I'm trying to improve the error messages. Can you please tell me what
the output of
http://lindi.iki.fi/lindi/systemtap/diagnose-error-cases.bash
is on your system?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
You have upgraded your kernel but not yet rebooted to this new version.
Just reboot?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996364
Title:
systemtap reports error 'Build-id mismatch'
To manag
"3.2.0-24" is not the full version number. You can see the version
number of your linux packages using e.g.
dpkg -l | grep linux-image
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996364
Title:
s
ftp://ftp.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/linux/linux-image-3.2.0-24
-generic-pae_3.2.0-24.38_i386.deb
?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996364
Title:
systemtap reports error 'Build-id
Are you sure you did aptitude update? Which mirror are you using?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996364
Title:
systemtap reports error 'Build-id mismatch'
To manage notifications abo
Can you try
apt-cache policy linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae
?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996364
Title:
systemtap reports error 'Build-id mismatch'
To manage notifications abo
Ok so it indeed still shows 3.2.0-24.37 for the us.archive.ubuntu.com
mirror. Unfortunately I have no idea why :(
Anyways, this is definitely not a bug in systemtap.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
I would have backported these but I did not know that it was possible to
upload new packages to precise since it has already been released. Can
you maybe handle such backports in the future or give some guidance?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Chris, thank you! A few comments:
1) I don't know if I have advertised this already but if you care about
systemtap in ubuntu I could really use some help. See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemtap/+bug/1144040
2) If new kernels are uploaded to old ubuntu releases would it be
possib
This is issue is also tracked in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690404
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #690404
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690404
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
Public bug reported:
Hi,
I'm one of the people who maintain systemtap in Debian. I care about
Ubuntu a bit but I don't use Ubuntu almost anywhere so I don't tend to
use systemtap on Ubuntu either. Since systemtap heavily depends on
kernel versions this means that I often can't reproduce the bugs
systemtap 2.1-1~experimental1 in debian now instructs users to see
README.Debian every time stap fails. README.Debian then asks them to run
the "stap-prep" command that installs all the required headers and
debugging symbols. This has been tested on both Debian and Ubuntu.
--
You received this bu
If I compare the binary packages systemtap-sdt-dev_1.7-1_amd64.deb and
systemtap-sdt-dev_2.1-1~experimental1_amd64.deb I see that the changes
are minimal:
diff -Nur ./systemtap-sdt-dev_1.7-1_amd64.deb.unpack/usr/bin/dtrace
./systemtap-sdt-dev_2.1-1~experimental1_amd64.deb.unpack/usr/bin/dtrace
--
These changes correspond to the following upstream git commits:
commit d85f7afdbff8b6056ef5221575f6fa6c59b07533
Author: Frank Ch. Eigler
Date: Fri Aug 10 13:56:36 2012 -0400
PR14452: drop 1ULL literal from sys/sdt.h
Use (unsigned long long) 1 instead, which is for some reason kosh
1.6-1 has been pretty stable for me so far in debian so I agree. Who on
the ubuntu side is usually handling such updates?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876855
Title:
System tap pkg n
Marcin, what should we do to this bug? In debian BTS I would mark it as
"pending" but I don't know the launchpad equivalent. Would be you be
interested in handling magit bugs that are reported to launchpad?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
It would be nice if the changelog entry would identify the exact kernel
version that is affected by the bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054274
Title:
stap fails with "error: ‘cp
README.Debian describes how you can install the debug symbols. I don't
know how this could be automated. You can have more than one kernel
installed and only want debug symbols for one kernel.
If the documentation does not help you, consider running
http://lindi.iki.fi/lindi/systemtap/diagnose-er
Public bug reported:
This occured on upgrade but can be reproduced by simply stopping and
starting cups:
Steps to reproduce:
1) sudo stop cups
2) sudo start cups
Expected results:
2) system is idle
Actual results:
2) udev-configure-printer process is using a lot of CPU time and does not seem
t
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1034304
Title:
"/lib/udev/udev-configure-printer enumerate" gets stuck on upgrade
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Closing as INVALID since in comment #14 and #15 we agreed that the bug
is not in systemtap.
** Changed in: systemtap (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Thank you for triaging this. Do I understand it correctly that you are
going to fix this in the kernel package and I don't need to change
anything in systemtap packaging?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Sorry to ask again but is there some specific area of code that you'd
like to be reviewed more carefully? I think I found at least a few
security bugs. For example it does not check that the file that the user
wants to write to the USB stick is actually something that the user can
normally access.
Sergey, utrace support is not mainline. you need to patch your kernel
before you can even select that option.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727160
Title:
systemtap process probes req
Yep upstream is still trying to fix some last bugs before 1.7 release.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876855
Title:
Please merge systemtap 1.6-1 (universe) from Debian testing
To man
The package already ships triplane.xpm. I do not use ubuntu and unity
does not seem to be in debian yet so I can't easily test this. Is there
some spec that should be followed to provide icon for unity in the
packaging?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Hi Leo,
are you planning to sync systemtap 1.6-1 from debian to ubuntu? If you
need to make some ubuntu specific changes it'd be interesting to hear
about them.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
adding-ifdef-CLONE_STOPPED-to-stop-module-compilatio.patch
* included upstream since 1.5, can be dropped
fix-compile-warning
* included upstream since 1.6, can be dropped
no-werror.patch
* is not needed in debian. are the ubuntu builds done using stricter compiler
defaults that cause extra warni
I just heard that upstream 1.7 release is possible happening already
next week. you might want to postpone 1.6
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876855
Title:
Please merge systemtap 1.6-
** Attachment added: "drizzle_7.1.36-stable-1ubuntu1.dsc.build"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemtap/+bug/1130626/+attachment/3567122/+files/drizzle_7.1.36-stable-1ubuntu1.dsc.build
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
The packages
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/d/drizzle/drizzle_7.1.36-stable-1ubuntu1.dsc
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/g/gearmand/gearmand_0.33-2.dsc
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/libg/libguestfs/libguestfs_1.18.10-1ubuntu2.dsc
http://archive.ubunt
** Attachment added: "gearmand_0.33-2.dsc.build"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemtap/+bug/1130626/+attachment/3567123/+files/gearmand_0.33-2.dsc.build
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
** Attachment added: "libguestfs_1.18.10-1ubuntu2.dsc.build"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemtap/+bug/1130626/+attachment/3567124/+files/libguestfs_1.18.10-1ubuntu2.dsc.build
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Attachment added: "ust_2.1.1-1.dsc.build"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemtap/+bug/1130626/+attachment/3567125/+files/ust_2.1.1-1.dsc.build
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Public bug reported:
This is a wishlist bug. Currently
http://www.ubuntu.com/download
nicely describes how a user can create Ubuntu installation USB stick
using usb-creator. What it does not mention is that you need to be an
admin to create the USB stick since
/usr/share/polkit-1/actions/com.ubu
The code at least tries to check if the drive is marked as "device-is-
system-internal" by udisks and aborts if that is the case.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000268
Title:
please
Michael, thanks for triaging systemtap bugs. I'd really appreciate if
somebody could triage these Ubuntu specific usability issues which I
don't hit since I mostly use Debian. (See also
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemtap/+bug/1144040 )
Regarding this particular bug, systemtap 2.1-
Is that for use with lttng user space tracepoints? Do they need
CONFIG_UPROBES? (See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691167 )
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #691167
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691167
--
You received this bug notification because
I'd also like to understand the motivation behind this but meanwhile you
should note that most of the security vulnerabilities can only be
exploited by users that have been added to the privileged stapusr group.
Just installing the package does not make you vulnerable.
--
You received this bug no
This might be debian bug #706817 that was fixed in systemtap
1.7-1+deb7u1.
To confirm, please paste the output of
ls -ld /sys/kernel/debug
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95389
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xterm
Steps to reproduce:
1) start xterm
2) type "cat xterm.testcase"
Expected results:
2) xterm does not crash
Actual results:
2) xterm crashes with
*** glibc detected *** xterm: free(): invalid pointer: 0x097f5830 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/li
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/5364/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/5365/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/5366/Dependencies.txt
** A
** Attachment added: "catting this file crashes xterm. It is sensitive to
timing"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/5457/xterm.testcase
--
reproducible crash with free(): invalid pointer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599780
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
They don't match since orig.tar.gz is created from upstream git tag.
This should probably be documented in debian/README.source. Reasons
included
1) upstream does not sign tarballs so they don't have much extra value
2) having upstream history in Vcs-Git is very useful
As git usage patterns for p
README.source is in git now (800b090142daf41d8342700565132f1feb28921d).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/853567
Title:
This package is not based on release tar available from github
To
Thanks for the report. I work on Debian but here's some information:
If I select
Start 60.121075,24.460361
End 60.121075,24.460361
Service openrouteservice.org
I get
do_pickpoint():
close(14) in netlib_connectsock()
close(14) in netlib_connectsock()
close(14) in netlib_connectsock()
close(14) i
The CoreDump.gz that you attached shows at least one occurence of a HTTP
reply that has just "temporarily out of order" in it.
I looked at the coredump with gdb. If I go to frame 7 I see that
gpx_string contains just "temporarily out of order".
--
You received this bug notification because you a
Hmm, www.tangogps.org seems to be down completely now. Can't test the
bug anymore :-/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787953
Title:
foxtrotgps crashed with SIGSEGV in ___vfprintf_chk()
Aha, if I click "Ok" two times I can also crash foxtrotgps, even on
Debian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787953
Title:
foxtrotgps crashed with SIGSEGV in ___vfprintf_chk()
--
ubun
I looked at the disassembly of
void XMLCDECL
xmlGenericErrorDefaultFunc(void *ctx ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, const char *msg, ...) {
va_list args;
if (xmlGenericErrorContext == NULL)
xmlGenericErrorContext = (void *) stderr;
va_start(args, msg);
vfprintf((FILE *)xmlGe
Linus Hoppe, no. It's a bug in foxtrotgps. As Joshua pointed out, we
shouldn't be calling xmlCleanupParser like that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787953
Title:
foxtrotgps crashed w
Linus, what do you mean by Status:Invalid?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787953
Title:
foxtrotgps crashed with SIGSEGV in ___vfprintf_chk()
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@
52 matches
Mail list logo
