[Bug 217809] Re: iwl3945 does not associate in Hardy

2008-07-05 Thread dominic
I'm having this problem too, since around Wednesday 2nd July. For no reason (that I can see) wireless will drop, and sometimes reconnect, sometimes not. dmesg below. The part from eth1:disassociate through many eth1: RX disassociation back to eth1: associated repeats over and over. [11176.520580

[Bug 218671] Re: MinY < MaxY leads to unexpected behaviour

2009-01-23 Thread Dominic
tion "UntouchDelay" "2" #Option "ReportDelay" "1" Option "PortraitMode" "Portrait" Option "SwapXY" "true" Option "SendCoreEvents" Option "ReportingMode" "Ra

[Bug 218671] Re: MinY < MaxY leads to unexpected behaviour

2009-01-23 Thread Dominic
click happen. I see the mouse pointer move when I touch though. Is the patch previously mentioned integrated in Intrepid? Thanks for your help! Dominic -- MinY < MaxY leads to unexpected behaviour https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218671 You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 239867] [NEW] svn-load crashes with --no-prompt (Python 2.5.2, hardy 2.6.24-18-generic)

2008-06-13 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: svn-load === The command line that fails === svn-load --no-prompt -t libcomplex-1.1 http://svn.example.com/repos/vendor/libcomplex current /path/to/libcomplex-1.1 === The error message === Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/svn-load", l

[Bug 114473] Re: Feisty: netgear wg111t causes ubuntu to crash

2007-06-14 Thread Dominic
I have exactly the same issues with Feisty freezing/crashing with the same combination of Netgear WG111T wireless USB dongle and ndiswrapper. No matter what I do the result is always a total system crash a few seconds after the USB dongle is inserted. Some more info for you... 'dpkg -l ndiswrapper

[Bug 114473] Re: Feisty: netgear wg111t causes ubuntu to crash

2007-06-14 Thread Dominic
I have attached a photographic screenshot of the kernel crash log. Sorry it has to be a photo but none of this is saved to /var/log/messages. ** Attachment added: "14062007418.jpg" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8089525/14062007418.jpg -- Feisty: netgear wg111t causes ubuntu to crash https://b

[Bug 99837] Re: I've selected an area in gnu paint and clicked on "Ausschneiden" (cut out), then gnu paint excited!

2007-04-01 Thread dominic
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7100070/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7100071/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7100072/Disassembly.txt ** Attachm

[Bug 99837] I've selected an area in gnu paint and clicked on "Ausschneiden" (cut out), then gnu paint excited!

2007-04-01 Thread dominic
tablePath: /usr/bin/gpaint Package: gpaint 0.2.4+0.3.0pre5-4 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: gpaint ProcCwd: /home/dominic ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 11 SourcePackage: gpain

[Bug 69486] Re: Broken preinst script

2006-11-15 Thread Dominic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 68628 *** ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #393773 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393773 ** Also affects: initramfs-tools (upstream) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393773 Importance: Unknown Status: U

[Bug 422224] Re: two-finger scrolling does not work on Acer AO531h

2010-02-10 Thread dominic
Is this dead? -- two-finger scrolling does not work on Acer AO531h https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/

[Bug 422224] Re: two-finger scrolling does not work on Acer AO531h

2010-01-17 Thread dominic
I have the same problems with multiple finger not recognized with my dell adamo 13 - but with windows7 multitouch works perfectly fine. so ive installed to newest (unstable) synaptics driver for my ubuntu 9.10: synchlient -V 1.2.1 unfortunately its still not working. from my point of view its wr

[Bug 389006] Re: NetworkManager Internet Connection Sharing fails to route DNS

2010-03-25 Thread Dominic
Tony, did you submit this fix for Karmic? I still have the DNS problem and I don't see it in the list of pending SRU. Do I need to enable karmic-proposed / karmic-backports? -- NetworkManager Internet Connection Sharing fails to route DNS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389006 You received this

[Bug 1927877] Re: DoH support is disabled

2021-06-21 Thread Dominic
The Debian MR has still not been actioned. Can we now consider enabling DoH support in Ubuntu's Unbound package? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927877 Title: DoH support is disabled

[Bug 1927877] [NEW] DoH support is disabled

2021-05-09 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: NLnetLabs has added DNS-over-HTTPS support to Unbound as of release 1.12.0. The current Ubuntu package delivering this release however has no DoH support. For DoH to work, Unbound simply would need to be compiled with the nghttp2 library. ** Affects: unbound (Ubuntu) Im

[Bug 1927877] Re: DoH support is disabled

2021-05-10 Thread Dominic
Thanks, I mostly copied the bug report from the Debian package. Is there someone here that can nudge the package managers at Debian? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927877 Title: DoH

[Bug 1927877] Re: DoH support is disabled

2021-05-12 Thread Dominic
I would support this, DNS-over-HTTPS is increasing in usage and its omission is frustrating. I had to compile from source on Hirsute to enable it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927877

[Bug 1849298] [NEW] unattended-upgrade is checking o=UbuntuESM, a=eoan-security when disabled in config

2019-10-22 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: My /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades file looks like this: Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins { "${distro_id}:${distro_codename}"; "${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-security"; // Extended Security Maintenance; doesn't necessarily exist for

[Bug 1849298] Re: unattended-upgrade is checking o=UbuntuESM, a=eoan-security when disabled in config

2019-10-22 Thread Dominic
Not sure I can close the bug. Nevertheless it's confusing to have this configuration in two places. Maybe deserves a review. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849298 Title: unattended-u

[Bug 1849298] Re: unattended-upgrade is checking o=UbuntuESM, a=eoan-security when disabled in config

2019-10-22 Thread Dominic
I just realised it's enabled by /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/51ubuntu-advantage- esm. Closing bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849298 Title: unattended-upgrade is checking o=UbuntuESM,a=eo

[Bug 1892569] [NEW] Font scaling not working correctly 20.04

2020-08-22 Thread dominic
Public bug reported: During log in screen and after all text on desktop is enlarged. (no accessibility settings are turned on) During log in, text scaling can be reset by turning on and off the text scaling accessibility option, however scaling after login is still messed up. After log in, manua

[Bug 1875950] [NEW] rsyslog log files failing to rotate

2020-04-29 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: In focal, /etc/logrotate.conf contains: su root adm logrotate does not rotate files in /var/log: error: skipping "/var/log/syslog" because parent directory has insecure permissions (It's world writable or writable by group which is not "root") Set "su" directive

[Bug 1875950] Re: rsyslog log files failing to rotate

2020-04-29 Thread Dominic
My mistake, error does not appear with: sudo logrotate -d /etc/logrotate.conf For some reason my logs are not being rotated though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875950 Title:

[Bug 1875950] Re: rsyslog log files failing to rotate

2020-05-02 Thread Dominic
VM reinstalled, logs are rotating now. ** Changed in: logrotate (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875950 Title: rsyslog log files failing to rota

[Bug 1817466] [NEW] Ram usage increases gradually until it reaches 100% and a hard reset is needed.

2019-02-24 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: Running Ubuntu 18.04 on Dell Latitude-E5420 with 3.7 GB RAM Gnome 3.28.2. Updated from Ubuntu 16.04. Applications freeze after about an hour continuous use, while applications are running RAM use increases gradually typically from about 55% to 100%. The solution is to us

Re: [Bug 1817466] Re: Ram usage increases gradually until it reaches 100% and a hard reset is needed.

2019-02-24 Thread Dominic
I have switched to lightdm to avoid the bug, I will switch back this evening to cause the problem again, RAM usage was measured by System Monitor, CPU usage was not high, only RAM usage which slowly increased until the display froze. The issue has been reported by multiple users in the forum (see

[Bug 1817466] Re: Ram usage increases gradually until it reaches 100% and a hard reset is needed.

2019-03-05 Thread Dominic
After switching back to gdm3 I have checked RAM usage repeatedly and the problem has not recurred. There is a gradual increase in RAM usage, but it is no longer enough to freeze the display. As a hypothesis, is it possible that something about enabling lightdm could have solved the problem even t

[Bug 1753193] [NEW] trying to install, Says hard drive is bad, returns to "trying ubuntu" pops up errors

2018-03-03 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: I am trying to dual boot Ubuntu 16.04 and Windows 10 on my Gigabyte, Amd 8 core cpu, 8 gb of ram, 4 gb of gpu, ats build. I have been trying for 8 hours to install, I have tried two usb's and Same result: Click "Install Ubuntu" then it goes to a screen showing errors, then

[Bug 1699049] [NEW] package libc-dev-bin 2.19-0ubuntu6.11 failed to install/upgrade: package libc-dev-bin is already installed and configured

2017-06-20 Thread dominic
Public bug reported: unknown ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: libc-dev-bin 2.19-0ubuntu6.11 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-79.100~14.04.1-generic 4.4.67 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-79-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.24 AptOrdering: blueman: Remove libc-dev-bin: C

[Bug 1497163] Re: Crash when I click on icon on application bar and there are multiple windows open for that application

2016-03-18 Thread dominic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1442455 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442455 I can confirm this bug in 16.04 and that temporary bugfix by Andrea Azzarone (azzar1) still works! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 1560901] [NEW] install maas (2.0 alpha3) from image (ubuntu 16.04) does not include power-types

2016-03-23 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: 1) The release of Ubuntu you are using, via 'lsb_release -rd' or System -> About Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) Release:16.04 2) The version of the package you are using, via 'apt-cache policy pkgname' or by checking in Software Cen

[Bug 1560901] Re: install maas (2.0 alpha3) from image (ubuntu 16.04) does not include power-types

2016-03-23 Thread Dominic
Thank you for your hint. So the default maas (rack & region controller) setup does not connect correct? i will check this and file a new bug. So is it not possible to edit the WOL file anymore? Since i had to edit the correct interface for the "wakeonlan" command, i'm a little bit conerned. however

[Bug 1560971] [NEW] after default installation of maas the rack and region controller are not connected

2016-03-23 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: 1) The release of Ubuntu you are using, via 'lsb_release -rd' or System -> About Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) Release:16.04 2) The version of the package you are using, via 'apt-cache policy pkgname' or by checking in Software Cent

[Bug 1573454] Re: Mouse pointer disappear after suspend in Xubuntu 16.04

2016-06-11 Thread Dominic
I'm also facing this issue, using Xubuntu 16.04 (minimal) on a Thinkpad W520. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573454 Title: Mouse pointer disappear after suspend in Xubuntu 16.04 To

[Bug 662998] Re: System freezes when running on battery

2010-12-09 Thread Dominic
Yes, 605967 looks similar, but the original post was for Ubuntu 10.04, which never froze on my system, even after I gave up on 10.10 and reinstalled Lucid. There is a bunch of other testimonials on the forum: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1595196 One thing that has not been mentioned i

[Bug 980320] Re: Skype silently crashes on Ubuntu 64bits

2012-05-21 Thread Dominic
Hello, I do have the same problem described here, since 11.04, 11.10, 12.04. Skype works fine on my different partition which runs on archlinux, but Ubuntu crashes silently after maybe 10 mins. I tried following terminal entry while starting skype: LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib32/libv4l/v4l1compat.so skyp

[Bug 270123] Re: Wrong battery status

2011-08-18 Thread Dominic
I use Ubuntu 11.04 on Lenovo T410, around 1 year old. On Win7 I had a battery life of 2 hours, now I only get less than 1 hour. The ouput says: present: yes design capacity: 5616 mAh last full capacity: 2606 mAh This is very weird, before Ubuntu my battery life alwa

[Bug 1043063] Re: Folder icons do not appear in the bookmarks in nautilus until the user opens them

2012-11-10 Thread Dominic
My nautilus version is 3.4.2 and the icons i use are located in /usr/share/icons. Please tell me if this works for you: 1. Create a link to a mounted hard drive (/mnt/Windows for me) 2. Place the link in a subfolder in your home directory (~/Devices for me) 3. Set an icon on the link using right-c

[Bug 898401] [NEW] Missing dependency on python-central

2011-11-30 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: On Ubuntu 11.10, mic2 is missing a dependency on the python-central package. In particular, pycentral is required for the function check_mic(bootstrap) in /usr/share/pyshared/mic/utils/bootstrap.py This is an example of the error message you would get if python-central is not

[Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for Synaptics touchpads v7.2

2010-11-21 Thread dominic
successfully installed the package on Dell Adamo Ubuntu 32bit Kernel 2.6.35-22-generic Many thanks to Henrik! @Henrik: Is it possible to change the scroll behavior to "roll" instead being "very exact"? The scrolling depends then on the speed of the fingers and does not abruptly stop when remo

[Bug 775882] [NEW] error message box a few seconds after login

2011-05-02 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: msttcorefonts only packages in installed are ubuntu-restricted and google chrome, i have ubuntu 11.04 i386 installed from cd. bug does not seem to affect anything ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not in

[Bug 775882] Re: error message box a few seconds after login

2011-05-02 Thread Dominic
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775882 Title: error message box a few seconds after login -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/lis

[Bug 631870] [NEW] Laptop goes back to hibernate twice upon resume after battery discharged and cable plugged

2010-09-06 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: upower Observed on Dell Vostro 1015 with Ubuntu Lucid (10.04.1), kernel = 2.6.32-24-generic, upower 0.9.1-1. Scenario: let battery discharge, laptop goes to hibernation, plug the cable and power on. The first resume brings up the last screen with ~10 war

[Bug 631870] Re: Laptop goes back to hibernate twice upon resume after battery discharged and cable plugged

2010-09-06 Thread Dominic
** Attachment added: "Kernel log, laptop goes back to hibernate twice upon resume" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631870/+attachment/155/+files/kernel-log-laptop-mult-hibernation.txt -- Laptop goes back to hibernate twice upon resume after battery discharged and cable plugged https://

[Bug 631870] Re: Laptop goes back to hibernate twice upon resume after battery discharged and cable plugged

2010-09-07 Thread Dominic
** Description changed: Binary package hint: upower Observed on Dell Vostro 1015 with Ubuntu Lucid (10.04.1), kernel = 2.6.32-24-generic, upower 0.9.1-1. Scenario: let battery discharge, laptop goes to hibernation, plug the - cable and power on. The first resume brings up the last sc

[Bug 2067057] [NEW] Unattended-upgrades order of restart caused failure to bind address

2024-05-24 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: This morning, nginx wan't working, so I checked the journal. It appears an overnight unattended-upgrades restarted a lot of services, including systemd-networkd and nginx. Logs pasted at the end, I am running Ubuntu 24.04. I bind nginx to specific IP addresses, because differ

[Bug 2067057] Re: Unattended-upgrades order of restart caused failure to bind address

2024-05-24 Thread Dominic
Contents of unattended-upgrades log, to confirm unattended-upgrades initiated the updates: 2024-05-24 06:27:37,661 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script 2024-05-24 06:27:37,662 INFO Allowed origins are: o=Ubuntu,a=noble, o=Ubuntu,a=noble-security, o=UbuntuESMApps,a=noble-apps-security, o=Ubun

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-30 Thread Dominic
Hi Mitchell, Your version works for me as well. In the interim I have been successfully using the following configuration. Would this be potentially useful, or are there issues with removing ${quote:} from --ip and --identity? condition = ${run{/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl \

[Bug 2049977] Re: journalctl --follow --grep lists lines in wrong order

2024-05-30 Thread Dominic
It was a problem in mantic, fixed in noble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049977 Title: journalctl --follow --grep lists lines in wrong order To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-30 Thread Dominic
I agree, I also do not know the potential risks of removing ${quote:} from tainted variables, so this needs further research before implementation. Or we go with yours. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 2056443] Re: CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check fails if inbound IP address is IPv6

2024-05-31 Thread Dominic
Closing this, as this will be fixed by bug #2056372 ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056443 Title: CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-01 Thread Dominic
Thinking more about this, wouldn't invoking /bin/bash actually increase the attack potential, by allowing for backticks and $() to execute via user-supplied data? Also, it's not clear to me that ${quote} escapes backticks or $(). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Dominic
Good find, I am still running my ${quote:}-less version at the moment so I was able to test the scenarios in that bug report. All three of the following senders were correctly rejected as spf fail by my server (example.com hard fails all senders in its spf record): MAIL FROM: "$PWD"@example.com M

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Dominic
No, I was not invoking bash, I was using the code I quoted previously and testing the scenarios at port 25. An empty $sender_address variable would create a missing argument and likely break spfquery.mail-spf-perl, I haven't tested that scenario yet. $sender_host_address should always be present a

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Dominic
It was floated before but it's worth raising again. What are the chances of bringing libspf2 to main and falling back into line with Debian? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-04 Thread Dominic
Thank you, I would appreciate you reiterating the case for libspf2. Aside from the fact that this implementation is looking (recurrently) fragile, this Ubuntu delta, disabled by default, is probably not getting enough attention to spot bugs. This bug has been open for three months and only one oth

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-06 Thread Dominic
Option three would be to remove the spf section completely until a non- broken sustainable solution is implemented, especially if libspf2 is going to take some time to implement. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-08 Thread Dominic
Postfix already has a configuration page for SPF [0], albeit requiring a package from universe. So although removing the SPF snippet from Exim could be an option in the short-term, I do think in the long-term Ubuntu's SPF support for Exim should be somewhat equivalent to that of Postfix's. Adding

[Bug 2056153] Re: Removing the systemd-resolved package breaks DNSSEC validation

2024-06-09 Thread Dominic
This bug continues into Noble. I continue to add "options edns0 trust- ad" to /etc/resolv.conf after removing systemd-resolved, but it would be nice not having to do so. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 1946909] Re: Merge unbound from Debian unstable for 22.04

2021-10-23 Thread Dominic
Please ensure that whatever happens, Unbound on Ubuntu continues to be compiled with the nghttp2 library. Unbound on Debian is currently not compiled with nghttp2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 1946833] Re: Merge bind9 from Debian unstable for 22.04

2022-02-10 Thread Dominic
It would be ideal if 9.18 could be included before the feature freeze. Any news? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946833 Title: Merge bind9 from Debian unstable for 22.04 To manage no

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-11 Thread Dominic
Hi Mitchell, I am setting CHECK_RCPT_SPF = true in /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.localmacros where local macros are typically set. I have run `update-exim4.conf` and `systemctl restart exim4`. Then I send myself an email from an outlook.com account, which has SPF enabled, and the headers report: Receiv

[Bug 2056443] Re: CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check fails if inbound IP address is IPv6

2024-03-11 Thread Dominic
Quite possibly related, although the way the error manifests is different. If the other bug is fixed, then it's very possible this one will be too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056443

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-12 Thread Dominic
exim4.conf.template is completely unmodified from stock mantic. Bug can be replicated by: 1. Installing mantic 2. Installing exim4 and spf-tools-perl 3. `dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config` and make it accept mail 4. Adding CHECK_RCPT_SPF = true to /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.localmacros 5. Sending yourself

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-12 Thread Dominic
Also: `update-exim4.conf` and restart exim before sending mail to yourself. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To mana

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-13 Thread Dominic
I'm using exim4-daemon-heavy. $ apt list --installed | grep exim4 WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in scripts. exim4-base/mantic-updates,mantic-security,now 4.96-17ubuntu2.2 amd64 [installed,automatic] exim4-config/mantic-updates,mantic-security,now 4.96-17ubu

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-13 Thread Dominic
According to the exim4 changelog, the spf logic was modified in Aug 2023. exim4 (4.96-17ubuntu1) mantic; urgency=medium * Merge with Debian unstable (LP: #2030098). Remaining changes: - Disable external SPF support to avoid Build-Depends on libspf2-dev (only available in universe).

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-15 Thread Dominic
I get the correct result when running spfquery.mail-spf-perl manually. $ /usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl --ip 40.92.113.65 --scope mfrom --identity exam...@outlook.com pass outlook.com: Sender is authorized to use 'exam...@outlook.com' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism 'include:spf.protection.outlo

[Bug 1823171] Re: systemd-resolve hides DS records in explicit queries

2024-02-25 Thread Dominic
DNSSEC isn't required to query a DS record. The reason your query succeeded after you enabled DNSSEC is because systemd-resolved caches it internally as a result of the DNSSEC lookup. Once the DS query is cached, the bug will not manifest. Another way to cache it is: ubuntu@server:~$ dig ripe.net

[Bug 2056153] [NEW] Removing the systemd-resolved package breaks DNSSEC validation

2024-03-05 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: Removing the systemd-resolved package breaks glibc DNSSEC validation, because it removes an existing line from the new /etc/resolv.conf file. This line should be retained so that packages like Exim can continue to use the AD bit after systemd-resolved is removed. ubuntu@ins

[Bug 2056372] [NEW] Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-06 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: As I understand it, enabling SPF validation in Exim4 simply requires setting CHECK_RCPT_SPF to true and installing the spf-tools-perl package. However, in mantic, every email has this header, regardless of whether the sender's domain has an SPF TXT record set: Received-SPF:

[Bug 2056443] [NEW] CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check fails if inbound IP address is IPv6

2024-03-07 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: On mantic, when CHECK_RCPT_SPF = true and spf-tools-perl is installed, Exim4 logs an error and fails the SPF check if the inbound IP address is IPv6: 2024-03-07 11:58:35 H=mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com [2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c] Warning: Unexpected error in SPF check. ** Affects: e

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-07 Thread Dominic
Note: this bug relates to inbound IPv4 addresses. IPv6 addresses are affected by a separate bug: #2056443 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-02 Thread Dominic
Also, this should not be marked as "incomplete" as I have supplied all the required information. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-02 Thread Dominic
Still an issue in noble / 24.04. "Received-SPF: none" is reported in the headers of received mail for senders known to have an spf record configured. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-03 Thread Dominic
It was a clean install of Noble, for some reason the spf check always returns "none". It is very easily reproducible, as per my comment #5. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title:

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-04 Thread Dominic
Possibly related to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1998678 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work T

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-06 Thread Dominic
No errors in /var/log/exim4/mainlog, just normal mail flow logs. I suspect some sort of error was introduced in the code for the #1998678 fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Ti

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-06 Thread Dominic
No, you should be seeing a header. Are the steps you followed the same as that which I wrote in comment #5 of this report? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF c

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-06 Thread Dominic
(and comment #6) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-17 Thread Dominic
Re-marking as new since I've supplied all requested information. ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling

[Bug 2081645] Re: (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-10-10 Thread Dominic
Another thing I tried was an additional script to loop "ip address" and look for the IPv6 address I need before wait-online finishes, and even that failed to sufficiently delay the boot process enough to allow nginx to bind to the address. -- You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Bug 2081645] Re: (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-10-10 Thread Dominic
Any update? I'm still seeing failures to bind to an IPv6 address that systemd-networkd has previously reported as being up. I can insert an arbitrary 5 second pause as a workaround, but this should not be necessary. ubuntu@hawk:~$ journalctl -g 2603:af50:1630:aec9:f19a:227e:2f54:5c73 -b Oct 10 13:

[Bug 2081645] Re: (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-10-10 Thread Dominic
> it does not override the existing one (maybe you already know that) Yep, I did know that. My drop-in creates a second wait-online invocation, but since they are both waiting I saw no need to remove the initial invocation. > I am wondering if networkd is reporting the link as configured after *o

[Bug 2081645] Re: (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-10-10 Thread Dominic
I've added my script back in to the wait-online override, which looks like this. After a few reboots, nginx once again failed to bind to this address. My hacky solution is to add a 5 second sleep to the end of this script. #!/bin/bash ip=$(ip -6 address) until [[ $ip == *"2603:af50:1630:aec9:f19

[Bug 2081645] Re: (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-10-10 Thread Dominic
** Attachment added: "wait-online.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2081645/+attachment/5826892/+files/wait-online.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208164

[Bug 2081645] Re: (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-10-10 Thread Dominic
** Attachment added: "networkd.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2081645/+attachment/5826893/+files/networkd.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081645 Tit

[Bug 2081645] Re: (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-10-24 Thread Dominic
I've solved this by statically entering the first IPv6 address in my netplan config. Previously it came up via DHCPv6, whereas the second IPv6 address was static. I don't know why the above script didn't achieve the required delay, given that it explicitly waits for the IPv6 address which nginx fa

[Bug 2081645] Re: (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-09-23 Thread Dominic
This sounds very similar: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/650 Nevertheless that bug was resolved, so it may be a regression or something else entirely. ** Bug watch added: github.com/systemd/systemd/issues #650 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/650 -- You received this bug

[Bug 2081645] Re: (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-09-22 Thread Dominic
I can launch the services manually after boot, so the IP addresses are fine. It's a question of why during boot systemd-networkd is reporting the IPv6 addresses as available before they actually are. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 2081645] [NEW] (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-09-22 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported: Not sure where to post this, but since systemd controls boot precedence this section seems appropriate. I am testing oracular / 24.10 , and I bind some services to specific IPv6 addresses. In order to wait until the IP addresses are up before binding to them during boot, I us

[Bug 2081645] Re: (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-09-24 Thread Dominic
Logs attached. I created the file: /etc/systemd/system/systemd-networkd-wait-online.service.d/override.conf in order to delay boot until IPv6 is available. ** Attachment added: "networkctl.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2081645/+attachment/5821598/+files/networkc

[Bug 2081645] Re: (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-09-24 Thread Dominic
** Attachment added: "wait-online.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2081645/+attachment/5821599/+files/wait-online.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208164

[Bug 2081645] Re: (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-09-24 Thread Dominic
** Attachment added: "cat-sd-wait-online.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2081645/+attachment/5821600/+files/cat-sd-wait-online.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 2081645] Re: (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-09-24 Thread Dominic
I'm using two IPv6 addresses, bind9 is binding to one, which as you say is fine. But when nginx and dovecot try to bind to the other IPv6 address during boot, they (sometimes) fail. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. http

[Bug 2081645] Re: (during boot) failed: Cannot assign requested address

2024-09-24 Thread Dominic
Also, there is no problem launching services manually after boot, and the issue doesn't happen on every boot, so whatever is happening is very time-dependant. I can manually add a few seconds of delay to the boot process, but that feels hacky. -- You received this bug notification because you ar

[Bug 231043] Re: xfwm window manager shortcuts not working at startup

2008-12-05 Thread Dominic Sacré
It's reproducible every time. All I did was to customize the window manager keybindings in the Xfce settings manager, and to enable automatic login in gdm. Every time I boot the machine (and get to an Xfce desktop automatically), my keybindings don't work. This does not happen if gdm is configur

[Bug 251830] Re: Mouseemu installed, not wanted

2008-11-19 Thread Dominic Baranski
I was also affected by this bug recently. I use a Mac Pro (not a notebook) and Ubuntu 8.10 installed mouseemu by default and it broke my forward and back buttons on my mouse. I had a heck of a time figuring out what was wrong since the button presses didn't event come up in xev! after un-installi

[Bug 348071] Re: No way to change default "Save As ... " format in AbiWord

2009-05-12 Thread Dominic Lachowicz
That's quite correct - we can't currently guarantee 100% formatting or semantic integrity with any other file format, though we of course strive to make our file filters as complete as is possible. If and when our RTF or ODF filters are good enough to round-trip documents with no dataloss, we'll ha

[Bug 375952] [NEW] alarm-clock preferences page doesn't scale with font dpi

2009-05-13 Thread Dominic Evans
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: alarm-clock minor bug but worth fixing opening up the preferences page with a System --> Preferences --> Appearance --> Fonts --> Details --> Resolution set to something higher than the default 96 (e.g., 125 dpi) causes the text in the alarm-clock prefer

[Bug 375952] Re: alarm-clock preferences page doesn't scale with font dpi

2009-05-13 Thread Dominic Evans
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26669128/Dependencies.txt -- alarm-clock preferences page doesn't scale with font dpi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >