[Bug 151194] gutsy amd64: thunderbird-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in PR_DestroyMonitor() when opening mail in preview window

2007-10-10 Thread Sean Mc Allister
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 150668 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150668 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: thunderbird All i need to do is click any mail in the Inbox. Sometimes thunderbird just freezes and exits after ~20 seconds, but most of the time it just segfaults

[Bug 151194] Re: gutsy amd64: thunderbird-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in PR_DestroyMonitor() when opening mail in preview window

2007-10-10 Thread Sean Mc Allister
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 150668 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150668 ** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9926126/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9926127/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 543506] Re: Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns "unknown"

2010-05-21 Thread Sean Mc Allister
I reconfigured my network interface to use static settings and seem to get reliable boots now. -- Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns "unknown" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543506 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 543506] Re: Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns "unknown"

2010-05-27 Thread Sean Mc Allister
Thanks Mike, I'm testing your rc-sysinit.conf now and so far I've had reliable boots. -- Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns "unknown" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543506 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 543506] Re: Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns "unknown"

2010-05-25 Thread Sean Mc Allister
Obviously my earlier comment (#39) about using static network configurations was nonsense. I just got lucky with a few boots in a row. Furthermore I'm using a minimal installation of lucid and don't have network-manager installed at all, so it is unlikely to be the culprit. -- Some services not