On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 08:36 +, FredBezies wrote:
> Just my end user point of view. But maybe I will not be listened by free
> software zealot, the worst thing in free software world.
If it weren't for zealots there would be no free software. While yes, to
many, fanaticism over software is at b
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:29 +, Lars Rune Nøstdal wrote:
> The "zealots" are right; Joe Sixpack (and others!) comes to Ubuntu
> because he's tired of all the nonsense from "that other platform" (bug
> #1).
EULA? We don't need no stinking EULA! Not to be with Ubuntu! Now take
off your pants ..
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 11:59 +, mrguitarmann wrote:
> Something like "Use of this browser infers(?) agreement of the _EULA_ (link)"
> Obviously this would have to be in plain sight on the start page, but would
> solve the problem without being too invasive.
Bad, bad and even more bad.. They ne
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 09:48 +, Laco Horváth wrote:
> Hey freetards! Let me know when this thread will be the longest flamewar
> in lusers history... I will export it into pdf and save for long, boring
> winter evenings :)
I think we now now who the "Linux Hater" is ;)
At least something inte
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 12:13 +, Creak wrote:
> Sorry to add another comment to this already too long list... I'd just say
> two things.
> - If I went to Ubuntu (after have been on Debian for some years), it's
> because it
> seems to respect the Free (as in Freedom) philosophy. This kind of ag
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 14:35 +, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> Tim Post wrote:
> > Sorry folks, I'm done promoting Ubuntu. The lack of response from Ubuntu
> > tells all, barring a few emails from Mark asking us to STFU.
> >
> > Redhat negotiated the first patent
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 06:31 +, Ante Karamatić wrote:
> And, as any other license, it's about software, not a service. You can
> have GPL software on your computer, but your service, based on it, can
> be non-free. Output of AGPL-ed software (aka service) can be non-free -
> it's simple, AGPL do
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 13:15 +, aschuring wrote:
> In light of the recent comments, I'm starting to see the additional
> problems with having firefox as-is in main, especially with the web
> services enabled by default. Indeed, like Chip pointed out, Firefox with
> web services cannot be freely
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 16:31 +, ua wrote:
> Tim Post wrote:
> >
> > So I dived into Google, which is ...u miss this kind of stuff? :)
> >
> > Friendly,
> > --Tim
> >
>
> I think you should stop. What you say isn't going to help free softw
I suggest closing this pending the introduction of Xen-0 ops in mainline
Linux. This is a bug, but backports to fix it are only the tip of the
iceberg, unless of course said fixes close several others for that
kernel .. but with Xen-0 so close to mainline (xenfs aka
/proc/xen/xenbus is now in Linu
Hi,
I was a little confused about the build (from source packages) for this
particular kernel, please close, its a non-issue.
Cheers!
--Tim
--
Zen modules / ops missing from 2.6.24-12-xen source packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219072
You received this bug notification because you are a
xm list-vcpus shows the proper output. Guests that have no implicit cpus
assigned but have multiple vcpus are being balanced over cpu 0 - 3,
guests that have cpus assigned are confined to the assigned cpus.
I don't think this is a Xen bug, I would more suspect 2.6.24-19-xen
itself.
** Attachment
I'm getting the same thing in a custom 2.6.20.3 kernel that I built from
kernel.org , dmesg isn't showing anything (at all) out of the ordinary.
Same thing with older / newer, from 2.6.18 to latest 2.6.22, 32/32P and
x64. These are all servers with no peripherals, so I see this only once
and boot
Bah, I get the same issue with Xen kernels (2.6.18) from xen-unstable.
Kernel debug is off, there is plenty of space yet the Kernel says 'no'
when udev talks. This is a Kernel issue, pls close it.
--
no buffer space available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57041
You received this bug notificatio
After taking out (a ton) of debug stuff, I was able to see the errors,
it was secure_unlink() complianing that certain files do not exist.
This is a kernel bug folks, please close it.
--
no buffer space available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57041
You received this bug notification because yo
15 matches
Mail list logo
