[Bug 549117] Re: users are not added to "users" group (empty, broken behaviour)

2010-03-26 Thread ceg
Attaching a simple patch that targets adduser. Please consider it for quick inclusion for the next release to stop creating broken user accounts. * Re-enables EXTRA_GROUPS="users". * Its not proposing a new behavior (change) but re-enables standard (and prior) bahaviour. * If an admin does not

[Bug 253103] Re: users are not added to "users" group

2010-03-26 Thread ceg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 549117 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549117 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 549117 users are not added to "users" group (empty, broken behaviour) -- users are not added to "users" group https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253103 You rece

[Bug 253096] Re: pam_umask.so missing in common-account

2010-03-26 Thread ceg
Forgot to mention the reason I changed it to common-account is that /etc/pam.d/sudo does not include common-session. This might be OK if sudo is not considered to open a session. But having a different umask using sudo would again not be expected and lead to wrong permissions etc. Maybe it is more

[Bug 549172] [NEW] common-session pam configuration not included

2010-03-26 Thread ceg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sudo The pam configuration seems to be incomplete in the sense that no common-session modules are included in sudo's pam config. (i.e. things like pam_umask and pam_env don't work with sudo) /etc/pam.d/sudo should contain @include common-session-noninte

[Bug 549172] Re: common-session pam configuration not included

2010-03-26 Thread ceg
Sudo seems to be patched to parse /etc/environment itself. With sudo correctly iplementing pam sessions that hack can be reverted. http://www.sudo.ws/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=83 ** Bug watch added: Sudo Bugzilla #83 http://www.sudo.ws/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=83 -- common-session pam configuration n

[Bug 25700] Re: sudo does not read /etc/environment on interactive logins (directly, not through pam_env)

2010-03-26 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - sudo does not use /etc/environment on interactive logins (through pam_env) + sudo does not read /etc/environment on interactive logins (directly, not through pam_env) -- sudo does not read /etc/environment on interactive logins (directly, not through pam_env) https://bugs

[Bug 549172] Re: common-session pam configuration not included

2010-03-26 Thread ceg
** Description changed: Binary package hint: sudo The pam configuration seems to be incomplete in the sense that no common-session modules are included in sudo's pam config. - (i.e. things like pam_umask and pam_env don't work with sudo) + (i.e. things like pam_umask, limits and pam_en

[Bug 535417] Re: mdadm monitor feature broken, not depending on local MTA/MDA or using wall/notify-send

2010-03-26 Thread ceg
explicit workaround commands using esmtp: #apt-get install esmtp procmail #echo mda=\'/usr/bin/formail -a \"Date: \`date -R\`\" \| /usr/bin/procmail -d %T\' -- mdadm monitor feature broken, not depending on local MTA/MDA or using wall/notify-send https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535417 You rece

[Bug 535417] Re: mdadm monitor feature broken, not depending on local MTA/MDA or using wall/notify-send

2010-03-26 Thread ceg
last line needs to address for esmtprc of course: #echo mda=\'/usr/bin/formail -a \"Date: \`date -R\`\" \| /usr/bin/procmail -d %T\' >> /etc/esmtprc -- mdadm monitor feature broken, not depending on local MTA/MDA or using wall/notify-send https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535417 You received this

[Bug 136252] Re: [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays.

2010-03-26 Thread ceg
Nice you found that out, Sami! Are your arrays taged with your hostname? From Bug #252345 mdadm --incremental seems to block members with non-matching homehost tag and does not seem to have an option to disable that. (Or comprehend the --auto-update-homehost option as a workaround with the possibl

[Bug 136252] Re: [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays.

2010-03-26 Thread ceg
@Sami, with that directory created in initramfs, your setup is now working without any mdadm.conf ARRAY lines, right? -- [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 136252] Re: [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays.

2010-03-26 Thread ceg
@Sami (newly subscribed): Some previous comments relate to you. -- [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubun

[Bug 244808] Re: --incremental --scan --run does not start anything

2010-03-26 Thread ceg
Note that starting all incomplete array indiscriminately is not a good idea in general. i.e. on boot, start only selected arrays degraded that are known to be needed. -- --incremental --scan --run does not start anything https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244808 You received this bug notification b

[Bug 226484] Re: boot fails: mdadm not looking for UUIDs but hostname in superblocks

2010-03-26 Thread ceg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 136252 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136252 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 136252 [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. -- boot fails: mdadm not looking for UUIDs but hostname in superblocks htt

[Bug 136252] Re: [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays.

2010-03-27 Thread ceg
Adopting from #226484 (now a duplicate of this one): This is a bug with mdadm --incremental not doing hotplug, because it looks for permission to do so in mdadm.conf. On hotplug systems mdadm.conf should not have to contain any specific references, to make things clear and for backwards compatib

[Bug 136252] Re: [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot fails)

2010-03-27 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. + [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot fails) ** Description changed: Binary package hint: mdadm Hi, I could not boot from my /dev/md1 -> /dev

[Bug 549451] [NEW] gksu uses keyring "default" but only "login" is auto opened

2010-03-27 Thread ceg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gksu During login seahorse/gdm/pam? seems to open "login.keyring", but gksu always saves passwords to "default.keyring". Either gksu needs to ask which keyring to use, or seahorse/gdm/pam? needs to be able to open secondary keyrings on login. (possibly

[Bug 352056] Re: fast-user-switch-applet crashes system on usage

2010-03-27 Thread ceg
This is with the radeon driver used here, not a dupe of #290704. -- fast-user-switch-applet crashes system on usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352056 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubunt

[Bug 352056] Re: fast-user-switch-applet crashes system on usage

2010-03-27 Thread ceg
here is a Xorg log of the crash ** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.old" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42160315/Xorg.0.log.old -- fast-user-switch-applet crashes system on usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352056 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whi

[Bug 352056] Re: fast-user-switch-applet crashes system on usage

2010-03-27 Thread ceg
It crashed when switching back to the first user. I used the fast-user-switch-applet as user2 and then selecting the user1 (already active user) from the gdm screen. -- fast-user-switch-applet crashes system on usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352056 You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 283385] Re: unable to to copy and paste files in a rdesktop session with glipper active

2010-03-17 Thread ceg
** Also affects: rdesktop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- unable to to copy and paste files in a rdesktop session with glipper active https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283385 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 371434] Re: PCI ExpressCard hotplug requires pciehp.pciehp_force=1

2010-03-17 Thread ceg
(using 9.10) Neither forcing pciehp nor loding acpiphp made the hd connected to the following eSATA express card reappear when it was removed and plugged in again after booting. 02:00.1 IDE interface: JMicron Technology Corp. JMB362/JMB363 AHCI Controller (rev 03) Note that lspci still lists the

[Bug 326135] Re: policykit introduction broke unix user/group privileges

2010-03-18 Thread ceg
** Also affects: policykit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- policykit introduction broke unix user/group privileges https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 326135] Re: policykit introduction broke unix user groups

2010-03-18 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - policykit introduction broke unix user/group privileges + policykit introduction broke unix user groups -- policykit introduction broke unix user groups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 489977] Re: Inaccessible directory has same emblem as read-only directory

2010-02-08 Thread ceg
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Incomplete => Confirmed ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- Inaccessible directory has same emblem as read-only directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489977 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 489977] Re: Inaccessible directory has same emblem as read-only directory

2010-02-08 Thread ceg
Hm, do your user2's directories have the same permissions as mine? Or are your directories of user2 "group writeable"? It would be OK for them not to have a lock emblem then, if you are browsing as user1 and member in the user2 group. Further details on the issue I observe: * The theme used in u

[Bug 531240] Re: breaking raid: root raid_member opened as luks

2010-03-09 Thread ceg
Err, it happened again, reduncancy in the system is destroyed, cryptsetup opened a raid member and it got mounted leaving the raid incomplet/inactive: md3 : inactive sda7[0](S) blkid (now again) returns TYPE="crypto_LUKS" for the raid member. When I run "su cryptsetup isLuks" on raid members or

[Bug 535417] [NEW] mdadm monitor feature broken, not depending on local MTA/MDA or using wall/notify-send

2010-03-09 Thread ceg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mdadm Anybody who cares about redundancy to use mdadm probably cares enough about redundancy to want being informed if redundancy is degraded. Debian systems do have at least local mail enabled and package mdadm asks for a mail address to notify during m

[Bug 531240] Re: breaking raid: root raid_member opened as luks

2010-03-09 Thread ceg
> it's still a bug in blkid. It's blkid that wrongly detects the LUKS UUID on a device that's a RAID member. Yes, your of course right, and if "cryptsetup isLuks" is itself scanning for a luks signature (without giving RAID precedence) it got the same bug. Can you rule that out / know for sure tha

[Bug 497684] Re: mountall and cryptsetup will fight for the console when not using usplash

2010-03-09 Thread ceg
Thank you Paul, for spreading that. I am backing up the ubuntu md raid systems now though, and switching them to a distro that does less hectic transitions and leaving things like raid or boot up unreliable in the process. -- mountall and cryptsetup will fight for the console when not using uspla

[Bug 531240] Re: breaking raid: root raid_member opened as luks

2010-03-10 Thread ceg
Lets think some more of signature rules. Crypt vs Container -> any crypt should be lower then other containers (not fs) because whaterver is in it wouldn't be visible or is random. Crypt vs FS <- old fs signatuers may have remained. RAID vs LVM-LV <- LVs never reside on RAIDs directly (alway

[Bug 531240] Re: breaking raid: root raid_member opened as luks

2010-03-10 Thread ceg
** Description changed: Binary package hint: util-linux After the member is opened as luks device it is booted instead of the md device, while the raid remains "inactive". I first noticed /proc/mdstat reported the root raid as inactive (although the system seemed to run fine!).

[Bug 531240] Re: breaking raid: root raid_member opened as luks

2010-03-10 Thread ceg
My current conception: (WARNING) Both blkid and "cryptsetup isLuks" misreport a raid_member as luks when checking devices, but blkid correctly reports RAID if the device is set up (mounted/active) in the system as intended (after install/update/recover). On boot what happens depends on the order

[Bug 531240] Re: breaking raid: root raid_member opened as luks

2010-03-10 Thread ceg
Cool, that I didn't know from the thread my search turned up about blkid. (increases the bug weight though) -- breaking raid: root raid_member opened as luks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531240 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 244838] Re: don't have any laptop-mode-tools settings in /etc/default/acpi-support

2009-12-17 Thread ceg
The laptop-mode freeze bug actually seems fixed but status not updated. (Bug #12483, debbugs #426548) -- don't have any laptop-mode-tools settings in /etc/default/acpi-support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244838 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 203473] apport-collect data

2009-12-19 Thread ceg
Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: cisco_ipsec Package: linux-image-2.6.31-16-generic 2.6.31-16.53 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-16.53-generic Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic i686 UserGro

[Bug 203473] Dependencies.txt

2009-12-19 Thread ceg
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36968589/Dependencies.txt -- rejected 1 configuration due to insufficient available bus power https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203473 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subsc

[Bug 203473] XsessionErrors.txt

2009-12-19 Thread ceg
** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36968590/XsessionErrors.txt ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Tags added: apport-collected -- rejected 1 configuration due to insufficient available bus power https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Bug 203473] Re: rejected 1 configuration due to insufficient available bus power

2009-12-19 Thread ceg
I am not sure if devicekit is right. If not please change to the package that provides the device detection UI. ** Also affects: devicekit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- rejected 1 configuration due to insufficient available bus power https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203

[Bug 263139] Re: usb device invisible until lsusb command issued

2009-12-19 Thread ceg
with 9.10 Same Hub here: Bus 001 Device 003: ID 05e3:0608 Genesys Logic, Inc. USB-2.0 4-Port HUB lsusb shows the flash drive (after a while), but nothing more happens. /var/log/messages however says: usb 1-2.3: rejected 1 configuration due to insufficient available bus power -- usb device invi

[Bug 498533] [NEW] failures on grub-install to create rescue boot media

2009-12-19 Thread ceg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub2 9.10 The following example used to work with grub1 to create separate rescue boot media: * Plugged in the USB Stick which contains a dedicated grup partition and chainloads other (rescue) boot partitions for several installations that are on the

[Bug 498533] Re: failures on grub-install to create rescue boot media

2009-12-19 Thread ceg
I did actually copy to /media//boot/ (But I have tried it as written above with same result.) -- failures on grub-install to create rescue boot media https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498533 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 498533] Re: failures on grub-install to create rescue boot media

2009-12-19 Thread ceg
One error I noticed now: grub-mkconfig is always writing to /boot/grub/device.map not honoring the path given with for grub.cfg with -o -- failures on grub-install to create rescue boot media https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498533 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 498533] Re: failures on grub-install to create rescue boot media

2009-12-19 Thread ceg
Hi, thanks for that quick response. Is there any workaround for "Cannot read `/grub/core.img'"? >> normally). -> Grub2 needed "grub-install /dev/sda5" to work again. >Should never happen if both the directory given with --root-directory is >the drive/partition you want and also the device you g

[Bug 498533] Re: failures on grub-install to create rescue boot media

2009-12-19 Thread ceg
> grub-mkconfig always uses /boot. > It doestn't have at all any support for something like --root-directory= > of grub-install. Hm, I took the option "-o, --output=FILE output generated config to FILE" for it. > Also all /etc/grub.d/* files only look in /boot/ for the kernels etc. That might n

[Bug 498533] Re: failures on grub-install to create rescue boot media

2009-12-19 Thread ceg
Ah, right, I probably just don't need to grub-mkconfig at all if /boot is copied. -- failures on grub-install to create rescue boot media https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498533 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 498533] Re: failures on grub-install to create rescue boot media

2009-12-19 Thread ceg
> you can use grub-install with --grub-setup=/bin/true Thanks for this, and your help! Way cleaner than copying to the rescue partition, over-mounting it to /boot and than doing update-grub/grub-install. -- failures on grub-install to create rescue boot media https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49

[Bug 498597] [NEW] live-usb: package linux-image-2.6.31-16-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: fehlgeschlagen in buffer_write(fd) (10, ret=-1): Backend dpkg-deb w?hrend ?./lib/modules/2

2009-12-19 Thread ceg
Public bug reported: 9.10 ubuntu desktop CD iso put on usb stick (live-usb) and booted: Update using synaptic failed and got reported by apport. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 ArecordDevices: List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices card 0: SB [HDA ATI SB], device 0: ALC883 Analog [

[Bug 498597] Re: live-usb: package linux-image-2.6.31-16-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: fehlgeschlagen in buffer_write(fd) (10, ret=-1): Backend dpkg-deb w?hrend ?./lib/modules/2.6

2009-12-19 Thread ceg
** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36978175/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36978176/AplayDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36978177/AptOrdering.txt **

[Bug 498533] Re: failures on grub-install to create rescue boot media

2009-12-19 Thread ceg
--grub-setup=/bin/true worked nice! Nailed it down to two issues now. 1) When I used grub-mkconfig (at that time with -o /media//boot/grub/grub.cfg" but shouldn't matter) it did create a faulty grub.cfg however. It probably looked in /boot/grub for the device.map (as it does not support --grub

[Bug 498636] [NEW] mountall can not be unblocked

2009-12-19 Thread ceg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountall When booting from a rescue boot device, mountall prevented a successful boot. It was waiting for the UUID of the (potentially destroyed) /boot partition. (different form the boot media used) While ESC did get me a shell, I could not disable boo

[Bug 498533] Re: failures on grub-install to create rescue boot media

2009-12-20 Thread ceg
* If /boot files are copied to rescue partition manually, the UUID in the search lines in grub.cfg will not match the UUID of the rescue partition. A --grub-root-directory option for grub-mkconfig would fix this. * grubenv seems to get written to (root)/grub while it is installed in (root)/boot/gr

[Bug 498636] Re: mountall can not be unblocked

2009-12-21 Thread ceg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 489474 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489474 Thank you. All good with that LucidBootRecovery spec. -- mountall can not be unblocked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498636 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 496461] Re: mounts fail because degraded raid is not beeing started

2009-12-21 Thread ceg
As "mountall" already has the "waiting for device" functionality, linking this to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReliableRaid that was updated with email discussion and made to match a SpecTemplate. ** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- mounts fail because degraded raid is n

[Bug 453895] Re: Online-Actions not working in GnuCash

2009-12-21 Thread ceg
Could someone give me a hint how/what I have to do, in order to install aqbanking from lucid (version 4.1.8) in 9.10? The package search turns out many .debs. -- Online-Actions not working in GnuCash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453895 You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 496461] Re: mounts fail because degraded raid is not beeing started

2009-12-21 Thread ceg
Ok, thought of checking it in somewhere. ->blueprints? -- mounts fail because degraded raid is not beeing started https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu

[Bug 453895] Re: Online-Actions not working in GnuCash

2009-12-21 Thread ceg
dowload and "dpkg -i *" of aqbanking-tools plus 5x "libaqbanking" and 1x libaqhbci seem to do it. -- Online-Actions not working in GnuCash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-

[Bug 489136] Re: patch: makes adduser.conf a symlink to a profile (provides switchable profile feature to all frontends)

2010-01-13 Thread ceg
If policykit broke the desktop and unprivileged profiles this is a bug with policykit not being set up to honor those unix groups. I don't see user profiles only with respect to g-s-t. It seems usefull also for admins not using g-s-t. As adduser is supposed to be thesystem wide tool, even the inst

[Bug 326135] Re: User Privileges ignored

2010-01-13 Thread ceg
If policykit broke the desktop and unprivileged profiles this is a bug with policykit not being set up to honor those unix groups. It seems to merely match all users in admin group to root. ** Also affects: policykit-1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: networ

[Bug 275304] Re: wrong ownership of .Xauthority and /tmp/libgksu-xxx

2010-01-15 Thread ceg
Fedora's "sandbox -X" seems to be made for this. ** Summary changed: - wrong ownership of .Xauthority and /tmp/libgksu-xxx + run as different user fails (wrong ownership of .Xauthority and /tmp/libgksu-xxx) -- run as different user fails (wrong ownership of .Xauthority and /tmp/libgksu-xxx) h

[Bug 508059] [NEW] encrypted home setup is messing with/breaking permissions

2010-01-15 Thread ceg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: user-setup /home//.Private gets currenty mounted as /home/ with permissions set to rwx-- by default. This is changing the default to have homedirs readable among users and for example breaks sharing files and having ~/public_html work. We can not as

[Bug 379233] Re: cp preserves mode with --no-preserve=mode

2009-11-14 Thread ceg
Hi there, it's now a vfat fs plugged into a 9.10 system: ii coreutils 7.4-2ubuntu1 The GNU core utilities $ ls -l /media/USB/ -rwxr-xr-x 1 test.txt1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 test.txt2 $ cp /media/USB/test.txt1 . $ ls -l -rwxr-xr-x 1 test.txt1 $ cp --no-preserve=mode /media/USB/test.file2 . $ ls

[Bug 457687] Re: error: Running 'grub-install --no-floppy "/dev/md0"' failed.

2010-01-09 Thread ceg
There is again the same error message in 9.10 when installing grub to md device. -> Bug #462171 -- error: Running 'grub-install --no-floppy "/dev/md0"' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457687 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 440544] Re: screen corruption with Radeon 4770

2010-01-12 Thread ceg
Phil, thank you for pointing me to the xorg.conf. (your help worked out great :) ** Description changed: Binary package hint: xorg There is reproducable corruption of the screen when using a Sapphire - Radeon 4770 card with the open source radeon drivers. + Radeon 4770 card with the open s

[Bug 488158] Re: users-admin should leave adduser handle main group creation

2010-01-12 Thread ceg
Hmm, seems like adduser wants to ensure UID == UPG-GID? Maybe g-s-t could offer to choose the next possible ID available, or optionally override the GID and possibly mess up the system? -- users-admin should leave adduser handle main group creation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488158 You rece

[Bug 488158] Re: users-admin should leave adduser handle main group creation

2010-01-13 Thread ceg
Good choice I think. Cutting down the settings forced with g-s-t GUI profiles is probably also a good measure for supporting the adduser profiles (or any other system wide profiles). -- users-admin should leave adduser handle main group creation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488158 You received

[Bug 489136] Re: Ship adduser.conf as symlink to user profiles to unify their handling by different tools

2010-01-13 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - Ship adduser with user profiles to unify their handling by different tools + Ship adduser.conf as symlink to user profiles to unify their handling by different tools ** Description changed: Binary package hint: adduser + Default profiles could be shiped for admininstr

[Bug 489136] Re: Ship adduser.conf as symlink to a profile (provides switchable profile feature for all frontends)

2010-01-13 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - Ship adduser.conf as symlink to user profiles to unify their handling by different tools + Ship adduser.conf as symlink to a profile (provides switchable profile feature for all frontends) ** Summary changed: - Ship adduser.conf as symlink to a profile (provides switchabl

[Bug 352056] Re: fast-user-switch-applet crashes system on usage

2009-12-28 Thread ceg
crased on me in 9.10 ** Changed in: fast-user-switch-applet (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- fast-user-switch-applet crashes system on usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352056 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 465318] Re: intel graphics laptop crashes with external monitor

2009-12-28 Thread ceg
This is confirmed many times by now. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 408432 [i915] 'xrandr' with no arguments garbles screen -- intel graphics laptop crashes with external monitor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465318

[Bug 440544] Re: Occasional screen corruption with Radeon 4770

2009-12-29 Thread ceg
Logging into kde the errors are all over the place. -- Occasional screen corruption with Radeon 4770 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440544 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub

[Bug 440544] Re: screen corruption with Radeon 4770

2009-12-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - Occasional screen corruption with Radeon 4770 + screen corruption with Radeon 4770 -- screen corruption with Radeon 4770 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440544 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ub

[Bug 440544] Re: screen corruption with Radeon 4770

2009-12-29 Thread ceg
Looks like they had the same prob, but I don't understand their solutions: http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18687 -- screen corruption with Radeon 4770 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440544 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 440544] Re: screen corruption with Radeon 4770

2009-12-30 Thread ceg
** Description changed: Binary package hint: xorg - There is occasional corruption of the screen when using a Sapphire - Radeon 4770 card with the open source radeon drivers. The takes the form - of a "chequered" effect, looking a bit like a chequer board. This is - most noticeable when the s

[Bug 48734] Re: Home permissions too open

2021-01-18 Thread ceg
--- Avoiding the caveat of "this does not work"? --- You may just not have thought yet of this solution that can be implemented with little adjustment: ( Privacy by default? YES, even with improved usability! ) Here is a trial script: https://salsa.debian.org/freedombox-team/freedombox/-/snippe

[Bug 48734] Re: Home permissions too open

2021-01-18 Thread ceg
Just two things that are broken with DIR_MODE=0750 (Which are still perfectly supported with the proof-of-concept lock-down plus improved-usability script from last the post. Independently from the additional group directories that it introduces.) * samba usershares * ~/public_html -- You recei

[Bug 1888632] Re: sct doesn't reduce colour temperature on second monitor (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS)

2020-07-29 Thread ceg
Among other things the fork? at https://github.com/faf0/sct claims to "iterate over all screens of the default display and change the color temperature". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1

[Bug 987420] [NEW] allow to set restart/resume time on shutdown/suspend

2012-04-23 Thread ceg
Public bug reported: Linux provides a simple way to schedule an restart event, for example: rtcwake -m on -s This command avoids that rtcwake does the switching into another power state (mode -m stays on). The power state are thus handled by the regular pm-tools, which is more stable especial

[Bug 987420] Re: allow to set restart/resume time on shutdown/suspend

2012-04-23 Thread ceg
** Description changed: Linux provides a simple way to schedule an restart event, for example: rtcwake -m on -s - This command avoids that rtcwake does the switching into another power state (mode -m stays on). - The power state are thus handled by the regular pm-tools, which is more

[Bug 884011] Re: zenity doesn't show tray/appindicator icon

2012-04-27 Thread ceg
The functionality to display a status icon continuously still remains a requirement, and this is a zenity regression. Reducing "zenity --notification" to implement just notifications (same as "notify-send") may be OK, but then a separate "zenity --trayicon" is required to maintain the functionali

[Bug 884011] Re: zenity doesn't show tray/appindicator icon

2012-04-27 Thread ceg
** Description changed: + + The functionality to display a tray icon with "zenity --notification" completely removed that functionality from zenity, instead of moving it into a proper "zenity --trayicon" feature. + + --- Ubuntu 11.10 zenity 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 In a script I use following l

[Bug 387984] Re: Notifications using --listen should allow clicking to remove the icon

2012-04-27 Thread ceg
Zenity --notify (or better --trayicon Bug #884011) may just always listen on stdin, and provide an --exit-on-click option enable user feedback. This would remove the asumption that --listen means to continusly listening to commands on stdin. It would provide the calling script with a feedback upon

[Bug 387984] Re: Notifications using --listen should allow clicking to remove the icon

2012-04-27 Thread ceg
** Description changed: Binary package hint: zenity + + + Zenity --notify (or better --trayicon Bug #884011) may just always listen on stdin, and provide an --exit-on-click option enable user feedback. + + This would remove the asumption that --listen always means to endlessly + listen to co

[Bug 884011] Re: regression: lost ability to show continuous status with tray/appindicator icon

2012-04-29 Thread ceg
Hi Peter-Alexander, you're right, and I agree it still is a regression looking at the --notification function alone. As far as I understand the reason for the change was the decision for an updated semantic. Notification now only means a bubble message, and is different from a status icon or win

[Bug 884011] Re: regression: lost ability to show continuous status with tray/appindicator icon

2012-04-29 Thread ceg
** Description changed: The change in the "zenity --notification" behavior completely removed the functionality to display an unobtrusive, always visible tray icon - from zenity. Instead, that functionality should have been moved into a + from zenity. + + For clarity, the tray icon functional

[Bug 884011] Re: regression: lost ability to show continuous status with tray/appindicator icon

2012-04-29 Thread ceg
In any case, it would be good if you could post the issue to the upstram bugtracker. ** Description changed: The change in the "zenity --notification" behavior completely removed the functionality to display an unobtrusive, always visible tray icon from zenity. For clarity, the tray ic

[Bug 884011] Re: regression: lost ability to show continuous status with tray/appindicator icon

2012-04-29 Thread ceg
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #675064 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675064 ** Changed in: zenity Importance: Undecided => Unknown ** Changed in: zenity Status: New => Unknown ** Changed in: zenity Remote watch: None => GNOME Bug Tracker #675064 -- You receive

[Bug 987664] Re: allow to set restart/resume time

2012-04-29 Thread ceg
Hi jacopoL, you set this to invalid, because you don't know about start events? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987664 Title: allow to set restart/resume time To manage notifications

[Bug 987664] Re: allow to set restart/resume time

2012-04-25 Thread ceg
Thank you for the pointer to ConsoleKit. Do I understand it correctly, there is no way to initiate a shutdown in gnome that saves the session, without using the gnome-session buttons? (I have been disapointed by gnome folks dumbing down functionality in other areas already, they are not just pro

[Bug 987664] Re: allow to set restart/resume time

2012-04-25 Thread ceg
** Description changed: - Linux provides a simple way to schedule a restart event. + Linux provides a simple way to schedule a restart event that is + particularly usfull in conjuction to initiating or scheduling a shutdown + or suspend. rtcwake -m on -s - This particular command avoids t

[Bug 989301] [NEW] large rsync runs stall system perfomance (missing --drop-cache)

2012-04-26 Thread ceg
Public bug reported: Please build the package with the --drop-cache patch available in the tarball, to avoid filling up the io cache with not re-queried copied data. The current behavior pushes the data of other process out of the cache and thus slows them down. http://insights.oetiker.ch/lin

[Bug 252351] Re: provide some info about users and file permissions

2010-12-16 Thread ceg
** Description changed: Binary package hint: debian-installer Following is a little informative text for the "set up users and passwords" stage: --- - It is easy for multiple users to collaborate on a debian/ubuntu system. - Just keep in mind that access to files always depends on

[Bug 531240] Re: silently breaking raid: root raid_members opened as luks

2010-12-22 Thread ceg
The UUID of the filesystem created on a raid mirror is of course present and identical on any member devices of the raid mirror mirror. The raid member device (superblocks) are probably also all taged with (another) UUID of the raid device they assemble, plus the device ID. Mdadm seems to handle t

[Bug 550131] Re: initramfs missing /var/run/mdadm/ dir (loosing state, race, misconfig)

2010-09-16 Thread ceg
Surbhi, you actually have an ubuntu system on raid installed and the mapfile is carried over? Then please state the exact version and details and say it works for you. If not please leave the bug filed as it was, documenting a bug in the ubuntu mdadm package. ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu)

[Bug 541058] Re: [->UUIDudev] mdadm fails to assemble raid during boot

2010-09-15 Thread ceg
@Surbhi when you go around changing many bug statuses you chould probably subscribe to mdadm bug mail in general and be careful with changes. -- [->UUIDudev] mdadm fails to assemble raid during boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541058 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 551719] Re: MD_AUTODETECT=y kernel option is obsolete (boot delay and udev/mdadm (raid) disturbance)

2012-05-06 Thread ceg
Same symptoms do not mean the same cause (bug). Many thanks for hinting to the module restriction. This bug can be closed then. :) ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notifi

[Bug 985882] Re: units shown are not equal to the units asked for creation

2012-05-06 Thread ceg
Thanks for the workaround! Having to look into Move/Resize before creating new partitions is still strange, though. I would expect the required unit numbers are available, at least in the detailed properties of partitions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 985882] Re: units shown are not equal to the units asked for creation

2012-05-06 Thread ceg
Use case was, not to copy but create two disks with same partiton sizes (only some of them raid partition clones). ** Description changed: Try to recreate or clone the OS partition on another harddrive of a different size as the original. GParted shows only an impresize size of the exist

[Bug 985882] Re: units shown are not equal to the units asked for creation

2012-05-08 Thread ceg
When I had the problem I finally had to turn to CLI-parted to get the proper numbers. Nothing a graphical tool user may like to do, but I could work around the problem that way. Fortunately, I was using the MiB allignment on all newer disks, so they should have ended up to have the same size as I

[Bug 985882] Re: units shown are not equal to the units asked for creation

2012-05-08 Thread ceg
Can't sectors per MiB be different on different harddisks? But the LBA size "sectors?" may be the right option for below MiB alligning. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985882 Title: un

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >