I'm seeing something that appears essentially the
same in 9.04 with an xml to dtd conversion. If I were
using java directly with jars, I would expect to see this
with an incorrect classpath specification.
Moreover, no source for ubuntu's binary package
"trang" seems to be available.
> trang t.xm
Also I see:
> apt-cache policy trang
The "trang" package looks old.
trang:
Installed: 20030619-6.1
Candidate: 20030619-6.1
Version table:
*** 20030619-6.1 0
500 http://mirror.anl.gov jaunty/universe Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
I recall that in the past I would get di
I wish to second the request of #5 that working access to photos on
iphones be kept up to date in xenial. For the credibility of xenial's
LTS status this should be done.
Up to the recent time of a new device with iOS 11, I had things working with
iOS 10.3 using
Martin Salbaba's ppa for the packa
Following up to my #49:
I'm working with Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS.
The Martin Salbaba ppa had been working for me with an iphone 5 and iOS
10.3
Recently I went to a new phone running iOS 11, and I fail to get to
photos with ifuse after an apparently successful "idevicepair pair".
Ifuse complains about
Continuing #55:
Given the change with libimobiledevice between iOS 10.3 and iOS 11+,
I decided to take a look at shotwell.
The curious thing is that shotwell
displays correct thumbnails for all photos on the iphone. That is curious
because AIUI the jpegs generated by the iphone camera contain em
At the github site referenced here at the top it is said:
--
"On newer iOS version, ValidatePair is not mandatory to gain trusted host
status. Starting with iOS 11, the ValidatePair request has been removed from
lockdownd and will throw an error. This commit adds a version check so that
Val
EUREKA (maybe) !
This evening I took the iPhone update to iOS 11.3, and just out of curiosity I
decided to check out the iphone as an attached device in the file manager. And
I'm in. I don't know why. I did not use
idevicepair nor ifuse. If I run ideviceinfo, I still get "ERROR: Could not
c
It appears to me that upon my move this date to iPhone's iOS 11.3 Apple
may have finally given us transparent usb file system access to our
photos. See Bug # 1718554, no. 8.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
I could not replicate for my latest photos this evening what I reported
in #8.
Yet by fiddling in various ways, after a reboot I was able to coax
shotwell to import the photos on the iPhone. I then had command line
access to those photos in the location where shotwell dropped them.
As for /run/us
My last sentence in #9 should be:
It's certainly less than transparent usb access through the lightning
port to the file system on the iPhone.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718554
Ti
Re 12.04 LTS: It doesn't make sense for an LTS user to add a baroque apt
repository. Please, could a stable fix be pushed out with regular
updates. (It's probably at least 8 months before 12.04 LTS is replaced
by what I understand to be its LTS successor, 17.04.1+)
--
You received this bug noti
#47: When you say you are using the regular packaged versions, am I
correct in thinking that you are speaking about an updated Ubuntu 17.04?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623666
Title
I've had success with newly installed 16.04.3 LTS following steps 8 - 11
given in #44 after installing the October 2016 ppa for 16.04 from Martin
Salbaba. That is, my first 3 steps were:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:martin-salbaba/ppa+libimobiledevice
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get dist-up
I'm seeing this for the first time with my update yesterday, 28 Jan 2017
23:00 PST, pushed out with standard Ubuntu updates for Ubuntu 12.04.5
LTS.
I can see the default entrance page, the preferences page, and
about:config. But I cannot see any html pages. However, html
does appear to render i
@Thomas Mayer (thomas303)
I previously reported (on another page from where I was pointed here) this
problem in Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS. Following suggestion I took the full profile
version 7. I did confirm that the problem was apparmor. However with
usr.bin.firefox_patched it began throwing pars
A new build of Firefox 51.0.1 was pushed out as a standard update for
the elderly Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS. The display problem is no longer
present. That was my complaint. I'm not in a position to say whether
it is suitably armored. Thanks to whoever fixed it.
--
You received this bug notification
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623588/+attachment/1516502/+files/Dependencies.txt
--
installation of emacs23 blocked by emacsen-common
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623588
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: emacsen-common
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
Release:10.04
This applies to a new desktop installation, rather than an upgrade,
via cdrom (made from iso downloaded 22 Aug 2010) of Ubuntu 10.04.1.
I have NOT seen this on two other machines wh
era, thanks for your reply; /var/log/apt/term.log is now attached
** Attachment added: "term.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacsen-common/+bug/623588/+attachment/1517916/+files/term.log
** Changed in: emacsen-common (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
installation
The call to install-info seems to be at the end of /var/lib/dpkg/info
/emacsen-common.postinst:
# Clean up dead emacs info entry...
install-info --remove --quiet emacs
But now what is "install-info"?
> type -a install-info
install-info is /usr/local/bin/install-info
Observations:
1. Hiding /usr/local/bin/install-info (which was the old GNU texinfo, v
4.8) enabled aptitude to finish cleanly.
2. Package management software operating in vendor (in this Ubuntu)
territory, i.e., using the vendor's package database, should insulate
itself from PATH components no
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 476115 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476115
The duplicate status is correct. However it's the latest in a series,
between ubuntu and debian, going back at least to 2008, of half a dozen
or so duplicates.
Its' time to pay attention.
As I wrote in my c
22 matches
Mail list logo
