** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16316266/Xorg.0.log
--
xorg fails to generate a working /etc/X11/xorg.conf on Compaq Armada 7800
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251676
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.old"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16316275/Xorg.0.log.old
--
xorg fails to generate a working /etc/X11/xorg.conf on Compaq Armada 7800
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251676
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
No, that xorg.conf fails also. Since the attached log mentions "vesa",
I double checked the xorg.conf and it does specify S3.
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.test"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16321104/Xorg.0.log.test
--
xorg fails to generate a working /etc/X11/xorg.conf on Compaq Armada
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# updatedb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# locate xorg.conf
/etc/X11/xorg.conf
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.606
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.bu
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.failsafe
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.failsafe.bak
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.test
/usr/share/displayconfig-gtk/xorg.conf.fallback
/usr/share/man/man5/xorg.conf.5.gz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/X11# ls -al xorg.*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1292 2008-07-26 00:14 xorg.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4033 2006-12-30 11:22 xorg.conf.606
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1225 2008-07-24 02:01 xorg.conf.bu
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1238 2008-07-26 00:17 xorg.conf.failsafe
-rw-r--r-- 1 root roo
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 02:10:44AM -, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> Hi mckemie,
>
>
> Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
> better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity
> in it recently. We were won
** Attachment added: "xorg.conf not working on Armada 7800"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16293188/xorg.conf
--
xorg fails to generate a working /etc/X11/xorg.conf on Compaq Armada 7800
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251676
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Public bug reported:
On a fresh install of 8.04.1 on a Compaq Armada 7800, the generated
/etc/X11/xorg.conf does not work. Earlier versions (7.04, 7.10) DO
generate a working xorg.conf. The work around is to install xorg.conf
from an older install. I have saved the non-working xorg.conf. I had
working xorg.conf (from 6.06, I think)
** Attachment added: "xorg.conf from 6.06 that works on Armada 7800 and 8.04.1"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16309626/xorg.conf
--
xorg fails to generate a working /etc/X11/xorg.conf on Compaq Armada 7800
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251676
You recei
/var/log/Xorg.0.log on Armada 7800 running 8.04.1 with
/etc/X11/xorg.conf from 6.06
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16309670/Xorg.0.log
--
xorg fails to generate a working /etc/X11/xorg.conf on Compaq Armada 7800
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251676
You recei
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci -n | grep 300
01:00.0 0300: 5333:8c01 (rev 06)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
--
xorg fails to generate a working /etc/X11/xorg.conf on Compaq Armada 7800
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251676
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xorg
8.04RC install on Dell Latitude D600 leaves a non-working
/etc/X11/xorg.conf. Fresh install of 7.10 generates a good
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.
I was goaded into a 8.04RC install because of a non-functional cursor on
an up to date 7.10. Re-installing 7.1
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13692679/Dependencies.txt
--
8.10RC install fails on Dell Latitude D600
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220361
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I see this bug report is being associated with a trouble-free version of
xorg. The bugs exist in the fully updated 7.10 xorg and the version
for 8.04RC.
--
8.10RC install fails on Dell Latitude D600
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220361
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 05:58:02PM -, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> Please attach the non-working /etc/X11/xorg.conf as well.
Sorry, I copied over a working version from Gutsy and did not save a
backup.
--
Willie, ONWARD! Through the fog!
http://counter.li.org Linux registered user #228836 sin
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:29:04AM -, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> So what's wrong with 8.04, you didn't tell. Please attach your
> /var/log/Xorg.0.log.
>
> ** Summary changed:
>
> - 8.10RC install fails on Dell Latitude D600
> + 8.04RC install fails on Dell Latitude D600
>
> ** Changed in: xorg (
I am having this problem with a 7.10-i386-alt install CD. The CD
installed OK on a Compaq Armada 7800, but not on a Dell Latitude C600.
The CD verifies ok on the target systems.
--
[Edgy knot2] "Failed to determine the codename for the release" during
installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
My Acer has a webcam that is recognized as a scanner device by all three
scanner aps: XSane, ScanLite, and Scanner Utility. All three aps also
recognize my CanoScan LiDE25. I just tested the webcam with ScanLite.
Worked fine.
--
failed to start scanner: Invalid argument
https://bugs.launchpad.n
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 07:27:04AM -, lacikae wrote:
> After reboot, also SkanLite is working without problems and there are no
> problems with XSane or with the device recognition.
>
> --
> failed to start scanner: Invalid argument
Thanks for the information. How do you think you got past
I recently upgraded from 9.04 to the released 9.10. I noticed that
flash had stopped working and started googling around to find the
reason. How disappointing to find this bug known in the release
candidate but unaddressed in the release. Indeed, "unassigned".
--
flash not running in 9.10 alph
I've encountered this bug with 9.10 64 bit on Acer notebook with a
CanoScan LiDE25. Scanner works great with both ScanLite and Scanner
Utility but not XSane.
--
failed to start scanner: Invalid argument
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478761
You received this bug notification because you are a m
Thierry Daucourt's workaround worked for me, too.
--
flash not running in 9.10 64 bit (Final Release)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434050
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
The work around link just worked again for me. Here is the same through is.gd:
http://is.gd/4UegJ
I agree that it is a bug that should be fixed; should have been fixed
before the release. Meanwhile, I/we need working systems, so the work
around IS needed.
Since I don't contribute much to Ubuntu
I have a possibly related bug. I use a very old NFS server running
Caldera OpenLinux from 1998. It mounted fine on Ubuntu 9.04 and many
other Linux flavors. However, after upgrading from 9.04 to 9.10, it no
longer mounts but fails with the message "failed: RPC Error: Success"
--
nfs-kernel-ser
I have encountered this bug on all versions of Ubuntu since 6.06 up to
and including 10.10. This affects Compaq Armada 7400 and 7800s and
probably all boxes with s3 video.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
25 matches
Mail list logo
