** Description changed:
== Regression details ==
- Discovered in version: 12.04 LTS
- Last known good version: depends. 9.04 Jaunty the last one before a
work-around became necessary. 11.10 was the last one that worked when you used
the work-around.
+ Discovered in version: 2.12.14-5ubuntu2 (U
Verified on natty-proposed.
$ dpkg -l | grep libvirt | awk '{print $2 " " $3}'
libvirt-bin 0.8.8-1ubuntu6.6
libvirt0 0.8.8-1ubuntu6.6
python-libvirt 0.8.8-1ubuntu6.6
$ lsb_release -ds
Ubuntu 11.04
$ uname -srvi
Linux 2.6.38-13-generic #52-Ubuntu SMP Tue Nov 8 16:53:51 UTC 2011 x86_64
$ cat /var/lo
http://askubuntu.com/questions/79347/what-is-the-policy-for-updating-
grub-pc-in-lts
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895
Title:
grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot e
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 563895 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895
Colin ACKed LP: #563895 so I'm closing this one as a dup of that one.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 563895
grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists
--
You received this
@vorlon please read:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1873424
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692691
Title:
update-grub thinks my kernel is a xen one
To manage notifications
In comment #104 Serge wrote that he did the verification on Maverick.
Based on that I'll update the tags.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done-maverick
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
clint-fewbar, Thanks, I'll keep that in mind.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350936
Title:
Should shut down domains on system shutdown
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
Adding this link for my convenience
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/grub/0.97-29ubuntu60.10.04.2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692691
Title:
update-grub thinks my kernel i
Verified on Lucid
$ lsb_release -ds
Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS
$ uname -svrm
Linux 2.6.38-12-server #51~lucid1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Sep 29 20:09:53 UTC 2011 x86_64
$ grep QEM /proc/cpuinfo
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.0
$ df -h / | tail -n 1 | awk '{ print $1 }'
/dev/vda2
$ sudo apt-get pur
Repeated verification on VM guest with only 2.6.32 kernel with the same
results.
$ uname -svrm
Linux 2.6.32-35-server #78-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 11 16:26:12 UTC 2011 x86_64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
http://askubuntu.com/questions/80224/does-grub2-require-an-optional-
scsi-feature
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604335
Title:
grub-pc.postinst script fails to detect virtio vda disk
Thanks Clint.
Are there plans to improve this section?
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Verification
I especially find it difficult to know if something is being expected of
the bug reporter (or subscribers) or not.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
Oh, I just found this:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692691
Title:
update-grub thinks my kernel is a xen one
To manage notif
@tekinozbek Applying a new sysvinit (2.87dsf-4ubuntu17.4) on an ancient
Ubuntu 10.04.1 when Ubuntu 10.04.3 is the current one will only
accomplish creating a system that no one else (hopefully) in the world
is using and does things no person could possibly predict.
If you want to apply the fix:
su
I just applied updates, see below for some details. I'm not sure if
they included the fix that was provided for this ticket or not.
Now the unity-2d-panel still does not display and also plymouthd just
crashed. I'm going to let apport open another ticket.
$ grep "status installed" /var/log/dpkg
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862421
Title:
plymouthd crashed with SIGSEGV in
ply_event_loop_process_pending_events()
To manage notifications abou
Attached output of xpdyinfo from QEMU VM guest in 24-bit color mode.
** Attachment added: "xdpyinfo.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/862421/+attachment/2480788/+files/xdpyinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
The new bug report with the plymouthd crash is LP: #862421
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/843432
Title:
unity-2d-panel crashed with SIGSEGV
To manage notifications about this bug go
I should mention that my previous comment about 16bit depth was while
testing the cirrus graphics card emulation.
The version of the X server incremented recently causing a minor change
in xdpyinfo output. Attached is a current copy of xdpyinfo from
KVM/Qemu guest running with cirrus graphics emu
When my KVM/Qemu VM guest is run with cirrus graphics emulation in
24-bit color depth mode none of the screenshots attached to this ticket
look like what I'm seeing.
The attached screenshot shows the unity-2d-launcher icons are displayed
correctly but it overlaps the menubar at the upper left beca
You are supposed to be able to use the -N (--nice) option to ntpd but
upstream ntp bug report shows it doesn't work:
http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1230
Testing on 11.04
$ lsb_release -ds
Ubuntu 11.04
$ uname -srv
Linux 2.6.38-10-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 28 15:07:17 UTC 2011
$ ntpd --
I thought it might be because the setpriority() call was tried after
permissions were dropped but running as UID 0 doesn't change the
"niceness" as seen in ps output
$ (ps alx | head -1) ; (ps alx | grep ntpd) | grep -v grep
F UID PID PPID PRI NIVSZ RSS WCHAN STAT TTYTIME COM
When run with -N and -u 117:126
Aug 19 08:14:22 linux ntpd[14158]: sched_setscheduler(): Operation not permitted
Aug 19 08:14:22 linux ntpd[14158]: setpriority() error: Permission denied
Aug 19 08:14:22 linux ntpd[14158]: set_process_priority: No way found to
improve our priority
Freaking apparm
I switched AppArmor for ntpd into "complain" mode
$ sudo aa-complain /usr/sbin/ntpd
Setting /usr/sbin/ntpd to complain mode.
after that the ntpd "-N" flag started to work.
$ (ps alx | head -1) ; (ps alx | grep ntpd) | grep -v grep
F UID PID PPID PRI NIVSZ RSS WCHAN STAT TTYT
Oops, didn't read Jamie's posts until just now, thanks Jamie!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229632
Title:
ntpd should run niced
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:/
Can an SRU for Lucid be done for the AppArmor modification too?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229632
Title:
ntpd should run niced
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https
@Jamie given that the default ntpd configuration is to poll and the
stability of the clock affects the polling interval[1] I would strongly
suggest the default ntpd configuration be adjusted to run with the "-N"
option since it would cut down on the load of NTP servers if polling was
less frequent.
The minimum sleep time between ntpd upstream requests is 64 seconds.
With 64000 clients an ntpd server must answer one thousand requests per
second.
If the client ntpd clocks are very stable they will ratchet back to one
request every 1024 seconds (about 17 minutes) so the same 6400 clients
would
Try with and with out ntpd "-N" option.
Use "ntpq -p" or "ntpdc -c peers" to view the polling interval. Both
reports have a "poll" column which is the sleep time in seconds between
requests being sent out over the network to the upstream NTP source.
The "poll" column will eventually change from 6
I think grub-pc is also affected by similar device name length issues.
I have a Sun Fire X4500 where the firmware is so strange only two of the
48 disk drives are exposed to the BIOS as boot disks. Ubuntu sees them
as /dev/sdy and /dev/sdag
I was able to shoe-horn an installation of 10.04.3 on by
I need to see what the impact is on LP: #604335
At the very least I may need to roll this up with
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/working-grub2-on-virtio-disk-for-lts
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
Oh, this is for grub1 not grub2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456776
Title:
No second os showing up in d-i auto resize
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.lau
Ah, my issue is really Bug #692691
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456776
Title:
No second os showing up in d-i auto resize
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.
Can't use grub2 on /dev/vda on LTS and can't use grub1 on /dev/vda with
2.6.38 backport on LTS too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692691
Title:
update-grub thinks my kernel is a xen
This is not a Xen-only issue as qemu-kvm is also affected.
Remember this? Bug #604335
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692691
Title:
update-grub thinks my kernel is a xen one
To manag
This is not a Xen-only issue as qemu-kvm is also affected.
My current work-around is to use OpsCode Chef to detect if grub1 in
installed and replace /usr/sbin/update-grub with a working version.
* QEMU guest environment:
$ lsb_release -sd
Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS
$ uname -srv
Linux 2.6.38-11-server #
Another "me too". Installed from 2nd beta 32-bit iso today and applied all the
updates, switched to pae kernel.
$ uname -svrp
Linux 3.0.0-12-generic-pae #19-Ubuntu SMP Fri Sep 23 23:10:56 UTC 2011 i686
$ lsb_release -ds
Ubuntu oneiric (development branch)
$ lspci -nn | grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compati
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 765677 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765677
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869941
Title:
gwibber-accoun
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 765677 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765677
** Changed in: gwibber (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8
I think my issue is slightly different than the one being discussed here
even if it's the same software defect. I'm going to open a new bug
report and mark this one as a duplicate of that. Hope nobody gets too
upset but I am testing on Oneiric and this bug report was open on Natty.
** Descriptio
** Tags added: oneiric testcase
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712626
Title:
gwibber-accounts crashed with IndexError in
on_facebook_auth_title_change(): list index out of range
To
$ dpkg -l gwibber | tail -n 1 | awk '{print $2 " " $3}'
gwibber 3.2.0.1-0ubuntu1
$ lsb_release -sd
Ubuntu oneiric (development branch)
$ uname -srv
Linux 3.0.0-12-generic #19-Ubuntu SMP Fri Sep 23 21:18:13 UTC 2011
1. Install 32-bit x86 Oneiric beta (I used the alternate installer iso)
2. Apply al
Thanks! :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712626
Title:
gwibber-accounts crashed with IndexError in
on_facebook_auth_title_change(): list index out of range
To manage notifications
I will be on vacation through Jan 5, 2012. Please do not ask for testing
until after that date, thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/896388
Title:
restart broken - Regression Caused
I will be on vacation through Jan 5, 2012. Please do not ask for
testing until after that date, thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895
Title:
grub2 fails to boot or install wh
I'm seeing "not enough MMIO resources for SR-IOV" when I use "max_vfs=7"
on:
$ uname -srvm
Linux 3.2.0-8-generic #15-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jan 11 13:57:44 UTC 2012 x86_64
$ lsb_release -ds
Ubuntu precise (development branch)
$ lspci -nn | grep Eth
03:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 8
There is a possibility that a necessary patch (based on a statement by
Linus) was vetoed by Bjorn Helgaas bjorn.helgaas@hp@ com
Start of thread:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128392923724817&w=2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
The OP has "redhat-bugs #652210" as the Red Hat bug but that is wrong.
That one was closed with "Status: CLOSED NOTABUG "
This one is much more interesting:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523341
I think the story is:
1. BIOS doesn't know about SR-IOV Virtual Functions so it does no
@Sergey Svishchev (svs)
Seems I should have read your comments more closely.
I just noticed the part about blacklisting the igbvf module, so it won't
attach to VF devices.
I will test that on 12.04 soon.
My PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/kvm-libvirt-lts
did get updat
Works!
1. install 12.04 LTS (no PPA's or other modifications)
2. configure igb via
/etc/modprobe.d/igb.conf contains:
options igb max_vfs=7
/etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-igbvf.conf
blacklist igbvf
3. put those configuration files in the initrd
sudo update-initramfs -k all -t -u
4. reboot
5. l
I'm trying with 12.04 LTS KVM host and guest.
RHEL 6 documentation says: {{ Secure device assignment also requires
interrupt remapping support. If a platform does not support interrupt
remapping, device assignment will fail. To use device assignment without
interrupt remapping support in a develop
allow_unsafe_assigned_interrupts=1 does work:
$ grep QEMU /proc/cpuinfo
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.0
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.0
$ lspci | grep Fun
00:05.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82576 Virtual Function (rev 01)
--
You received this bug notif
Thanks Colin Watson, you do such great work!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895
Title:
grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists
To manage notifications about thi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 900512 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/900512
@kensay-kavi you need to run:
apport-collect 902722
to complete this bug report. Otherwise it's dead.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 900512
ia32-libs-multiarch:i386 is not installable
-
epairing this is why I am doing this work.
I have been working on remediating the fix. You can see my current work in this
PPA.
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/nrpe-unbreak-lp-600941
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
$ grep -i sometimes /etc/init.d/nagios-nrpe-server
#sometimes deleting the pidfile fails. cleanup afterwards.
That got past QA? It looks like a red flag to me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
I'm back, feel free to ask for non-developer QA testing from me.
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/896388
Title:
restart broken - Regression Caused by LP: #600941
To manage noti
Interesting dates in the life of LP: #563895
March 21, 2010 - Reported as Debian #574863
April 4, 2010 (elapsed 14 days) Reported as LP: #563895
June 2, 2010 (elapsed 73 days) Fix committed into Debian and Debian bug closed.
July 5, 2010 (elapsed 106 days) Fix committed in Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick)
Sorry, Colin, it's not about you. I'll explain later if I get the
chance.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895
Title:
grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists
To
The following non-developers have made comments in this bug indicating they
understand at least a little bit about this problem:
* https://launchpad.net/~alvind
* https://launchpad.net/~nigelbabu
* https://launchpad.net/~listmail
* https://launchpad.net/~berni
* https://launchpad.net/~bugs-sehe
*
> Why aren't they testing now? What could be wrong?
Wait! Maybe it's that they are all stupid! Yeah, that's it they're too
stupid to test. Don't worry stupid people, I'll do your testing for
you.
nutz@lp-563895:~$ apt-cache policy grub-pc
grub-pc:
Installed: 1.98-1ubuntu13
Candidate: 1.98-1
nutz@lp-563895:~$ sudo lvcreate -s -l 437 /dev/vg0/lv0
Logical volume "lvol0" created
nutz@lp-563895:~$ sudo vgs
VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree
vg01 3 1 wz--n- 6.00g0
nutz@lp-563895:~$ sudo lvs
LVVG Attr LSize Origin Snap% Move Log Copy% Convert
lv0 vg0 ow
The system rebooted with the snapshot. Everything works. Thanks.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895
Title:
@dblade it's the price that you pay for not doing the SRU work yourself.
The reward for being the one to do the work is that you don't have to
listen to the ones who are doing it for you. Why not spend some time
learning how to do the work?
I have some information for you:
http://www.youtube.com/
@Colin: that will not work for /dev/vda on Ubuntu 10.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895
Title:
grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot exists
To manage notificatio
Oh, right after I wrote that I remembered LP: #623609
Does 1.98-1ubuntu13 fix that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895
Title:
grub2 fails to boot or install when an LVM snapshot ex
I tested with Ubuntu 12.04 today and the nscd work-around no longer
works. The failure occurs with or without running nscd on Ubuntu 12.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252
Title:
** Tags added: precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252
Title:
NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2
suexec, and atd
To manage notifications abo
DEP-5: Patches pushed to the Debian Policy repository
http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2012/02/msg00078.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350
Title:
LDAP account via SSL can
The DEP-5 specification v1.0 was released on Monday February 22, 2012 as
part of debian-policy_3.9.3.0_all.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350
Title:
LDAP account via SSL cannot
PPA for the patch suggested by Howard Chu's in comment #73
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/howard-chu-libgcrypt11-patch-
for-ldap-clients
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
According to Andreas Metzler
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2011/02/msg6.html
{{ GnuTLS upstream has added support for different crypto backends in
2.11.x and has chosen nettle as prefered backend (2.10.x is using
libgcrypt). }}
I have started to experiment with using a gnutls26 package
This bug no longer pertains to be as it is opened against libgcrypt11
now and to me this is now a GnuTLS backend selection bug.
I put the patched gnutls into this PPA as my preferred solution.
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/gnutls26-with-nettle
--
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
If your account is an LDAP one and your LDAP client connects to its LDAP server
via SSL then running setuid programs from your account fail since libgcrypt11
is horribly broken and upstream GnuTLS no longer recommends using it as the
backend crypto library:
http://lists.deb
** Description changed:
If your account is an LDAP one and your LDAP client connects to its LDAP
server via SSL then running setuid programs from your account fail since
libgcrypt11 is horribly broken and upstream GnuTLS no longer recommends using
it as the backend crypto library:
http://li
I meant to type "no longer pertains to me" not "to be".
I am unsubscribing from this bug report.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252
Title:
NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applica
PPA with patch for the benefit of other affected people:
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/gnutls26-with-nettle
** Description changed:
If your account is an LDAP one and your LDAP client connects to its LDAP
server via SSL then running setuid programs from your account fail since
@ubuntu-treblig I do so appreciate your wisdom.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350
Title:
LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is
rebuilt with nettle no
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 926350 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 423252
NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec,
and atd
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 926350
LDAP account
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 926350 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 926350
LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt
with nettle not libgcrypt11
--
You received this bug notification because y
This will never be fixed in Lucid and Lucid has the "use nscd" work-
around.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252
Title:
NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo,
Debian bug for this issue:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658739
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #658739
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658739
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
I tried installing sssd and the error message only prints the first
line:
$ sudo id
sudo: setresuid(ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID): Operation not permitted
The sssd.conf file is a copy of one that works on CentOS 6.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
That was with the libgcrypt11 GnuTLS package (2.12.14-5ubuntu2).
Once I switch back to a GnuTLS with nettle then sssd works, supporting
sudo.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350
Titl
** Summary changed:
- noise from /etc/cron.daily/mdadm
+ /etc/cron.daily/mdadm fails if mdadm monitor daemon is already running
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920324
Title:
/etc/cron
** Description changed:
+ Reproducing:
+
+ 1. Install Ubuntu 12.04 with md raid.
+
+ My system has:
+
+ $ cat /proc/mdstat
+ Personalities : [raid1] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
[raid10]
+ md1 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0]
+ 522048 blocks [2/2] [UU]
+
+
Title was updated based on advice in:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages
** Description changed:
Reproducing:
1. Install Ubuntu 12.04 with md raid.
My system has:
- $ cat /proc/mdstat
- Personalities : [raid1] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4
** Description changed:
Reproducing:
1. Install Ubuntu 12.04 with md raid.
My system has:
$ cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
[raid10]
md1 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0]
522048 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md0 : ac
** Summary changed:
- Please sync mdadm 3.2.3-2 from Debian unstable (main) (was:
/etc/cron.daily/mdadm fails if mdadm monitor daemon is already running)
+ Please sync mdadm 3.2.3-2 from Debian unstable (main) (multiple regressions)
** Description changed:
+ Looking at the list of fixes upgradi
PPA of mdadm 3.2.3-2 for Ubuntu 12.04
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/mdadm-3.2.3-2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920324
Title:
Please sync mdadm 3.2.3-2 from Debian
I have a server running with the 3.2.3-2 from my PPA now.
$ lsb_release -ds
Ubuntu precise (development branch)
$ uname -srvi
Linux 3.2.0-14-generic #23-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 3 23:17:59 UTC 2012 x86_64
$ ps ax | grep mdadm | grep -v grep
15618 ?Ss 0:00 /sbin/mdadm --monitor --pid-file
/
Successful reboot of a second system, this one has ext2 /boot on RAID-1
md0 and LVM on RAID-0 md1
$ cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid0] [raid1]
md1 : active raid0 sda2[0] sdb2[1]
1953130496 blocks super 1.2 512k chunks
md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1]
194548 blocks supe
uname -srvm
Linux 2.6.38-13-server #56~lucid1-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 14 03:35:38 UTC 2012 x86_64
apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.38-13-server
linux-image-2.6.38-13-server:
Installed: 2.6.38-13.56~lucid1
Candidate: 2.6.38-13.56~lucid1
Version table:
*** 2.6.38-13.56~lucid1 0
400 http:/
Let me see if I understand. The reason this bug is not going to be
fixed is:
* Only some of the software distributed by Debian and Canonical under the GNU
General Public License Version 2 includes a clause that says you can use future
versions of that license AND
* Some of the libraries have co
ubuntu-treblig: go to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls26/+bug/926350
and search for: Colin Watson: Needs Information on 2012-02-11
then explain just how that information will be provided.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
ubuntu-treblig: when you can answer my question then I will be able to
answer yours.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350
Title:
LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until
I'm beginning to suspect that the best answer is to not ask any more
questions.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350
Title:
LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnut
The answer to "why didn't this get into Lucid?" is nobody did the SRU
process:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563895
Title:
gru
Attached debdiff for Lucid
** Patch added: "grub2_1.98-1ubuntu12.1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/563895/+attachment/2589256/+files/grub2_1.98-1ubuntu12.1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification:
+
+ Impact: When /boot and / are in an LVM VG and a snapshot is made of an
+ LVM LV in that VG the system will not boot and grub can not be modified
+ (updated, reinstalled.)
+
+ Testcase:
+
Binary package hint: grub2
Steps to reproduce:
101 - 200 of 624 matches
Mail list logo
