*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1805014 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805014
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1805014 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805014
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1805014
Launcher is visible on the Lock screen and apps can be launched
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805014
Title:
Launcher is visible on the Lock screen and apps can be launched
To
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804949
Title:
Screen locking issue data leak~
To manage notifications about this
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1803807 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1803807
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1805014
Launcher is visible on the Lock screen and apps can be launched
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1803807
Lock screen doesn't hide the s
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1803807 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1803807
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1803807
Lock screen doesn't hide the screen contents
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: sshfs-fuse (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mike Salvatore (mikesalvatore)
** Changed in: sshfs-fuse (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
oops
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805736
Title:
hiannis
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1805736/+subscription
I was unable to reproduce this bug. I tried to reproduce it in a VM, I
don't know if that makes a difference vs. bare metal.
** Package changed: gnome-calculator (Ubuntu) => gnome-screensaver
(Ubuntu)
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805640
Title:
lcab applet crashes when given a folder with a lot of files for
co
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805572
Title:
package mysql-server-5.7 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
trying
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Hi Balint,
As new CVEs have been discovered against Wireshark 2.6.3, it seems that
backporting wireshark 2.6.4 would kill two birds with 1 stone: fix the
libvirt build, resolve CVEs. You mentioned backporting to Bionic and
Xenial, can it also be backported to Trusty?
Mike
--
You received this b
Public bug reported:
Due to the massive number of CVEs against the versions of wireshark in
trusty, xenial, and bionic, upgrade wireshark to v2.6.1 in order to
resolve the 190+ CVEs.
** Affects: wireshark (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notifica
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1823574
Title:
CVE-2018-3750: Prototype Pollution
To manage notifications about t
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1823786
Title:
[SRU] ffmpeg 3.4.6 for bionic
To manage notifications about this bu
I think some solution here is needed. There are a lot of encrypted
filesystems, and I don't think the /etc/updatedb.conf file should be a
curated list of those. Given that both CryFS and EncFS are packaged in
Ubuntu, I think it's reasonable that they should be in covered by
/etc/updatedb.conf.
**
Please try 2.3.4-4+deb8u2ubuntu0.16.04.2 and see if it resolves your
issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815741
Title:
Probable regression after rssh security update
To manage not
Fixes were released today. Please upgrade (sudo apt-get update && sudo
apt-get upgrade).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815935
Title:
Regression in 2.3.4-4+deb8u1build0.16.04.1 on sc
** Changed in: libssh2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815741
Title:
Probable regression after rssh security update
To manage notification
It's no trouble at all. Thanks!
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824530
Title:
Heap Buffer Overflow in UzpPassword
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862705
Title:
firefox package vulnerable
To manage notifications about this bug g
This issue has been assigned CVE-2017-10195 and has been resolved in the
following Ubuntu releases:
trusty: 0.12.21-10~build0.14.04.1
xenial: 0.12.21-10~build0.16.04.1
bionic: 0.12.21-10~build0.18.04.1
cosmic: 0.12.21-10
** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2017-10195
**
Public bug reported:
Moodle in 18.04 and later does not work at all. The bug discussed in [1]
manifests as a result of moodle 3.0.3 requiring php5.4.x, php5.5.x, or
php7.0.x. PHP7.2 and later are available in ubuntu 18.04 and later, but
these version of PHP are not compatible with moodle 3.0.3 [2]
Released 6.0.3p1-1ubuntu0.2 for bionic.
** Changed in: opensmtpd (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864707
Title:
arbitrary com
Released 6.0.3p1-6ubuntu0.2 for eoan
** Changed in: opensmtpd (Ubuntu Eoan)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864707
Title:
arbitrary command e
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
CVE-2019-12210
CVE-2019-12209
** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2019-12209
** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2019-12210
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850032
Title:
scanbd prevents HP printers to work correctly with HPLIP
To manage
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853371
Title:
discover did not ask for a password on an update
To manage notifica
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853545
Title:
discover did not ask for a password on an update
To manage notifica
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see https://wiki.ubuntu.
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
PolicyKit
- does not use Javascript
Security team ACK for promoting sshfs-fuse to main.
** Changed in: sshfs-fuse (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Mike Salvatore (mikesalvatore) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
Public bug reported:
OS
Ubuntu Focal Fossa 20.04
Snapcraft Version
snapcraft, version 4.1.3
Contrary to the status of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapcraft/+bug/1724788, not all umask
issues are fixed.
In general, I set my umask to 027 on my systems. When `snapcraft init`
is ru
Public bug reported:
On some focal 20.04 systems, users are seeing "QEMU/KVM - Not Connected"
when they attempt to use virt-manager to manage virtual machines.
AppArmor denials like the following are seen in the logs:
sudo grep libvirt /var/log/syslog | grep -i apparmor | grep -i denied
Jun 28 14
I haven't yet tried to reproduce it. It also works fine for me. My only
guess at this point is there's some difference between a machine that
has been upgrade to focal and a machine that has a freshly installed
focal.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Also affects: pam-python (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: pam-python (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: pam-python (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The issue occurs because the patch sets Py_NoUserSiteDirectory. I'm
currently looking into a fix.
For a temporary workaround, you can `sudo apt install libpam-
python=1.0.4-1` and then pin the package version by following the steps
here: https://serverfault.com/questions/435132/how-to-version-lock
It may actually be caused because Py_NoSiteFlag is set. I'm still
investigating.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901606
Title:
security update broke module import in libpam-python, "f
** Also affects: pam-python (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901606
Title:
security update broke module import in libpam-pyt
** Also affects: pam-python (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: pam-python (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: pam-python (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: pam-python (Ubu
** Changed in: pam-python (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: pam-python (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: pam-python (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
This issue has been resolved in the following Ubuntu releases:
xenial: 1.0.4-1.1+deb8u1ubuntu0.1
bionic: 1.0.6-1.1+deb10u1ubuntu0.1
Please note that the version of pam-python in focal and groovy (1.0.7-1ubuntu1)
will still prevent loading 3rd party python modules from site-specific paths.
This
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884380
Title:
screen lock and wifi hotspot is not working
To manage notifications
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1608239 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1608239
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873514
Title:
Ubuntu uses insecure FreeRDP version
To manage notifications about
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
