*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 495370 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495370
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 495370
Please upgrade to a non-outdated version
--
Please update mdadm to version 3.1.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/603118
You received this bug notifica
this bug does not concern decoding an Encoded-Word in a mailto url
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #623838
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=623838
** Changed in: evolution
Status: New => Unknown
** Changed in: evolution
Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #615400 => GNOME
I have reported the bug upstream, and linked this bug report to that newly
reported GNOME bug report, replacing the link to bug 615400 with the newly
reported bug. I have also removed the "likely-dup" tag because this bug is not
(very) related to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615400
Would it be completely crazy to try to install mdadm 3.0.3-2 from Debian
squeeze in Lucid?:
http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/mdadm
Well I just tried it. It did spit out an error:
r...@runescomp:~/Desktop$ sudo dpkg -i mdadm_3.0.3-2_i386.deb
Selecting previously deselected package mdadm
I see. Thanks for the heads up.
How would you rate the reliability of your package? Would you recommend
that I just stick with the version in the repos unless I'm feeling
adventurous, or would you say it's relatively safe to use your package?
I guess you'd be the one to know if you've touched some
Cool. I'll give it a whirl as well then. I have backups of my data on a
non-RAID partition anyway.
I must admit that I was surprised as well, when I saw that Lucid shipped
with a 20 month old build of this component. Wouldn't this mean that the
Server edition uses this version as well? If that's t
I just tried to install your package. I received an error, which was
this:
cp: cannot stat `/lib/udev/rules.d/65-mdadm.vol_id.rules': No such file
or directory
at the very end of the installation process. Not sure whether it has any
significance.
--
Please upgrade to a non-outdated version
http
It seems that the file "65-mdadm.vol_id.rules" in "/lib/udev/rules.d/"
was used by mdadm in Karmic
(http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/i386/mdadm/filelist), and changed in
Lucid to "65-mdadm-blkid.rules" with the fixing of Bug #493772.
I'm guessing your package is based on the Karmic version of mda
201 - 208 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
