[Bug 452175] Re: Random segfaults when using ld.so explicitly to start a program

2010-01-19 Thread Visi
I was able to compile the latest public karmic 32 bit generic kernel with the patch. When I have used that kernel I was not able to see anymore the reported problem. I would say that the fix was working for me. Can someone tell me when could this patch appear on an average user desktop? I would b

[Bug 452175] Re: Random segfaults when using ld.so explicitly to start a program

2009-12-04 Thread Visi
to Pekka: If you have seen the above discussion then there was this link about the nx-emulation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Security/Features#Non-Exec%20Memory If you read it you will see that the generic-pae kernel is also using the nx-emulation if your processor does not support "nx". As far as

[Bug 452175] Re: Random segfaults when using ld.so explicitly to start a program

2009-11-17 Thread Visi
broken the next one: * 2.6.30-3.4 So it seems with this release came the change that broke it. Changes: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26403381/linux_2.6.30-3.4_i386.changes -- Random segfaults when using ld.so explicitly to start a program https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452175 You received this

[Bug 452175] [NEW] Random segfaults when using ld.so explicitly to start a program

2009-10-15 Thread Visi
Public bug reported: It seems that memory allocation fails occasionally, when an optional (non-standard, but legal) startup method is used to execute a binary. Our application requires that method (scratchbox2) so that's why we found it. Environment: - Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala 32b

[Bug 119595] SIGSEGV when using T2CON

2007-06-09 Thread Gabor Visi
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ktechlab When I run the following program in ktechlab, I got a SIGSEGV. Usually not for the first time but for the 2nd or 3rd. Program: processor p16f628 include banksel T2CON movlw 0x04 movwf T2CON loop

[Bug 63132] Re: fuse-utils 2.5.3-2.1ubuntu3 installation (edgy) crashes in post installation phase

2007-01-13 Thread Gabor Visi
I have the same problem with fuse-utils 2.5.3-2.1ubuntu4. I also have my own kernel with fuse support compiled in statically, and so obviously no fuse module. Is there any progress on this bug? -- fuse-utils 2.5.3-2.1ubuntu3 installation (edgy) crashes in post installation phase https://launc

[Bug 1505242] Re: WARNING: ... intel_display.c:11100 intel_check_page_flip

2015-10-17 Thread Visi Bilius
I have updated the BIOS. Thank you for the help. sudo dmidecode -s bios-version && sudo dmidecode -s bios-release-date # SMBIOS implementations newer than version 2.8 are not # fully supported by this version of dmidecode. 1101 # SMBIOS implementations newer than version 2.8 are not # fully suppo

[Bug 1505242] Re: WARNING: ... intel_display.c:11100 intel_check_page_flip

2015-11-02 Thread Visi Bilius
Unfortunately, I can see this warning with the 4.2.0-16 kernel, as well: Oct 30 07:56:24 fozzy kernel: [ 1314.912537] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at /build/linux-AxjFAn/linux-4.2.0/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:11100 intel_check_page_flip+0xfc/0x110 [i915]() Oct 30 07:56:24 fozzy kernel: [ 131

[Bug 1505242] [NEW] WARNING: ... intel_display.c:11100 intel_check_page_flip

2015-10-12 Thread Visi Bilius
Public bug reported: I see warnings similar to this occasionally in the dmesg output. I first noticed it, when the system refused to put load on all but one core, and I tried to find the reason. But it happened again a few times, and I did not notice that effect (or any). I do not know the trigge

[Bug 1505242] Re: WARNING: ... intel_display.c:11100 intel_check_page_flip

2015-10-28 Thread Visi Bilius
I tried the 4.3-rc6 version: it did boot, but I saw the screen flickering after any change on it. I saw these in the logs: Oct 24 14:32:30 fozzy kernel: [1.125622] i915 :00:02.0: Direct firmware load for i915/skl_dmc_ver1.bin failed with error -2 Oct 24 14:32:30 fozzy kernel: [1.1256

[Bug 1505242] Re: WARNING: ... intel_display.c:11100 intel_check_page_flip

2015-10-28 Thread Visi Bilius
I just upgraded to 15.10. The provided kernel, 4.2.0-16-generic, works fine so far. If the warning happens to come, it must come very rarely. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1505242 Titl