10.10 (which introduced libnotify4) is EOL, but 10.04 (which contains
libnotify1) is not. The problem _appeared_ in 10.10, but is still
around today in 12.04, 12.10, 13.04. The older library is part of *10.04
LTS* (...why do you think this was reported in 2011?)
oldlibs packages are shipped for v
Based on what we've been seeing maintaining Oracle Linux, there are many
workloads for which THP results in a ~9-10% performance hit overall on
the system, and this includes kernels up through 3.8.13 (which we're
using as the baseline for a new kernel in that distro). It has to do
with the fact tha
BTW, by "we're probably going to remove it for the time being", I'm
referring to the kernels in the distro at my day job (OL). I use Ubuntu
at home. ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743
-2ubuntu7.4 was released with a different upstream path relating to
captive mouse pointers, and this patch addresses a *crash*. Could we
please see this make it into -2ubuntu7.5?
--
X server segfaults when using XTest
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607071
You received this bug notification becau
I was using -2ubuntu7.5 all day today while snowed in, with Eclipse on
top of xpra. Can't get much more stressful testing than that. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607071
Title:
[S
The attached patch is a trivial one-liner to debian/rules and fixes
installation of this file. The diff is against mrtg_2.17.4-2ubuntu2
(Trusty and later) but likely applies as-is to mrtg-2.17.3-* as shipped
in Precise as well.
** Patch added: "install mrtg-traffic-sum in debian/rules"
https:/
A temporarily fixed version of this package for Trusty and later is
currently in my PPA using the above patch:
https://launchpad.net/~duh/+archive/ubuntu/duh/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
I don't see how it is possible to justify this kind of change in a LTS
release. This proposal ignores the whole point of what a LTS release is:
version stability is the default. The above suggestion doesn't even
belong in trusty-backports, never mind trusty-proposed or trusty-
updates.
Putting thi
Ah, and someone already implemented *precisely* what I specified above
using update-alternatives. See this PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~brightbox/+archive/ubuntu/ruby-
ng?field.series_filter=trusty
IMNSHO, this proposal should be rejected in favor of a PPA solution such
as above.
--
You received
Public bug reported:
mrtg has included a cumulative-value calculation script, bin/mrtg-
traffic-sum, which is documented on MRTG's homepage but isn't installed
by the Ubuntu package for some reason. The script has been around for
>10 years; it should be installed by default.
This is true of all c
Public bug reported:
The current version of libnotify in oneiric is libnotify4, and
libnotify1 was removed in early September. However, there are third
party binary packages using libnotify.so.1 (in my case, it's Jungle
Disk, that I've found so far). It would be nice to have this available
in oldl
tucker-simmons: Simply install libnotify1. It provides the missing
library, libnotify.so.1. I've already put in a ticket with the Jungle
Disk maintainers to make the next versionof their .deb explicitly depend
on the libnotify1 package.
(The libnotify4 package that is part of Oneiric has a differe
And when using the XFCE context menu's "Fullscreen" option, it only does
the same thing as F11 from within VLC: the controls and menubar are
still there.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
For oneiric and later:
A needed fix in ca-certificates-java is to change the dependency line from:
openjdk-6-jre-headless (>= 6b16-1.6.1-2) | java6-runtime-headless,
to:
default-jre-headless | java6-runtime-headless
It "works" right now, but this is a correction to the current case as
seen on
Here's the change for oneiric for java-access-bridge. With this change,
installing openjdk-{jdk,jre} no longer pulls in any openjdk-6 components
by default. I have not tried this change for precise, but my gut feeling
is that it will probably Just Work.
For those who cannot wait for this change in
Bah, previous comment should have said "...installing
openjdk-7-{jdk,jre} no longer pulls in any openjdk-6 components by
default."
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881218
Title:
openjdk
Note: ca-certificates-java "works" as noted in comment 7, thus I set it
to Fix Released for that package only. The patch in comment 8 needs to
be applied to java-access-bridge in order to fix this bug completely.
** Changed in: ca-certificates-java (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
Note, I've forward-copied libnotify1 from my PPA all the way through
Saucy as of this writing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859223
Title:
libnotify1 missing from oneiric
To manage
This is _still_ broken in oneiric and the fix is absolutely trivial -
can someone please take this on in the official packaging? As it
currently stands, applications like eclipse for amd64 cannot run using
the default /usr/bin/java if ia32-sun-java6 is installed, without
altering the priorities.
-
Jonathan, it's not possible to install the "lsb" metapackage, which aids
in building/maintaining some third-party source that is distro-
independent, if nullmailer is installed (though it's possible to do so
if other noncompliant MTAs are installed, such as ssmtp or the lsb-
invalid-mta).
--
You
JohnW, a version of nullmailer with this restriction removed is
available in this PPA for Lucid, Maverick, and Natty:
https://launchpad.net/~duh/+archive/duh
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
sylvestre, the patch has been attached to this bug since it was created
last year.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643658
Title:
ia32-sun-java6-bin has improperly equal alternatives pr
** Also affects: blueproximity
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: blueproximity
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599850
Title:
B
e the time to work on a 'real'
implementation of the feature; I needed it for my workstation at
$dayjob, and created my own ~suffixed dpkg without the conflict. I
offered the conflicts change solely for real-world practicality.
--
-- Todd Vierling
--
You received this bug notification because
This issue exists (and the same patch works against) 6.21-1ubuntu1 as
shipped in maverick.
--
ia32-sun-java6-bin has improperly equal alternatives priority on amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643658
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nullmailer
Yes, we know that the full LSB spec specifies that "-bs" be provided by
the sendmail frontend. However, this interface is not supplied by ssmtp,
nor is it supplied by the default lsb-invalid-mta (of course). I don't
see why [only] nullmailer sh
** Patch added: "Conflicts change to debian/control"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660089/+attachment/1691330/+files/nullmailer_1-1.04-1.2_1-1.04-1.2%2Bduh1.diff
--
nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660089
You received this bug notification be
For the moment, I have made 6.22 versions under the DLJ license for
Lucid-Maverick-Natty, plus UNTESTED backports to Hardy-Karmic, in the
following PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~duh/+archive/sun-java6
The packaging is based on the DLJ-based packaging in 6.21-1ubuntu1 as
published in Maverick, plus
The PPA versions have been moved to their own PPA, now offered for
Karmic, Lucid, Maverick, and Natty: ppa:duh/sun-java6
https://launchpad.net/~duh/+archive/sun-java6
--
ia32-sun-java6-bin has improperly equal alternatives priority on amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643658
You received thi
The fixed xvfb (only) has been put into my generic PPA: ppa:duh/duh
https://launchpad.net/~duh/+archive/duh
This version builds only the fixed xvfb package, allowing use of the
normal lucid-updates xorg-server packages otherwise. The separate
ppa:duh/lucid-xpra-fix PPA is now deleted.
--
X serv
Public bug reported:
When trying to build an updated libept, I found that the test step did
this:
cd "/build/buildd/libept-1.0.4~duh1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/ept" &&
"LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/build/buildd/libept-1.0.4~duh1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/ept"
/build/buildd/libept-1.0.4~duh1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/ept/
** Patch added: "fix for LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667952/+attachment/1714598/+files/libwibble_0.1.24-1_0.1.26-1.diff
--
wibble CMake tests fail in LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting command
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667952
You received this bug notification because
Bah, forgot to mention this is for Lucid, which has libwibble-dev
0.1.24.
--
wibble CMake tests fail in LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting command
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667952
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
upstream git to prevent crash of Xvfb under xpra:
+https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/parti-all/+bug/607071
+
+ -- Todd Vierling Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:55:31 -0400
** Patch added: "xtest.c.diff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52590445/xtest.c.diff
** Changed in: parti-a
Public bug reported:
Ideally, the default JVM should match the default JDK architecture. If
ia32-sun-java6-bin is installed, it should not take over the java VM
alternative links unless explicitly requested by the user via update-
java-alternatives. As it is, installing the sun-java6-jdk package a
chrisisbd: You could install the xorg-server packages from my PPA to
find out:
https://launchpad.net/~duh/+archive/lucid-xpra-fix
If those packages do not fix it, I recommend installing ppa-purge (it
will show up as a new package in aptitude the first time you add a PPA
to your system) and using
Trivial patch: force priority to 15 when building ia32- version of the
package
** Patch added: "ia32-java-priority.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sun-java6/+bug/643658/+attachment/1613989/+files/ia32-java-priority.diff
--
ia32-sun-java6-bin has improperly equal alternatives
For testing, a version of the 6.20dlj-1ubuntu3 package for lucid, with
this patch applied (altered so as to build only the affected binary
package), is in the following PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~duh/+archive/duh
(Well, it will be available when the build cluster gets to it, in about
a half hour
38 matches
Mail list logo
