On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Noiano wrote:
> stomlin wrote:
> > 9.2 fixed the problem for me. I have a Asus z80k with a mobile 9700 pro
> (rv350)
> > I installed them manually using the install method here...
> http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubuntu_Intrepid_Installation_Guide
> > Hooorraaay
I would suggest that if possible we could hold in catalyst 9.3 for r300-r500
support, since those were dropped in 9.4.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Hanno Meyer-Thurow
wrote:
> I wonder if it is too hard to do name-version packages like for nvidia
> packages. :)
> See:
> http://packages.ubunt
Nope. Its a target of stupidity at most, and target of problems at
least. None of the FOSS drivers support OpenGL 2(.1) or OpenGL 3.0. The
ATI FOSS drivers do not support FBOs, which are needed by quite a few
OpenGL-based games, especially emulators of game consoles. If you can
bring up full OpenGL
Besides, Catalyst 9.2 finally fixes this issue, however, it will not
work without a screen configuration set in xorg.conf. So in a future
Ubuntu update, a screen configuration MUST be saved into xorg.conf for
it to work...
--
r3xx Hardware does not work with fglrx [EPR#257839]
https://bugs.launch
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:35 AM, F-3582 wrote:
> I read that on Heise a month ago, just prior to those announcements that
> AMD were to drop support for those chips entirely.
Then it looks like we will be leaving them out cold as far as OpenGL 2.1
support then. None of the existing FOSS drivers
A fresh installation of Ubuntu 10.04 Beta 2 or RC will result in this
too. It worked in Beta 1.
--
upgrade 8.04LTS to 10.4LTS RC results in no keyboard available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569803
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Also affects: firefox via
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422540
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Firefox is not able to play mp4 tags
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412647
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
** Also affects: python-configshell-fb (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901484
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
I'll also note that it sometimes works with UEFI, but I've never gotten
it to work with BIOS...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824245
Title:
Can't create a bootable disk by doing ima
Public bug reported:
I'm trying to create a bootable disk image using an image file mounted
as a loop device with partx.
While the grub-install succeeds, when I attempt to boot in KVM or
VMware, it fails with the following error:
error: no such device: 92136917-76ff-4115-9eed-9caa20529682.
I'll note that this configuration is loop images on a disk that was
created as a disk image file mounted as a loop.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824245
Title:
Can't create a bootab
Thanks Jeremy!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867775
Title:
Sync pagure 5.8.1+dfsg-3 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.lau
> I'm also trying to get some clarifications around why fedora 26/27
ship 0.10.X vs 0.11.X, I wonder if it was just the simplest thing to do
with the document portal move in 0.11.X. If I get any reasoning I'll
update this bug.
Fedora 26 and 27 started out with flatpak 0.9.x, so they transitioned t
Public bug reported:
Please sync rpm 4.14.1+dfsg1-2 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception:
RPM v4.14 introduces support for packages compressed with zstd, and
distributions are
starting to consider/use it. However, for Ubuntu to be able to be useful for
buildi
Sweet, thanks Adam!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756566
Title:
FFe: Sync rpm 4.14.1+dfsg1-2 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:/
Bump? What about Ubuntu 16.04?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824245
Title:
Can't create a bootable disk by doing image creation on a loop device
To manage notifications about this
cyphermox, if this helps, I've created a patch that directly applies on
top of the existing grub2 sources reconstructed with `dpkg-source -x`
that I've tested locally to work.
** Patch added: "Patch to debian packaging to fix this"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1824245/+
cyphermox, could you please backport the fix for Ubuntu 16.04?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824245
Title:
Can't create a bootable disk by doing image creation on a loop device
To
cjwatson, I've updated the patch accordingly...
** Patch added: "Patch to debian packaging to fix this (v2)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1824245/+attachment/5289052/+files/grub2-ubuntu-pkg-support-partitioned-loops-v2.diff
--
You received this bug notification becaus
I've verified locally that this does fix my issue when I patch grub
myself.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824245
Title:
Can't create a bootable disk by doing image creation on a loo
Public bug reported:
The packaging for Mir is in the legacy 1.0 format.
Please switch to "3.0 (quilt)" format.
Thanks in advance.
** Affects: mir (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: packaging
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1078808
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078808
** Also affects: lightdm (Fedora) via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078808
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Public bug reported:
Applications that expect the unversioned binary for lldb-server to exist
in /usr/bin will be bitterly disappointed, as the lldb package does not
provide that currently (though it is there for lldb).
Please add the missing symlink, otherwise lldb itself can't debug
properly.
** Description changed:
Applications that expect the unversioned binary for lldb-server to exist
in /usr/bin will be bitterly disappointed, as the lldb package does not
- provide that currently (though it is there for lldb).
+ provide that currently (though it provides /usr/bin/lldb).
- Ple
Err, because LP is awesome and I can't edit my own comment, I'm
primarily available through Pharaoh_Atem (my workstation) or Son_Goku
(my laptop). Alternatively, I can be reached by email.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
Hey all,
I'm the one who discovered the problem. As indicated in my LP profile, I
can be reached on Freenode as "Conan_Kudo", "Pharaoh_Atem", or
"Son_Goku".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
** Package changed: ubuntu => ifupdown (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573275
Title:
ifupdown should not hard-depend upon 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom'
To manage notifications
This is no longer a problem on the Open Build Service, as we're now
ignoring the ifupdown dependency from upstart. Thus, Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
build environments now work, as seen by this example[1].
[1]:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:Pharaoh_Atem:u1604_stuff
/php-libvirt/xUbun
Paul: Unfortunately not, but you can see how the configuration is set up
on build.opensuse.org[1]. Details about the prjconf format is available
on the openSUSE Wiki[2].
[1]: https://build.opensuse.org/project/prjconf/Ubuntu:16.04
[2]: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_prjconf
--
Yo
Yes. Actually, it might be more useful to diff between 15.10[1] and
16.04[2]. That lets you see all the differences that were required to
get it working.
[1]: https://build.opensuse.org/project/prjconf/Ubuntu:15.10
[2]: https://build.opensuse.org/project/prjconf/Ubuntu:16.04
--
You received this
So, I'd like to chime in here a bit.
As Ondřej mentioned earlier, php-fpm is known to be a more secure
alternative to mod_php, and is recommended for secure setups. I recently
contributed a decent default configuration for php-fpm for PHP 7.0, and
I would support flipping libapache2-mod-php7.0 to
Of course, I realize it means that for httpd, it would need to have
mod_proxy_fcgi enabled by default for the php-fpm configuration I
contributed to be useful in an out-of-the-box scenario.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
@Robie: I can certainly take a look through them. Where can I see them?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267255
Title:
[MIR] php5 (php5-fpm binary)
To manage notifications about this
** Patch added: "Patch to ensure php-fpm httpd config is properly installed"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php7.0/+bug/1547738/+attachment/4576060/+files/0001-Ensure-php-fpm-apache-httpd-config-is-prepared-and-i.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Patch added: "Patch to fix the tests"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php7.0/+bug/1547738/+attachment/4576061/+files/0002-Fix-the-tests-to-pass-and-handle-conditions-that-sho.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
I've submitted patches to Ondřej Surý to fix the failing tests for the
php7.0 package. Please sync with the version that will be released with
these patches, so that Ubuntu will not need to carry a delta for test
fixes.
The patches have not yet been applied, and I will notify
The patches above are the ones I've submitted to Ondřej Surý for Debian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547738
Title:
Request: Sync with Debian to get upstream fixes for autopkgtests
** Patch added: "Patch that has regenerated tests for the package"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php7.0/+bug/1547738/+attachment/4576062/+files/0003-Regenerate-d-tests.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
My patches have been merged into the git master for pkg-php[1] for
Debian. Please pull in the current git master (noted as git hash:
65566bc2c31fd96f29c1327cd42c0e86682b3a52). This is the php7.0-7.0.3-6
package with everything properly generated.
[1]: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-php/php.git
Ondřej seems to have made some fixes and the current git HEAD is at
php7.0-7.0.3-7, so please pull that in.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547738
Title:
Request: Sync with Debian to
It looks good to me, but I'm curious as to why libmcrypt isn't in main
(and consequently able to be used as a PHP build dependency)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547738
Title:
Requ
After working with Remi Collet to track down the issue, we've identified
the problem to be with PCRE support, specifically with PCRE JIT. We
reached this suspicion after Remi was able to run the tests successfully
with his PHP7 SCL for Fedora 23 just fine with the JIT enabled, but it
broke on CentO
This is not a valid bug anymore (if it ever was), as with the move to
systemd, sysv calls redirect to systemd, and systemd captures the
information in the journal, which can be viewed by looking at
/var/log/syslog, using "journalctl -u php5-fpm" (php7.0-fpm for Xenial),
or any other mechanism for r
There's been no information received for several years on this issue. If
this is still a problem, please provide the requested information and
set it back to "New".
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
This issue is quite old, and I cannot reproduce it on current Ubuntu
systems. If this is still an issue, please re-open and set the status to
"New" with details on what the problem is.
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because
Could you please provide more information? Please report back at least
the version of php5-fpm package installed, which version of Ubuntu you
were using, and which architecture this was running on.
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notificatio
This is very clearly not fixed on Ubuntu trusty, and the changelog of
the package in trusty does not indicate any fix was applied.
Please remove the incorrect designation of "Fix Committed" for trusty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
I'm also being bitten by this issue. I can't create chroots or VM images
based on trusty due to polkit-1 bringing in libpam-systemd, which breaks
as other commenters have described earlier...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
Public bug reported:
Please sync pagure 5.8.1+dfsg-3 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Changelog entries since current focal version 5.8.1+dfsg-1:
pagure (5.8.1+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Correct mistake and make sure we create HOME under /var/lib/pagure.
In my last commit, I forg
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1941335
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941335
** Also affects: systemd (Fedora) via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941335
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #79603
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=79603
** Also affects: php via
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=79603
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
Using IWD wouldn't obviate the use of wpa_supplicant, since the latter
is used for more than Wi-Fi security. 802.1x authentication can be used
for physical networks as well as VPNs and other things, so
NetworkManager will use wpa_supplicant for those scenarios.
IWD is pretty much only for Wi-Fi, s
52 matches
Mail list logo
