Public bug reported:
Description of problem:
Community reported one SB600 SATA issue(BZ #9412), which led to 64 bit
DMA disablement for all SB600 revisions by driver maintainers with
commits c7a42156d99bcea7f8173ba7a6034bbaa2ecb77c and
4cde32fc4b32e96a99063af3183acdfd54c563f0.
But the root cause
** Attachment added: "Restore SB600 SATA controller 64 bit DMA"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27633466/D%3A%5Cprojects%5CBugs%5CSB600%5C64bit_DMA%5Casus_m2a_vm_quirk_v2.patch
--
Restore SB600 SATA controller 64 bit DMA
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384671
You received this bug notification
The accepted patch can also be found here, which will appear from kernel 2.6.30:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/i2c-piix4-add-support-for-sb800.patch
Will you add it for Ubuntu 9.04 first before its final release?
--
Add support to SB800 SMBus change
Thanks for your update.
--
Add support to SB800 SMBus changes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338108
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm
Public bug reported:
Description of problem:
This version of driver adds support for the AMD SB800
Family series of products. Major changes include the
changes to addressing the SMBUS registers at different
location from the locations in the previous compatible
parts from AMD such as SB400/SB600/S
** Attachment added: "Add support to SB800 SMBus changes"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23475117/D%3A%5Cprojects%5CPatches%5CSB800_patch%5CSMBus_ASIC_change%5CSB800_SMBus_ASIC_change.patch
--
Add support to SB800 SMBus changes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338108
You received this bug noti
Is it possible for you to add it before the final release of Ubuntu 9.04?
Thanks
--
Add support to SB800 SMBus changes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338108
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
Seems that it is not available yet, but you may get some info here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-i2c&m=123575347413022&w=2
I will keep an eye on
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=history;f=drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c;h=761f9dd5362041845a2d09e57e76938aad7ac71a;hb=HE
well, the final release works on some of our RS690+SB700 boards, but failure
still exists on some other boards,
anyway, it's good news.
--
[Gutsy Beta] Desktop CD doesn't put Gutsy in Grub
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146583
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
The GRUB installation failure still exists on Ubuntu7.10 RC x86_64 with
my same HW platform. :-(
--
[Gutsy Beta] Desktop CD doesn't put Gutsy in Grub
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146583
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubu
I think my case is similar as yours:
I tried to install 7.10 beta desktop amd64 into my board, but I find that the
GRUB
is not installed at all each time.
The installation exits at about 80-90% without any dialog asking me to continue
use
live CD or reboot.
when I mount the root partition to so
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-source
SB700 supports one physical IDE channel, but SB700 SATA controller
supports combined mode. When the SATA combined mode is enabled,
two SATA ports(port4 and port5) share one IDE channel from IDE
controller, and PATA will share the other IDE ch
** Attachment added: "support two IDE channels for SB700"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9602350/D%3A%5Cprojects%5CPatches%5CSB700_patch%5CSB700_2_IDE_Channels.patch
--
AMD/ATI SB700 should support two IDE channels
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147065
You received this bug notification beca
Yann:
Can you add this patch:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a878539ef994787c447a98c2e3ba0fe3dad984ec
to see whether it can fix your bug?
This patch is already in kernel 2.6.25, if it can fix your bug,
Ubuntu guys please add it to Ubuntu 8.04.
Thanks
Oh, my mistake, Yann is using Intel's platform, please ignore my comment
above.
But the above git commit can be added to Ubuntu kernel to fix another
bug.
--
Hard drives recognizing issues (P5W-DH with Intel 82801GR/GH Sata Controller)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219312
You received this bug
Can you confirm that whether is patch will be applied into the next stable
Ubuntu 7.10 release?
Thanks
--
Add more device IDs to support ATI SB700 SATA controller completely
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125744
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
Can you confirm that whether thess patches will be applied into the next stable
Ubuntu 7.10 release?
Thanks
--
The SATA, IDE, SMBus controllers don't work on ATI/AMD SB700
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120361
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
We find that SB700 and SB800 use the same SMBus device ID as SB600, which is
0x4385, instead of the already submitted 0x4395.
We submitted an error SB700 SMBus patch in the bugzilla# 120361
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/120361
Please apply the attached new SMBus patc
** Attachment added: "SB600/SB700/SB800 use same SMBus controll device ID"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8836458/D%3A%5Cprojects%5CPatches%5CSB700_patch%5CATI_SBX00_SMBus.patch
--
AMD/ATI SB600/700/800 use same SMBus controller devID
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132616
You received this b
** Attachment added: "SB700 SATA related Device IDs"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8473415/D%3A%5Cprojects%5CPatches%5CSB700_patch%5Csb700sataids.patch
--
Add more device IDs to support ATI SB700 SATA controller completely
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125744
You received this bug notifica
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-source
Description of problem:
Ubuntu may fail be installed on ATI SB700 when set "onchip SATA type"
in BIOS into "AHCI" mode. There are four SATA related device IDs in SB700:
0x4390, SATA in IDE mode
0x4391, SATA in AHCI mode
0x4392, SATA in RAID m
Public bug reported:
Description of problem:
There is one SB600 USB bug which will lead to usb stress test failure:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8692
The workaround contains three linux patches:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=07d29b6
** Attachment added: "backported patch to fix USB stress test failure"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12431211/D%3A%5Cprojects%5CPatches%5CSB700_patch%5CUSB%5CSBX00_USB_hang_fix_Ubuntu.patch
--
USB stress test failure on AMD SB600
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198619
You received this bug n
The third patch http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=120469059715031&w=2
has been added to linus source tree too, which is:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e82cc1288fa57857c6af8c57f3d07096d4bcd9d9
But there is some small difference between them,
the latter(gi
Again, two patches plus one line modification should be added to fix the bug:
1. "backported patch to fix USB stress test failure"
2. "to replace the above attached patch by mistake"
3.
- if (!HC_IS_RUNNING(ehci_to_hcd(ehci)->state))
+ if (!HC_IS_RUNNING(ehci_to_hcd(ehci)->state) && ehci->reclaim)
Just double check on this issue: Have you added all these three patches
into Hardy?
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=07d29b63ef6b39963ab37818653284d861cf55af
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=f8fa7571a928
Linux USB guys submit another patch to make things better:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=120469059715031&w=2
And that new patch can also replace this one:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/19/546
So, I backported and attach this new patch here.
Can you apply it as well as the above patch?
You need ap
I'm sorry that I attached another patch by mistake just now,
please use this one to replace the above one "Another USB patch to make things
better"
** Attachment added: "to replace the above attached patch by mistake"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12492335/D%3A%5Cprojects%5CPatches%5CSB700_p
The upstream commit for those 4 patches are:
1. SB700 Combined mode:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=823777181b4c0200923dcb026efa5b37f55c0ecf
2. IDE device ID:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6c6a2a8d201b4f8fd5
The bug fix patch has been accepted, which mean these two patches
need to be added to support SATA FBS, can you help to add them?
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d6ef31539d715db7a0eb2d67a1a008c9d8ccf059
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/
Public bug reported:
SATA AHCI controller like AMD SB800 support FBS(FIS-based switching),
which can be used to improve the performance for SATA PMP(Port Multiplier).
SATA FBS feature has been added into kernel 2.6.34:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d6
Patches appear from kernel 3.14-rc1, git commits:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=032f708bc4f6da868ec49dac48ddf3670d8035d3
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=85fd0fe6fc002deba03fe36c1c9726cde1e6331c
--
You received
The patch has been added into kernel 2.6.37, here is the git link:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=3d091a6f703906c5680855ff29bd94d051c8c6d8
Since Ubuntu 11.04 is already based on 2.6.37, so there is no need to
add this patch again, we can close this bug
Confirmed that DMA position buffer is not supported by ATI/AMD HD Audio, we
need to use LPIB instead.
We are submitting a patch to refine Takashi's recent commits by removing vendor
ID check and deleting duplicated code.
Thanks,
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Public bug reported:
On AMD SB700/SB800/Hudson-2/3 platforms, USB EHCI controller may read/write
to memory space not allocated to USB controller if there is longer than
normal latency on DMA read encountered. In this condition the exposure will
be encountered only if the driver has following forma
35 matches
Mail list logo
