[Bug 1320683] Re: Update manager does not show all available updates

2015-04-14 Thread Paul Crawford
Having read the page on phased updates I can see the rational behind that. However, it is still a broken GUI in my view because it is not telling you the whole story. You are told one thing by the GUI and another if you look at the package status vit apt-get or similar. Would it not be better to

[Bug 1421044] Re: Too easy to accidentally restart computer when 'restart to complete update' box pop up

2015-04-14 Thread Paul Crawford
Thanks Brian, will look out for that! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1421044 Title: Too easy to accidentally restart computer when 'restart to complete update' box pop up To manage

[Bug 1260321] Re: dpkg-deb unable to install/upgrade oracle-java8-installer

2013-12-16 Thread Paul Crawford
My suggestion is to (ideally) have the later version back-ported to 10.04 so this problem is not an issue for the remaining 1.5 years or so of "long term support" for such servers, or to make sure Oracle uses the older style of compression so the package is usable. -- You received this bug notifi

[Bug 1260321] [NEW] dpkg-deb unable to install/upgrade oracle-java8-installer

2013-12-12 Thread Paul Crawford
Public bug reported: Running a 10.04 LTS machine (32-bit) and it seem that the oracle- java8-installer now uses the more recent compression option that is not supported by the version of dpkg that is currently used by 10.04 Indirectly this is a security risk as java is well known for vulnerabilit

[Bug 1217933] [NEW] update-grub fails to detect other md OS

2013-08-28 Thread Paul Crawford
Public bug reported: I have a system with two main HDD configured as several md RAID-1 devices and I installed the 32-bit version of 12.04.2 on to one of these partitions (using the "alternate installer" ISO), with most of the others being user data (e.g. one for /home, another for virtual mach

[Bug 1217933] Re: update-grub fails to detect other md OS

2013-08-28 Thread Paul Crawford
Why might it be a mdadm problem? All of the md devices are up and accessible from the 64-bit OS, and the /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf file appears to match the output of the command ' mdadm --detail --scan' suggesting it is correct. Even if I mount the previous 32-bit systems root partition (that just

[Bug 1217933] Re: update-grub fails to detect other md OS

2013-08-28 Thread Paul Crawford
Ah - my apologies for not having this logged under 'grub2' as I had just accepted the launchpad suggestion which, I'm guessing, was based on the bug title. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 1217933] Re: update-grub fails to detect other md OS

2013-08-28 Thread Paul Crawford
:) For the record: $ apt-cache policy grub2 grub2: Installed: (none) Candidate: 1.99-21ubuntu3.10 Version table: 1.99-21ubuntu3.10 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/universe amd64 Packages 1.99-21ubuntu3 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/

[Bug 1217933] Re: update-grub fails to detect other md OS

2013-08-29 Thread Paul Crawford
Noticed that syslog has various messages about the os-prober generated during update-grub but tellingly NO reference to and md device, just the constituent partitions. ** Attachment added: "syslong during update-grub" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1217933/+attachment/379

[Bug 1217933] Re: update-grub fails to detect other md OS

2013-08-29 Thread Paul Crawford
See also my question #234837 for the os-prober, as it appears to only know about dmarid and not about mdadm RAID. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217933 Title: update-grub fails to de

[Bug 1217933] Re: update-grub fails to detect other md OS

2013-08-29 Thread Paul Crawford
I think I have a patch that fixes this, basically adding another step to generate the 'partitions' that include the md arrays, and to drop the md arrays themselves as being part of any array obtained from /proc/mdstat If this is OK, can it be made available for 12.04 support? ** Patch added: "Upd

[Bug 20915] Re: os-prober doesn't support software RAID

2013-08-30 Thread Paul Crawford
This appears related to Bug #1217933 and I have a basic patch that enables it for mdadm RAID. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/20915 Title: os-prober doesn't support software RA

[Bug 1217933] Re: update-grub fails to detect other md OS

2013-08-30 Thread Paul Crawford
I think this applies to the following versions since I first tested the 1.61 version of os-prober to see if it was already fixed (was not) and my patach should work for all of them, though I have only tested on 1.51 & 1.61: Saucy (1.61ubuntu1) Raring (1.57ubuntu1) Quantal (1.56ubuntu1) Precise (1

[Bug 576602] Re: Fancontrol relies on the module load order

2013-09-02 Thread Paul Crawford
Thanks Thomas, that is a much better work-around method! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576602 Title: Fancontrol relies on the module load order To manage notifications about this bu

[Bug 1499089] Re: Please enable kconfig X86_LEGACY_VM86 for i386

2015-10-03 Thread Paul Crawford
We also run critical software that depends on the vm86 for performance reasons, and we are already using dosemu with root privileges to gain direct hardware access, so we see the potential security risks of this are trivial. The suggestion above to have the patch back-ported to enable vm86 only whe

[Bug 1001189] [NEW] 'man' command fails with lseek error

2012-05-18 Thread Paul Crawford
Public bug reported: When trying to look up the on-line documentation using the 'man' command it fails on 12.04 with lseek error. For example: $ man resolvconf gdbm fatal: lseek error This lseek error applies to other requests as well (e.g. ls, fdisk, etc). System information is: $ lsb_release

[Bug 999725] Re: broken start-up dependencies for ntp

2012-05-18 Thread Paul Crawford
Yes, it looks very much like the DNS system is broken here, but when I tried to look things up I get Bug #1001189 so overall not impressed with 12.04 so far :( Still, adding some "dns-nameservers" lines to /etc/network/interfaces is the next obvious thing to try. -- You received this bug notific

[Bug 1001189] Re: 'man' command fails with lseek error

2012-05-18 Thread Paul Crawford
Thanks for the package identification, result is: $ apt-cache policy man-db man-db: Installed: 2.6.1-2 Candidate: 2.6.1-2 Version table: *** 2.6.1-2 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status It seems to be a permissions i

[Bug 1001189] Re: 'man' command fails with lseek error

2012-05-18 Thread Paul Crawford
Just to add that 'man' works fine on 10.04 LTS using NIS user accounts, so I am guessing it is something that has changed with 12.04 file locations/permissions, and/or the NIS package for 12.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 999725] Re: broken start-up dependencies for ntp

2012-05-18 Thread Paul Crawford
I think this bug should concentrate on the key issue: that ntp (and maybe others?) is being brought up on the wrong event, that is it comes up with the interface, and not with the chosen type of name server. In our case NIS provides user and name server resolution, and ntp comes up before it with

[Bug 1001189] Re: 'man' command fails with lseek error

2012-05-18 Thread Paul Crawford
The id command shows: $ id uid=xxx05(opr) gid=xxx00(local) groups=xxx00(local),4(adm),20(dialout),109(lpadmin),501(operadores),502(vboxuser),xxx03(hrpt),xxx04(dosgroup),xxx07(vboxsf) (with xxx replacing various numeric values that our sysadmin don't want on a public forum) The copy works withou

[Bug 999725] Re: broken start-up dependencies for ntp

2012-05-18 Thread Paul Crawford
Yes, you are right in that our NIS servers are solaris boxes, and they do support behind-the-scenes DNS lookups as it turns out. It is also true that NIS is depreciated, though a lot of older installations like ours still use it, and for most machines DNS is available and will probably fix our spec

[Bug 999725] Re: broken start-up dependencies for ntp (starts before NIS is available)

2012-05-19 Thread Paul Crawford
It is probably true that this has not been seen much as a bug due to DNS normally being available, hence NIS dependency (if present) being a secondary issue. However, we found that ntp did not recover by itself, so possibly it only tries to find the nameservers once, but will re-try for the time se

[Bug 1001189] Re: 'man' command fails with lseek error

2012-05-19 Thread Paul Crawford
Given those files are readable, could it be some file format change between the working-on-NIS version with 10.04 (2.5.7-2ubuntu1) and the problem version of 12.04 (2.6.1-2), say if it is seeing extra man files via the NIS/automount environment? -- You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 1001189] Re: 'man' command fails with lseek error

2012-05-19 Thread Paul Crawford
Running it with strace produced this near the end: open("/packages/local/share/man/index.db", O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=3208201, ...}) = 0 fcntl64(3, F_SETLK, {type=F_RDLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=0, len=0}) = 0 read(3, "\316\232W\23\0\0\20\0\0\0\20\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\20\

[Bug 1001189] Re: 'man' command fails with lseek error

2012-05-19 Thread Paul Crawford
There is no $HOME/.manpath file in any of the NIS accounts I have tried, or for the local user accounts on my 10.04 box either. Actually it is slightly more bizarre, that NIS account (opr) is braking 'man' but another NIS account on the 12.04 machine is OK, while opr (and others) accounts are al

[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

2012-05-20 Thread Paul Crawford
The original problem, though sadly I did not post the exact messages, was saying it could not run fsck.cifs (which of course is non-existent). The bug in this case was that with pass=0 it should not even have tried to run a check on boot-up. The bug now is the same underlying problem, that during

Re: [Bug 1001189] Re: 'man' command fails with lseek error

2012-05-20 Thread Paul Crawford
> As far as the first question: Does "/packages/local/share/man/" get opened > and/or stat-ed in the strace when you run "man" on the Lucid box and from > other accounts on the Precise box? It seems not. > Is $MANPATH set differently in the different accounts? There is no $MANPATH variable set o

[Bug 1001189] Re: 'man' command fails with lseek error

2012-05-20 Thread Paul Crawford
One thing I noticed that is different is $PATH but I expected that to be the search order for programs, not for mand pages and/or index.db files! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001189

[Bug 575293] Re: mountall trying to check mounts with pass=0

2012-05-20 Thread Paul Crawford
The current (64-bit 10.04) boot.log file has messages such as these appearing: error -1 (Unknown error 18446744073709551615) opening credential file /home/paul/.smbcredentials mountall: mount /media/swdev [1087] terminated with status 1 mount error: could not resolve address for smb: Temporary fa

[Bug 1001189] Re: 'man' command fails with lseek error

2012-05-20 Thread Paul Crawford
The $PATH variables are different, with the 12.04 (32-bit) system having /packages/local/bin included in the list. If I remove that from the 12.04 system it then avoids the /packages/local/share/man/index.db file and it works. However, if I add /packages/local/bin to the 10.04 system (64-bit, in c

[Bug 1001189] Re: 'man' command fails with lseek error

2012-05-20 Thread Paul Crawford
If I run the accessdb command on the 32-bit 12.04 machine it core dumps: $ /usr/sbin/accessdb /packages/local/share/man/index.db Segmentation fault (core dumped) Doing the same on the 64-bit 10.04 machine produces something intelligible: $ /usr/sbin/accessdb /packages/local/share/man/index.db $

[Bug 1001189] Re: 'man' command fails with lseek error

2012-05-20 Thread Paul Crawford
It seems this dumbness has been recognised since 2005 according to this bug report, but not taken seriously: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162416 Apparently "gdbm-1.9.1 (already in Rawhide) provides different magic values for 32 and 64 bits, so we can discover what system the file w

[Bug 1001189] Re: 'man' command fails with lseek error

2012-05-20 Thread Paul Crawford
Trying to be positive, we have a possible work-around for our own system (drop /packages/local/bin from $PATH) but it is not really a decent fix. The underlying problem is difficult in that all current 32-bit and 64-bit DB files look similar, so work on an improved libgdbm3 is going to be diffic

[Bug 1001189] Re: 'man' command fails with lseek error opening cross-architecture index.db file (on network share)

2012-05-21 Thread Paul Crawford
In the long run, migrating all of the DB files to newer ones that identify the size/swap nature is the right approach, however, I wonder if a simpler fix for 'man' which would be useful for current systems would be to keep everything in the in local DB (say the /var/cache/man/index.db file or simil

[Bug 984801] [NEW] Thunderbird 11 has stupidly high idle CPU usage

2012-04-18 Thread Paul Crawford
Public bug reported: Running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32-bit and today I got the upgrade from Thunderbird 3.6.X to 11.0.1 and noticed it is using a stupid amount of CPU time when apparently idle. On my quad-core AMD machine it is taking typically 30-50% CPU when doing nothing, and this is much the same wh

[Bug 984801] Re: Thunderbird 11 has stupidly high idle CPU usage

2012-04-18 Thread Paul Crawford
Maybe it is indexing or something? The old version told you that (bottom - left status bar?) but this one is just saying "No messages to download" although there seems to be a lot of disk activity. However, that is still no excuse for polling the time at sub-millisecond intervals! -- You receive

[Bug 984801] Re: Thunderbird 11 has stupidly high idle CPU usage

2012-04-18 Thread Paul Crawford
Looks like it was probably indexing, as reported here: https://getsatisfaction.com/mozilla_messaging/topics/thunderbird_indexing_hogs_the_cpu CPU load is now normal, and remaind so after re-start, but seems the "Activity Manager" window is volatile so there is no log of what it was originally doi

[Bug 596859] Re: ntp profile denies write access to serial devices

2012-04-20 Thread Paul Crawford
This appears to be broken again, the 10.04 default profile has: # vim:syntax=apparmor # Last Modified: Tue Aug 11 16:14:21 CDT 2009 # Updated for Ubuntu by: Jamie Strandboge @{NTPD_DEVICE} r, So it only allows read-access to the devices. Also broken/reverted is the tunables which has: # La

[Bug 1535840] [NEW] systemd ignoring /etc/modules due to blacklist

2016-01-19 Thread Paul Crawford
Public bug reported: I tried the daily build of 16.04 32-bit to test out the watchdog daemon code. Usually (Ubuntu 10.04-14.04) I add the watchdog module in /etc/modules so it is loaded at boot-time, as watchdog timer modules are not normally auto-loaded due to the risk of an unexpected reboot. H

[Bug 459730] Re: rsyslog doesn't create /dev/xconsole

2016-01-19 Thread Paul Crawford
This is still present in the development branch for 16.04 Jan 19 17:53:23 ubuntu rsyslogd-2039: Could not open output pipe '/dev/xconsole':: No such file or directory [v8.14.0 try http://www.rsyslog.com/e/2039 ] System information: $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (developme

[Bug 1535854] [NEW] watchdog daemon going in to failed state on reboot

2016-01-19 Thread Paul Crawford
Public bug reported: I was testing the watchdog daemon code on the development version of 16.04 today and found the associated systemd service files for this has some bugs. The first of these was a typo in /lib/systemd/system/watchdog.service where there was a missing ['] character. This lead to

[Bug 1535854] Re: watchdog daemon going in to failed state on reboot

2016-01-19 Thread Paul Crawford
Just to add this is only a problem on shut down / reboot, you can manually stop and start the daemon without problems using: service watchdog start service watchdog stop -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 378696] Re: --version not supported (error in manpage ?)

2016-01-19 Thread Paul Crawford
This has been fixed from at least 2011 onwards so can be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378696 Title: --version not supported (error in manpage ?) To manage notifications abo

[Bug 795622] Re: Interface sensor fails

2016-01-19 Thread Paul Crawford
Some updates added this month (Jan 2016) add a timer so you get a less "trigger happy" behaviour if the interface is slow in coming up. Currently in the GIT version, but hopefully this will be in a release version 5.15 some time soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1010855] Re: watchdog/0 100% cpu usage

2016-01-19 Thread Paul Crawford
Note the "watchdog/0" thread you see is not the system monitoring daemon. Rather it has a similar task for kernel scheduling: http://linux-tips.org/t/what-is-kernel-soft-lockup/78 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:

[Bug 1225386] Re: watchdog should allow a configurable SIGTERM->SIGKILL delay

2016-01-19 Thread Paul Crawford
This has been added to the current GIT version: http://sourceforge.net/p/watchdog/code/ci/77e777e2fb4cc0723fb51ad5556a427cf345385b/ Hopefully there will soon be a version 5.15 release with this feature included. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 1448924] Re: watchdogd doesn't start on boot

2016-01-19 Thread Paul Crawford
This is probably the same problem as bug #1535854 thought there could be a number of related factors, for example bug #1535840 for module loading. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448924

[Bug 1535854] Re: watchdog daemon going in to failed state on reboot

2016-01-19 Thread Paul Crawford
Doh! I meant bug #1448924 (above is this bug) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535854 Title: watchdog daemon going in to failed state on reboot To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1535854] Re: watchdog daemon going in to failed state on reboot

2016-01-19 Thread Paul Crawford
This may be a duplicate of bug #1535854 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535854 Title: watchdog daemon going in to failed state on reboot To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1535854] Re: watchdog daemon going in to failed state on reboot

2016-01-19 Thread Paul Crawford
I just tested the proposed fix from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/watchdog/+bug/1448924/comments/7 and while it includes the fix for the "unbalanced quoting" it does not fix the system going in to a failed state. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1448924] Re: watchdogd doesn't start on boot

2016-01-19 Thread Paul Crawford
I tested the proposed fix from comment #7 on bug #1535854 but it did not work for that system (16.04) :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448924 Title: watchdogd doesn't start on boot

[Bug 1093870] Re: A long startup fsck causes cyclic watchdog reboot

2016-01-19 Thread Paul Crawford
Usually the wd_keepalive daemon would be started early for this reason, to keep the hardware from timing out. Once the machine is up it would hand over to the watchdog daemon that runs system tests. I am guessing that the at-boot fsck is run before loading anything (daemons, etc) so all the file s

[Bug 932381] Re: IT87 watchdog timer driver not working

2016-01-19 Thread Paul Crawford
Note the work-around for this bug is not in the GIT repository for the watchdog package as: http://sourceforge.net/p/watchdog/code/ci/0d156df287656d1031389cac99caa9fa94c2d204/ Hopefully a release of version 5.15 soon will make that more widely available. -- You received this bug notification be

[Bug 1093870] Re: A long startup fsck causes cyclic watchdog reboot

2016-01-19 Thread Paul Crawford
I think this problem is down to the IPMI style of watchdog being configured when the machine boots, but the Linux system not starting the refresh action until much later. For example if I try a test on my home PC (Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit desktop) after installing the watchdog and using "touch /forcefsc

[Bug 999191] Re: 10de:0421 X crashes with gnome-session: Fatal IO error 11

2014-04-30 Thread Paul Crawford
Seeing this with a fresh 12.04.4 64-bit installation using ATI graphics. Seems to be triggered by "changing user" and it frequently breaks VM operations. Typical syslog entry looks like this: Apr 29 14:26:59 john-desktop rtkit-daemon[2183]: Successfully made thread 23506 of process 23506 (n/a) ow

[Bug 1328264] Re: packaging issues with the trusty Xstack in precise xserver-xorg-lts-trusty

2014-07-30 Thread Paul Crawford
This bug, the ability to get the kernel back on to a supported stream, is still broken a month on, even though there was some update to the update manager today (which still caused a crash report, though that was supposed to be fixed). -- You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 1328264] Re: packaging issues with the trusty Xstack in precise xserver-xorg-lts-trusty

2014-07-30 Thread Paul Crawford
Running from the command line reports: $ /usr/bin/update-manager Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/defer/__init__.py", line 473, in _inline_callbacks result = gen.throw(result.type, result.value, result.traceback) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-pack

[Bug 1350310] [NEW] update-manager chashes on 12.04.4 HWE update

2014-07-30 Thread Paul Crawford
Public bug reported: In spite of apparent fixes for [bug #1342424] I find that the update- manager is still crashing and failing to perform the HWE upgrade to move my 12.04.4 LTS installation. If I run the update-manager from the command line I get the same behaviour as the normal alert when upda

[Bug 1350310] Re: update-manager chashes on 12.04.4 HWE update

2014-07-30 Thread Paul Crawford
Sorry, should have been related to [bug #1341324]. Not sure if this counts a "distribution upgrade" since it is about continued kernel support for 12.04 LTS and not about moving to 14.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1350310] Re: update-manager chashes on 12.04.4 HWE update

2014-08-04 Thread Paul Crawford
Just to say a recent update has fixed this. There are still problems with Nvidia driver post-update, but that is another bug... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350310 Title: update-ma

[Bug 1328264] Re: packaging issues with the trusty Xstack in precise xserver-xorg-lts-trusty

2014-08-04 Thread Paul Crawford
A recent update to the update-manager seems to have fixed this for me. Still problems with the Nvidia driver post-update, but that is not the same bug/dependency issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 1260321] Re: dpkg-deb unable to install/upgrade oracle-java8-installer

2014-08-18 Thread Paul Crawford
No, the underlying problem is with dpkg not recognising the .xz compression type used in Oracle's .deb file. This is ALREADY fixed in the 12.04 version, so for from there being "nothing the Ubuntu developers can do", there is - backport the later version of dpkg that supports the .xz file type!

[Bug 1192037] Re: rsyslog shuts down too soon with Upstart

2014-08-06 Thread Paul Crawford
I would also like to have shutdown messages logged. Could it be configured to stop on reaching the last of the init-style of run-levels? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1192037 Title:

[Bug 1350310] Re: update-manager chashes on 12.04.4 HWE update

2014-08-09 Thread Paul Crawford
Attached are my term.log files from before the bug report and afterwards when it seems to have succeded (mostly). I say mostly, as there are missing firmware warnings, and it screwed up the graphics (removed the nvidia driver but did not un-blacklist the nouveau driver, so 640x480 VGA graphics o

[Bug 1217933] Re: update-grub fails to detect other md OS

2014-01-28 Thread Paul Crawford
Seems this bug still is present with the latest grub update, as had to patch /usr/bin/os-prober again to allow dual-boot from MD array. $ apt-cache policy grub2 grub2: Installed: (none) Candidate: 1.99-21ubuntu3.14 Version table: 1.99-21ubuntu3.14 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.

[Bug 1376245] Re: remove_proc_entry+0x139/0x1b0() -- name 'fs/nfsfs'

2014-11-12 Thread Paul Crawford
Updated a 12.04 LTS box today with the kernel "3.13.0-39-generic #66~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 29 09:56:49 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux" and problem still there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs

[Bug 1376245] Re: remove_proc_entry+0x139/0x1b0() -- name 'fs/nfsfs'

2014-10-17 Thread Paul Crawford
We are seeing the same a dozen or so timers per day, and it happened after we updated from the -36 to the -37 kernel build. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1376245 Title: remove_proc_e

[Bug 514574] Re: dvd95 crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main()

2013-01-25 Thread Paul Crawford
Happens for me with one DVD, seems to be a fault situation that also segfaults k9copy, though K3b and VLC can both read the DVD OK-ish. My suspicion is either a read error or copy protection trick that is causing the error, and these packages are not doing some sensibility check on what is read.

[Bug 787475] Re: Rhythmbox [0.12.8] & [0.12.5] Not Fetching Album Information From MusicBrainz

2011-09-27 Thread Paul Crawford
It is now almost a month after "status: Unknown → Fix Released" was reported for this bug. This still has not been fixed in the 10.04 LTS version. Can anyone tell me when it will be fixed? Can anyone tell me what the "support" in "Long Term Support" version is supposed to mean? Does anyone car

[Bug 864846] Re: ifconfig reports wrong network values

2011-10-03 Thread Paul Crawford
Tried the same test on my work PC and it seems to work just fine. Will have to try rebooting home PC to see if it is still playing up... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/864846 Title: i

[Bug 864846] Re: ifconfig reports wrong network values

2011-10-03 Thread Paul Crawford
Nope, rebooted home PC and ran test again, still showing absurd transfers: $ ifconfig eth1; dd if=/dev/zero of=/nfs/thecus/data/temp.dat bs=1M count=100; sync; ifconfig eth1 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1b:21:2f:ae:37 inet addr:192.168.1.100 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.

[Bug 864846] Re: ifconfig reports wrong network values

2011-10-03 Thread Paul Crawford
Looks like it is NFS-related, as a test with the same NAS mounted using CIFS shows sensible values: $ ifconfig eth1; dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/z/data/temp.dat bs=1M count=100; sync; ifconfig eth1 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1b:21:2f:ae:37 inet addr:192.168.1.100 Bcast:192.

[Bug 864846] Re: ifconfig reports wrong network values

2011-10-04 Thread Paul Crawford
I booted my home PC with the older kernels, and found that 2.6.32-33 also shows this fault, but 2.6.32-32 reported the correct value. As it seems not to affect my work PC with the same 10.04 LTS installation (tested both 32 and 64 bit versions) I guess it must be something specific to the kernel d

[Bug 1027805] Re: logins are not recorded in wtmp

2012-10-22 Thread Paul Crawford
Really, no logging or blocking of failed log-in attempts? Did no one learn from computing history? Also another failing of lightdm is it fails to respond to the power button, even if you have set it under Gnome, etc, to do an orderly shut- down. There have been times when a keyboard/mouse problem

[Bug 986289] Re: lightdm shutdown opens a window without focus

2012-10-26 Thread Paul Crawford
There is still an underlying issue of "discover-ability" here and it fails, in my view, to be acceptable for a disabled user: (1) Why does the tab key not cycle to the shutdown menu? Where exactly will a user, faced with the log-in screen, find out that the 'F10' key opens that menu? (2) The ta

[Bug 986289] Re: lightdm shutdown opens a window without focus

2012-10-26 Thread Paul Crawford
OK, I just discovered that the up & down arrow keys cycle the user accounts, but they do not cycle the log-in method! For that you need to use the tab key! How do you get access to the accessibility drop-down menu on the to bar? Same for the keyboard/language selection? Also why no 'F1' for help

[Bug 1071728] [NEW] lightdm fails keyboard accessability design

2012-10-26 Thread Paul Crawford
Public bug reported: Following on from the issue of bug #986289 to more general issue about the design of the unity greeter and how a person, in particular a newer user, with only keyboard-like access can make proper use of the computer. There is an underlying issue of poor "discoverability" here

[Bug 986289] Re: lightdm shutdown opens a window without focus

2012-10-26 Thread Paul Crawford
Realised this is separate issue so opening new bug for it as #1071728 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986289 Title: lightdm shutdown opens a window without focus To manage notificatio

[Bug 1027805] Re: logins are not recorded in wtmp

2012-10-26 Thread Paul Crawford
@Sebastien Apologies for the apparent hijacking of this bug, opening a new report for that subject. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027805 Title: logins are not recorded in wtmp To m

[Bug 915382] Re: ACPI events to shutdown/reboot don't generate a popup like after logging in

2012-10-26 Thread Paul Crawford
There should be no requirement to log-in in order to shut the machine down if you have physical access, the power button should initiate this in an orderly manner (warning/prompting as required). Basically, if the person at the power button wants to, they can hold the button in for 5 sec and power

[Bug 1027805] Re: logins are not recorded in wtmp

2012-10-26 Thread Paul Crawford
Found the power button issue is already open as bug #915382 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027805 Title: logins are not recorded in wtmp To manage notifications about this bug go to

[Bug 1029048] [NEW] 'who' and 'users' failes to report the GUI user

2012-07-25 Thread Paul Crawford
Public bug reported: On Ubuntu 12.04 the utility 'who' fails to report the presence of a user logged in using the Unity or Gnome fallback GUI. For example, if I log in as "psz" to the 10.04 machine in use by "arz" and I run 'who' in the ssh terminal I get something like this: $ who arz tty7

[Bug 1029048] Re: 'who' and 'users' failes to report the GUI user

2012-07-25 Thread Paul Crawford
Of course, this bug might really be down to Gnome/Unity failing to declare the user as logged in, but the fault _appears_ to be the core utilities simply not seeing anyone logged in using the main keyboard/mouse/display. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 1027805] Re: logins are not recorded in wtmp

2012-07-27 Thread Paul Crawford
I am not sure this bug should be considered a low priority, given that it breaks core utilities such as 'who', 'users', 'top', and similar by fooling them in to saying there is no one else logged in (which might result in a remote reboot being initiated while a user is on the normal keyboard/video/

[Bug 507062] Re: synaptic assert failure: synaptic: ../../src/xcb_io.c:385: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.

2012-07-27 Thread Paul Crawford
Happened again today, presumably nothing has been done to fix anything? LTS? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507062 Title: synaptic assert failure: synaptic: ../../src/xcb_io.c:385: _X

[Bug 1027805] Re: logins are not recorded in wtmp

2012-07-28 Thread Paul Crawford
Sorry about that. I am still seeing the problem with an up-to-date 12.04 system and my bug #1029048 was marked as a duplicate of this one, so I presumed it was still a significant unresolved issue. I guess it is a case of the previous bug-fix not being released yet. -- You received this bug no

[Bug 1026622] [NEW] instalation breaks network interface settings

2012-07-19 Thread Paul Crawford
Public bug reported: When I installed rpcbind on Ubuntu 12.04 (32-bit) version (by means of old 'potrtmap' package) I found that it broke the settings in /etc/network/interfaces by commenting out the last line that configured eth0 for DHCP, etc. Original file had this as the last 3 lines: # The

[Bug 1026622] Re: instalation breaks network interface settings

2012-07-19 Thread Paul Crawford
Actually this is not quite true. It turns out on the next machine that this change was done earlier (Friday 13th, with interfaces.bak-0 file having the uncommented line), but it results in the system breaking once rpcbind, nis, etc has been added. So before rpcbind & nis is installed, I can reboot

[Bug 1026622] Re: instalation breaks network interface settings

2012-07-19 Thread Paul Crawford
It is strange. I have a script to install NIS and autofs, it installs the following packages: portmap nis tcsh nscd autofs rsh-client rsh-server nfs-kernel-server Then it creates/updates some of the file (auto.master and so on) to suit out use. If I install each package in turn and reboot, it co

[Bug 1026622] Re: instalation breaks network interface settings

2012-07-20 Thread Paul Crawford
The odd thing is I ran the script after installing the packages one-by-one and it worked OK. Obviously it realised the packages were already installed so skipped doing anything there, then it set up the various files. However, it was still a bit slower to come up after reboot than when the comme

[Bug 627648] Re: firefox/thunderbird default to US Letter for papersize

2012-07-22 Thread Paul Crawford
This bug also causes me problems with machines I support. The default should *always* be the system-wide settings that Ubuntu honour, and at the very least it should not reset during an 'upgrade'. This 'reset to US paper size' arrogance is a major irritation and causes problems for users who print

[Bug 859315] Re: clicking email address in web browser opens HTML composer, despite default account settings preferring plain text

2012-07-23 Thread Paul Crawford
This is still a problem for me. $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS Release:10.04 $ apt-cache policy thunderbird thunderbird: Installed: 14.0+build1-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 Candidate: 14.0+build1-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 Version table: *** 14.0+build1-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 0 5

[Bug 627648] Re: firefox/thunderbird default to US Letter for papersize

2012-07-23 Thread Paul Crawford
Unfortunately (1) moving some machines to 12.04 is not an acceptable option due to the vast differences in user interface, and (2) it is still not right (as far as I can tell) with 12.04 as a recently installed test system when set up for UK preferences with an OKI network printer set for A4, bo

[Bug 627648] Re: firefox/thunderbird default to US Letter for papersize

2012-07-23 Thread Paul Crawford
Do you know where they store the page size setting? Also is there any (easy) way to force apt-get or similar to 'upgrade' a package to see what is happening? I wonder if the package comes with a default config file that is clobbering the user-configured file? -- You received this bug notificati

[Bug 627648] Re: firefox/thunderbird default to US Letter for papersize

2012-07-23 Thread Paul Crawford
I also looked at the Windows version in a VM and it has no page size preference option, I presume as it is written to always take the selected printer's choice. So this is probably a Linux-only bug (though I can't rule out MacOS since I don't have a Mac to try)/ -- You received this bug notificat

[Bug 10910] Re: Default page size for printing is letter

2012-07-23 Thread Paul Crawford
This bug is STILL not fixed in 10.04 with Firefox 14.0.1 Is this related to bug #627648 that applies to both Firefox and Thunderbird and why, after 8 YEARS is this still an issue for the majority of the world that use A4 paper and not US Letter? Seriously, what is happening here? -- You receive

[Bug 627648] Re: firefox/thunderbird default to US Letter for papersize

2012-07-23 Thread Paul Crawford
Looks like this has been known about, but nothing useful done to really fix it, for 10 YEARS now: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147419 ** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #147419 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147419 -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 627648] Re: firefox/thunderbird default to US Letter for papersize

2012-07-23 Thread Paul Crawford
Incidentally my setting is LANG="en_GB.utf8" so it is still an issue and not fixed, as per comment 73 in the above link. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627648 Title: firefox/thunderbi

[Bug 627648] Re: firefox/thunderbird default to US Letter for papersize

2012-07-23 Thread Paul Crawford
Looking at the modified preferences shown by about:support I don't see anything that appears to be the global page size. There are various printer-specific settings, but as this problem occurs with all printers it is clearly a program-wide problem and not a printer-specific one. -- You receive

<    1   2   3   4   >