** Information type changed from Public to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1810517
Title:
re-enable GhostScript in ImageMagick
To manage notifications about this bug g
Although the security vulnerability in GhostScript that led to this
restriction on converting to and from PostScript and PDF has been
addressed in version 9.24, this restriction remains in place in at least
Ubuntu and Gentoo, and an attempt to remove it in Gentoo has been
stopped, apparently out of
Thanks for the context! It makes sense.
Can someone with adequate rights please mark this as Won't Fix, to close
the report? Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1810517
Title:
re-
I can also report the same behavior, on a Clevo laptop running Ubuntu
20.04 (development version), kernel 5.3.0-24. Clevo does not currently
provide BIOS updates for this model, and it is unlikely that they ever
will.
The error is as reported by the OP, and repeats several times per second
on the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1832087 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832087
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1832087
Intel WIRELESS-AC 9260 (2526:0010) Wi-Fi doesn't work on kernel > 5.0.0-16
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
On Ubuntu 20.04 (development branch), as of today, Additional Drivers
(software-properties-gtk 0.98.6) reports that the device "Intel
Corporation: Wireless-AC 9260" is not working, and suggests using a
manually installed driver (cf. screenshot).
However the device is working
In case it is relevant, note that I am starting the kernel with the
option "pci=nommconf" to work around an issue with my PCIe SSD.
** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+attachment/5319314/+files/dmesg.txt
--
You received
** Attachment added: "*9260*.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+attachment/5319318/+files/%2A9260%2A.txt
** Description changed:
On Ubuntu 20.04 (development branch), as of today, Additional Drivers
(software-properties-gtk 0.98.6) reports tha
** Attachment added: "lshw.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+attachment/5319315/+files/lshw.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859308
** Attachment added: "lspci -v.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+attachment/5319317/+files/lspci%20-v.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
** Attachment added: "lsmod.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1859308/+attachment/5319316/+files/lsmod.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185930
The bug is fixed in gedit-plugins 3.36.1, and therefore in Ubuntu 20.04
Focal Fossa which has 3.36.2 at the moment. Previous releases are not
affected by this bug.
** Changed in: gedit-plugins (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you
Thanks for the insight Brian. I indeed rarely use the graphical update
manager. I'm starting to suspect I should manually install the snap-
store and uninstall the gnome-{calculator,logs,characters} snaps to get
in sync with the development release.
** Also affects: gnome-logs (Ubuntu)
Importan
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues #117
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues/117
** Also affects: nautilus via
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues/117
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because yo
The fix was made upstream on Mar 24 [1], released as part of gnome-
software 3.36 on Apr 3 [2], which was packaged for Ubuntu today Apr 6
[3]. I'd say it's just a matter of hours before it's available in the
repository :)
[1]
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/commit/bb7f58f5f8838185
Please disregard my previous comment. Looking at the code, I realize
that the maintainer packaged the upstream gnome-software "3.36.0" tag,
not the "gnome-3-36" branch, which makes a lot more sense indeed.
So even though the fix is made upstream, it is NOT YET released, and
therefore not packaged
Thanks a lot for the work Marcus, and Iain for reviewing, Gunnar for
translating! I look forward to try that out.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868409
Title:
[FFe] gnome-{calculator
Just ran update-manager and can confirm that the fix works perfectly.
The gnome-{calculator,logs,characters} snaps were removed, leaving their
deb equivalents. The snap-store was installed, and the gnome-software
deb was removed.
Thanks a lot!
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
With the replacement of gnome-software by snap-store in 20.04, this bug
is no longer apparent. Only users who manually (re-)install gnome-
software will see it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Hi Jonathan and Dan:
> I am not sure what you mean. There is no "snap-store" deb on my
> 20.04 system, nor does "apt search snap-store" yield any results.
It's a snap application, which you'll see in the output of the "snap
list" command if it is installed. It provides the Ubuntu Software
applica
> Updates installed snap-store snap and uninstalled ubuntu-software
This is normal behavior, unless you have manually installed the "gnome-
software" package. The Ubuntu Software application on 20.04 is now
provided by the "snap-store" snap instead of the "gnome-software"
package. More info in htt
Fixed by update-manager version 1:20.04.6 in bug 1872958
** Package changed: gnome-software (Ubuntu) => update-manager (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
Hi Jonathan and Dan:
> I don't think either apt nor snap auto-updates will handle this.
I don't think so either, and nor will manual snap updates ("snap
refresh" command).
My assumption is that deb-to-snap and snap-to-deb transitions are
limited to development releases. It would be very surprisi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872258 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872258
Jonathan:
Actually that sounds like a question for the update-manager developers,
so I've asked it there and subscribed you to it:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-
manager/+question/6902
Public bug reported:
I'm trying to switch from the "fingers" click-method to the "areas"
click-method, because tapping with three fingers is awkward and I find
that my three-fingers taps are rarely registered as such.
* "fingers": single-finger tap for a click, two-finger tap for a right
click,
** Attachment added: "xinput --list-props 13"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-libinput/+bug/1877798/+attachment/5369255/+files/xinput--list-props13.txt
** Description changed:
I'm trying to switch from the "fingers" click-method to the "areas"
click-method, be
** Attachment added: "xinput --list"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-libinput/+bug/1877798/+attachment/5369254/+files/xinput--list.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Hi Rip,
> Three fingers results in a right-click now for whatever
> reason. I have the appropriate settings enabled in KDE
> (I haven't changed them).
>
> Middle click works sometimes after restarting the device
> via xinput, but this is very rare.
If your three-finger taps are inconsistent (some
Description updated to reflect that this issue is not specific to a
particular Intel wireless card. A number of different cards are
concerned.
** Summary changed:
- software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that Intel Wireless-AC 9260
device is not working
+ software-properties-gtk erroneously
Public bug reported:
When I run gnome-control-center (1:3.36.1-1ubuntu5) on a remote Ubuntu
20.04 host over ssh -X, trying to enable Screen Sharing (VNC) or Media
Sharing in the Sharing panel (*) fails with the following D-Bus related
messages on the standard error:
--
Here is another user reporting the same GDBus errors when trying to
enable Screen Sharing on Ubuntu Server 20.04, if I understand correctly:
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1238329
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/issues #999
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/issues/999
** Also affects: gnome-control-center via
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/issues/999
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unkn
Issue reported upstream and bug watch added
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878109
Title:
Certain features in the Sharing panel fail with D-Bus related messages
when gnome-control-c
** Summary changed:
- screenshot tool inserts corrupt border area
+ gnome-screenshot adds unnecessary transparent padding around window
screenshots
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18645
** Description changed:
- Screenshot tool inserts corrupt border area.
+ When taking a window screenshot with gnome-screenshot in 19.10 and
+ 20.04, a 20 to 25 pixel wide area of transparent padding (alpha) is
+ added around the screenshot.
- This also applies to Ubuntu 20.04 daily build.
+ See
** Attachment added: "With --include-border and --border-effect=shadow"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1864539/+attachment/5367065/+files/include-border-and-shadow-border-effect.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Attachment added: "With --remove-border"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1864539/+attachment/5367066/+files/remove-border.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
I can confirm this bug. I have updated the bug report with more precise
information, and I'm adding additional screenshots to demonstrate the
issue.
Additionally, I've noted that:
* There is no difference between --include-border and --remove-border:
the window border is included in the screensho
** Attachment added: "With --include-border and --border-effect=none"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1864539/+attachment/5367064/+files/include-border-and-no-border-effect.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
It appears to be an upstream issue, as the only Ubuntu patches in gnome-
screenshot 3.36.0 are related to:
* Unity support
* Disabling the possibility of taking a screenshot of a window or an area by
right-clicking on gnome-screenshot's desktop icon, because this feature doesn't
work in Wayland
Indeed! Thank you for pointing that out. I also found
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-screenshot/-/issues/82 and linked
issues and merge requests, for additional context.
So the option to include/remove-border is removed from the upstream GUI
and so are the border effects. The CLI isn't updat
Does anyone know where this bug is being tracked upstream now? GNOME has
migrated from Bugzilla to GitLab, and I haven't been able to find the
GitLab version of the Bugzilla bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
Ah, OK, thanks. No news since 2018-08 then - I was hoping the GNOME
GitLab would have something new :(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1685754
Title:
gnome-terminal unduly forces umask
@Kristoffer:
Assuming the package apt-transport-https is up-to-date on your computer,
what you're seeing are not errors but probably the warnings mentioned in
the bug's description, second-to-last paragraph.
Please refer to the bug's description, and please report details here if
seeing something
** Changed in: pepperflashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1620103
Title:
Installation fails with realpath error
To manag
@mohan:
Have you tried doing what APT suggests: reinstalling deja-dup, which is
apparently "in a very bad inconsistent state" (possibly because
something failed during your system update on 2017-04-11 11:02:02,
although I don't know what did)?
For instance, from the command line:
sudo apt-get
** Summary changed:
- Back up failed with message: Failed to execute child process "duplicity" (No
such file or directory)
+ Backup fails with message: 'Failed to execute child process "duplicity" (No
such file or directory)' or 'No module named gi.repository': missing
deja-dup-backend-gvfs, du
Hi Victor, you're just missing a Python module ("no module named
gi.repository"). This has been encountered before, e.g. bug 1641423. No
reason why it is sometimes missing has been found yet.
The module is provided by the python-gi package, which should have been
installed as a dependency of the d
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Manpreet (manpreetkunnath) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: adobe-isv
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
Much has changed regarding the Flash plugin and its support by Adobe and
Canonical since this bug was reported. Things are better and simpler.
This bug is unlikely to still be occurring, and if it were it certainly
wouldn't warrant a Critical status.
The Flash plugin can be installed and kept up-t
I am setting this old bug to expire, seeing how it concerns ancient
releases and how Flash plugin support has improved since it was
reported.
The Flash plugin can be installed and kept up-to-date via the
flashplugin-installer package in the multiverse repository (NPAPI
version) or via the adobe-fl
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
I am setting this old bug to expire, seeing how it concerns ancient
releases of Ubuntu with antediluvian versions of Flash and Firefox.
To install and keep the Flash plugin up-to-date, one can nowadays use
the flashplugin-installer package in the multiverse repository (NPAPI
version) or the adobe-
Public bug reported:
Please remove pepperflashplugin-nonfree from Ubuntu, starting from the
upcoming Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark".
pepperflashplugin-nonfree is the only (packaged) way for Debian users to
install the PPAPI Flash plugin, but adobe-flashplugin from Canonical's
partner repository i
I'm converting this bug report to a question, as it doesn't appear to be
a bug in Déjà-Dup (upstream or package), but a support request after an
installation failure.
Please comment and/or convert the question back to a bug if more help is
needed and/or more information can be provided and/or it t
@Russ Phillips (or anyone using MATE):
Can you confirm that "Caja" is the user-facing name of the file manager
in MATE desktop environment? And by that I mean, its name in the menus.
Thanks.
Cause in Unity DE and Cinnamon DE, I'm quite certain that the user-
facing name of Nautilus and Nemo, resp
@Russ Phillips:
Don't bother, I checked by myself in the .desktop file.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657092
Title:
deja-dup refers to "Files" instead of "Caja"
To manage notifica
forks? Right now Déjà-Dup only officially integrates
with GNOME/Nautilus and Unity/Nautilus as far as I know.
If he's OK with Russ's suggestion then I'll be happy to propose for
merging of course.
** Changed in: deja-dup
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nathanaël Naeri (Naël)
Yes I am marking this Invalid because the issue hasn't manifested itself
since mid-2015. See comment 3 for more details. Fingers crossed that it
doesn't come back.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
** Description changed:
[Symptoms]
When installing or updating the package ttf-mscorefonts-installer in
Ubuntu 16.04 or 16.10, an error message appears in a GUI window,
indicating "failure to download extra data files" (the fonts themselves)
"after package installation" (the package i
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1607535 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607535
@Christopher: thanks for the clarification. I have added this detail
(that reinstallation is necessary) to bug 1607535's description, section
[Fix].
The warnings about user _apt have been reported in a numb
Sigh... The bug that never got away. Did you update apt-transport-https?
Reinstalled ttf-mscorefonts-installer? Followed the instructions in
section [Fix] of the bug's description? And what's the errors saying?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
@Tanner
> "All done, no errors."
Where is the error?
Joke aside, the fonts are successfully downloaded and installed. The
warnings (W) that you see, about the user _apt, are non-blocking. They
have been reported in several other bug reports. I don't think anybody
is investigating them yet. They'
** Description changed:
[Symptoms]
When installing or updating the package ttf-mscorefonts-installer in
Ubuntu 16.04 or 16.10, an error message appears in a GUI window,
indicating "failure to download extra data files" (the fonts themselves)
"after package installation" (the package i
Russ, can you please post the values of the following environment
variables in MATE, I'm going to try and implement something and I'm not
sure which one to use (probably the last one). You can use printenv var
or echo $var to find them out. Thanks.
SESSION
GDMSESSION
DESKTOP_SESSION
XDG_CURRENT_DE
I wish I was knowledgeable enough to fix less trivial bugs. In the
meantime, here are two branches. Michael, which one would you like I
request a merge of?
https://code.launchpad.net/~nathanael-naeri/deja-dup/fix-1657092-a
Changes the word "Files" to "the file manager". The more accurate "a
compa
@Bhavani: thanks a lot! If it's easily doable to SRU in Trusty, why not?
That would unbreak the package for the rest of Trusty's life. But
Trusty's version of the package is 1.3 vs. Xenial/Yakkety/Zesty's 1.8.x,
so the difference in versions may make it more difficult to SRU in
Trusty. In which cas
@Michael: Sweet, thanks for merging!
@Vej, C de-Avillez: It's nice to nominate this bug for Xenial and
Yakkety, but I'm not sure it's really worth fixing in these series, or
that it fits the SRU requirements (I would personally go with Won't Fix
for the published releases).
--
You received this
Not reproducible every time in my case. Sometimes the folders are listed
twice, sometimes once. In both the include and exclude lists.
This bug and bug 1599662 are probably duplicates indeed.
Also: I cannot reproduce the bug at all on Trusty (deja-dup
30.0-0ubuntu4.1, duplicity 0.6.23-1ubuntu4.1)
** Changed in: deja-dup (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => Confirmed
** Tags removed: amd64 oneiric running-unity
** Tags added: xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989750
Title:
r
Status changed to "Confirmed" because some users are still affected, on
recent Ubuntu releases.
We still don't have enough information for triaging though. Everyone
affected, please provide the full log when replicating the problem, not
just the GPG error:
$ DEJA_DUP_DEBUG=1 deja-dup --backup > d
Added this bug to the Duplicity project, as it looks more like a bug in
Duplicity than a bug in Déjà-Dup, judging from the currently available
log files.
Also it's worth noticing that the GPG error reported by Joseph Hedgcorth
in comment 24 is not the same as the GPG error reported by Mathias Bink
@Joseph: When Vej wrote "the first backup", I think he meant "a full
backup" (as opposed to an incremental backup), not the actual first
backup of your documents.
You can force a full backup by backing up to a new location, e.g. a
different folder on the server/disk that you are backing up to. Don
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 989750 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989750
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 989750
repeatedly asks for encryption password when backing up, even though
"remember password" is ticked
--
You received this bug notification because you
Awesome, thanks for weighting in Kenneth.
I've set the status to "Invalid" (not a bug) for deja-dup since the bug
was in duplicity.
** No longer affects: deja-dup
** Changed in: deja-dup (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
@Greg:
> 500 Bad redirection (path)
> which I have not seen listed here before - is this a new issue?
Possibly. I have not seen this error before either, in relation to this
bug. Just to be sure, can you please make sure that there aren't any
font-related partial downloads in /var/lib/update-noti
** Description changed:
[Symptoms]
When installing or updating the package ttf-mscorefonts-installer in
Ubuntu 16.04 or 16.10, an error message appears in a GUI window,
indicating "failure to download extra data files" (the fonts themselves)
"after package installation" (the package i
** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648676
Title:
package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 failed to
Still affects xorg-lts-trusty for the users of releases < Trusty LTS,
but all of those releases e.g. Precise LTS are EOL now.
There is therefore no point in fixing this package, it won't be
installed by anybody any more.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
I set it to incomplete because the original reporter (or anyone else
affected by this problem) hasn't replied to my comment #2 requesting
more information (or hasn't brought up any additional information that
might help understanding the bug's cause).
This is standard practice (AFAIK) and sets old
Sounds right. I just assumed that there wasn't any users of releases <
Trusty any more, as all those releases are EOL. But actually there may
still be, indeed.
Bug should stay Confirmed until Trusty itself is EOL.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
Fair point.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648676
Title:
package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 failed to
install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; y
@Elliot, can you give more details please? I don't know how to extract
files to the root of an image and obtain a new image. I'd like to try.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429030
Titl
** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660556
Title:
Package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to
insta
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1657567 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657567
You're getting an "invalid Content-Range header" error from the server,
see bug 1607535 (description and comment 69) and bug 1657567 about that.
Basically delete the downloaded fonts in /var/lib/update-noti
** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658707
Title:
ttf-mscorefonts-installer drop-priv warnings and download er
Hi Christopher, thank you for resurrecting this bug report.
The affected machine has since been upgraded to Xenial. It still uses
the same scanner. The current versions of sane-backends and iscan are
barely more recent, so one could suppose the behavior I reported in
2015-05 could still occur. How
** Tags removed: utopic vivid wily
** Tags added: yakkety
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429030
Title:
netboot mini.iso doesn't support UEFI boot
To manage notifications about this
** Also affects: duplicity
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: duplicity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: duplicity
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: duplicity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this
Added this bug to duplicity, since it is probably better suited for
resolution there than in Déjà-Dup.
Also updated the description.
** Tags removed: amd64 xenial
** Tags added: testcase
** Description changed:
- Deja-dup has never worked for me (last 5 years) always errors.
- No after a new sy
** Tags added: bitesize packaging
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641950
Title:
ubuntu-restricted-addons amd64 package should have the same Adobe
Flash dependencies as the i386 pack
** Tags removed: amd64 xenial
** Tags added: packaging
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1656776
Title:
should depend on apt-transport-https (was: fails to download
andale32.exe, spams
See also bug 1607535 for more details and instructions
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654573
Title:
dowload of ttf-mscorefonts-installer failed
To manage notifications about this bu
** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442111
Title:
Scanner is correctly identified but scan fails with "sane_star
This bug has been fixed in pepperflashplugin-nonfree 1.8.3+nmu1 in
Debian on 2017-01-14, and the fix landed in 1.8.3+nmu1ubuntu1 in Ubuntu
Zesty (the current development release) on 2017-01-22. The PPAPI Flash
plugin is now downloaded from Adobe rather than Google. One still has to
run the provided
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1632870 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632870
Bug fixed in Debian Sid and Ubuntu Zesty, pepperflashplugin-nonfree
version 1.8.3+nmu1ubuntu1. See bug 1632870 comment 34.
Pepperflashplugin-nonfree is still not recommended over adobe-
flashplugin though.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1632870 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632870
Bug fixed in Debian Sid and Ubuntu Zesty, pepperflashplugin-nonfree
version 1.8.3+nmu1ubuntu1. See bug 1632870 comment 34.
Pepperflashplugin-nonfree is still not recommended over adobe-
flashplugin though.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1632870 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632870
Bug fixed in Debian Sid and Ubuntu Zesty, pepperflashplugin-nonfree
version 1.8.3+nmu1ubuntu1. See bug 1632870 comment 34.
Pepperflashplugin-nonfree is still not recommended over adobe-
flashplugin though.
Thanks for reporting this bug.
Much has changed regarding the Flash plugin in the last few months.
Adobe has started supporting the NPAPI plugin again, which is now
version 24.0 compared to 11.2 when you reported this bug. So perhaps
things are better now: can you please check if the current versi
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
