[Bug 648754] Re: Can't mount ftp location

2010-10-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
debdiff which fixes this is attached to LP Bug #653577 ** Also affects: sbackup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Can't mount ftp location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648754 You received this bug notificat

[Bug 701916] Re: Incremental Backup not working in ver. 0.11.3

2011-01-12 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using SBackup and for taking the time reporting this bug. In order to track down the cause of the problem some more information are required. Please answer the following questions: * what distribution do you use? I've understood correctly 10.04 Lucid and 10.10 Maverick, right? * fr

[Bug 71698] Re: Old backups are not deleted (log purge)

2010-09-15 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Please test latest release of SBackup from our PPA (https://edge.launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team/+archive/ppa) and report whether this issue is still present. Thanks. ** Changed in: sbackup Status: New => Incomplete -- Old backups are not deleted (log purge) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Bug 71698] Re: Old backups are not deleted (log purge)

2010-09-15 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
> (ns)sbackup does not purge incremental backups (in the latest version) is not totally right: logarithmic purge works in SBackup 0.11+, however the fix is not yet ported to nssbackup 0.3 (and I'm not sure it ever will). See bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nssbackup/+bug/587911 to track progress ma

[Bug 640034] [NEW] Setting status to attention does not change to specified icon

2010-09-15 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: indicator-application Package: python-appindicator Distro: Ubuntu Maverick beta Setting status to attention does not change to specified icon: In Lucid it was possible (as documented) to define an attention icon. When setting the indicator status to att

[Bug 1282509] Re: xfdesktop crashed with SIGSEGV in xfce_desktop_refresh()

2014-02-24 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Happens for me with a fresh install of Xubuntu daily build as of 2014/02/22 in VM (virtualbox i386). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1282509 Title: xfdesktop crashed with SIGSEGV in xf

[Bug 1315638] [NEW] upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04LTS fails

2014-05-03 Thread Peer-Dominik Schmitz
Public bug reported: Es konnte nicht ermittelt werden, welche Systemaktualisierungen verfügbar sind Ein unlösbares Problem trat beim Berechnen der Aktualisierung auf. Dies kann verursacht worden sein duch: * Aktualisieren auf eine Vorabversion von Ubuntu * Verwendung der aktuellen Vorabversio

[Bug 1315638] Re: upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04LTS fails

2014-05-04 Thread Peer-Dominik Schmitz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1069133 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069133 Thats it! I have done it and it worked! Thanks for the quick help! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Bug 1353468] Re: Scheduled backup without user logged in

2014-08-07 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. It is a "kind-of" bug: sbackup uses GIO/GVFS as default backend to access remote location e.g. over FTP. The gvfs-daemon, in turn, is started via Dbus on user login, so it is not running without user session. For reference see http://ubuntuforu

[Bug 1336505] Re: missing man page

2014-08-07 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Any help is appreciated. Thanks. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133

[Bug 1321414] Re: Free space on local ssh server is incorrectly reported as 0 (leads to failed backup due to not enough free space)

2014-08-08 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321414 Title: Free space on local ssh server is incorrectly reported as 0 (leads to

[Bug 1316679] Re: Backup over FTP fails with Generic error if file cannot be closed (gio backend)

2014-08-08 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316679 Title: Backup over FTP fails with Generic error if file cannot be closed (gio

[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream bugfix release 0.11.6

2014-03-07 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Please sponsor. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286532 Title: New upstream bugfix release 0.11.6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour

[Bug 1203991] Re: sbackup backuo on external usb drive not possible

2014-03-13 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1181056 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1181056 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1181056 TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs

[Bug 1181056] Re: TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found

2014-03-13 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1181056 Title: TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType

[Bug 1244320] Re: Sbackup crashes on startup in Kubuntu 13.04

2014-02-26 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1174124 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174124 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1258743 initial install of sbackup - 1st setup use failed? ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1174124 Error when destination path is changed --

[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Attachment added: "sbackup_0.11.6-0ubuntu1_source.changes" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002206/+files/sbackup_0.11.6-0ubuntu1_source.changes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Attachment added: "Screenshot of GUI with replaced FileChooserButton" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002200/+files/GUI_with_replaced_FileChooserButton.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Attachment added: "Upstream tarball" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002203/+files/sbackup_0.11.6.orig.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Attachment added: "Build log on Trusty builddaemon" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002198/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-i386.sbackup_0.11.6-0ubuntu1_UPLOADING.buildlog.xz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Attachment added: "sbackup_0.11.6-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002204/+files/sbackup_0.11.6-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Patch added: "Debdiff of new version" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002202/+files/sbackup_0.11.6-0ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 1286532] [NEW] New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sbackup Please grant a Feature Freeze exception. This is necessary as many bugs are being fixed in this upstream release, in particular: * removes 'backup upgrade' feature and 'rebase snapshot' feature which can cause *severe* user data loss. * adds re

[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Attachment added: "Log of installation on Trusty" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002199/+files/sbackup_0.11.6-install_on_trusty.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. htt

[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Attachment added: "sbackup_0.11.6-0ubuntu1.dsc" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002205/+files/sbackup_0.11.6-0ubuntu1.dsc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Attachment added: "Screenshot of GUI of legacy-restore tool" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002201/+files/legacy-restore-gui.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:

[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/sbackup -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286532 Title: New upstream release 0.11.6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream bugfix release 0.11.6

2014-03-02 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Summary changed: - New upstream release 0.11.6 + New upstream bugfix release 0.11.6 ** Description changed: Binary package hint: sbackup Please grant a Feature Freeze exception. - This is necessary as many bugs are being fixed in this upstream release, - in particular: + This is nec

[Bug 1181056] Re: TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found

2014-03-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
o on is welcome and highly appreciated. Just get in touch if you have resources available. I'd be very happy. Best regards, Jean-Peer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1181056 Title:

[Bug 609814] Re: Exception when selecting the "Use recommended settings": NoOptionError

2013-01-10 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609814 Title: Exception when selecting the "Use recommended settings": NoOption

[Bug 113864] Re: Display password in cleartext

2013-01-10 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
This should be fixed in sbackup series 0.11.4 and newer. Please feel free to re-open the issue if you want to comment or if the issue is still valid. Thanks. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 330680] Re: SBackup fails if target path contains #

2013-01-23 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330680 Title: SBackup fails if target path contains # To manage notificati

[Bug 609814] Re: Exception when selecting the "Use recommended settings": NoOptionError

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Please upgrade to our latest release. Thanks. ** Changed in: sbackup/0.10 Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609814 Title: Exception when selecting

[Bug 227642] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with RuntimeError in normpath()

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release of sbackup (0.11.4). Thanks. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 224131] Re: simple-restore-gnome.py crashed with IOError in copyfile()

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release of sbackup (0.11.4). Thanks. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 197031] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with AccessDeniedError in delete()

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release of sbackup (0.11.4). Thanks in advance. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 216416] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with IOError in do_add_file()

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release of sbackup (0.11.4). Thanks. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 231841] Re: simple-restore-gnome.py crashed with OSError in cmp()

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231841 Title: simple-restore-gnome.py crashed with OSError in cmp() To manage notificatio

[Bug 225176] Re: simple-backup-config.py crashed with TypeError in isdir()

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release of sbackup (0.11.4). Thanks. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 290329] Re: Simple Backup crashs silently if an io error occurs while doing backup and restoration

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
This problem is fixed in sbackup 0.11.x. Please update. Thanks. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290329 Title: Simple

[Bug 224131] Re: simple-restore-gnome.py crashed with IOError in copyfile()

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224131 Title: simple-restore-gnome.py crashed with IOError in copyfile() To manage

[Bug 221603] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with error in _compile()

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221603 Title: sbackupd.py crashed with error in _compile() To manage notifications abo

[Bug 222566] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with OSError in rmtree()

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release of sbackup (0.11.4)? If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomp

[Bug 730514] Re: python2.6 crashed with IOError: [Errno 5] Input/output error

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release of sbackup (0.11.4)? If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomp

[Bug 441091] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with EOFError: End of file

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release of sbackup (0.11.4)? If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invali

[Bug 283257] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with NotPermittedError in delete()

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release of sbackup (0.11.4)? If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomp

[Bug 250024] Re: simple-restore-gnome.py crashed with IOError in copyfile()

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release of sbackup (0.11.4)? If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomp

[Bug 230834] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with OSError in do_backup()

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release of sbackup (0.11.4)? If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomp

[Bug 239257] Re: sbackup / tar -xcvfz will lockup Hardy

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release of sbackup (0.11.4)? If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invali

[Bug 225437] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with IOError in ()

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release of sbackup (0.11.4)? If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomp

[Bug 766185] Re: annoying modal dialog pops up if destination directory does not exist

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. This is a valid feature request, comments are welcome. Thank you. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Opinion ** Summary changed: - annoying modal dialog pops up if destination directory does not exist + [wish

[Bug 754628] Re: unable to restore home folder with with sbackup

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. This bug was introduced in version 0.11.3 which is packaged in Ubuntu 10.10. It is fixed in sbackup 0.11.4 in current Ubuntu releases. Please update. (Altenatively, you can use sbackup's latest version from our PPA, have a look at

[Bug 336240] Re: sbackup 0.10.5 ignores maxsize setting

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Valid for sbackup series 0.10. However, needs verification of both bug and patch. Anyhow, setting the status to confirmed. ** Summary changed: - sbackup ignores maxsize setting + sbackup 0.10.5 ignores maxsize setting ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You recei

[Bug 802111] Re: Restore shows files in gray

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Could you please specify, what version of Ubuntu and sbackup you are using. I was not able to fully understand your issue. I'd appreciate, if you could post a screenshot or similar. Thank you. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)

[Bug 108317] Re: [Wishlist] Sbackup should be able to revert my datas to a certain state

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108317 Title: [Wishlist] Sbackup should be able to revert my datas to a certain state T

[Bug 275258] Re: Sbackup wont exclude directories in UPPER Case

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using newer releases of sbackup (0.10.5 in Lucid/0.11.4)? If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: N

[Bug 231619] Re: loading backup

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release of sbackup (0.11.4)? If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomp

[Bug 312945] Re: sbackupd lock file generation is not atomic

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312945 Title: sbackupd lock file generation is not atomic To manage notifications about

[Bug 116743] Re: Sbackup should exclude its own backups

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Does this still happen with newer releases of sbackup (0.10.5 resp. 0.11.4)? Please feel free to reopen it if it still exists. Thanks. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 645543] Re: "Cannot concatenate str and error object" error in 0.11.2 leads do no incremental backup

2012-11-11 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
This bug was fixed in the version 0.11.3 of sbackup ** Changed in: sbackup Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645543 Title: "Cannot concatena

[Bug 653577] Re: Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected

2013-01-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653577 Title: Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no

[Bug 648754] Re: Can't mount ftp location

2013-01-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
A fix for this was released in sbackup 0.11.3. I am closing this bug for now, feel free to re-open it if still valid. Thanks. ** Changed in: sbackup Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 567328] Re: [Feature request] Sort files by name in restore dialog

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Also affects: sbackup/0.10 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/trunk Importance: Wishlist Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: New => Won't Fix ** Chan

[Bug 568384] Re: sbackup uses too much memory

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Also affects: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/trunk Importance: Wishlist Assignee: Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received

[Bug 906044] Re: admin terminal opened with sbackup and blocked

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Please note, the "error message" you have encountered is a warning and can be safely ignored. In case there are more issues please provide more comprehensive information. Thank you in advance. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Ne

[Bug 898271] Re: sbackup was configurated but didn't do the backup. It display that the destination folder don't exist

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting your problem. Did you checked the permissions of your destination folder? Does the problem still exists? Thanks for further information in case your problem is still valid. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You receive

[Bug 330680] Re: SBackup fails if target path contains #

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
A fix for this issue was pushed into repository series 0.11. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330680 Title: SBackup

[Bug 407280] Re: too many incremental backups are deleted

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Can you please test whether the problem still exists when using the latest version of sbackup 0.11.4? Thank you so much. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 357498] Re: sbackup doesn't remove all Regex Exclude rules

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Can you please test whether the problem still exists when using the latest version of sbackup 0.11.4? Thank you so much. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 345949] Re: Single directory exclude not working if backing up root

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Can you please test whether the problem still exists when using the latest version of sbackup 0.11.4? Thank you so much. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 336452] Re: if you add file or directory in include tab, after having changed some of the entries, you have to save and the reload sbackup

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Can you please test whether the problem still exists when using the latest version of sbackup 0.11.4? Thank you so much. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 675298] Re: sbackup doesn't honor regex excludes on full backup

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
I am closing this report since it is fixed in latest version of sbackup 0.11.x. Please upgrade to the latest version. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu

[Bug 661746] Re: Error in stream protocol: End of stream

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
I'm setting the status of this report to confirmed since it affects multiple users. Unfortunately, I was not able to reproduce the error so far. @cuby: Would you mind to post your full log file (debug mode) please? I start to think it is related to some timing issue...help in tracking this down

[Bug 223073] Re: Simple backup through ssh crashes at startup

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Can you please test whether the problem still exists when using the latest version of sbackup 0.11.4? Thank you so much. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 146618] Re: The file size limitation should not be a recommendation

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
The issue was fixed in sbackup series 0.11.x Please upgrade. Thank you. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/14661

[Bug 116076] Re: sbackup using remote target fails ungracefully over wireless connection (with gnome-vfs-modules-CRITICAL error)

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Can you please test whether the problem still exists when using the latest version of sbackup 0.11.4? Thank you so much. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 126280] Re: sbackup time option "simple" time is obscure

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
The issue was fixed in sbackup series 0.11.x Please upgrade. Thank you. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126280 T

[Bug 336240] Re: sbackup 0.10.5 ignores maxsize setting

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
The issue was fixed in sbackup series 0.11.x Please upgrade. Thank you. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336240 T

[Bug 384362] Re: No clear way to enter a password containing the '@' character in Simple Backup Utility

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Can you please test whether the problem still exists when using the latest version of sbackup 0.11.4? Thank you so much. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 384359] Re: Simple Backup Utility may prompt user for password to remote server but not remember it

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Can you please test whether the problem still exists when using the latest version of sbackup 0.11.4? Thank you so much. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 249292] Re: Exclude regex for Trash does not include location used in Gnome >=2.22

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
The issue was fixed in sbackup series 0.11.x Please upgrade. Thank you. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: sbackup/0.10 Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 773815] Re: package sbackup 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2013-01-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Does this also happens when upgragding to more recent distributions (12.10 or 13.04)? Thanks for any additional information - otherwise I'll close this bug. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You receive

[Bug 311429] Re: simple-backup-config.py crashed with NoOptionError in get()

2011-10-02 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Does this still happens with the latest release of sbackup 0.11.4? Please consider to update, if you are on Lucid you can use our PPA at https://edge.launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team/+archive/ppa. Thanks. ** Changed in: sbackup (U

[Bug 86298] Re: simple-restore-gnome (sbackup) chrashes

2011-10-02 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. Does this still happens with the latest release of sbackup 0.11.4? Please consider to update, if you are on Lucid you can use our PPA at https://edge.launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team/+archive/ppa. Thanks. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ub

[Bug 840305] Re: Status indicator information greyed out

2011-10-02 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better. At the moment this is not possible. Therefore I'm setting the status of this bug to Wishlist in order to keep it in mind. Thanks. ** Summary changed: - Status indicator information greyed out + Text of status indicator has bad

[Bug 224129] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with IOError in do_add_file()

2011-10-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue. Meanwhile sbackup 0.10.5 and 0.11.4 (via PPA) is available. Does this problems still encounters with the latest release of sbackup? Thanks. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 877905] Re: After upgrading Xserver video does not work properly

2011-10-19 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Having the same issue on intel graphics, see enclosed xorg.log. ** Attachment added: "xorg log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/877905/+attachment/2561149/+files/Xorg.0.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 877905] Re: [lucid] glx regression after upgrading xorg-server packages to versions in USN-1232-1

2011-10-20 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for the quick fix, works for me (on Lucid). Everything is back to normal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877905 Title: [lucid] glx regression after upgrading xorg-server packag

[Bug 796234] Re: Segmentation fault on start

2011-06-29 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
For me it started crashing after upgrading package "faenza-extras" from 0.9 to 0.9-ubuntu1 on 2011/06/22. Running Ubuntu Lucid. Removing the (now empty) package faenza-extras solved it for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 796234] Re: Segmentation fault on start

2011-06-29 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
The package didn't removed some links it had created on installation. And apparently this leads liferea to segfault. So, this bug are actually two: 1. Liferea shouldn't segfault (silently) just because some icons are not available. 2. faenza-extras is broken/contains packaging errors. Somebody o

[Bug 617192] Re: [maverick-beta] Disabled menu items unreadable

2010-09-24 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
The change is almost not observable. It's slightly better though not ready for release IMO. Menus with disabled items look like having big gaps. Not really appealling. The same holds for Radiance (not that pronounced). For me this bug is not fixed. -- [maverick-beta] Disabled menu items unreadab

[Bug 538856] Re: Radiance is not the default light theme

2010-09-25 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Summary changed: - radiance to default theme + Radiance is not the default light theme -- Radiance is not the default light theme https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538856 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 538856] Re: Radiance is not the default light theme

2010-09-25 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
I've created an idea in Ubuntu Brainstorm: Idea #25928: Radiance is not the default light theme - http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/25928/ Moreover, I think it's a valid feature request and not 'Invalid'. Therefore, I've set the status to 'Opinion' in order to express there is some kind of brains

[Bug 617192] Re: [maverick-beta] Disabled menu items unreadable

2010-09-26 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Radiance: basically ok for me. Personally, I'd like to see disabled menu items in Radiance slightly darker to make it less dependent on display type etc. (and yes I use a 8 years old CRT and indeed, themes look different compared to LCD panels). -- [maverick-beta] Disabled menu items unreadable h

[Bug 412934] Re: sbackup/nssbackup fails if exclude-path contains an equal-sign

2010-06-29 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Fix for this committed to nssbackup trunk. ** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: nssbackup Assignee: (unassigned) => Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) -- sbackup/nssbackup fails if exclude-path contains an equal-sign https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 130856] Re: ( wishlist )sbackup time to completion??

2010-06-29 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
mitted ** Changed in: nssbackup/0.3 Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: nssbackup/0.3 Assignee: (unassigned) => Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) -- ( wishlist )sbackup time to completion?? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130856 You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 746569] Re: package sbackup-gtk 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-04-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 742348 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742348 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 742348 package sbackup-gtk 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 * You can su

[Bug 745973] Re: package sbackup-gtk 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-04-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 742348 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742348 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 742348 package sbackup-gtk 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 * You can su

[Bug 742348] Re: package sbackup-gtk 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-04-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
I guess this issue is related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mono/+bug/741387. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742348 Title: package sbackup-gtk 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 fa

[Bug 744070] Re: package sbackup-gtk 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-03-29 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 742348 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742348 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 742348 package sbackup-gtk 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 * You can su

<    1   2   3   4   >