[Bug 1938958] [NEW] popcon does not submit on focal because it tries to use https

2021-08-04 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Public bug reported: SUBMITURLS in focal has an https:// URL, which currently does not work. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991908 for full details. The fix (until this will become implemented in a newer popcon version) is to use: $ tail -1 /etc/popularity-contest.conf SU

[Bug 1938958] Re: popcon does not submit on focal because it tries to use https

2021-08-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hmm, it’s still installed in the WSL installation, and it’s very useful from a Debian maintainer’s PoV as I can see how many people use my Debian packages in its derivatives that way… so maybe better fix it? ☻ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1916327] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04 failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, gemeinsam benutztes »/etc/java-8-openjdk/security/java.security« zu überschreiben, welches

2024-03-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
8u402-ga-4 actually, but first we have to check if Ubuntu indeed stays with libcups2 (in which case that version should work) or also switches to libcups2t64 (in which case another change is needed). 8u402-ga-3 had a… tiny fuckup. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1916327] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04 failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, gemeinsam benutztes »/etc/java-8-openjdk/security/java.security« zu überschreiben, welches

2024-03-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
According to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/2.4.7-1.2ubuntu1 they did, so you’ll need https://evolvis.org/plugins/scmgit/cgi- bin/gitweb.cgi?p=alioth/openjdk-8.git;a=commitdiff;h=6586b716485710c94fa2bcb1b85989393f37d856 as well. I’m not uploading this as openjdk-8_8u402-ga-5 to Debian ri

[Bug 1916327] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04 failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, gemeinsam benutztes »/etc/java-8-openjdk/security/java.security« zu überschreiben, welches

2024-03-24 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi again Vladimir, I did upload a -6 today to temporarily disable the tests to help the ARM builders across the transition better, so you can also do a sync, I believe. Disclaimer: I haven’t tested that on Ubuntu, only Debian, and not yet on t64-affected architectures (but the powerpc buildds sho

[Bug 1916327] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04 failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, gemeinsam benutztes »/etc/java-8-openjdk/security/java.security« zu überschreiben, welches

2024-03-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Stuck how? (Can you link to the PPA so I can peek at it?) Did you add noble-proposed to the PPA’s sources? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916327 Title: package openjdk-8-jre-headles

[Bug 1916327] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04 failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, gemeinsam benutztes »/etc/java-8-openjdk/security/java.security« zu überschreiben, welches

2024-03-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi Roman, Vladimir Petko and I found a solution that retains coïnstallability: on i386 for focal‥mantic, we fake having the wrapper (as in, all on-disc files are identical to amd64), but we don’t add the dependency and add a patch to change the exception to a warning for i386 only. I’ll upload to

[Bug 1987195] Re: libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile

2024-08-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
** Also affects: libpng1.6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: musescore3 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987195

[Bug 1933782] Re: Needs updating

2024-08-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
For reference: please see the linked Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977835 for the story regarding mu͒3 and https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077944 regarding mu͒4. tl;dr: ⓐ mu͒4 would need to be packaged separately anyway, but it’s “open core” with

[Bug 1903793] Re: rng-tools: should become a transitional package, like in Debian, but to rng-tools5

2022-02-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Having finished the transition in Debian (where rng-tools just got removed) I cannot help but wonder if anyone even actually looks at *buntu bugs…? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903793

[Bug 2097400] Re: Update to 8u442

2025-02-04 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Working on this in Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097400 Title: Update to 8u442 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openj

[Bug 1755640] Re: Pitch-Bend Control Wrong On Java MIDI Interface

2025-02-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
I fear your best bet at this point is to try and contact the OpenJDK developers upstream. Their “fixing policy” is a bit annoying, so you’d first have to see if it’s still a bug in the latest JDK, then if it gets fixed, the fix can be backported to the LTS JDKs (21, 17, 11, 8). I see you invested

[Bug 1784220] Re: package openjdk-8-jdk:amd64 8u171-b11-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed openjdk-8-jdk:amd64 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status

2025-02-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1784220 Title: package openjdk-8-jdk:amd64 8u171-b11-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to instal

[Bug 1775221] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT in JNIHandles::resolve()

2025-02-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Which JNI library are you using? How to reproduce this? Handle is passed the string "(Lcom/su" instead of a pointer, so I guess something either has a memory dereference too much or a buffer overflow overwriting the place where the handle is stored. ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status

<    2   3   4   5   6   7