Let's see. When it fails I log in via ssh and watch what's happening. As
the .xsession-errors indicates, it's spinning on a unity-2d-panel
failure, but unity-2d-shell is running and doesn't report any errors.
Eventually it gives up as noted, ending with
gnome-session[22299]: WARNING: Application '
So then I rebooted, and removed the user directory, and logged in on
unity-2d--so it should be a completely fresh state--and it didn't work,
though with fewer errors. This time you see that it crashed once, but
the second time it's actually still running, though the panel is not
painted on the scre
Could there be something in the accounts database that gets tweaked by
Unity and that is causing Unity 2D problems?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993694
Title:
unity-2d does not star
Ok, on a completely fresh install I can't get unity-2d to start (with
exactly the same reports as mentioned above). So at least that means
that the "after unity has been used" is a likely red herring. I have in
the past had unity-2d start, but ::shrug::.
Some interesting things that might be relev
Christopher, Liz is a colleague of Joel's and mine, and was responding
to your request for whether this bug still affects us. The answer is
"yes", and Liz was providing the information you asked for, because Joel
is no longer on the team. Can you please restore what you deleted and
treat her respon
Christopher, you have misunderstood. I have explained that Liz is not
just some random other person who is affected, but is our colleague. We
work together. I regret that the appearance you're giving is that you're
embarrassed that the bug has gone ignored for two years, and you're
trying to find a
What is the state of releasing the fix for Precise, please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988079
Title:
Much slower OpenGL frame rates with unityshell loaded, than plain
compiz
To
Thanks Daniel, that's very helpful. We would love to test it once you have
the backported patches ready. Is it planned to backport all the bugfixes
mentioned in the changelog, or only some of them? (If only some, is there a
list available of which are targeted?)
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:48 PM, D
Sebastian: I don't think it's unity. Kenneth is pretty sure it's a
failure to implement the GLX swap interval, which is definitely compiz'
responsibility. If Unity is using GL more aggressively than Gnome
classic, then it stands to reason that the problem would be moderately
worse on unity.
--
Yo
Public bug reported:
nsscache has a syntax error in
/usr/share/pyshared/nss_cache/lock_test.py which produces a compiler
warning in precise. I believe that Jamie Wilkinson is uploading a patch
to Debian soon, which should get pulled into precise once it's in
Debian.
** Affects: nsscache (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
Upgrading from lucid to precise finds a problem with the defoma
invocation in the prerm of the libwmf0.2-7 package, when upgrading from
0.2.8.4-6.1ubuntu2 to 0.2.8.4-8.1ubuntu1, and with apt-get's invocation
of debsums.
The error reported is this, from dpkg (via apt-get):
Ca
** Summary changed:
- perl-moules lucid->precise upgrade failure
+ perl-modules lucid->precise upgrade failure
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/901741
Title:
perl-modules lucid->precis
Happens to us too:
Setting up hyphen-en-us (2.7.1-4ubuntu1) ...
Error: update-openoffice-dicts not present or executable. Missing dependency on
dictionaries-common?
Said program is gone now; postinst should call it conditionally.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Can this please not be closed just because it was (mostly) ignored?
** Changed in: indicator-session (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888714
Sounds great. Given the large number of packages using defoma, it might
be worth a comprehensive scan across lucid to make sure the no-op prerm
is in place for all of them.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
No. We are fine with users who have already logged in having their
username visible; that's helpful.
It's not a lightdm issue, but I'm really quite flabbergasted how even
one user shows up in the accounts manager before anyone has logged in,
on our configuration. In any case, we like the idea that
By the way, this bug is quite new. With our configuration, in December,
it worked just fine, as far as I can tell.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921315
Title:
lightdm greeter provide
We're case 2. Listing all the users is impossible anyhow. Where would you
get the list? But we're OK I believe with listing those who have logged in
before on the particular machine. That's not essential however.
Right now the "other" selector is totally missing. It should be impossible
for that t
I have confirmed that adding "greeter-hide-users=true" in the
SeatDefaults stanza of lightdm.conf fixes the problem.
We would still like to have the behavior I saw before, where if a user
was known to the accounts manager, they would be listed, but there was
always an "other" box also. However, th
Public bug reported:
at-spi (1.32.0-0ubuntu4) contains the file
/usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/org.a11y.atspi.gschema.xml which is also
present in libatk-adaptor-schemas (2.3.2-0ubuntu3).
At the least a Conflicts is likely needed.
** Affects: at-spi2-atk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Enterprises need to insulate their systems from "reporting upstream",
not because of an objection to participating in upstream development,
but because we need to prevent our users from accidentally leaking
confidential information.
Somewhere the following dependency chain needs to be broken:
ubun
We have this problem too. The fix is in grub-installer in the udeb.
The problem is the grub_probe function in that script. It does an apt-
install and then calls grub-probe in the chroot. The apt-install prints
output, however, and the callers of grub_probe expect to see only the
output from grub-
I'm confused about why chroot_setup is the issue here. It's the apt-
install command inside the grub_probe command which is spitting out
output, and the output it spits out looks like typical apt-get output.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
We have this problem too. Our users typically do not have a home
directory until the first time they log in, by the way, with the use of
pam_mkhomedir.so to create it, however this behavior is independent of
whether the home directory exists or not.
We do not see the session chooser widget until y
Public bug reported:
In our configuration, nearly all users are granted access to the system
via pam. The User Accounts dialog in Settings shows only a single user
which was created at install time...and I'm not sure where from, because
we preseed "d-i passwd/make-user boolean false" to try and in
Thanks for looking at this Colin; I appreciate the eyes! It's in the
depths of dark magic to me sometimes.
For this to work reliably in a cross-version lucid->precise upgrade,
however, won't you need to push a new libwmf0.2-7 package in lucid that
fixes its prerm?
--
You received this bug notifi
As far as I can tell, this isn't fixed. I just had the following:
Unpacking evince-common (from .../evince-common_3.2.1-1ubuntu4_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/evince-common_3.2.1-1ubuntu4_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/evince',
Public bug reported:
apt uses its own strategy for sending Range: requests on https, instead
of the libcurl handling. Here's is a scenario where it gets it wrong:
1) apt downloads the file but doesn't put the file in place yet (perhaps it got
interrupted or something)
2) the file on the server g
Oh, and the bug is particularly pathological. Because after it happens,
the index file is in the staging area is now always larger than what's
on the server, it won't self correct.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:
** Patch added: "apt-fix.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1157943/+attachment/3586456/+files/apt-fix.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1157943
Title:
apt
David, servers are not required to send 416; it's only a SHOULD.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1157943
Title:
apt-get update fails hash checks on https repositories when file size
The behavior in 4 is not the If-Range + Range behavior. The latter is
about what happens when the contents have changed; the behavior in 4 is
not about changed content, but about a range request which starts after
the end of the file on the server.
--
You received this bug notification because yo
David, #6 means that servers SHOULD send a 416. But apt should support
both, because it cannot rely on servers sending a 416.
#7, you have misunderstood. Yes, there is newer contents, and the server
returns the current complete contents of the file in this case, and apt
is *not replacing the file
I don't think certificates are necessary here: we could permit any https
without any certificate checking, and still have an improvement, with no
additional dangers over using http. For example, you would remain
vulnerable to DNS spoofing or man-in-the-middle problems, but you would
not be subject
Public bug reported:
See http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14048.
** Affects: eglibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Now that this has been narrowed down, and the requested check of 295.49
has been done (actually, with 295.53), can we move the status away from
Incomplete?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Moving this to compiz now that kbr has identified the locus of the
problem.
** Package changed: nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) => compiz (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988079
Public bug reported:
If a package has a space in its Filename: entry in the Packages file,
you get errors on HTTP resolution.
Normal Debian repos don't have a case like that, but the Packages file
should work even if packages are not stored in the pool in the most
usual way.
** Affects: apt (Ubu
012 5:50 PM, "Daniel Hartwig" wrote:
> On 6 December 2012 05:09, Thomas Bushnell, BSG
> <1086...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> > If a package has a space in its Filename: entry in the Packages file,
> > you get errors on HTTP resolution.
>
> Why are there sp
Thanks for the reference. I apologize for missing section D; it's not
relevant here, but I had forgotten that it has those things. It doesn't
actually say much relevant here.
However, I think section 5.1 is dispositive, so this isn't a bug. It's an
unfortunate restriction, because it ends up meani
What I meant by saying that appendix D wasn't relevant was only that it
doesn't say anything particularly helpful about the syntax of a
Filename: field.
I agree that any attempt to modify 5.1 is pointless, and it's not any
trouble in my particular case to simply conform more closely to the
typical
aniel Hartwig
wrote:
> On 6 December 2012 14:06, Thomas Bushnell BSG
> <1086...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> > And in my case, there was an independent
> > bug *producing* the directories with spaces in them which I did not
> > intend.
>
> Ah, I had thought you were
Public bug reported:
When using an https: connection, apt-get does not properly reuse
connections. Because https setup costs can be quite high, this can cause
much slowdown when, for example, many different distributions on the
same server need to be checked.
I believe the attached patch addresse
Public bug reported:
Inexplicably, one set of udev rules in /lib/udev/rules.d/69-cd-
sensors.rules didn't get converted from gcm to colord:
# i1Display3
ATTRS{id
This is needed for precise as well. What can we do to get an SRU asap?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806248
Title:
unity::TimeUtil::TimeDelta returns an int value which overflows aft
I don't understand how an update to bamf can fix this, since I don't
have bamf installed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925421
Title:
sometimes icons get dropped from the launcher wh
Never mind, I'm dumb.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925421
Title:
sometimes icons get dropped from the launcher when they should not
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
ht
I can confirm that with the referenced package update I no longer see
the bug. thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925421
Title:
sometimes icons get dropped from the launcher when
Fix works for us.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880104
Title:
Using pam_group results in: pam_group(lightdm:setcred): unable to set
the group membership for user: operation not per
We rely on pam_mkhomedir. We're using it with the standard options.
It used to work fine on lightdm, but as of recently, it doesn't.
It works fine with ssh.
This is crucial for us.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
The documentation for pam_open_session says, "It should be noted that
the effective uid, geteuid(2). of the application should be of
sufficient privilege to perform such tasks as creating or mounting the
user's home directory for example."
AFAICT, this is contrary to Steve Langasek's assertion tha
A new option has been added to lightdm which provides the needed
functionality here. So AFAIC this one can be closed.
On Mar 27, 2012 8:31 AM, "Sebastien Bacher" wrote:
> ** Also affects: indicator-session
> Importance: Undecided
> Status: New
>
> --
> You received this bug notification b
Here is a screenshot of glitchy menu behavior. Here, menus show the
background shadow effect, but the actual foreground text is missing or
partial, and shows up when you mouse over it.
In both cases, I believe the bug is that Unity thinks that some texture
or other has particular contents, but the
Screenshot of glitchy menu
** Attachment added: "IMG_20120227_144839.jpg"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/936506/+attachment/2819255/+files/IMG_20120227_144839.jpg
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
Here is screenshots of the glitchy launcher. This happens (reliably) on
a 24" Dell monitor, the system is a Dell T3500 with Quadro FX 580.
This happens when I switch from the X display to a VT and then back. The
launcher and the top menu/notification bar both look glitchy. As soon as
the mouse ent
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 844039 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844039
John, I'm confused by why you think this is a dup of bug #844039. That
bug requests that the Other option be disabled. This bug complains the
opposite: that it *is* disabled, even when it should not be.
--
Y
Public bug reported:
Reporting against unity-greeter because it's a UI problem, but it might
well go deeper.
We have a pam auth module which needs to use pam_conv.conv (the callback
function which prompts the user). It implements a two-factor
authentication regime, in which the first factor is a
It appears that user-list.vala (user_list.show_prompt) basically ignores
the text of the prompt and displays its own messages, based on the guess
that if echo is off then it's a password, and if echo is on, it's a
user, sort of, sometimes.
This is quite wrong.
--
You received this bug notificati
We no longer see the error message, but pam_group is still not setting
the groups we need it to set.
** Changed in: lightdm
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
Please do not confuse "hiding user list" with "providing a user-name
entry box".
We want a user list *and* we want the ability to enter a user-name by
hand if the person logging in is not in the list.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
data leakage is a security issue :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931967
Title:
Corrupted graphics after the login until the unity launcher appears
To manage notifications about th
Robert, I think that will be very great for our case. I agree completely
that it is not plausible to distinguish a "network" account. For our
part, we are not concerned so much with the labeling, and whatever looks
good to the designers is fine with us. I'm very pleased that this change
will let us
Has any progress happened on this bug? It turns out it's even more
important to us than we initially realized; we rely on it to add users
to the "fuse" and "cdrom" groups; being absent those groups cases real
inconvenience.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
As of ubuntu7 (and maybe ubuntu6), we get failing installs related to
the new resolvconf changes which do the /etc/resolv.conf link in the
postinst.
During the "select and install software" step, we see /etc/resolv.conf
go away (simply vanish) at some point in the prep step,
It's already there.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Alec Warner
<732...@bugs.launchpad.net>wrote:
> Can we get it in Precise?
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > As of libpam-krb5 4.5, the temporary ticket cache will be written to
> > ccache_dir rather than /tmp if ccache
I'm pleased to report that with the newly rebuilt installer images that
include this patch, the symptoms we reported are no longer visible.
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926447
This appears to be one of several serious regressions in
295.20-0ubuntu1. I can confirm that we see it as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936506
Title:
graphical glitch after log
I have seen this bug both on precise and oneiric (haven't checked
anything older).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937665
Title:
Ubuntu 12.04, compiz snap plugin behaves inconsistently
I know apport-collect is now SOP to insert a delay into the processing
of every bug, but I do think it's perfectly clear what's going on here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953494
Titl
Thanks for this Robert; it works great!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844044
Title:
Unity Greeter - Add Network Login option
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bu
I just tried a login with a second factor module in place in pam, and
whether it's deliberate or not, I see that a two-factor auth prompt
shows up nicely in the unity-greeter box. Perhaps this is because we
switched to teh new greeter-show-manual-login and disabled greeter-hide-
users, or not, but
I'm concerned that this bug exposes a very severe security bug in X, at
least, on affected hardware.
If I understand correctly, I could create a pixmap, not initialize it, and
thus gain access to various bits of previous screen real-estate. (Note
that people have seen on their display desktop bit
Didn't we just have this?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954303
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960546
Title:
package libopencryptoki0 2.3.1+dfsg-3ubuntu2 failed to
install/upgrade:
It's back:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/+bug/960546
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954306
Title:
package libopencryptoki0 2.3.1+dfsg-3ubuntu1 failed to
ins
Thanks Colin. I'm afraid that we've basically stopped using debmirror,
so I don't think we're in a position to test this fix.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1034679
Title:
debian-inst
Public bug reported:
libnm-glib-vpn1 in precise contains the file /usr/lib/libnm-glib-
vpn.so.1 which was also found in lucid's libnm-glib2 package. At the
least it needs to declare an appropriate conflict.
** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Public bug reported:
evince-common version 3.2.1-1ubuntu1 (in precise) contains the file
/etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/evince, which is also found in the evince
package 2.30.3-0ubuntu1.2 (in lucid). It should declare a conflict, at
the very least.
** Affects: evince (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undec
Public bug reported:
The python-desktopcouch-application (version 1.0.8-0ubuntu1) package
contains the file
/usr/share/pyshared/desktopcouch/pair/couchdb_pairing/__init__.py which
also exists in the python-desktopcouch package in lucid
(0.6.4-0ubuntu3.3). A package conflict, at least, should be de
I think this may have been caused by a local configuration change. We
will not know for certain for a few weeks. I would like to leave the bug
alone until I can confirm this newer understanding, at which point I'll
close it.
There isn't any need to spend energy on it right now.
--
You received t
Public bug reported:
The version of linux-firmware in lucid-updates is 1.34.7.
This lacks an update to the ath3k driver which was released in the
git.kernel.org firmware repo on December 13, 2010. See
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/dwmw2/linux-
firmware.git;a=history;f=ath3k-1.fw;h=63a
Let me stress that this is not a "fairly minor problem", but is a
critical security vulnerability in some contexts.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620693
Title:
Screen not locked when
Public bug reported:
I need to disable guest logins for lightdm, and did so by adding the
line "allow-guest=false" to /etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf.
However, this also has the side-effect of disabling the user-switcher in
the indicator area of Unity after I log in, which is bad. I want the
user-switc
Public bug reported:
xdiagnose currently declares a dependency on apport. This is not
necessary; it seems that xdiagnose includes some apport hooks, but
that's fine to do (and the rest of the package runs fine) without apport
present. This dependency should be changed to a Recommends or Suggests.
I think I see what's going on. By removing the guest account, the
desktop now thinks there is only one user...
First, that's incorrect. With pam, there may well be accounts that
lightdm can log in to, but which are not visible in the accounts
database, and the "Switch User Account" option would st
Got filed against incorrect package for some reason.
** Package changed: shadow (Ubuntu) => xdiagnose (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888749
Title:
xdiagnose declares unneces
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tcsh
tcsh truncates the .history when multiple scripts are run.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648592 for the
description of how to reproduce this.
We know the problem happens in tcsh 6.17.00, and it was reportedly fixed
in 6.17.01 (see
Public bug reported:
Pulseaudio uses a cookie file (normally ~/.pulse-cookie). This file is
manipulated by the code in src/pulsecore/authkey.c. Currently it does this to
read the key:
1) Open the file
2) Acquire a write-lock for the file.
3) Read the file.
4) If the file is not a good cookie, ge
The following script (if ~ is in NFS) will demonstrate the problem. The
two pactl processes both try to acquire the lock on the file
simultaneously, and whichever one loses will take thirty seconds before
it wins, because of the needless contention (and the unfortunate facts
of how lockd in NFS wo
Because we run a modified kernel, it would be inconvenient to need to
install a vanilla system in order to verify the fix there. Etienne has/had a
vanilla setup reproducing the bug. I can confirm that the patch successfully
solves the problem for our kernel.
Thomas
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:34 AM
101 - 189 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
