philinux wrote:
> Intrepid clean install. Just transferred files with gthumb and the timestamps
> are not preserved. However copying with nautilus, while painfully slow keeps
> the correct timestamps.
> Canon G5 camera. And it gets mounted correclty.
>
>
Now I see why Sebastian was having such
I'll need some help getting this to the right group but it seems there
is a larger problem here.
People have reported a "bug" or "feature" in that Nautilus was not
preserving timestamps, in particular, the file modification date, when
doing file copies. I see the comments that this has been fixed
My comment wasn't just about the camera issue. I'be found the same
change in behavior when copying a file from Firefox to the desktop or a
folder.
But, give me a suggestion then. Do I open a bug with the Firefox people
or with the Gnome people or with the Ubuntu people? It just seems odd
that s
It's an easy thing to say when the person you're saying it to can't
refute it. The combination of behavior changes is an odd coincidence,
though. It speaks of multiple points of failure which is less likely
than a single point of failure. (I know, you don't think anything has
failed but we who h
Public bug reported:
This seemed to be part of 215499 but Sebastian denies it being a
Nautilus problem.
Under 7.10 and Firefox 2, there was a behavior available where an image
could be dragged and dropped from a website, not all but some websites,
to a folder displayed by Nautilus or the Desktop
Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote:
> This bug was fixed in the package gvfs - 0.99.6-0ubuntu1
>
> ---
> gvfs (0.99.6-0ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low
>
> * New upstream version:
>- Better cross-backend copy/move logic. Now will perform an actual file
> system move if possible, even
philinux wrote:
> I've raised a bug for the camera issue. Bug 242647.
>
> But it doesn't seem to have had any attention. I had to buy a card
> reader and use cp.
>
>
Yes, there's a core interest here and any thing outside of that core is
disregarded. I actually found a separate Firefox add-on
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> the issue is not a lack of interest but a lack of manpower, there is
> thousand bugs opened and only a small team to work on those, the photo
> issue is a different one and seems to be a libgphoto one, see bug #49906
> for example, the issue is not new in hardy
>
>
Agai
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> the issue is not a lack of interest but a lack of manpower, there is
> thousand bugs opened and only a small team to work on those, the photo
> issue is a different one and seems to be a libgphoto one, see bug #49906
> for example, the issue is not new in hardy
>
>
Your
** Description changed:
This seemed to be part of 215499 but Sebastian denies it being a
Nautilus problem.
Under 7.10 and Firefox 2, there was a behavior available where an image
could be dragged and dropped from a website, not all but some websites,
to a folder displayed by Nautilus
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> the bug you are commenting on was an issue about nautilus standard
> copies, no about photos, not about firefox, and it has been fixed. if
> you have an another issue open a new bug as it has been done for the
> photo copies timestamp issue
>
>
And If I do open one it w
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> nautilus can have several issues, why do you insist to want to use this
> code issue which was a libglib bug and has been fixed now? bug #247980
> seems to describe this one so you should rather comment on this one, not
> sure why the firefox maintainer didn't reply but I
Sorry, Steve, don't know how this got here. I marked it invalid for
you.
** Description changed:
- Under 7.10 and Firefox 2, there was a behavior available where an image
- could be dragged and dropped from a website, not all but some websites,
- to a folder displayed by Nautilus or the Deskt
** Description changed:
-
- Under 7.10 and Firefox 2, there was a behavior available where an image could
be dragged and dropped from a website, not all but some websites, to a folder
displayed by Nautilus or the Desktop and the filename and last modified time
stamp were preserved in the copy.
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> why did you open the other bug on firefox if you think that's not a
> firefox issue?
>
>
It can't be opened as a Nautilus problem. All your previous arguments
were that it must be something other than Nautilus. I'm unfamiliar with
the process of opening a new bug so
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => kpoole (ken-poole)
Status: New => Invalid
--
Firefox/Nautilus losing mtime stamp on file copy to folder
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247980
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Tormod Volden wrote:
> Why did you close the bug by marking it invalid? And do not assign it to
> yourself unless you intend to fix it yourself.
>
> ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
> Assignee: kpoole (ken-poole) => (unassigned)
>Status: Invalid => New
>
&
On a whim I tried the KDE installer DVD. I see the prcess goes through
all the steps, through assigning mount points and produces a bootable
system. All that's needed is to find the difference between the cd and
dvd install process.
For my needs, I'll hang in with the Kubuntu DVD for now and ins
jb90123 wrote:
> Thx you very much for posting these steps ya im kinda a newbie at this
> and after i did a update and it wouldnt show i was like omg XD well thx
> again for uploading this
>
>
Very nice to hear that someone else is still benefiting from my little
bug report.
It's interesting
sebasmagri wrote:
> Could anybody please describes the solution procedure for a newbie?
>
>
It was embarrassing because it meant I didn't understand the system as
well as I thought I did.
The 'Taskbar' (carrying a name over from Windows) is a very customizable
thing. It comprises one or more
enezuela...
>
> 2007/9/22, kpoole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> sebasmagri wrote:
>>
>>> Could anybody please describes the solution procedure for a newbie?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> It was embarrassing because it meant I didn't
Your suggestion worked and I thought I'd sent a reply to you. Closing
this is fine. No other action needed.
--
no button for active applications in taskbar, cannot recover app if minimized
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
I'd since downloaded a later copy of Ubuntu 6.06 and not had any problem
with it so thought this had been sorted out. I've been using the Ubuntu
6.06 as my main machine since last year. Since the bug lasted this long
unattended and I've had no problem with later downloads I'll assume it
was a pro
on to change the scanning source.
ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Sun Mar 18 22:43:55 2007
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/xsane
Package: xsane 0.99+0.991-1ubuntu2
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcCmdline: xsane
ProcCwd: /home/kpoole
ProcEnviron:
PATH=/usr/
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6853728/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6853729/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6853730/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcCmdline: gnome-panel --sm-client-id default1
ProcCwd: /home/kpoole
ProcEnviron:
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-panel
Uname: Linux feisty 2.6.20-13-generic #2 SMP Sun Mar 25 00:21:25 UTC
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7171635/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7171636/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7171638/ProcStatus.txt
--
no but
note that I have firefox open but there is nothing in bottom panel to
correspond to it.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot.png"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7174353/Screenshot.png
--
no button for active applications in taskbar, cannot recover app if minimized
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Thanks for your bug report. The crash looks like a memory corruption.
> Could you try to get a valgrind log for it (you can follow the
> instructions from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Valgrind for that)?
>
> ** Changed in: xsane (Ubuntu)
>Importance: Undecided => Medium
>
Okay, this has gotten silly. The problem was reported, a fix released
for Intrepid but not backported to Hardy two years ago. The last
previous update before it was just upgraded to medium was over a year
ago and I think all of us LTS types have probably upgraded from Hardy to
Lucid by now. I ac
30 matches
Mail list logo
