I tested Doug's patch on 3.0.0-16 in tickless mode, and it seems to
report the same or similar results as the same kernel without the patch
and ticks enabled.
Attached is a before and after load average graph, ignore the spike that
was the kernel compiling Doug's patch.
** Attachment added: "web1
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838811
Title:
load average too low
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
i am seeing the same problem on 11.10
please see here my description
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=11612057
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848
Title:
[karmic] CPU load
** Attachment added: "lspci-vnvn.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838811/+attachment/2339924/+files/lspci-vnvn.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838811
Title:
load average to
Public bug reported:
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS
Release:10.04
2.6.37-02063706-generic
load average doesn't seem to be registering for sleeping processes, as
demoed here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjSZ-D0XBBQ
first found this problem also on squeeze .32 and .38:
http://bugs.d
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838811
Title:
load average too low
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
