[Bug 380858] Re: HP printers Media Source selection stopped working after upgrade to 9.04

2009-10-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
It looks like this bug has regression on the latest Karmic version. Earlier Karmic alphas were working with the CD/DVD tray on my HP Photosmart D5460 but after some recent updates (within the last month or so), no more CD/DVD tray. -- HP printers Media Source selection stopped working after upgra

[Bug 447157] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-sett ings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus nouveau script post-removal a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1

2009-10-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: le sou

[Bug 446541] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1

2009-10-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: subpro

[Bug 446289] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1

2009-10-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: subpro

[Bug 424702] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-10-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: https:

[Bug 399855] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1

2009-10-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: subpro

[Bug 410867] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-10-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-default-settings (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 446871] Re: I have caught karmic bug during updating.

2009-10-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ironstorm, that is not the correct way to mark a duplicate bug. This bug IS VALID, it's just a duplicate. To mark a bug as a duplicate, at the upper left of the bug's launchpad page click the "mark as duplic

[Bug 391834] Re: Crash while loading from Synaptic

2009-10-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- Crash while loading from Synaptic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391834 You

[Bug 384521] Re: Can't install or purge ubuntustudio-default-settings

2009-10-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 391834 Crash while loading from Synaptic ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upg

[Bug 435713] Re: tried to remove ubuntustudio

2009-10-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- tried to remove ubuntustudio https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435713 You recei

[Bug 384519] Re: Can't install or purge ubuntustudio-default-settings

2009-10-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 391834 Crash while loading from Synaptic ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upg

[Bug 447847] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: post-removal script berria azpiprozesuak 1 errorea eman du irteeran

2009-10-10 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: post-r

[Bug 410867] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-10-10 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
>From what I see, the fix is still Committed, but not yet Released. SubliM, what makes it Released? ** Changed in: ubuntustudio-default-settings (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 447267] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-10-10 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: https:

[Bug 447265] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-10-10 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: https:

[Bug 360590] Re: Please compile portaudio with Jack support

2009-09-04 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
Matthias, Jack getting into main is waiting on two things: 1) Bug #416778 2) Jack dropping the celt dependency (easily taken care of, just waiting on confirmation from jack devs that this will only cause a minor feature in netjack to break). I'd say if you want to help on getting Jack into main, f

[Bug 390302] Re: ffado cause ardour or jack to crash after export

2009-09-04 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
Removed the Needs Packaging tags. Libffado is already packaged. ** Summary changed: - [needs-packaging] ffado cause ardour or jack to crash after export + ffado cause ardour or jack to crash after export ** Tags removed: needs-packaging ** Also affects: jaunty-backports Importance: Undecide

[Bug 157861] Re: [needs-packaging] OpenLibraries

2009-11-07 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
This bug is now two years old. Andrew, are you planning on updating the revu package to Lucid? These libraries are still an active project. ** Description changed: This is a statement of an intent to package OpenLibraries for Ubuntu. It will start with the base packaging already done by the

[Bug 479156] Re: gnome-app-install instead of ubuntu-software-center

2009-11-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
This has just been fixed upstream in Bzr for this package. Attached is the debdiff. ** Changed in: ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Attachment added: "ubuntustudio-menu_0.12ubuntu2.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35436515/ubuntustudio-menu_0.12ubuntu2.deb

[Bug 479662] Re: muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install

2009-11-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
hmm, Muse starts just fine on 32bit Ubuntu Studio Karmic. The bug you posted from Arch linux is also a 64bit bug. -- muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 479662] Re: muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install

2009-11-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #2894009 http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2894009 ** Also affects: lmuse via http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2894009 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install

[Bug 479688] [NEW] Upgrade muse to 1.0rc3

2009-11-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: muse The current version of Muse in the Ubuntu repositories is getting quite out of date. An upgrade is required. http://sourceforge.net/projects/lmuse/ ** Affects: muse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Upgrade muse to 1.0r

[Bug 479688] Re: Upgrade muse to 1.0rc3

2009-11-09 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #09 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=09 ** Also affects: muse (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=09 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Upgrade muse to 1.0rc3 https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 475853] [NEW] [needs-packaging] NASPRO plugin bridge

2009-11-05 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
Public bug reported: Website: http://confluence.atheme.org/display/NA/NASPRO License: BSD Info: NASPRO, recursive acronym for "NASPRO Architecture for Sound PROcessing", is a free/open source, modular and cross-platform software architecture to perform sound processing with a strong emphasys o

[Bug 99965] Re: [needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite

2009-08-23 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
I can confirm that on 32bit Karmic boxes aren't drawn right. It got a little better when I turned compiz off, but not by much. However, I don't honestly believe this minor bug should prevent the package from entering Karmic. Get the package uploaded to REVU as soon as possible (feature freeze is

[Bug 417987] Re: alsa/libasound jack plugin needs building

2009-08-23 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 84900 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84900 This depends on Jack being included in the Main repositories (Bug #47814) from what I understand of alsa plugins. ** Changed in: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Tags added: needs-packaging

[Bug 417987] Re: alsa/libasound jack plugin needs building

2009-08-23 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 84900 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84900 whoops, that should have read Bug #407814 -- alsa/libasound jack plugin needs building https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 407841] Re: Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio servers from integrating with it

2009-08-23 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
** Description changed: Jack should be put into the Main repository so that other sound servers in Ubuntu can integrate with it. Here are a few related bugs that all depend on this action: Bug #152487 Jack output for xine apps Bug #84900 libasound2-plugins misses alsa pcm jack plugin

[Bug 417987] Re: alsa/libasound jack plugin needs building

2009-08-23 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 84900 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84900 One last try: Bug #407841 Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio servers from integrating with it ** Also affects: alsa-plugins (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 407841] Re: Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio servers from integrating with it

2009-08-24 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
Currently relies on Bug #416778 -- Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio servers from integrating with it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407841 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -

[Bug 416778] Re: main inclusion request for libffado

2009-08-24 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
I've begun to revive the discussion on Jack entering main. Here are links to the threads: ubuntu-devel https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2009-August/028784.html ubuntu-devel-discuss https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2009-August/009237.html ubuntu-studio-devel h

[Bug 268324] Re: [needs-packaging] a2jmidid

2009-08-24 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
** Changed in: a2jmidid Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- [needs-packaging] a2jmidid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 411962] Re: Pulse audio queues audio and gets locked to the app PID

2009-08-25 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
mac_v can you post the contents of those folders on an account that is experiencing these problems? -- Pulse audio queues audio and gets locked to the app PID https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411962 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 418953] Re: Pulseaudio hogs bandwidth

2009-08-25 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
More information is needed for anyone to diagnose/fix this bug. Please explain how you've setup your home server. Also if you could post the appropriate logs of activity on your network, that would be helpful. ** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- Pulseaudio ho

[Bug 415137] Re: Should depend on kdebase-bin not kdebase

2009-08-25 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
** Also affects: frescobaldi (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Should depend on kdebase-bin not kdebase https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415137 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 362190] Re: xserver-xorg-ati driver + disk encryption + linux-rt prevents xserver start

2009-10-10 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
I have briefly tested this on a VM with Ubuntu Studio Karmic's Beta (32bit version). Unfortunately it's clear that the VM was not happy after reboot, it clearly was loading, but the resolution of the VM screen was very messed (like 1600x400) and GDM did not successfully load. I am still not able

[Bug 159941] Re: fglrx driver does not work in RT kernel

2009-10-12 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
** Also affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntustudio Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided => High -- fglrx driver does not work in RT kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159941 You received this

[Bug 407841] Re: Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio servers from integrating with it

2009-10-13 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
Matthias, nope, Bug #416778 is still not fixed. It's in the process of getting fixed (and will likely be fixed early in the Lucid Lynx 10.04 cycle - just speculating). It's also way too late for this bug to get fixed for the Karmic cycle. -- Jack package is not currently in Main repository whic

[Bug 453524] [NEW] Track fails to load into player

2009-10-16 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xwax As soon as a track is loaded into the player (by pressing F1) the track name appears on the player, but the song fails to import. The program also fails to close after this, and needs to be killed manually. The following is the output from the comm

[Bug 173240] Re: [needs-packaging] gollage

2009-08-28 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
** Also affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [needs-packaging] gollage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173240 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.

[Bug 414131] Re: Upgrade mixxx to latest release (from 1.6.1 to 1.7.0)

2009-08-28 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
As it sits, we're past Karmic's Feature Freeze deadline (Aug 27), so new versions of mixxx wouldn't get into Karmic unless a Feature Freeze Exception were granted. My hope in filing this bug as soon as I heard Mixxx 1.7.0 was released was to get the upgrade done before the freeze. This bug will l

[Bug 459330] Re: Missing required font Vera.ttf

2009-10-23 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
For now, an easy workaround is to install the ttf-bitstream-vera font package. I'll work on making a patch that will require this package on install. Upstream has mentioned that they're planning on moving the software to DejaVu since it's much more widely used. -- Missing required font Vera.ttf

[Bug 12016] Re: RFE: Replace Bitstream Vera with DejaVu

2009-10-23 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
Why was this package removed from the repositories without even a transitional package put in its place? Many programs still depend upon ttf-bitstream-vera explicitly. This "fix" has broken many other packages. -- RFE: Replace Bitstream Vera with DejaVu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12016 You

[Bug 459330] Re: Missing required font Vera.ttf

2009-10-23 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
My mistake, it is infact removed entirely from the current Karmic repositories. A manual install of the Jaunty .deb file will fix it though. That .deb file is available here: http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/all/ttf-bitstream-vera/download -- Missing required font Vera.ttf https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 459598] [NEW] Mixxx needs a patch for 2.6.31 kernels to work with Hercules DJ console

2009-10-23 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mixxx According to this forum post on the Mixxx website: http://www.mixxx.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=851&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a Karmic's 2.6.31 kernel needs a patch for the Hercules DJ console to work. The patch is attached there. ** Affects: linux

[Bug 469907] Re: please backport CELT for Hardy

2009-11-02 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
** Also affects: hardy-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please backport CELT for Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469907 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bug

[Bug 454082] Re: ubuntustudio-controls fails to enable NICE

2009-10-19 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
ttoine, please file a separate bug report for the Memlock problem you've noticed. -- ubuntustudio-controls fails to enable NICE https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailin

[Bug 455239] [NEW] raw1394 permissions are only temporarily set

2009-10-19 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntustudio-controls By writing the raw1394 permission to /lib/udev/rules.d/50-udev- default.rules the changes that Ubuntu Studio Controls makes is only temporary. As soon as udev is updated, that file is re-written and the Ubuntu Studio Contros changes

[Bug 455336] [NEW] [upgrade] newer version has been released

2009-10-19 Thread Eric Hedekar (stochastic)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sooperlooper Karmic's package is at version 1.0.8 while the latest release is version 1.6.14 Source available here: http://essej.net/sooperlooper/download.html ** Affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: sooperl

[Bug 885525]

2019-06-13 Thread I. M. Stochastic
I found this bug recently after discovering that I have been losing emails I had not intended to lose for an indeterminate period of time. I am deeply angry, and I believe rightly so. I have a gmail account. I'm using Thunderbird 31.6.0 on Ubuntu linux. The thunderbird UI clearly states, under Ac

[Bug 1193657] [NEW] package linux-image-3.2.0-48-generic 3.2.0-48.74 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17

2013-06-22 Thread I. M. Stochastic
Public bug reported: tried to reinstall the kernel package. No love ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: linux-image-3.2.0-48-generic 3.2.0-48.74 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-40.64-generic 3.2.40 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-40-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia AlsaVer

[Bug 1193659] [NEW] package linux-image-3.2.0-45-generic 3.2.0-45.70 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17

2013-06-22 Thread I. M. Stochastic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1000423 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000423 Public bug reported: tried to reinstall the kernel package. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: linux-image-3.2.0-45-generic 3.2.0-45.70 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-40.64-gener

[Bug 1193657] Re: package linux-image-3.2.0-48-generic 3.2.0-48.74 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17

2013-06-22 Thread I. M. Stochastic
@brad-figg no, the change to invalid was made by me, the OP. I would have deleted the bug had I had the option. The discussion under the bug this is marked as a duplicate of worked for me. Sorry for the spam! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 554393] Re: nm-applet will not connect using vpnc plugin

2010-09-06 Thread I. M. Stochastic
unchecking "available to all users" does not work for me. I uninstalled all of my network-manager-* packages (pptp, vpnc, strongswan, openconnect), rebooted, and installed just the one I needed (vpnc). I now get a prompt for passwords, followed by a "Connection failed" message. -- nm-applet wil

<    1   2