I since upgraded to Dapper but as long as I used Breezy I had the
problem. Apparently fixes from Dapper were not backported so the bug
is probably still there.
--
Je me console d'être femme en songeant que, de la sorte, je n'en épouserai
jamais une. Lady Montagu
--
Huge mem leak
https://launchp
Could you give some details on your system (ubuntu release and flavor,
window manager etc) ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574101
Title:
Edge non transparent window
To manage notif
Le 23/04/2016 23:27, Xavier Laffargue a écrit :
> Sure :
> Ubuntu 16.04, Unity, 64bits
> Intel i3
> Chipset : Intel Ironlake Mobile
>
Thanks.
Do you have the same problem with others GNUstep applications ? I don't
see how this could be related to agenda.app but I could be missing
something.
--
Your last screenshot seems to be from a gnome/gtk application, right ?
So the problem probably comes for Unity, gtk, the theme you're using or
something near the graphic stack.
You should probably redirect this bug to another package but I don't
know which one. What graphic theme do you use ?
--
The reporter chose the wrong package, see the second screenshot.
** Package changed: agenda.app (Ubuntu) => gnome-calendar (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574101
Title:
Edge
Well, I would like to help but I don't know how...
Can I see the config.h file generated by configure ?
Also, why are there 2 libobjc referenced in the build logs ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
I think I gave the solution to this problem, even if the patch I
provided is not fully correct.
Is there something I can do to help close the bug fot good ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
This second patch fixes the build problem in a nicer way.
But the main problem of mixing libobjc2 with libobjc3 and libgnustep-
base.1.20 with libgnustep-base.1.22 remains.
** Patch added: "ld-flags-2.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/agenda.app/+bug/765936/+attachment/2170957/
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: agenda.app
When installing SimpleAgenda/agenda.app in Maverick, gnustep-
back0.16-art is installed as the GNUstep backend. The art backend uses
nfont packages but gnustep-back0.16-art .deb doesn't contain any font.
This results in the following messages w
I shoud probably have linked this bug with gnustep-back, is it still
possible ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707720
Title:
SimpleAgenda won't start after a clean install because of
Here's an (edited) explanation :
Old gnustep-back in Debian/Ubuntu uses a defoma script to
generate .nfont bundles during installation; they are not shipped in
the package as there is no way to predict which fonts will be
available on the user's machine (no font package ships .nfont
bundles, and t
Ok but apparently gnustep-gui uses libobjc.so.2 :
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libobjc.so.2, needed by /usr/lib/libgnustep-
gui.so, may conflict with libobjc.so.3
Anyway, Natty seems to ship gcc 4.5 so can you please tell me for which
environment this package is build and how can I reproduce it ?
--
Y
Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 09:33 +, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2011-April/033040.html
Ok, you're not really helping here. I asked how I could reproduce this
problem (and also to see the config.h file) and your only answer is a
link to a message w
Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 21:33 +, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> rant as you want.
Thanks, I certainly will.
> please see the followup on the cited email for the instructions you are
> asking for.
Great.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 21:33 +, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> rant as you want.
>
> please see the followup on the cited email for the instructions you are
> asking for.
Try the appended patch.
This just moves the '-lical -luuid' part of the link command near the
end of the line. I don't k
Update : with the latest gnustep-make release, the '-lical -luuid'
linker flags are located at the end of the command without modifications
to GNUmakefile.preamble.
This is not a bug in SimpleAgenda (or agenda.app if you prefer).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Description changed:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765936
Title:
agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
17 matches
Mail list logo
