[Bug 1551393] Re: Duplicated pam_u2f.so

2017-11-11 Thread nicoo
Hi, It seems the package `pam-u2f` should be simply removed, as it is unmaintained and provides the same software as `libpam-u2f` (which is the correct name, according to the Debian convention). (For information, I maintain libpam-u2f, libu2f-host and libu2f-server in Debian) -- You received th

[Bug 1387908] Re: [udev] FIDO u2f security keys should be supported out of the box

2017-11-11 Thread nicoo
making this package installed by default, as it seems more up-to-date than the current solution in Ubuntu, and would let us cooperate (between Debian and Ubuntu, but also with upstream) and avoid fixing the same problems in many places. Best, nicoo -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1499783] Re: Add udev rules for others U2F tokens

2017-11-11 Thread nicoo
the current solution in Ubuntu, as we could cooperate (but between Debian and Ubuntu, but also with upstream) and avoid fixing the same problems in many places. Best, nicoo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 1318678] Re: haveged consumes 100% cpu when used with -w > 4067

2016-07-05 Thread nicoo
Hi, This has been fixed, along with a number of other issues, in the Debian package. I attached the relevant patch, but you might want to consider tracking the upstream Debian package. Best, nicoo ** Patch added: "0003-Don-t-set-a-watermark-higher-than-pool-size.patch"

[Bug 1318678] Re: haveged consumes 100% cpu when used with -w > 4067

2016-07-05 Thread nicoo
PS: The solved issues include launchpad bugs #1540978 (and its duplicate #915218). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318678 Title: haveged consumes 100% cpu when used with -w > 4067 To

[Bug 1548342] [NEW] No debconf answer for autologin

2016-02-22 Thread nicoo
Public bug reported: There are no debconf answers for configuring autologin (nor `greeter-hide-users` for that matter). Would it be possible to add this? ** Affects: lightdm Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: lightdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: