I already sent an E-mail to Bruce Rogers of Novell asking about why his patch
didn't get into the upstream kernel, see:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2011-February/014414.html
You are welcome to try reaching out to anyone who might have the answer
as to why this patch never made i
I have reason to believe that the absence of this patch in upstream
kernels is a critical oversight.
I used "apt-add-repository ppa:kernel-ppa/ppa" to put the "Natty" kernel
on my Lucid test VM
$ uname -a
Linux dubnium 2.6.38-2-server #29~lucid1-Ubuntu SMP Mon Feb 7 15:09:10 UTC 2011
x86_64 GNU/
You can test that too.
First install the tools
apt-get install dpkg-dev python-software-properties
After the tools are installed run
apt-add-repository ppa:kernel-ppa/ppa"
and then edit:
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/kernel-ppa-ppa-lucid.list
Copy this line
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/kernel-ppa/ppa/u
Peter, does your news server use NFS?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579276
Title:
Lost network in KVM VM / virtio_net page allocation failure
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
Bruce Rogers of Novell replied to my E-mail saying that the patch should have
been accepted upstream and it was an oversight.
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2011-February/014428.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
daily) as the starting point
https://launchpad.net/~kernel-ppa/+archive/ppa
I put the results in the PPA
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/natty-virtio-napi
** Patch added: "virtio-net napi patch for 2.6.38"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/579276/+att
The patched 2.6.38 kernel is running and has not crashed while copying
data overnight.
$ uname -a
Linux dubnium 2.6.38-2-server #29~lucid3-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 8 21:49:57 UTC 2011
x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ date;ps -eO lstart | grep "scp -r" | egrep -v 'grep|ssh'
Wed Feb 9 05:31:07 EST 2011
1035 Tue Feb
If there is a problem fill out complaint form and place it in an envelope
addressed to...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEyFH-a-XoQ#t=1m
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579276
Title:
At this point a representative from the Ubuntu kernel team thanked me for my
work in driving this however no evidence exists that the patch has made it into
the upstream kernel yet.
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2011-February/014433.html
--
You received this bug notification bec
https://lists.linux-
foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2011-February/016320.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579276
Title:
Lost network in KVM VM / virtio_net page allocation
http://goo.gl/FQqS0
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2011-February/016321.html
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2011-February/016322.html
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2011-February/016323.html
But still not in 2.6
I started following @Linux_Kernel
http://twitter.com/Linux_Kernel
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579276
Title:
Lost network in KVM VM / virtio_net page allocation failure
--
ubuntu-
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg12364.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg12365.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579276
Title:
Lost netwo
$ git show-branch
[master] Merge branch 'usb-linus' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb-2.6
$ git log drivers/net/virtio_net.c
commit 3e9d08ec0a68f6faf718d5a7e050fe5ca0ba004f
Author: Bruce Rogers
Date: Thu Feb 10 11:03:31 2011 -0800
virtio_net: Add schedule check
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/gpsdrive/+packages
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585025
Title:
gpsdrive incompatible with gpsd
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/gpsdrive
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585025
Title:
gpsdrive incompatible with gpsd
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
@hamish Is there any chance you could either use a PPA or share your
"debian" directory from your source code?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585025
Title:
gpsdrive incompatible with
Oh, nevermind there's a debian directory in the subversion checkout.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585025
Title:
gpsdrive incompatible with gpsd
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-
This happened to me today on a Lucid VM which had not been upgraded from
a prior release ever.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445370
Title:
nscd terminates with assertion in prune_cac
Patch is now in pre-proposed.
https://launchpad.net/~kernel-ppa/+archive/pre-proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579276
Title:
Lost network in KVM VM / virtio_net page allocation
Tested Ok on my VM:
$ uname -a
Linux dubnium 2.6.32-29-server #58pre201102150902-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 15
10:16:07 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579276
Title:
In proposed now:
http://www.ubuntuupdates.org/packages/show/199704
Please test if you can:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579276
Title:
Actually, it's not in proposed yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579276
Title:
Lost network in KVM VM / virtio_net page allocation failure
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 604335 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604335
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 604335
grub-pc.postinst script fails to detect virtio vda disk in KVM guest
* You can subscribe to bug 604335 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.
I got around this on Ubuntu 10.10 by upgrading to Beautiful Soup 3.2.0.
Fetch tar file from
http://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/download/3.x/BeautifulSoup-3.2.0.tar.gz
Extract from it and overwrite the broken 3.1 version that Ubuntu 10.10 comes
with:
sudo cp BeautifulSoup.py /usr/share/p
Would it make sense to do some crowd sourcing here? If a test program
that identified if a monitor's EDID was broken and report back to a
database was distributed before a Linux that requires EDID to work was
sent out it might be useful.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
NAPI patch for 9.10 today.
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/karmic-virtio-napi
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737663
Title:
linux: 2.6.31-23.75 -proposed tracker
--
ubuntu-bu
I ran into this on a fresh installation of Natty via the alternate iso.
Took care of it this way:
Click on "Applications" in the Dock.
Type Language in the text field at the top
Click on Language Support (blue UN flag)
If you are asked about installing more software do it.
Fiddle with the controls
as a work-around:
sudo rm /etc/motd.tail
then log out and back in again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/785424
Title:
Double motd when ssh'ing into 10.04.2
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
@Joshua Lückers openssh does not configure MOTD.
$ dpkg -S /etc/update-motd.d
base-files, update-notifier-common, update-manager-core: /etc/update-motd.d
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
$ grep motd.tail /etc/update-motd.d/99-footer
# motd.tail is reserved for the admin to append static
[ -f /etc/motd.tail ] && cat /etc/motd.tail || true
$ dpkg -S /etc/update-motd.d/99-footer
base-files: /etc/update-motd.d/99-footer
** Package changed: openssh (Ubuntu) => update-notifier (Ubun
Manual page update-motd(5)
Executable scripts in /etc/update-motd.d/* are executed by pam_motd(8)
as the root user at each login, and this information is concatenated in
/var/run/motd. The order of script execution is determined by the run-
parts(8) --lsbsysinit option
After building a new VM from ubuntu-10.04.2-server-amd64.iso it looks
like the issue is in one of these:
landscape-client (1.5.0.1-0ubuntu0.10.04.0) lucid; urgency=low
* New upstream version
- Fix smart-update failing its very first run (LP: #562496)
- Depend on pythonX.Y-dbus and pytho
** Package changed: base-files (Ubuntu) => landscape-client (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/785424
Title:
Double motd when ssh'ing into 10.04.2
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
1. Create new VM from ubuntu-10.04.2-server-amd64.iso
2. log in. Notice motd is displayed twice
3. log out and back in again. Notice motd is displayed only once
4. apply updates. Log out and back in again. Notice motd is displayed
twice.
5. remove /etc/motd.tail and log out and back in again
2. log in. Notice motd is displayed twice
This isn't true, there's some other one-time message displayed.
Running
sudo strace -o apt.str -s 4096 -f aptitude dist-upgrade
on a fresh VM shows that the issue is in the postinstall script of the
initscripts package.
sysvinit-2.87dsf/debian/initscri
sysvinit (2.87dsf-4ubuntu17) lucid; urgency=low
* debian/initscripts/etc/init.d/sendsigs: additional upstart jobs may be
/started/ on shutdown after this script has first been invoked; so don't
assume the list of known jobs is constant, instead requery initctl before
each killall5 -C
Looks like the code in sysvinit-2.87dsf/debian/initscripts.postinst that
tries to preserve an existing motd by turning it into a motd.tail only
makes sense if /etc/motd isn't already symlink to a generated file.
#
# Set up motd stuff, putting variable file in /var/run/
#
if [ ! -f /etc/motd.tail ]
** Description changed:
When I ssh into my 10.04.2 servers I get two motd print outs. The first
one appears to be current-ish, but the second one is way out of date.
The first motd contains this:
- System information as of Fri May 20 01:36:13 EDT 2011
+ System information as of Fri M
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 634387 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634387
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 634387
creates motd.tail on postinst, which could mean duplicate entries in
/etc/motd
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Looks like the code in sysvinit-2.87dsf/debian/initscripts.postinst that
tries to preserve an existing motd by turning it into a motd.tail only
makes sense if /etc/motd isn't already symlink to a generated file.
#
# Set up motd stuff, putting variable file in /var/run/
#
if [ ! -f /etc/motd.tail ]
This is the update which broke it:
sysvinit (2.87dsf-4ubuntu17) lucid; urgency=low
* debian/initscripts/etc/init.d/sendsigs: additional upstart jobs may be
/started/ on shutdown after this script has first been invoked; so don't
assume the list of known jobs is constant, instead requery
FWIW I'm running it on an HP Proliant DL165 G5 with KVM/qemu and two
very busy VM guests.
$ uptime
17:00:02 up 1 day, 2:30, 4 users, load average: 17.40, 12.19, 12.28
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
$ uname -rsvmo
Linux 2.6.38-9-server #43~ppa1~lucid1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 24 23:20:27 UTC 2011
x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ lsb_release -ds
Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772096
@psusi Oh, you saved my desktop! How can I ever repay you?
Admittedly I copied your dmraid packing into a PPA by itself because I
don't like PPAs with too many different packages.
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/natty-dmraid
But as they say across the point "works a treat!
I built 10.10 with LVM on DMRAID because GRUB2 lets you boot from that
without any /boot filesystems.
I upgraded to 11.04 and *kaboom*
I installed the PPA with the newer version of DMRAID while in a chroot
booted off a usb stick with Gentoo amd64 stage1 made with unetbootin.
Had to remember how t
@Pete Ashdown yes, there is a workaround.
First one of the things that goes wrong is that ethernet media
autoconfiguration takes up time and causes network interfaces to take so
long to come up there is the possibility that that will interfere with
bonding configuring. You can hardcode the media
Too many IRL fires today. I just threw this up for now.
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/pure-ftpd
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746588
Title:
Fix a STARTTLS flaw in
Please SRU for 10.04 thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760223
Title:
ucarp adverts are delayed for twice as long as you ask for
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
Thanks, I'll test on lucid-proposed and let you know how it goes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760223
Title:
ucarp adverts are delayed for twice as long as you ask for
--
ubuntu-b
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767267
Title:
X.509if vulnerability in Wireshark® version 1.2.0 to 1.2.15
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lis
Fixed typo in title:
s/emply/empty
** Summary changed:
- Python-apt shows emply origins object
+ Python-apt shows empty origins object
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704595
Title:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ucarp
Impact: the time between advertisements is twice as long as the amount
of time ucarp is configured to use.
This is 100% fixed in ucarp 1.5.2 upstream.
TEST CASE: configure ucarp to send advertisements every five seconds and
use tcpdump to display
** Patch added: "ucarp_1.5.1.1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760223/+attachment/2032477/+files/ucarp_1.5.1.1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760223
Title:
ucarp
OPSI-1209
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760223
Title:
ucarp adverts are delayed for twice as long as you ask for
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://li
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: ucarp
Impact: the time between advertisements is twice as long as the amount
of time ucarp is configured to use.
This is 100% fixed in ucarp 1.5.2 upstream.
TEST CASE: configure ucarp to send advertisements every five seconds and
us
Public bug reported:
Right off the top, here's the smoking gun:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/7/20/4596144 "[inode
not file system] Shrinker fixes for XFS"
Back story: kernel 2.6.32.12 does not have xfs_reclaim_inode_shrink() but
2.6.32.13 and subsequent kernels do, see:
ht
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706136
Title:
kernel 2.6.32.13 introduced buggy xfs_reclaim_inode_shrink() function
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://
** Description changed:
Right off the top, here's the smoking gun:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/7/20/4596144 "[inode
not file system] Shrinker fixes for XFS"
Back story: kernel 2.6.32.12 does not have xfs_reclaim_inode_shrink() but
2.6.32.13 and subsequent kernel
** Summary changed:
- kernel 2.6.32.13 introduced buggy xfs_reclaim_inode_shrink() function
+ e1001e driver requires more memory than the default
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706136
** Description changed:
- Right off the top, here's the smoking gun:
- http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/7/20/4596144 "[inode
- not file system] Shrinker fixes for XFS"
+ The calculations that set vm.min_free_kbytes are too parsimonious. This
+ leads to log messages that start w
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 591947 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591947
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 591947
Copying large files to NFS mount blocks system
* You can subscribe to bug 591947 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs
The calculations that set vm.min_free_kbytes are too parsimonious. This
leads to log messages that start with the text:
fooprog: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x4020
and go on for dozens of lines.
By doubling the value set in vm.min_free_kbytes I was able to squelch
those messages.
See
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 591947 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591947
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/591947
run: sysctl vm.min_free_kbytes
and then take the number of KB output from that and multiply it by two.
Then run:
sysctl -w vm.min_free_kbyt
run: sysctl vm.min_free_kbytes
and then take the number of KB output from that and multiply it by two.
Then run:
sysctl -w vm.min_free_kbytes=new-number-of-KB
(substitute the value you calculated for "new-number-of-KB" in my case
it was 16266 KB doubled to 32532 KB)
To make this persistent over
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 591947 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591947
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 591947
Copying large files to NFS mount blocks system
* You can subscribe to bug 591947 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs
Additional report of this issue
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1452659
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591947
Title:
Copying large files to NFS mount blocks system
--
ubunt
This is probably not a regression. I'm seeing both Lucid and Jaunty KVM
guests with this problem too. The KVM host is running Lucid.
Jaunty VM guest with virtio IRQ page allocation failure:
https://gist.github.com/793522
Lucid VM guest with virtio IRQ page allocation failure
https://gist.github.
Another report with the same pattern: network driver IRQ happens before
page allocation failure.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=10393393
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591947
I found a Karmic KVM VM guest with virtio where it also happened.
https://gist.github.com/793807
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591947
Title:
Copying large files to NFS mount blocks s
How min_free_kbytes default size is calculated. Note that the comments
mention network bandwidth.
https://gist.github.com/793880
The comments say:
min_free_kbytes = 4 * sqrt(lowmem_kbytes), for better accuracy:
min_free_kbytes = sqrt(lowmem_kbytes * 16)
So perhaps
min_free_kbytes = sqrt(lowm
@Aaz, if you run the non-PAE 32-bit kernel does the issue go away? I
know that you won't be able to use all 4GB RAM without PAE, I'm just
interested in testing PAE vs. non-PAE.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://b
I can't test; my only AMD box is now converted to 64-bit in reaction to
this issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666180
Title:
KVM does not boot Ubuntu i386 10.04 minimal server ima
This patch is in 2.6.37.1 as of Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:03:31 +
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579276
Title:
Lost network in KVM VM / virtio_net page allocation failure
--
ubuntu-bu
Yesterday a new ticket and branch stable-v2.6.32.29 was created with
this patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/linux/+bug/723819
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=rtg/ubuntu-
lucid.git;a=blob;f=drivers/net/virtio_net.c;h=fb09effbfb63f5e080a87bfc80a823f83c363810;hb=refs/heads/stable-
@Mark Favas - dude, it's not about fixing things, it's about declaring
them fixed. Fiat bug fixes are what Canonical and the other
Ubuntunistas do best.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/4
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 579276 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579276
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 579276
Lost network in KVM VM / virtio_net page allocation failure
* You can subscribe to bug 579276 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubunt
This was fixed, but not in Ubuntu yet.
See:
"udp: use limited socket backlog"
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2010/3/3/6271096
Bug#576838: virtio network crashes again
starting with comment 184
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592187#184
LP#661212 "crash after ksw
Oh, sorry, I hadn't seen this yet:
KVM: add schedule check to napi_enable call
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2010/6/4/6278660
If you want to get this into Lucid make a debdiff
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/Debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because yo
Thinking about this a bit more, the "udp: use limited socket backlog" is
still necessary since the "page allocation failures" from nic drivers
problem affects real hardware with e100, e1000 and e1000e nic drivers.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
Debdiff containing two patches:
* [PATCH] KVM: add schedule check to napi_enable call
- http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2010/6/4/6278660
* [PATCH 4/8] udp: use limited socket backlog
- http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2010/3/3/6271096
** Patch added: "li
** Patch removed: "linux_2.6.32-28.55ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/579276/+attachment/1828276/+files/linux_2.6.32-28.55ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
Oh, I see what you mean by "can't integrate backlog for every protocol".
I rebuilt the debdiff with only the virtio driver patch and deleted the
old debdiff with two patches.
Debdiff containing patch:
* [PATCH] KVM: add schedule check to napi_enable call
- http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive
How to install the debdiff:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuPackagingGuide/BuildFromDebdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579276
Title:
Lost network in KVM VM / virtio_net page allocat
To get any further with this bug report read
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
and try to do what it says.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579276
Title:
Lost network in KVM
I did the debdiff, the update to the bug report description for the SRU
and subscribed https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sru
Now this needs sponsorship.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess
In the meantime I started this PPA with the patch
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/lucid
I'm actively testing two concurrent "scp -r" of > 200 GB from NFS
directory to remote host which crashed the VM on the stock kernel.
$ uname -a
Linux dubnium 2.6.32-28-server #55ubuntu1~ppa3~lucid1-Ubuntu SMP Sun Feb 6
01:03:25 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
To test with the PPA run
sudo apt-get ins
486.5 GB transmitted without locking up.
$ ifconfig eth0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:36:1c:fe:1a
inet addr:192.168.1.105 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::216:36ff:fe1c:fe1a/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apparmor
Impact: Lack of a single AppArmor base profile rule renders glibc is unable to
perform functions on Hardy that are available on Lucid.
Patch: TBD
Reproducing: trapping a segfault fails; see
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=10043474
Regr
--
AppArmor on Hardy Interferes with glibc Access to /proc/self/maps
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668479
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.c
debdiff with the missing AppArmor base profile rule added.
** Patch added: "debdiff with the missing AppArmor base profile rule added."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/668479/+attachment/1716207/+files/apparmor_2.1%2B1075-0ubuntu9.3.debdiff
** Patch removed: "debdiff
debdiff with the missing AppArmor base profile rule added.
** Patch added: "debdiff with the missing AppArmor base profile rule added."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/668479/+attachment/1716210/+files/apparmor_2.1%2B1075-0ubuntu9.3.debdiff
** Description changed:
@Kees Cook - The https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Examples
section only offers a single example of how the SRU process works for a
package in main.
That example is LP #173082
Does LP #173082 actually fulfill all the requirements listed in
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: apparmor
Impact: Lack of a single AppArmor base profile rule renders glibc unable to
perform functions on Hardy that are available on Lucid.
+ Addressed: apparmor 2.5-0ubuntu3 (on Lucid) possibly earlier too.
Patch:
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Instead of
QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=alsa /usr/bin/kvm.bin $@
use
QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=alsa exec /usr/bin/kvm.bin $@
also in /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf
# QEMU implements an extension for providing audio over a VNC connection,
# though if your VNC client does not support it, your only chance for getting
# sound outpu
Also of interest:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_Virtualization_problems#Audio_output
--
QEMU_AUDIO_DRV set to none by libvirtd in Lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591489
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Same problem with
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation GT218
[GeForce 210] [10de:0a65] (rev a2)
Monitor: DS-275W
Raw EDID bytes:
00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 1a 36 fa 00 00 00 00 00
1c 13 01 03 a5 3c 22 78 e2 6f b1 a7 55 4c 9e 25
0c 50 54 00 00 00 01 01 01 01 01 01
Another link for my own benefit
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html
--
Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
an interim fix I did a backport of GlusterFS 3.0.4 from Maverick to Lucid
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/glusterfs3
so my systems are safe.
This is the upstream Changelog message:
commit c55134fc0c5ebe952de12757d5c53d463a9c21b5
Author: Anand Avati
Date: Thu Feb 18 10:28:06 2010 +
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/glusterfs3
so my systems are safe.
This is the upstream Changelog message:
commit c55134fc0c5ebe952de12757d5c53d463a9c21b5
Author: Anand Avati
Date: Thu Feb 18 10:28:06 2010 +
- server_writev: add proper iobuf into iobref
401 - 500 of 624 matches
Mail list logo
