[Bug 162031] Re: Move the profiles directory

2008-06-30 Thread furicle
FWIW, I just linked c:\windows\profiles to c:\documents and settings and got rid of some error messages in an app I just installed. I'm no Wine expert, but this helped me and I can't see how it would hurt? -- Move the profiles directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162031 You received this b

[Bug 253758] [NEW] Use of bterm makes vi and nano close to unusable

2008-07-31 Thread furicle
Public bug reported: When using the 'rescue a broken system' option and you are dropped into a shell, it seems to use bterm. Vi and Nano both have display issues with a TERM of bterm. The screens are often not redrawn properly etc. It's tough enough verifying UUID's as it is without the termina

[Bug 253758] Re: Use of bterm makes vi and nano close to unusable

2008-07-31 Thread furicle
** Description changed: When using the 'rescue a broken system' option and you are dropped into - a shell, it seems to use bterm. + a shell, it sets TERM to bterm, but bterm isn't installed. - Vi and Nano both have display issues with a TERM of bterm. The screens - are often not redrawn prop

[Bug 46548] Re: Include big analog clock as screensaver

2008-12-04 Thread furicle
A digital clock style screensaver can be done with gltext - see http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=266124 But an analog clock like KDE's would be nice -- Include big analog clock as screensaver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46548 You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Bug 377251] [NEW] If multiple gnome-panels placed in same location, auto-hide is unusable

2009-05-16 Thread furicle
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel Turn on autohide on the typical top and bottom panels and place them both on the left side. Both panels hide, with a slight offset that doesn't really make it possible to pick one or the other. A better solution might be to 'join' them, so t

[Bug 377251] Re: If multiple gnome-panels placed in same location, auto-hide is unusable

2009-05-16 Thread furicle
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26812350/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26812351/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26812352/ProcStatus.txt -- If mul

Re: [Bug 19033] Re: systemwide default startup homepage ignored

2008-09-30 Thread furicle
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Philippe Seewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a workaround: > By following http://kb.mozillazine.org/Locking_preferences create a .cfg > file and put in > > // > pref("browser.startup.homepage", "XXX"); > > > Where XXX ist your default startup homepage. >

Re: [Bug 19033] Re: systemwide default startup homepage ignored

2008-10-01 Thread furicle
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Philippe Seewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, the current firefox directory layout is a bit cluttered up. > > Anyway, step by step instructions for fully updated 8.04.1 as of this > date: > > 1. create file mozilla.txt with the following contents > // > pref("br

Re: [Bug 19033] Re: systemwide default startup homepage ignored

2008-10-02 Thread furicle
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Philippe Seewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > furicle wrote: >> I cannot get this to work - even using your supplied mozilla.cfg. >> >> Brian > > I've just verified it on an indepentent ubuntu setup and it works. Are > you sur

[Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

2008-09-16 Thread furicle
As pointed out earlier in this thread, I found http://spot.livejournal.com/299409.html to be very informative. It indicates the static html 'eula' that Fedora 9 uses is only temporary, and Mozilla is insisting on a complete EULA for Fedora 10. If that article clearly and accurately represents the

[Bug 19033] Re: systemwide default startup homepage ignored

2008-09-18 Thread furicle
Is there no work around for this? I'm lost in a sea of documentation, most of it referring to Windows or FF2 -- systemwide default startup homepage ignored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19033 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subs

[Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

2008-09-15 Thread furicle
Mark, I think reading these comments should make it quite clear We hate EULAs more than we like the Firefox brand. We'd all be happy to have Firefox in restricted, and even make it easy to install - but an alternative HAS to be the default. All this is of course assuming your charm can't s

Re: [Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

2008-09-15 Thread furicle
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Mike Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am a Fedora user, and have heard about this little argument and > someone brought it up thinking we did it as well. Well, we don't show > that EULA at all but we do have a link to it. The URL below is how > Fedora shows

Re: [Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

2008-09-22 Thread furicle
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ** Attachment added: "Screenshot: proposed about:rights (expanded) (rev2)" > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17836931/about_rights_expanded.png A nit - do we really need ALL CAPS? Even Mr. Shuttleworth doesn't seem to

[Bug 252991] Re: incorrect transformation of man: link in run dialog

2008-08-12 Thread furicle
I can confirm the issue. Please note that this bug did not exist in gutsy, and doesn't exist in Debian testing (Gnome 2.22 I believe). It's just Hardy. -- incorrect transformation of man: link in run dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252991 You received this bug notification because you ar

[Bug 252991] Re: incorrect transformation of man: link in run dialog

2008-08-12 Thread furicle
Whoops - meant to mention that 'gnome-open man:ls' works - it's just that run dialog box as far as I can see. -- incorrect transformation of man: link in run dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252991 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 218671] Re: MinY < MaxY leads to unexpected behaviour

2008-07-13 Thread furicle
confirmed here as well. -- MinY < MaxY leads to unexpected behaviour https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218671 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.co

Re: [Bug 218671] Re: MinY < MaxY leads to unexpected behaviour

2008-07-31 Thread furicle
This patch fixes the problem for me too! Thanks! Since it looks like a pretty simple patch, hopefully someone can apply it without a whole lot of review being required. Thanks again Brian -- MinY < MaxY leads to unexpected behaviour https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218671 You received thi

Re: [Bug 218671] Re: MinY < MaxY leads to unexpected behaviour

2008-08-01 Thread furicle
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Cheetahcat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, I finally got some information about what touch panel the POS system > is using: > > (--) Elographics touchscreen is a AccuTouch, connected through a serial link. > (--) The controller is a model E271-2200, firmware revisio

Re: [Bug 218671] Re: MinY < MaxY leads to unexpected behaviour

2008-08-05 Thread furicle
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:47 AM, BastiBense <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What's a reliable way to get this info? Mine is serial, but the >> monitor is just labelled as a standard LG model. I don't see any >> external indications. >> >> Brian > > This info should be in the Xorg.log (/var/log/Xorg.0

[Bug 320797] Re: Remove hubackup from repositories (no GUI restore!)

2009-01-26 Thread furicle
** Changed in: hubackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Remove hubackup from repositories (no GUI restore!) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/320797 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list u

[Bug 310741] [NEW] report bug spams ubuntu-users mailing list

2008-12-22 Thread furicle
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: reportbug Bug #7839 is marked closed and leaves the impression it was fixed - but report bug still exists in Hardy, and still spams the user list as far as I can see. Since this started back in 2005, wouldn't it be nice to finish this baby off?IIUC,

[Bug 310741] Re: report bug spams ubuntu-users mailing list

2008-12-22 Thread furicle
This bug reported with apport-cli to prove to myself that's working. I counted 18 bug filings in November that were just dumped on the user's mailing list rather than going to Launchpad. -- report bug spams ubuntu-users mailing list https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310741 You received this bug no

[Bug 310994] [NEW] /etc/init.d/ufw status should return firewall status like /usr/sbin/ufw does

2008-12-23 Thread furicle
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ufw It seems odd the executable will return a status when the init script doesn't. No reason why both can't work is there? This would also further https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/203169 I looked at Hardy only. ** Affects: ufw (Ubunt

[Bug 192508] Re: mouse keys turns on randomly

2009-02-18 Thread furicle
I can confirm the random activation of num pad as mouse keys via VNC. In my case the other end is usually Chicken of the VNC on OSX - so it's something in the VNC/Gnome end of things. Nice to know I'm not the only one who's had this happen! -- mouse keys turns on randomly https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 336875] [NEW] gconftool-2 would be more useful with bash completion enabled

2009-03-02 Thread furicle
Public bug reported: To set gconf settings using gconftool-2, you have to know the path to the key you want, or search for it using another tool or recursive --gets. If gconftool-2 could integrate bash completion, then you could navigate the keys just like you navigate the file system using the

Re: [Bug 218671] Re: MinY < MaxY leads to unexpected behaviour

2009-03-04 Thread furicle
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote: > Basically I agree with comment #10.  This bug should go upstream for > review.  I have a suspicion that there is something hardware-specific > about this bug, but unfortunately none of the many people who have > confirmed this issue have i

[Bug 54790] Re: Can not establish internet connection by using Modem Monitor applet

2008-05-01 Thread furicle
This still applies in Hardy! Any work arounds and or progress on fixing? -- Can not establish internet connection by using Modem Monitor applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54790 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- u

[Bug 54790] Re: Can not establish internet connection by using Modem Monitor applet

2008-05-03 Thread furicle
I can certainly try - can you give me a pointer where to start? Boy, I didn't think I was the last guy in the world using dialup -- Can not establish internet connection by using Modem Monitor applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54790 You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Bug 198483] [NEW] install-keymap doesn't make setting permanent

2008-03-04 Thread furicle
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: console-data Ubuntu 7.10 gutsy console-data 3:1.02-2ubuntu4 The man page states 'install-keymap [...] puts the result in /etc/console/boottime.kmap.gz which will be loaded into the kernel at boot time.' However when I try it, it seems to be in effect o

[Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?

2008-02-05 Thread furicle
This bug is still outstanding on a 32 bit gutsy clean install. I've done nothing on this machine but install gutsy, then the updates, then attempted to install the flashplugin via the firefox 'install plugins' bar. It reported that it was installed, but it didn't. Checking this bug report made

[Bug 182865] Re: [Gutsy backport] Cannot switch to console after installing "xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.1.1-0ubuntu9.1"

2008-02-27 Thread furicle
Can we get that gutsy backport?I have same issue... -- [Gutsy backport] Cannot switch to console after installing "xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.1.1-0ubuntu9.1" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

Re: [Bug 182865] Re: [Gutsy backport] Cannot switch to console after installing "xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.1.1-0ubuntu9.1"

2008-02-28 Thread furicle
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Bruno Beaufils <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We get the same bug. It seems that the problem is not present with the > xserver-xorg-video-intel (2:2.1.1-0ubuntu-9) available on Gutsy CD-ROM. > The problem comes with updates done when using internet sources.list >

[Bug 504432] [NEW] Would be nice to be able to change time of already scheduled jobs - i.e. atmv

2010-01-07 Thread furicle
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: at I sometimes want to move the time it runs at rather than delete and re run it. I'm picturing something like this mock example # at 6pm > mail -s "go home" root < /dev/null # atq 150 2010-01-07 18:00 a root # atmv -c 150 7pm # atq 150 20

Re: [Bug 493607] Re: rkhunter reports openssl and sshd versions out of date

2009-12-16 Thread furicle
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Andrew Cholakian wrote: > It does appear that adding 'apps' to the DISABLE_TESTS option in > /etc/rkhunter.conf does work. Sure, but wouldn't it be better to only whitelist certain versions rather than skipping them altogether? Keep the whitelist as tight as pos

[Bug 250517] Re: gvfs performs slowly on bulk sftp transfers

2009-09-15 Thread furicle
More data points - problem still exists in Jaunty AFAICS This method should be easier to reproduce for most people rather than relying on iptraf etc. I created a 120meg file called 'test' via /dev/urandom and dd, then tried comparing sftp client and regular cp over gvfs ~/.gvfs/sftp on Hardy

[Bug 219840] Re: rkhunter reports hidden directories under /dev

2009-12-07 Thread furicle
The current set-up is consistent with the upstream projects feelings on the subject. Let it detect them but hint it may be ok by putting common whitelists commented out in the conf file. I wonder if it's possible to pop up some kind of warning message at install time - 'rkhunter is installed but

[Bug 493607] [NEW] rkhunter reports openssl and sshd versions out of date

2009-12-07 Thread furicle
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rkhunter As of now (Dec 09) rkhunter updates to the programs_bad.dat file will cause rkhunter to warn about the installed versions of openssl (0.9.8g) and openssh (4.7p1) As I understand it, that's a 'false positive' because Ubuntu patches the current ve

[Bug 502661] Re: mpage_da_map_blocks block allocation failed

2010-05-26 Thread furicle
Jeremy, I'm sorry I didn't respond to your earlier comments sooner. This issue has existed since before Hardy, and in multiple distros (not just Ubuntu). Unless there's some reason to think the latest release fixes it, asking me to keep retesting for no supportable reason is kinda annoying. Aski

Re: [Bug 493607] Re: rkhunter reports openssl and sshd versions out of date

2009-12-17 Thread furicle
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Andrew Cholakian wrote: > furicle, > > It looks to me that every security release would require an update to > the white list unless I'm mistaken. I don't so. The problem is because they (Debian based distros like Ubuntu) PATCH the curr

Re: [Bug 493607] Re: rkhunter reports openssl and sshd versions out of date

2009-12-17 Thread furicle
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Andrew Cholakian wrote: > furicle, while it is true that Ubuntu backports fixes from upstream > versions its incorrect to say that the version number doesn't change. > For instance, on Hardy at the moment the current version of PHP is PHP >

[Bug 502661] [NEW] mpage_da_map_blocks block allocation failed

2010-01-03 Thread furicle
Public bug reported: Trying to clean install Karmic Server. Died while creating and formatting partitions. Noticed bug #493661 but not sure it was related since his is post install. I suspect the real problem is outlined in bug #492994 - problems with the sata_via module. I have seen these ata

[Bug 502661] Re: mpage_da_map_blocks block allocation failed

2010-01-03 Thread furicle
** Attachment added: "syslog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37386113/syslog.txt -- mpage_da_map_blocks block allocation failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502661 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 502661] Re: mpage_da_map_blocks block allocation failed

2010-01-03 Thread furicle
** Attachment added: "cpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37386117/cpuinfo.txt -- mpage_da_map_blocks block allocation failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502661 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bu

[Bug 502661] Re: mpage_da_map_blocks block allocation failed

2010-01-03 Thread furicle
** Attachment added: "lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37386128/lspci.txt -- mpage_da_map_blocks block allocation failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502661 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs m

[Bug 502661] Re: mpage_da_map_blocks block allocation failed

2010-01-03 Thread furicle
** Attachment added: "modules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37386143/modules.txt -- mpage_da_map_blocks block allocation failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502661 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bu

[Bug 502661] Re: mpage_da_map_blocks block allocation failed

2010-01-03 Thread furicle
Well, I'm getting similar ATA resets in CentOS 5.4 (2.6.18 I believe) so it's not just Ubuntu 1322 <5>SCSI device sda: 1953525168 512-byte hdwr sectors (1000205 MB)$ 1323 <5>sda: Write Protect is off$ 1324 <7>sda: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00$ 1325 <5>SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back$ 1326

[Bug 646816] [NEW] Flash - Hash of download from Adobe incorrect

2010-09-24 Thread furicle
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.283.0ubuntu1 >From the post inst script wget http://download.macromedia.com/pub/flashplayer/installers/current/9/install_flash_player_9.tar.gz and check sha256sum post inst script says 890f07d8ff5102851ede49

[Bug 646816] Re: Flash - Hash of download from Adobe incorrect

2010-09-24 Thread furicle
Bizarre - I got a different file when downloading on a server in the US. Must be some caching going on somewhere -- Flash - Hash of download from Adobe incorrect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646816 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscri

[Bug 646816] Re: Flash - Hash of download from Adobe incorrect

2010-09-24 Thread furicle
Found it - bad squid cache - sorry for the noise ** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- Flash - Hash of download from Adobe incorrect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646816 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

Re: [Bug 192508] Re: mouse keys turns on randomly

2010-06-25 Thread furicle
No, shift-numlock is NOT how most of us are having this happen. -- mouse keys turns on randomly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.