The problem disappears when using the 2.6.37-020637rc2 mainline kernel.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687599
Title:
BUG: Scheduling while atomic in fuse_notify_inval_entry
--
ubunt
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evince
- Open a PDF document,
- set the zoom level to 100%,
- select "Save Settings as Default"
- Exit evince, open a brand-new PDF document that hasn't been opened with
evince before
- Zoom level is at 70%
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10
--
Zoom Level is not saved
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682492
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: system-config-printer
When adding a new printer, the "select device" dialog freezes as soon as
it has populated the list of network printers.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: system-config-printer-gnome 1.2.3+20100723-0ubuntu8.1
Proc
--
"Add printer" freezes in "Select Device" dialog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682837
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinf
Public bug reported:
When watching videos with totem, the picture is way too dark and also
has wrong colors (kind of red-greenish looking). The same videos play
fine using mplayer, but once totem has been running mplayer is no longer
able to display the video properly either until X11 has been res
--
Video settings are messed up and videos show with false colors and too dark
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682958
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://list
Wow, I expected apport would add a tiny bit more system information to
this bug. Here is at least the lspci output, since I expect this to be
video card specific:
$ lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 4 Series Chipset DRAM Controller (rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 4 Series
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: thunderbird
When I am clicking the "Reply" or "Reply List" button for a plain text
mail, the compose window opens in HTML mode. When I am doing the same
for an HTML mail, the compose window opens in plain text mode. I
strongly believe it should be the oth
--
Replys are HTML for plain text mails and vice versa
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683143
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/lis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 577482 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577482
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 577482
Window decoration and title bar is missing in Lucid
* You can subscribe to bug 577482 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sourc
Same problem with Ubuntu 10.10. Happens for about 50% of the logins.
Running "gtk-window-decorator --replace" also fixes the problem.
** Summary changed:
- Window decoration and title bar is missing in Lucid
+ Window decorations are sometimes missing after login
--
Window decorations are someti
Omer, could you elaborate on why you set the priority to Low? With
missing window decorations, the system is unusable for a non-tech savy
user.
--
Window decorations are sometimes missing after login
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577482
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
The source of the problem is that the /etc/cron.daily/apt aborts if it
cannot find a repositories at one of the URLs in /etc/apt/sources.list
(in this case a ppa). Is that intended behaviour? It seems to me that
system upgrades should still happen even if some ppas are not available.
--
lucid una
Here's the output of /etc/cron.daily/apt with VERBOSE=3 for an invalid
URL:
# /etc/cron.daily/apt
verbose level 3
+ which on_ac_power
+ on_ac_power
+ POWER=255
+ [ 255 -eq 1 ]
+ [ 255 -ne 0 ]
+ debug_echo power status (255) undetermined, continuing
+ [ 3 -ge 1 ]
+ echo power status (255) undetermi
Here is a backtrace of gtk-window-decorator when the decorations are
missing:
(gdb) backtrace
#0 0x00922416 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0x0107edf6 in __poll (fds=0x1116ff4, nfds=6, timeout=-1)
at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:87
#2 0x00971a1b in g_poll () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#3 0
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apt
/etc/cron.daily/apt segfaults. I added an "ulimit -c unlimited" at the
beginning to get a core dump, but the gdb output does not look very
illuminating:
(gdb) core apt-core
[New Thread 13583]
Core was generated by `/usr/bin/python /usr/bin/unattended
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684785
Title:
/etc/cron.daily/apt segfaults
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 528326 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528326
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 528326
Sync libsynthesis 3.2.0.35+ds2-2 from debian sid
* You can subscribe to bug 528326 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/l
Where did you get this package version from?
The most-recent s3ql package in the official precise repository is 1.9-1
(see http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/s3ql). The most recent s3ql
package for precise in the ppa is 1.18.1-1~precise1 (not
1.18-1~precise1, see
https://launchpad.net/~nikratio/+
On 10/21/2013 05:46 AM, Frank Lazzarini wrote:
> I just upgraded my Ubuntu installation from 13.04 (kernel
> 3.10.0-031000rc7-generic) with a USB Displaylink working just fine to
> 13.10 after loading the new kernel the usb displaylink stopped working.
> After reading this thread I tried 3.11.0-031
Fixed in Debian. Thanks for the report!
** Changed in: s3ql (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1223514
Title:
autopkgtest failure: Tests fail
FWIW, you can work around the problem by using e.g. XFCE instead of
unity.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1213338
Title:
Displaylink slow graphic performance on Ubuntu 13
To manage n
I cloned the git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-trusty.git
repository, but I'm having trouble identifying the commits that
correspond to 3.11.0-031100-generic and 3.11.0-11-generic. There does
not seem to be a Ubuntu-3.11.0-11 tag:
$ git log --oneline Ubuntu-3.11.0-031100..Ubuntu-3.11.0-11
fata
I'm afraid I still don't get the mapping. There's no 3.11.0-031100 in
the "Ubuntu Kernel Version" column on http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-
ppa/info/kernel-version-map.html.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
Apologies, the Ubuntu kernel naming/versioning scheme is completely
opaque to me. I have no idea why 3.11.0-031100-generic needs to be
mainline while 3.11.0-11-generic is not (and I read through many of the
Ubuntu kernel wiki packages).
So, I'm still happy to test other packages or perform a bisec
I tested with the amd64 precise desktop image, and I can confirm that
the problem is reproducible there as well. I do have a /dev/dri/card1
device, but X11 fails to open it with "Resource temporarily
unavailable".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
I can probably give the BIOS update a shot. However, could you elaborate
why we're going this avenue? The DisplayLink is a USB device, and it
works with the mainline kernel. So wouldn't the correct course of action
be to bisect the differences between Ubuntu and mainline to determine
which ubuntu-s
It might be deliberate, but is there any good reason for it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575156
Title:
fuser output is scattered between stderr and stdout
To manage notifications
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818/+attachment/3922174/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
Title:
Re
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected trusty
** Description changed:
My Plugable UGA-2K-A USB 2.0 to DVI adapter (using chipset DisplayLink
DL-195, USB ID 17e9:4302) works fine with 3.11.0-031100-generic.
However, when upgrading to 3.11.0-11-generic, X11 fails to open the DRI
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818/+attachment/3922169/+files/ProcEnviron.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
apport information
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818/+attachment/3922164/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
apport information
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818/+attachment/3922162/+files/BootDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
Titl
apport information
** Attachment added: "CRDA.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818/+attachment/3922163/+files/CRDA.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
Title:
Regres
apport information
** Attachment added: "PulseList.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818/+attachment/3922172/+files/PulseList.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
Titl
apport information
** Attachment added: "RfKill.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818/+attachment/3922173/+files/RfKill.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
Title:
Re
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818/+attachment/3922168/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818/+attachment/3922170/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818/+attachment/3922167/+files/Lsusb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
Title:
Regr
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818/+attachment/3922175/+files/UdevLog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818/+attachment/3922166/+files/Lspci.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
Title:
Regr
apport information
** Attachment added: "IwConfig.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818/+attachment/3922165/+files/IwConfig.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818/+attachment/3922171/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
Just tested latest Trusty live CD. Bug is still present.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Saucy)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
Bug is *not present* in http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-
ppa/mainline/v3.11.10-saucy/, i.e. the external display is working with
that kernel.
** Tags added: kernel-fixed-upstream-3.11.10
** Tags removed: needs-kernel-logs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #909438
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=909438
** Also affects: thunderbird via
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=909438
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
The log on https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/trusty-adt-
s3ql/36/ARCH=i386,label=adt/console says that the tests were run under
Python 3.3.
Did you built with python3.4, but then ran the self tests with python
3.3? This mustfail, because then the C extension (deltadump.so) is not
available for pyt
I found a problem that causes the unit tests after (and including)
t4_adm.py to fail. The problem is that when forking subprocesses, the
subprocesses try to load the modules from the source package rather than
the installed package.
This is, however, unrelated to Python 3.4 being installed or not
The subprocess related bug is fixed in
https://bitbucket.org/nikratio/s3ql/commits/8772e4b7548d09dbf77bf8b126bd084a1f338a36
Is there a way to reproduce the problems with python3.4 as default
python? I'm running a chroot with trusty-proposed, but it still seems to
use python3.3 as default.
--
You
I've added the ppa and upgraded the system. Now all the s3ql unit tests
fail because none of the dependencies are available for Python 3.4 (e.g.
no python-apsw), not really surprising and (as far as I understand) not
a bug in S3QL. I'd like to debug this problem, but I'll need some
instruction to r
After another update && dist-upgrade, the testcases now fail because
s3ql itself has not been rebuilt with the new default python (as a
Python app rather than Python module, the package is build only with the
default interpreter).
Is there some missing metadata that ought to have triggered a rebu
In other words, this bug will resolve itself automatically, and there is
nothing that needs to be fixed in the s3ql package?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1272375
Title:
tests fail w
Martin, why should the package build extensions for all supported
python3 versions? It is an application, not a Python module. So isn't it
sufficient if it works with the default python version? At least in
Debian, this seems to be the officially blessed way to package Python
apps (see eg. https://
I just performed the BIOS update. It still does not work with the Ubuntu
kernel, and it still works with the mainline kernel.
$ sudo dmidecode -s bios-version && sudo dmidecode -s bios-release-date
[sudo] password for nikratio:
G6ETA1WW (2.61 )
12/13/2013
--
You received this bug notification b
spamistrash, try to install a vanilla upstream kernel without Ubuntu
patches. This makes things work reliably for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
Title:
17e9:0378 [Lenovo T
** Attachment added: "broken-lspci-vnvn.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1234818/+attachment/3857792/+files/broken-lspci-vnvn.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
** Attachment added: "working-uname-a.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1234818/+attachment/3857781/+files/working-uname-a.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
** Attachment added: "broken-uname-a.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1234818/+attachment/3857793/+files/broken-uname-a.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
** Attachment added: "working-version.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1234818/+attachment/3857782/+files/working-version.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
Public bug reported:
My Plugable UGA-2K-A USB 2.0 to DVI adapter (using chipset DisplayLink
DL-195, USB ID 17e9:4302) works fine with 3.11.0-031100-generic.
However, when upgrading to 3.11.0-11-generic, X11 fails to open the DRI
device with
[ 8.868] (EE) open /dev/dri/card1: Resource temporar
** Attachment added: "working-lspci-vnvn.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1234818/+attachment/3857780/+files/working-lspci-vnvn.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
** Attachment added: "working-dmesg.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1234818/+attachment/3857779/+files/working-dmesg.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
** Attachment added: "broken-version.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1234818/+attachment/3857794/+files/broken-version.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
** Attachment added: "broken-dmesg.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1234818/+attachment/3857791/+files/broken-dmesg.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Public bug reported:
I'm trying to report a bug against an Ubuntu kernel, but apport won't
let me do it and keeps claiming that I'm running a mainline kernel. I
have indeed *installed* a mainline kernel to test if the problem exists
there as well, but I'm definitely not running it at the moment.
These were all the results. Please let me know if you want me to do
other tests.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
Title:
Regression: DisplayLink DL-195 fails with EAGAIN after u
..and 3.11.0-11-generic is still failing with "Resource not available"
(just to reconfirm).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
Title:
Regression: DisplayLink DL-195 fails with EAG
3.11.1-031101-generic is still working (my X11 looks really weird with
it, but that's probably a separate issue)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
Title:
Regression: DisplayLink
The first link seems to point to the kernel where I originally found the
problem (at least the .deb file name is identical), so I'll just test
the other two kernels and report back. Is that what what you wanted me
to do?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
3.11.2-031102-generic is still working too (and here my X11 is looking
good again as well).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234818
Title:
Regression: DisplayLink DL-195 fails with EAG
This version does not fix the bug.
[0] nikratio@thinkpad:~$ uname -a
Linux thinkpad 3.11.0-11-generic #17~lp1234818Commitcd6e935Reverted SMP Mon Oct
7 21:09:34 UTC 20 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[0] nikratio@thinkpad:~$ grep EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not im
This is quite confusing, the 3.11.0-11-generic kernel trat I tried first
did not come with an -extra package.
In any case, installing the -extra package did not make a difference,
the problem still occurs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
Well, from my comments above the only version buggy kernel is the
current saucy release (3.11.0-11-generic). Everything else I tested is
good (3.11.0-031100-generic, 3.11.1-031101-generic,
3.11.2-031102-generic).
I'm mightily confused by the version numbering though. Shouldn't the
3.11.1-0xx versi
Bug found in:
Linux version 3.11.0-12-generic (buildd@allspice) (gcc version 4.8.1
(Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-10ubuntu7) ) #19-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 9 16:20:46 UTC
2013
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Bug found in:
Linux version 3.11.0-9-generic (buildd@allspice) (gcc version 4.8.1
(Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-10ubuntu3) ) #16-Ubuntu SMP Fri Sep 27 15:08:11 UTC
2013
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Bug is present in
Linux version 3.11.0-1-generic (buildd@roseapple) (gcc version 4.8.1
(Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-8ubuntu1) ) #4-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 9 02:29:21 UTC
2013
Is it possible that this never worked with the Ubuntu kernels but only with the
mainline kernel?
--
You received this bug notificat
There doesn't seem to be anything available for download on
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/3.10.0-3.12. I randomly tried
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/3.10.0-5.14 but couldn't find
any .debs there either. Are you sure these links are working?
I believe there were some imp
Bug is also present in
Linux version 3.10.0-5-generic (buildd@panlong) (gcc version 4.8.1
(Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-7ubuntu1) ) #14-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jul 22 15:23:30 UTC
2013
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Bug is also present in
Linux version 3.10.0-0-generic (buildd@roseapple) (gcc version 4.8.1
(Ubuntu 4.8.1-4ubuntu2) ) #6-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jun 24 19:38:38 UTC 2013
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Bug is also present in
Linux version 3.9.0-0-generic (buildd@panlong) (gcc version 4.8.0
(Ubuntu 4.8.0-4ubuntu1) ) #1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 26 15:36:25 UTC 2013
That seems to be the earliest saucy kernel available. Which version(s) should I
try next?
--
You received this bug notification because
When reporting this bug, I called it a regression because an older
kernel package worked, but a more recent one did not. I did not realize
that the older one was mainline, and the later one with Ubuntu patches.
The system runs Ubuntu raring. Since raring comes with a 3.8, which I
believe does not
Thanks a lot Peter! I can confirm that this patch fixes the problems
when added on top of Debian's qemu-kvm 1.1.2+dfsg-4 package. I have
attached a patch against the Debian git tree.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
** Patch added: "Patch against debian package"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1033727/+attachment/3482404/+files/qemu-debian.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033727
Title:
Ralf, you are right, my apologies. I have since transitioned away from
Ubuntu, because for me bugfixes took too long to reach LTS releases.
That is probably the reason why I get quickly annoyed when asked to
reconfirm bugs or fixes. There are several bugs that I've been
reconfirming every 6 months
Hi Steve,
I can give you a shell account on a server affected by the problem.
Would that help?
If so, please send me an ssh key.
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C
--
You receiv
Ok, here's my theory of what happens:
I noticed that if you have a very simple upstart job:
# cat /etc/init/test.conf
start on niko-a and niko-b
script
sleep 10
end script
and then emit niko-a without --no-wait:
# initctl emit niko-a
then this call blocks until niko-b is emitted as well.
I think this bug can be considered triaged. It would be great if someone
with the necessary permissions could update the status.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964207
Title:
Dependenc
Things aren't quite that simple. /home is an NFS mount transported over
VPN, and mountall generally dosn't mount it (presumably because the VPN
isn't up quickly enough). It nevertheless happily emits the "filesystem"
event. We tried solving the problem by adding the explicit "mounted"
event and sta
Hi Steve,
Thanks for your efforts! Our MDSplus installation has been compiled from
source. I have attached the strace output as well as the debugging
output.
** Attachment added: "strace output"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/1027122/+attachment/3235341/+files/jScop
** Attachment added: "jScope stdout&stderr with -verbose:jni"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/1027122/+attachment/3235343/+files/jScope.out
** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
I tried running NativeTest.java from bug 737603 with the same
environment variables that are used for the jScope invocation (exept the
classtpath):
Before the upgrade:
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=:/opt/hbt/valen/lib/i686/:/opt/mdsplus//lib
SHLIB_PATH=:/opt/mdsplus//lib DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=:/opt/mdsplus//lib
fstab looks like this:
proc/proc procnodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0
/dev/mapper/vg0-fat_client / ext4
relatime,errors=remount-ro 0 1
/dev/mapper/vg0-swapnoneswapsw 0 0
spitzer:/opt /optnfs4auto
Update: sometimes, /opt and /home are also not mounted at all with the
above configuration.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964207
Title:
Dependency loops due to ANDed start conditions
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1037192
Title:
NFS shares are mounted with wrong clientaddr or not at all
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubunt
Public bug reported:
With the following fstab:
proc /proc proc nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0
/dev/mapper/vg0-fat_client / ext4 relatime,errors=remount-ro 0 1
/dev/mapper/vg0-swap none swap sw 0 0
spitzer:/opt /opt nfs4 auto 0 0
spitzer:/home /home nfs4 auto 0 0
The /opt and /home are sometimes not mo
No, tinc has a separate initscript in /etc/init.d. During startup, tinc
executes "ifconfig $INTERFACE $IP netmask 255.255.255.0", where
$INTERFACE is a tun interface created by tinc.
Will gather the debugging logs as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
How would tinc need to behave for compatibility? I was assuming that
udev would automatically generate a net-dev up event when the tun
interface comes up, and that nothing else would be necessary.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
Ah, so if we manually emit a net-device-up event after the ifconfig call
(or better, call the hooks in if-up.d), everything should integrate
well?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1037192
Bryce, why did you set this to "Fix Released"? The problem is still
experienced by multiple users.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/814777
Title:
Occassional mouse cursor corruption on
601 - 700 of 754 matches
Mail list logo
