[Bug 284082] Re: INTEL_BATCH=1 not implemented in Intrepid ?

2008-11-05 Thread Pandemonium
Conn, Executing glxgears with the vblank_mode variable set as you described makes no performance difference on my Acer Aspire One notebook. Likewise, disabling vertical sync using the driconf utility does not offer any performance gains in glxgears. Can you offer any further explanation or instru

[Bug 453524] Re: Track fails to load into player

2010-02-05 Thread Pandemonium
xwax_import and xwax_scan have nothing to do with it. In fact, the same error is given when running xwax built from source as downloaded directly from xwax.co.uk, with the import and scan scripts present. I was able to get it to import tracks properly by purging mpg123 and ffmpeg, rebooting, rein

[Bug 474555] Re: Double-declining depreciation does not prompt for salvage value

2009-11-04 Thread Pandemonium
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35109838/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35109839/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35109840/ProcStatus.txt -- Double

[Bug 474555] [NEW] Double-declining depreciation does not prompt for salvage value

2009-11-04 Thread Pandemonium
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gcalctool When using the calculator in Financial mode, pressing the Ddb button for Double-declining depreciation should prompt for Cost, Salvage, Life, and Period. The prompt for Salvage is missing, and therefore cannot be entered. Consequently, the

[Bug 459330] [NEW] Missing required font Vera.ttf

2009-10-23 Thread Pandemonium
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xwax When trying to launch xwax from the command line, the following error is given: Font 'Vera.ttf' cannot be found in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-bitstream-vera /usr/share/fonts/ttf-bitstream-vera /usr/share/fonts/TTF.

[Bug 459330] Re: Missing required font Vera.ttf

2009-10-23 Thread Pandemonium
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34278700/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34278701/XsessionErrors.txt -- Missing required font Vera.ttf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459330 You received this bu

[Bug 459330] Re: Missing required font Vera.ttf

2009-10-23 Thread Pandemonium
ttf-bitstream-vera does not seem to be in the repositories for a default installation of Karmic RC UNR. Is there another repository that's missing? -- Missing required font Vera.ttf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 474555] Re: Double-Declining depreciation to enter missing box salvage value

2010-10-03 Thread Pandemonium
After testing in 10.10 RC, I can confirm that it is still not correctly calculating double-declining depreciation. The calculator's UI has changed, and something about the change has stopped it from presenting the error message; however, the calculation is still not performed correctly. As per my

[Bug 599917] [NEW] xwax missing ttf-dejavu-extra package dependency

2010-06-29 Thread Pandemonium
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xwax Installing xwax 0.7-4 from repos on 10.04 does not properly install the font DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf, which is contained in the package ttf- dejavu-extra. xwax will not launch until this package has been installed. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ub

[Bug 599917] Re: xwax missing ttf-dejavu-extra package dependency

2010-06-29 Thread Pandemonium
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51128382/Dependencies.txt -- xwax missing ttf-dejavu-extra package dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 474555] Re: Double-Declining depreciation to enter missing box salvage value

2011-01-14 Thread Pandemonium
Sorry, but you've made the friction to find a resolution a bit too great for your customers. At some point Canonical needs to own the problem of bugs that their users are filing. If additional ticket need to be filed, go right ahead. I reported this bug over a year ago and have tried to provide

[Bug 474555] Re: Double-Declining depreciation to enter missing box salvage value

2010-09-13 Thread Pandemonium
Just tried it in Lucid. The problem is still there, identical to how it was when I filed the bug in 9.04. -- Double-Declining depreciation to enter missing box salvage value https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474555 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 474555] Re: Double-Declining depreciation to enter missing box salvage value

2010-09-18 Thread Pandemonium
In Maverick, after clicking Dbd does it present you with three entry boxes or four? Is there a place to enter a Salvage value? The problem wasn't the error message, but the lack of a prompt for a Salvage value. In order to calculate double-declining depreciation, four values are necessary. The