appropriate results. As I often see results that do

[Bug 407317] [NEW] xorg depends on fonts, package does not.

2009-07-31 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg The package doesn't depend on/pull in the fonts. But starting an Xserver then results in: Fatal server error: No valid FontPath could be found. after: apt-get install xfonts-base the Xserver starts. Ooops. This IS on the older 8.10 versi

[Bug 385261] [NEW] Waiting for root filesystem hangs.

2009-06-09 Thread rew
Public bug reported: When I booted one of my systems this morning, it hung at "waiting for root filesystem". It turns out it was waiting for the WRONG filesystem. The old "kernel panic cannot mount root device 0301" was more informative in telling me what device it was waiting for. It was a misco

[Bug 567343] [NEW] on pae kernel, the linux-headers...-pae doesn't get installed

2010-04-20 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: virtualbox-ose On my workstation, an amd64 install, installing "virtualbox-ose" pulls in the modules, which seems to pull in the linux-kernel-headers. Or maybe they were pulled in for another reason, but it cleanly installed the modules without any user i

[Bug 567343] Re: on pae kernel, the linux-headers...-pae doesn't get installed

2010-04-20 Thread rew
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44907495/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "LsMod.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44907496/LsMod.txt ** Attachment added: "VirtualBoxOse.DpkgList.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44907497/VirtualBoxOse.DpkgLi

[Bug 567801] [NEW] when selecting medibuntu, the indexes for medibuntu cannot be found.

2010-04-21 Thread rew
Public bug reported: found I could add medibuntu using the official menu item system-> administration->software sources. I then get: Err http://packages.medibuntu.org lucid/non-free Sources Unable to connect to packages.medibuntu.org:http: and several others. (hmmm fur

[Bug 567801] Re: when selecting medibuntu, the indexes for medibuntu cannot be found.

2010-04-21 Thread rew
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44950814/Dependencies.txt -- when selecting medibuntu, the indexes for medibuntu cannot be found. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567801 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 550933] [NEW] screensaver doesn't recognise password

2010-03-29 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-screensaver Logging in works, my password is available through NIS, and logging in works normally. However, when my screensaver comes up, and asks for my credentials, it doesn't accept my password. Clicking "switch user", selecting "other user", a

[Bug 550933] Re: screensaver doesn't recognise password

2010-03-29 Thread rew
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42385672/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "GconfGnomeLockdown.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42385673/GconfGnomeLockdown.txt ** Attachment added: "GconfGnomePowerManager.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/423

[Bug 551585] [NEW] tcsh holds wrong history for nested loops.

2010-03-30 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tcsh In the most recent 10.4 release, tcsh now remembers the lines entered inside loops: Good. :-) foreach i (*) something complicated end you can recall the "something complicated" by using up-arrow. However this goes wrong in nested loops: foreac

[Bug 551605] [NEW] default config on Lucid mentions Karmic.

2010-03-30 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apt-mirror Apparently this is an issue for every release... :-) TODO: Update the default mirror.list file for the new release. (in this case Lucid). ** Affects: apt-mirror (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- default config on L

[Bug 520846] [NEW] loss of precision (while calculating in hex).

2010-02-12 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bc Although bc has been working flawlessly for me for many years I stumbled into an annoying loss-of-precision today. This is good: assurancetourix:~> bc -l bc 1.06.94 Copyright 1991-1994, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2004, 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. T

[Bug 520846] Re: loss of precision (while calculating in hex).

2010-02-12 Thread rew
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39090922/Dependencies.txt -- loss of precision (while calculating in hex). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520846 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 520846] Re: loss of precision (while calculating in hex).

2010-02-12 Thread rew
I couldn't find an upstream bug tracker, so I emailed this to g...@gnu.org as well. -- loss of precision (while calculating in hex). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520846 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 530278] [NEW] Swiss armyknife can't do what I want.

2010-03-01 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: netcat Netcat falls short of it's self-proclaimed swiss armyknife status. I want it to listen on a port and report any UDP packets recieved on that port. However, after sending one UDP packet only packets from that single host/port that sent the first p

[Bug 530278] Re: Swiss armyknife can't do what I want.

2010-03-01 Thread rew
After a bit of trouble patching the source for Ubuntu I have now a patched source that indeed does what I want. Just that one line commented out If you want me to add a command switch, someone should suggest a useful letter. I'm not good at that sort of stuff. (-p for promiscuous is taken). -

[Bug 265035] Re: Xorg -configure breaks on undefined symbol: xf86GetPciVideoInfo

2009-09-03 Thread rew
Apparently the suggestion to drop nsc was followed for jaunty. I can't say I'm thrilled: My openbricks need the module to display anything -- Xorg -configure breaks on undefined symbol: xf86GetPciVideoInfo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/265035 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 234835] Re: almost at the end of installation

2009-12-07 Thread rew
>Ok so, this problem seems to be caused by running ubiquity within a >liveboot that was booted from an iso file on the hdd (in my case I used >grub2's loopback interface). It would seem that the migration assistant >wanted to access other files on the partition that had the iso on it and >refused t

[Bug 546815] Re: when mounting NFS, DNS isn't up yet.

2010-04-13 Thread rew
Current workaround which seems to work: Add option "noauto" to the fstab, and add mount to /etc/rc.local. -- when mounting NFS, DNS isn't up yet. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546815 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 546815] Re: when mounting NFS, DNS isn't up yet.

2010-04-14 Thread rew
Before this machine was running Ubuntu it was configured statically. To prevent having to configure Ubuntu I now have: host falbala { hardware ethernet 90:e6:ba:9a:46:08; fixed-address 192.168.234.32; } in my dhcpd.conf on the server. So it is dynamically configured using DHCP. -

[Bug 546815] Re: when mounting NFS, DNS isn't up yet.

2010-04-14 Thread rew
It's a wired network. When Ubuntu installs, it uses DHCP to configure the networking. This keeps on working after install, except that the IP address is from my dynamic pool. So when I want to work remote on the machine, I have trouble getting to it. So that's why I put the IP address in the DHCP

[Bug 546815] Re: when mounting NFS, DNS isn't up yet.

2010-04-14 Thread rew
To be sure: I don't know if I'm using network manager. I don't touch the network configuration anywhere, and get a working network configuration. To prevent me having to find out what network manager is, and how to configure it, I decided to do what I already have to do for the diskless clients. -

[Bug 546815] Re: when mounting NFS, DNS isn't up yet.

2010-04-14 Thread rew
I got two new worstations. I was not looking forward to installing a soon-to-be-outdated 9.10 on them, so I installed the Lucid beta. I've ran "apt-get update" and "apt-get upgrade" regularly, so I think I'm up- to-date. One of the machines had memory problems so it has been rebooted a lot. The ot

[Bug 562951] [NEW] doesn't gray out create disk when no source is seleted.

2010-04-14 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: usb-creator Apparently it requires a source iSO image. If none is selected, the "doit" button (whatever its called) is not grayed out. After selecting a source ISO image, when I select "/dev/sdb" which apparently is not right, it grays out, and then co

[Bug 562951] Re: doesn't gray out create disk when no source is seleted.

2010-04-14 Thread rew
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44141503/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "UsbCreatorLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44141504/UsbCreatorLog.txt ** Attachment added: "UsbDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44141505/UsbDevices.txt

[Bug 178038] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV

2010-04-14 Thread rew
I don't think it "always" crashes as JosephB says. At least not here. I was browsing "There I fixed it" or something like that. (Maybe it crashed the moment I clicked away from the homepage of "failblog.org" after playing one embedded video. ) I'm thinking I might have seen firefox hang and/or cra

[Bug 551605] Re: default config on Lucid mentions Karmic.

2010-04-15 Thread rew
Re: clean-lock-file patch is indeed neccesary. Thanks! Excuse me for silently working around this issue without reporting it. How long does it take before the updated version hits the repositories? I just purged and reinstalled the apt-mirror package, and still get karmic. I'm probably too impatie

[Bug 551605] Re: default config on Lucid mentions Karmic.

2010-04-15 Thread rew
OK. I still have nothing beyond in my repositories... 0ubuntu3. Will work out. eventually. Thanks! -- default config on Lucid mentions Karmic. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- u

[Bug 546815] Re: when mounting NFS, DNS isn't up yet.

2010-04-07 Thread rew
Weird Had to reboot about 5 times before it would come up. The time that it booted up fine, it still complained about the dns lookup failure (for the numeric IP address!). So it may be hanging somewhere else. :-( -- when mounting NFS, DNS isn't up yet. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54681

[Bug 508657] Re: "ubuntu-bug linux" refuses: kernel not a genuine Ubuntu package

2010-04-08 Thread rew
I'm on Lucid, beta I believe. Mine is: getafix:~> apt-cache policy linux-image-generic linux-image-generic: Installed: 2.6.32.17.18 Candidate: 2.6.32.19.20 Version table: 2.6.32.19.20 0 500 http://falbala/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ub

[Bug 558480] [NEW] xnetload stops at 4G throughput.

2010-04-08 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xnetload I started xnetload yesterday, and now my "in" traffic displays 0.0 B/s (6.4MB/s) [4.0 GB], even when I'm sure that there must be traffic. The 4Gb is fishy, as if it has a 32bit limit. Thing is, this is a 64 bit machine Of course it worked

[Bug 558480] Re: xnetload stops at 4G throughput.

2010-04-08 Thread rew
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43443970/Dependencies.txt -- xnetload stops at 4G throughput. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558480 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bu

[Bug 558480] Re: xnetload stops at 4G throughput.

2010-04-08 Thread rew
It seems it has trouble parsing the kernel counter, because a fresh instance of xnetload shows the same behaviour, except for that it shows zero bytes so far. This is shown in /proc/net/dev: Inter-| Receive| Transmit face |bytespackets errs

[Bug 516204] Re: soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in Window::CallEventListeners()

2010-04-06 Thread rew
Freshly updated today, opened a file (confidential info inside, can't provide...) hit q (which ended up inside a table in the document) remembered: "oh yeah, this is not xpdf", and moused over to "quit". On "unsaved changes" I then hit "discard". -- soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in Window::Cal

[Bug 546815] Re: when mounting NFS, DNS isn't up yet.

2010-04-06 Thread rew
OK. The machine rebooted twice today succesfully mounting the IP address. However, it also rebooted twice, getting stuck again. Nothing in the config files changed... (and once it worked, once not (reboot: controlaltdel), then not again (reboot: reset button), and then it worked again. -- when

[Bug 551637] [NEW] debconf seems to require a controlling TTY even when no interaction is required

2010-03-30 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debconf Having installed NTP on a very similar workstation I expected no interaction, so I typed: % ssh r...@falbala apt-get install ntp Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... The following packages were aut

[Bug 537133] Re: mountall issues with NFS root filesystem

2010-06-03 Thread rew
is supposed to happen, I don't know. Adding the "nolock" to fstab was something I figured out on my own. I wrote: remountroot.conf (with utterly too little knowledge to do this properly, but it works for me) # # hack by REW to remount the root # start on startup description

[Bug 578851] Re: Fail to remount root on nfsroot install

2010-06-03 Thread rew
Ah! this would be another workaround for my situation! I wrote an upstart script which does the same, which I added to bug #537133 -- Fail to remount root on nfsroot install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578851 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 579497] Re: eagle package depends on fontconfig-config

2010-05-13 Thread rew
I filed this yesterday after setting up a chrooted lucid on my lucid- 64bit machine. Today I need eagle5.x on my other workstation running jaunty, 32bit. I followed the same debootstrap procedure, then did "do-release-upgrade" twice to bring it up to lucid. Next I installed eagle just like I did

[Bug 579497] [NEW] eagle package depends on fontconfig-config

2010-05-12 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: eagle In a minimal Lucid install (debootstrap ...; apt-get install language- pack-en tcsh) I installed and tried to run the package "eagle" (with a DISPLAY variable set to point outside the chroot.) Eagle will then fail to display any text. apt-get ins

[Bug 579497] Re: eagle package depends on fontconfig-config

2010-05-12 Thread rew
The bug was filed from outside the chroot environment that failed, the automatically added info therefore says that eagle wasn't installed. In my real environment I run an older eagle version. The chroot is specifically to allow the newer version to coexist without conflict. -- eagle package depe

[Bug 546815] [NEW] when mounting NFS, DNS isn't up yet.

2010-03-25 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountall I have: abra2:/home /home/ nfs noauto,user 0 0 in my fstab. When I reboot, moutall gets stuck in "waiting for /home". Switching to the console shows (I didn't see this in previous ubuntu versions, but had th

[Bug 546815] Re: when mounting NFS, DNS isn't up yet.

2010-03-25 Thread rew
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41945898/Dependencies.txt -- when mounting NFS, DNS isn't up yet. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546815 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubunt

[Bug 546830] [NEW] Ubuntu-bug uses user prefs for displaying URL...

2010-03-25 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apport Ubuntu-bug uses my user-prefs settings to display the bug-url after automatically collecting some of the data. However, for my older system I had manually installed firefox-3.5 in /opt somewhere, which in my new system doesn't exist yet, and won't

[Bug 546830] Re: Ubuntu-bug uses user prefs for displaying URL...

2010-03-25 Thread rew
** Attachment added: "CrashReports.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41947660/CrashReports.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41947662/Dependencies.txt -- Ubuntu-bug uses user prefs for displaying URL... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546830 You r

[Bug 546993] Re: Dead pixel test works only on one screen in dual screen mode.

2010-03-25 Thread rew
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41964347/Dependencies.txt -- Dead pixel test works only on one screen in dual screen mode. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546993 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscri

[Bug 546993] [NEW] Dead pixel test works only on one screen in dual screen mode.

2010-03-25 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: checkbox I have a dual screen setup (which Ubuntu flawlessly detects and uses!). Checkbox only shows the dead pixel test on one of my monitors. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Mar 25 16:34:05 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMe

[Bug 546815] Re: when mounting NFS, DNS isn't up yet.

2010-03-25 Thread rew
However... changing the mount line to the ip address doesn't help with having the boot continue -- when mounting NFS, DNS isn't up yet. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546815 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 520846] Re: loss of precision (while calculating in hex).

2010-02-12 Thread rew
Bernard, BC is quit consistent. Your example doesn't clearly show what's wrong. People are not very good at reading base-22 output. So I suggest that you keep the input and output base the same bc 1.06 ibase=16 obase=10 .126 .122 Note that I set the output base to "10" which, because I'

[Bug 520846] Re: loss of precision (while calculating in hex).

2010-02-12 Thread rew
Phil Nelson (upstream) says that this is for POSIX compliance. POSIX specifies this absurdity. So I have a number lba = c * SPT * H + h * SPT + s . So when I have a LBA, I can divide by SPT*H, and then multiply the resulting fractional part by SPT*H and have the h*SPT+s part. Sometimes the fractio

[Bug 415416] Re: sasl2-bin doesn't mention saslauthd for apt-cache search searchterm.

2009-10-08 Thread rew
Chuck, Of course, as soon as I found the package, I found the package. So even before I submitted the report it was no longer an issue for ME. It however took me longer-than-necessary to find this package, so I made the suggestion to improve ubuntu here on launchpad. Of course it's low priority i

[Bug 401193] Re: Segmentation fault on file dialog in 5.4.0-4ubuntu1 on Jaunty

2009-11-06 Thread rew
FYI, I and others have experienced something similar. IIRC in my case just moving an object caused a segmentation fault. As a workaround, you can download the installer for the most recent version (5.6) from cadsoft and install that. This "upgraded" my brd files so that they could not be opened by

[Bug 401193] Re: Segmentation fault on file dialog in 5.4.0-4ubuntu1 on Jaunty

2009-11-06 Thread rew
Oops I see the previous comments are pretty old, and must refer to a pre-release of karmic. I'm running released-karmic. -- Segmentation fault on file dialog in 5.4.0-4ubuntu1 on Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401193 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 1909297] Re: cups missing write permission (for sendmessage operation) in apparmor

2021-06-16 Thread rew
Soo any progress about this in 6 months? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909297 Title: cups missing write permission (for sendmessage operation) in apparmor To manage notificatio

[Bug 1909297] Re: cups missing write permission (for sendmessage operation) in apparmor

2021-06-28 Thread rew
Hi, I got fed up and figured out how to configure apparmor to allow it. I added # *** Added by rew. /run/systemd/notify rw, near line 108 of /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd That solves it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1918269] Re: moving tabs to a new window no longer works.

2021-05-09 Thread rew
I switched to chrome. Chrome started to have the same behavior, while IIRC, above I reported it didn't. ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://

[Bug 1727356] Re: Login screen never appears on early generation Intel GPUs (Core2 and Atom etc)

2018-10-29 Thread rew
Well that's annoying: I need an LTS for a project. (The 5 years support frame for the LTS versions is too short, but we'll have to get by) so the remaining option is to wait for 20.4, right? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 776929] Re: grub-mkconfig picks the wrong kernel.

2020-03-06 Thread rew
I don't remember writing this 9 years ago. If I run into this again I'll probably open a new request. Go ahead and close it... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776929 Title: grub-mkconf

[Bug 776929] Re: grub-mkconfig picks the wrong kernel.

2020-03-06 Thread rew
Ah, Marcus. I maintain a package myself. Somtimes you hear "that bug has been present for years and hasn't been fixed" while it is an easy fix, but you didn't know about it. Nobody reported it. So I try to report things and thereby make things better for everybody. And hopefully I won't run into

[Bug 1838975] Re: Login is slow.

2019-08-05 Thread rew
P.S. I THINK that update-motd is meant to run the updates only occasionally, and just cache the results somewhere. I'd find a reasonable strategy that if the cache is older than an hour, but less than 24h, you'd get the cached version, but a refresh is run in the background. If the cache is ol

[Bug 1838975] [NEW] Login is slow.

2019-08-05 Thread rew
Public bug reported: I've installed Ubuntu-server on a raspberry pi 3. That's my first Ubuntu install, previously I've always used Raspbian. Anyway, my impression was that ubuntu was seriously sluggish compared to raspbian. Turns out that one of the main things is that the login through ssh runs

[Bug 1838975] Re: Login is slow.

2019-08-05 Thread rew
80-esm: 0.7 seconds. 80-livepatch: .1 seconds. 90-updates-available .2 91-release-upgrade .5 95-hwe-eol .3 /usr/share/landscape/landscape-sysinfo.wrapper 2.0 My test consists of: time ssh anticlimax id (Hostnames are asterix-and-obelix characters here). and with everything enabled this now takes

[Bug 1910991] [NEW] munpack has trouble with duplicate filenames.

2021-01-11 Thread rew
Public bug reported: I have a mail with one attachment, a text/plain description and a text/html description. Both are encoded quoted printable. munpack then decides to use tempdesc.txt as the filename for both. Then when the second "create" fails, it deletes it, before the first instance tries t

[Bug 1910991] Re: munpack has trouble with duplicate filenames.

2021-01-11 Thread rew
This project seems orphaned. I couldn't find upstream sources. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910991 Title: munpack has trouble with duplicate filenames. To manage notifications abo

[Bug 1918269] [NEW] moving tabs to a new window no longer works.

2021-03-09 Thread rew
Public bug reported: Somewhat similar to bug #999632, but different and quite new. When I have a tab that I want to move to a NEW window, I used to be able to drag the tab and then when releasing it near the tab bar of another chromium window, it would snap into that window's tab list. This still

[Bug 1918269] Re: moving tabs to a new window no longer works.

2021-03-09 Thread rew
% chromium --version ERROR: ld.so: object 'libgtk3-nocsd.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded (failed to map segment from shared object): ignored. /bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8) Chromium 89.0.4389.82 snap % -- You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 1918269] Re: moving tabs to a new window no longer works.

2021-03-09 Thread rew
Nope Not fixed But I think the behaviour changed from last time I tested it (my machine crashed inbetween... Grrr..). So now, when I drag a tab it shows as a new window, and stays "attached to the mouse" until it snaps into an existing window when I come close to the tab bar in the other w

[Bug 1918269] Re: moving tabs to a new window no longer works.

2021-03-10 Thread rew
Just verfied on my other machine: Same chrome version (Chromium 89.0.4389.82 snap) but slightly different behaviour. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918269 Title: moving tabs to a new

[Bug 1915181] Re: cups crashes with SIGABRT every other printing attempt

2021-03-13 Thread rew
I'm also seeing this on a samsung printer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915181 Title: cups crashes with SIGABRT every other printing attempt To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1846334] Re: cupsd assert failure: free(): invalid pointer

2021-03-13 Thread rew
I'm also seeing this on a samsung printer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846334 Title: cupsd assert failure: free(): invalid pointer To manage notifications about this bug go to

[Bug 1893650] Re: Chromium snap causes network traffic. (Duh!)

2021-02-17 Thread rew
I just measured the network trafic that chromium is causing It is about 23000 network packets per second. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893650 Title: Chromium snap causes networ

[Bug 1893650] Re: Chromium snap causes network traffic. (Duh!)

2021-02-20 Thread rew
(earlier this week:) To debug this further I started chromium under "strace -f -o /tmp/..." : Must be run as root. Hmm. Today I tried something different. I used strace on ALL 33 chrome processes. Many did something every second or so, just one was in a tight loop. This is also the process that c

[Bug 1893650] Re: Chromium snap causes network traffic. (Duh!)

2021-02-20 Thread rew
I copied the "common" directory of ~/snap/chromium to a local filesystem (1Gb ) and created a symlink to point to the local version. When I start chromium I then get: mkdir: cannot create directory '/home/wolff/snap/chromium/common': File exists and chrome refuses to start. I then restored my b

[Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2021-01-24 Thread rew
Guys. What I don't get is that it is 2021 now, this bug has been reported (in 2019) and is tagged "fixed" and still the installer "crashed" and tells me it is this bug that is happening. This happens to me on a "clean" machine. I unplugged my harddisk, only have an SSD installed now. The i

[Bug 1913304] [NEW] Chromium crashes after about a day.

2021-01-26 Thread rew
Public bug reported: After about a day of use (or more accurately, after about half a day of non-use) my browser reports "aw snap: SIGTRAP" on every new page. Old pages still render, but a reload causes the "aw snap!" It happens on both my Ubuntu 20.04 workstations. It is not hardware on either o

[Bug 1913304] Re: Chromium crashes after about a day.

2021-01-26 Thread rew
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected focal snap ** Description changed: After about a day of use (or more accurately, after about half a day of non-use) my browser reports "aw snap: SIGTRAP" on every new page. Old pages still render, but a reload causes the "aw snap!" It

[Bug 1913304] Dependencies.txt

2021-01-26 Thread rew
apport information ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304/+attachment/5457038/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304

[Bug 1913304] Lspci.txt

2021-01-26 Thread rew
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304/+attachment/5457039/+files/Lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304 Title: Chro

[Bug 1913304] Lspci-vt.txt

2021-01-26 Thread rew
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lspci-vt.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304/+attachment/5457040/+files/Lspci-vt.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304 Title:

[Bug 1913304] Lsusb.txt

2021-01-26 Thread rew
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304/+attachment/5457041/+files/Lsusb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304 Title: Chro

[Bug 1913304] Lsusb-t.txt

2021-01-26 Thread rew
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb-t.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304/+attachment/5457042/+files/Lsusb-t.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304 Title:

[Bug 1913304] Lsusb-v.txt

2021-01-26 Thread rew
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb-v.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304/+attachment/5457043/+files/Lsusb-v.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304 Title:

[Bug 1913304] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2021-01-26 Thread rew
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304/+attachment/5457044/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304

[Bug 1913304] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2021-01-26 Thread rew
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304/+attachment/5457045/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 1913304] ProcEnviron.txt

2021-01-26 Thread rew
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304/+attachment/5457046/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913304

  1   2   3   >