[Bug 205669] Re: [needs-packaging] flabber

2008-06-07 Thread Remo Wenger
Hello! Thanks for your commitment. First of all: I don't really know about the world of debian/ubuntu packaging, but we need three different packages: - one for flabber, the console programme - one for glabber, the additional GUI, written in python too - one or more as language packages For the

[Bug 205669] Re: [needs-packaging] flabber

2008-06-07 Thread Remo Wenger
In this case, that's okay. I thought in the packaging guide is declared that we have to split the packages for translations. But if this is incorrect, your suggestion is great. -- [needs-packaging] flabber https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205669 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 205669] Re: [needs-packaging] flabber

2008-05-07 Thread Remo Wenger
** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: Remo Wenger (moepot) => (unassigned) Status: In Progress => New -- [needs-packaging] flabber https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 205669] [NEW] flabber

2008-03-23 Thread Remo Wenger
: Remo Wenger (moepot) Status: In Progress ** Tags: needs-packaging ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => Remo Wenger (moepot) ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => In Progress -- flabber https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205669 You received this bug notifi

[Bug 197132] Re: Corewars should recommend nedit

2008-03-24 Thread Remo Wenger
I think '/usr/bin/editor' should be linked to a console-based editor. Because of this it's okay to start gnome-terminal and execute the default console-based editor. But why not implement a tick in "editor settings" of corewars to mark the editor as console-based or not? Also set the default edi