Public bug reported:
The src:php5 packages needs a little nudge to not conflict with the new
PHP infrastructure, could you please pull these?
commit 23e81c46bb4978596efe58a23070eb75dd3d5380
Author: Ondřej Surý
Date: Mon Jan 4 13:49:00 2016 +0100
Make phar command versioned and use update
You might try the script I use in ppa:ondrej/php:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-
php/php.git/tree/debian/sessionclean?h=master-5.5
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356113
Title:
P
Nish, this would be for Trusty and Wily for people using backported PHP
7.0. As those little patches are really small and non intrusive, I think
they can be merged to help the users.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
This is a known bug:
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=18556
** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #18556
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=18556
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988963
Title:
> Yes confirmed on Ubuntu 11.10 running 3.0.0-17-generic kernel and PHP
5.3.6-13ubuntu3.6 with Suhosin-Patch (cli) (built: Feb 11 2012
03:26:01).
And ... have you tried installing fixed psmisc as told several times in
this bug report?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
Fixed in cbdf7c2. Feel free to pull. I am probably going to update php5
in unstable after it migrates to testing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953081
Title:
libapache2-mod-php5 post
Transition status in Debian:
- Most packages binNMUable
Rest:
ming - patch needed; NMUed (already in Unstable)
ossp-uuid - upstream fix needed; going to drop php5-uuid (no rev-dep); will NMU
DELAYED/5 soon, wrote maintainer yesterday
php-auth-pam - RM requested
php-imlib - patch needed; NMU DELA
scribed to php5 in
> Ubuntu.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948156
>
> Title:
> Include PHP 5.4 to Ubuntu 12.04 release
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/948156/+subscriptions
--
Ondřej Surý
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 876387 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876387
It's a bug in fuser and was fixed in recent psmisc, see the report
#876387.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 876387
fuser forking uncontrollably in cron job
--
You received this bug notific
Hi Alex,
it's:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: Dell Device 0277
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 42
Memory at f6c0 (64-bit, non-
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 673748 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673748
Is it really that hard to check for existing bug report before creating
a new one?
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 673748
package bird 1.0.15-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installe
> https://launchpad.net/~neosofti/+archive/experimental with enabled GD
library
Could you please at least rename the package to something like php5-gd-
bundled (with Provides: php5-gd, Replaces: php5-gd, Conflicts: php5-gd),
so the bug reports for this package doesn't end up in the official
tracke
BTW This bug is security and has assigned CVE: http://security-
tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-3710
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2010-3710
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:
I guess you should really work on this, since lp#611316 was already
fixed in php5/5.3.3-5.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685014
Title:
Please merge php5 5.3.3-5 (main) from Debian un
Just a note: With an introduction of php5-fpm (little bit premature in
Ubuntu, but still there), there's really no need to have mod_php5 for
mpm_worker. Given that it's still high risk because of thread safety, I
doubt it will ever happen now when there is better alternative solution.
--
You rece
I suggest you merge 5.3.3-6 it adds three more security patches picked
from upstream SVN.
And 5.3.3-5 includes fix for:
http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/TEMP-000-10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
You can find the 5.3.3-6 prepared here:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-php/php.git
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685014
Title:
Please merge php5 5.3.3-5 (main) from Debian unstable
--
Just a note from Debian to Ubuntu maintainers: if you have tracked (and
helped) in Debian php packaging, you would be free of this shame, since
this bug was already fixed in 5.3.3-5 which was released on 30th
November 2010.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #605391
http://bugs.debian.org/c
@Micah: the diffstat between 5.3.3-1 and 5.3.3-4 is not that big:
$ git diff 3c7bc2c87fd842df1df75783e014029adae00433 | diffstat
b/debian/patches/CVE-2010-2950.patch
| 11
b/debian/patches/CVE-2010-3436.patch
You broke your system somehow, starting with:
Start-Date: 2014-06-08 13:08:10
Commandline: apt-get -f install
Error: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
End-Date: 2014-06-08 13:08:11
This should not happen unless you have accidentally deleted couple of
directories...
debconf:
What does the log says?
# apt-cache policy php5-fpm
php5-fpm:
Installed: 5.6.0~rc2+dfsg-1
Candidate: 5.6.0~rc2+dfsg-1
Version table:
*** 5.6.0~rc2+dfsg-1 0
700 http://ftp.cz.debian.org/debian/ sid/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
5.6.0~rc1+dfsg-1 0
8
There's nothing wrong with master process NOT CHANGING the PID. I told
you to look at the logs and not at the PID, so please do so before
jumping to wrong conclusions, thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
Did you modify the standard logging?
# grep -E 'log' /etc/php5/fpm/php-fpm.conf /etc/php5/fpm/pool.d/* | grep
-v ":;"
?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242376
Title:
"reload php5-fp
I have no idea why there's nothing in the logs, but I can say for sure
that the PID of the master process *DOES NOT* change between reloads
(the execve() call exchange the running code, but not the PID of the
process).
The easy thing how to check if the pool.d/* processes do reload is to
change so
PHP 5.3 was first version to have php-fpm integrated, so I guess there
might have been a room for improvement.
I haven't packaged FPM in Debian squeeze, so I cannot confirm the PHP
5.3 behaviour.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
andatory for IPv6
-- Ondřej Surý Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:59:35 +0100
Just use the official Bird PPA for now (https://launchpad.net/~cz.nic-
labs/+archive/ubuntu/bird)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
@racb did you check the master-5.6 branch? I am quite sure that Debian
jessie already has the new sessionclean script.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356113
Title:
PHP5 session clean
Gosh, why monit blackmagic when there's a simple fix in #5
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1230917/comments/5)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1230917
Title:
php5
That said - you can add systemd tmpfiles override to fix that:
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-tmpfiles.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1456575
Title:
php
php5-fpm is not creating any directories. And it also should not.
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1456575
Title:
php5 fpm wo
As far as I remember I have discussed this on the debian-devel and the
reload signal was added to upstart just recently.
Robie, could you please confirm that the older versions of upstart won't
cry too much if they encounter unknown directive?
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
To Ubuntu maintainers - cherry-pick c3d4814177.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242726
Title:
php5-common is missing dependency on php5-json
To manage notifications about this bug go
It's not missing, it has been split to php5-json package due the
licensing reasons.
The fix is to install php5-json package:
sudo apt-get install php5-json
** Summary changed:
- json_encode php function missing
+ php5-common is missing dependency on php5-json
--
You received this bug notific
Just change the reopen-logs in /etc/logrotate.d/php5-fpm to reload (or
restart).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1230917
Title:
php5-fpm logrotate errors after package switched to upst
Ubuntu 15.04 comes with php5 5.6.11+dfsg-1ubuntu3.1. Could you clarify
that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1514845
Title:
Error in using already defined constants (PHP)
To manage no
Than you should not report this bug against Ubuntu. Upstream PHP
bugtracker (bugs.php.net) would be most appropriate place (and wait
until there's an php 5.6.15 update).
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
@Goran, not every bug has to have a reason. Could you please fill this
as a bug in Debian where main packaging development happens, I would be
grateful for that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
stamps at postinst time because already created
directories can have time in the past
* Fix couple of lintian errors and warnings
-- Ondřej Surý Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:21:47 +0200
** Affects: golang (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notifi
Even better. I thought that everything which needs to be pulled after
freeze needs an exception.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979390
Title:
[FFe] Update golang to 2:1-3 in Precise
I think that full version number is important and we will gain no extra
security by hiding it by default, just more pain when debugging. You
always have an option to disable the headers yourself, if you think it
will gain you any extra security.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #582204
ht
'exit status 139' is a segmentation fault and there's virtually nothing
in the postinst script which should segfault.
Please check your memory using memcheck (f.e. from Ubuntu CD)
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Package changed: php5 (Ubuntu) => xdebug (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963301
Title:
php5 crashed with SIGSEGV when i was compiling XDebug using pear
To manage notificat
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 968734 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968734
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 968734
package kate-syntax-go (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
»/usr/share/kde4/apps/katepart/syntax/go.xml« is already in kate-data
4:4.8.1-0ubunt
There is no 'go' command in 0.60.x version of the packages. Hence, no
bug here.
** Changed in: golang (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968971
This was already fixed in kdelibs5-data and I don't know why it wasn't
pulled from Debian package (kate-data is ok in Debian).
It's not a bug here, but in kate-data, which need to remove go.xml
syntax file, since it's much better to track this close to the upstream.
** Also affects: kate (Ubuntu)
** Summary changed:
- Please sync golang 1:60.3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) onto Oneiric
+ Please sync golang 2:1-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) onto Oneiric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
Could you please do:
apt-cache policy psmisc
Just to be sure you are running correct version?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876387
Title:
fuser forking uncontrollably in cron job
i.e. it's a feature (and there's nothing wrong), but it wasn't properly
announced in the USN.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931342
Title:
USN-1358-1 missing NEWS entry about XSLT wri
http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-1358-1/
It was discovered that PHP did not properly enforce libxslt security
settings. This could allow a remote attacker to create arbitrary
files via a crafted XSLT stylesheet that uses the libxslt output
extension. (CVE-2012-0057)
I think Steve missed adding few n
Well, it affects all versions which got that security report (i.e. all
supported).
As far as I understand this bug, the magic_quotes are actually set to
the correct value, it's just the ini_get() which reports wrong value.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 968734 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968734
Is it really that hard to check for duplicate bug reports?
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 968734
package kate-syntax-go (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
»/usr/share/kde4/apps/ka
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 968734 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968734
Is it really that hard to check for duplicate bug reports?
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 968734
package kate-syntax-go (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
»/usr/share/kde4/apps/kat
Caused by invalid MultiArch patch, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670011
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #670011
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670011
** Also affects: db (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670011
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 989326 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989326
People, is it really that hard to not fill _duplicate_ bug reports?
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 989326
package libdb5.1-java (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
'./usr/share/java
Should be fixed in 2:1.0.1-1
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #669354
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669354
** Also affects: golang (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669354
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received th
I have just split the package into -java and -java-jni, which will fix
the issue in Debian. It's up-to Ubuntu whether they want to pull the
fix.
(Seems like we miss something on the side of automated tests.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
@Phillip Kleinhenz: It's fixed in psmisc from 22.15-2 (as mentioned
above in my posts).
So yes, it is fixed in precise: http://packages.ubuntu.com/psmisc
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 989326 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989326
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 989326
package libdb5.1-java (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
'./usr/share/java/db-5.1.25.jar' is different from the same file on the system
--
Yo
Clint,
+lfs is arch dependent.
O.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994194
Title:
Unable to load dynamic library pdo_pgsql.so
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bug
@jegr Just run Ubuntu Trusty for PHP 5.x, virtualization is nowadays
cheaper then dual PHP version maintenance. Or just have two sets of
machines on on Trusty and second on Xenial and migrate the customers
between those platforms.
The story with "foo doesn't support bar" is getting too old as I've
@jegr The folks who already have PHP code compatible with PHP 5.6
shouldn't have any problems updating to PHP 7.0. I would worry more
about the upgrade from PHP 5.3 in precise to PHP 5.5 in trusty.
If the customers could upgrade their code to PHP 5.6, they might as well
jump directly to PHP 7.0. T
@vinc-q @jegr An upstream unmaintained code would be total no-go, but
still having two versions of PHP in the main is a quite big burden for
Ubuntu folks.
I could afford to run PPAs with multiple PHP versions, because I have
the liberty of saying: "upstream bug, bummer" and do nothing about it if
@bhat3 I don't think there are any differences on src:php7.0 (as we
coordinate the changes - I just merged couple of patches), so the main
differences is in packages written in PHP (and perhaps some PECL
modules, haven't checked what has been done in ~php-ubuntu on that
front).
--
You received th
@nacc Can you pull from experimental? The problem is that libbson and
libmongoc have been uploaded to experimental, so I am waiting for them
to appear in unstable. But I can upload to experimental if that would
help you.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
Lintian is wrong.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1543703
Title:
[needs-packaging] php-mongodb
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/154
Not on my phone, so I could be more verbose.
> W: php-mongodb: command-with-path-in-maintainer-script postrm:12
/usr/sbin/phpdismod
This is kind of correct, but it's not a call but a check whether the
tool exists.
But I rewrote this in dh_php 0.8 to switch from [ -x /usr/sbin/phpdismod
] to whic
I'll upload dh_php tomorrow, but I am not sure if you want to pick this
change, since I had to change the place where mods-available is from
/etc/php/mods-available to /etc/php/7.0/mods-available.
The upgrade should be automatic as much as possible, but it need binNMU
on all extensions that depend
Phillip, that's a question for @rbasak and ultimately for Canonical
whether they allocate enough time to make it happen.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522422
Title:
PHP5 branch and
@racb and rest:
The main blocker is all the rdeps that depend on php5-. There
are two approaches we could take:
1) patch all the sources to depend on php-
2) prepare src:php5 that just depend 1:1 on src:php7.0
well, there's third option:
3) do as much 1) and then finish with 2)
I have prepare
> This worries me a bit more. Do we risk breaking PEAR/PECL users if we
> commit to PHP 7.0 in 16.04 and then find we don't have this ready in
> time?
PECL seems to be mostly fine although some PECL packages won't be
converted at all and some need a code from some upstream git branch.
PEAR is har
Nah, php7 is not a revolution. php5 over php4 broke API too much, but
php7 is much more close to php5.6 than php3 to php4 or php4 to php5 ever
was.
And php5.6 follow the same support pattern as all php 5.x versions
before: http://php.net/supported-versions.php
Thus I don't think Debian would ever
The performace improvement is nice, but "revolution" would mean a lot of
broken code, and this is not what happens with PHP 7.0. The amount of
breakage is not that big to justify the amount of work to also support
PHP 5.6.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
You are just repeating the same story that I've heard with every minor
version. I still hear some broken obsolete code requires PHP 5.3. The
major version bump is not as severe as with python2->python3, so there's
a need to put a stake into the ground somewhere.
Also "think" is different from putt
This should be the tar.gz I uploaded to NEW:
`a9ec24292beb2a8caf1b42c0ed801d0105afc63c7dcc57449f12e54caecc815c
php-pear_1.10.1+submodules+notgz.orig.tar.gz`
** Attachment added: "php-pear_1.10.1+submodules+notgz.orig.tar.gz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1543324/+attachment/4572058
> 2) The php-fpm package currently refers to php5.6:
Strange, it looks like php-fpm is missing from src:php-defaults, I'll
look into that.
> 4) I was a bit confused that the php-fpm service is called
php7.0-fpm.service, whilst the binary is called php-fpm7.0.
The service file is called after the
> The php-fpm package currently refers to php5.6:
Fixed in src:php-defaults_27
JFTR php7.0-dev_7.0.3-4 also fixes building with new libtool (>=
2.4.6-0.1~) and as Xenial already have this libtool you need to merge
the update.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
@bhat3 there's no direct dependency on apache2. php7.0 package just
pulls first SAPI and coincidentally it's libapache2-mod-php7. 0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522422
Title:
Updat
@rbasak @nacc zmq and imagick PECL extensions modified for PHP 7.0 have
been ACCEPTED into unstable today, if you still can import them...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522422
Title:
@bhat3 phpX.Y-mysql is already compiled with mysqlnd; php-imagick is the
package you seek. graphicsmagick was not yet asked for by anybody, so I
haven't touched it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
> mysqlnd: that means we're using mysqlnd now by default and there is
only one package now?
Yes
> imagick: php5-imagick is also the package for PHP 7?
No, I said `php-imagick`, so it's php-imagick and not php5-imagick.
> gmagick: Here, asking for it ;) No serious i can really reduce the
load on
> - No clear (obviously safe?) path for users upgrading from a PHP 5
base (Trusty or Wily) to PHP 7 base.
If you can pull this http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-
php/php.git/commit/?h=master-
jessie&id=23e81c46bb4978596efe58a23070eb75dd3d5380 via SRU you might be
able to keep src:php5 from trusty
You can also pull it from the pkg-php git repo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539133
Title:
[needs-packaging] php-gmagick
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.
Brandon, I would be very grateful if you could spend some more time and
expand your blog into a man page (I could do the GROFF formatting in
case you haven't done this before).
Cheers,
Ondrej
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
@Johannes: It's called SRU: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1374892
Title:
Please backport php5-apcu version 4.0.6 to Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
To
> In addition, Debian has had an RFS open on php5 for two years now:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664595.
JFTR the team is quite healthy now, but I keep the bug open since we are
always keen on having more people on board.
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
I have reworked the whole php5{en,dis}mod thing and I don't really
remember how I reimplemented it :), but the source code helps:
get_priority() {
local sapi=$1
local modname=$2
local source_ini="/etc/php5/mods-available/${modname}.ini"
module_ret=0
module_exists $modname ||
In any case this is not a bug in php5, but in apt dependencies
resolution.
** Package changed: php5 (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1333745
Title:
updating ph
Seth, I don't think that mod_php has functions to access random memory
chunks under normal conditions...
Thus I don't think that TLS private keys are available to PHP scripts if
the permissions are correctly set in the apache2.
I believe this is worth fixing anyway.
--
You received this bug not
I think it's not exactly clear here, why this cannot be fixed right away
in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
The main problem is that 'upstart' is not following Postel's principle
(be benevolent in what you receive, and strict in what you send) and
barfs and breaks whole release upgrade process if it encounters
@Robie: Try pulling fbdc116d6023141060d515949f38fcaa61ef2ed7 from
master-5.5 branch.
I have implemented:
> Hmm, or we can just patch php5-fpm to reload on SIGHUP
That would just make everyone happy without fixing upstart.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #67553
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67553
** Also affects: php via
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67553
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1336713
Title:
Nginx+PHP-FPM - Apache gets installed automatically on PHP upda
JFTR the ppa:ondrej/php5-oldstable, ppa:ondrej/php5 and ppa:php5-5.6 has
been updated (or will be updated shortly) with patched PHP 5.4, 5.5 and
5.6 that accept SIGHUP as reload signal and thus it doesn't break with
upstart.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I suspect this bugreport is just a result of misunderstanding how the
kernel scheduling works (and maybe some draconic VPS settings or not
powerful enough CPU).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Just don't use bashisms when your default shell is not bash.
The default shell is not interpreting &> as redirection of stdout and
stderr, but as background character and runs *two* processes, fist php
without redirection and second with empty command (so it probably
barfs), but redirected to >/de
It's not a php-cli bug.
TL;DR
The user (default) shell and default shell (what links from /bin/sh) is two
entirely different things. Just don't use '&>', but use '>/dev/null 2>&1' and
you'll be fine.
As for:
exec("php test3.php &");
please go read the exec function documentation.
But you sh
** Changed in: db4.6 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793773
Title:
Just let it die in peace...
To manage notifications about this bug go to
This is known upstream problem:
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=53829
We should probably enable the patch in the Debian build when we unbreak
the LFS build.
** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #53829
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=53829
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
JFTR although I can't help with regular Ubuntu maintenance, I fully
support inclusion of FPM into Ubuntu main as the FCGI/FPM method is far
more secure than standard libapache2-mod-php5.
I would even propose to demote libapache2-mod-php5 in favor of php5-fpm
(if we can provide reasonably good defa
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #757521
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757521
** Also affects: cyrus-imapd-2.4 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757521
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification b
301 - 400 of 572 matches
Mail list logo
